THE NEXT GLOBALIST REALITY REVISION: THE GREAT RESET
Repeatedly, Orwell returned in his writing to the idea that a state of health in a body politic is dependent on a careful and deliberate use of language. Newspeak, used by state propagandists in Orwell’s famous futuristic novel 1984, was effective, in Orwell’s view, because it had “the power” to render people incapable of “grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest argument, if they are inimical to Ingsoc [the official ideology], and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction.” But what offended Orwell most about this kind of propaganda was that it engenders a “protective stupidity.”
Today’s political messages are distilled in the laboratories of public relations and consumer branding to achieve maximum potency. Their power to shape emotions and opinions lies in their uncanny ability to get under people’s skin without arousing in citizens a powerful immune response.
–What Orwell Didn’t know: Propaganda and the New Face of American Politics
I first quoted that book on DIA in a 2012 post called VIEWS ON NEWS–a short post worthy of review and serious consideration given current events. When viewed through the lens of globalist reality revisionism, and therefore something I point to often, changes in language matter–they are trying to tell us something important. These changes not only indicate a new revision is coming, but also tell us what that revision is going to be.
The emergence of the “Great Reset” language, as well as the increasing frequency of its use, is something to pay attention to. Moreover, this ‘Great Reset’ is about far more than just finances, which is why it was referred to in a July 2, 2020 essay explaining that de-funding the police has nothing to do with police violence, but instead everything to do with a long held plan to replace local police officers (accountable to local citizens) with a global force accountable only to globalists:
Considering it’s now public knowledge the socialist/globalist-minded in our country are constantly spouting off the “evils of capitalism”, and the COVID ‘crisis’ is being used by leftists/globalists all over the world to destroy economies, should we really be surprised to see Al Gore suddenly pop up demanding a “great reset of global capitalism? The following article was posted on Fox Business, June 25th, 2020:
Al Gore, UN Secretary-General, others now demanding ‘Great Reset’ of global capitalism
These are truly dangerous times for those who support individual liberty and free markets
By Justin Haskins FOXBusiness
“The economic, social and political chaos caused by the COVID-19 outbreak and Black Lives Matter protests have for months captured the attention of virtually every American — and for good reason. These are incredibly important issues worthy of significant and thoughtful debate.
But while most Americans have been preoccupied with protests and pandemics, a potentially bigger story has managed to slip beneath the radar: a growing movement among the world’s most powerful leaders to call for a “reset” of the entire global economy.
US ECONOMIC RECOVERY FROM CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC WILL TAKE ‘SOME TIME,’ FED’S EVANS SAYS
At a meeting hosted by the highly influential World Economic Forum earlier in June, powerful officials from nonprofits, government, business, academia, labor unions and activist groups announced their plan for a “Great Reset” of global capitalism. It’s a proposal they acknowledged has only been made possible because of the “opportunity” provided by the economic destruction caused by the novel coronavirus.
Supporters and attendees of the meeting included Prince Charles; António Guterres, the secretary-general of the United Nations; Ajay Banga, CEO of MasterCard; Bernard Looney, CEO of BP; and Gina Gopinath, the chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, among many others.
The purpose of the Great Reset isn’t merely to enact policies that would lead to additional wealth redistribution, but rather to completely overhaul the world’s existing structures and institutions
In an article published on the World Economic Forum’s website, Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of WEF, wrote of the Great Reset, “Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”
You can read the rest of the article at the link provided, but we’ve been hearing about this financial reset for years under the cover of the phony green movement–the only thing ‘green’ about it being the massive redistribution of wealth from the people of the world, to globalist corporations and pockets. They used to call it a carbon tax, but I have little doubt their marketing centers are hard at work re-branding that one–the word “tax” just doesn’t work in a commercial showing people running through tall green grass while laughing and holding hands.
The video below, THE GREAT RESET, is an excellent compilation of, and commentary on, the great reset. The author of the video also makes reference to the connection between this reset and “social contracts”. Because so many people remain completely unaware what that will mean for the future of their nation and their children, a brief explanation was included in the second ‘de-fund’ essay on July 21, 2020–it was included there because this reset also plays a pivotal role in transforming local citizens to global citizens:
THE GOAL IS TO DE-FUND ALL COMPETING REALITIES–NOT JUST THE POLICE
The first DEFUND essay further exposed that a global police force is meant to police a global citizenry–not citizens of individual sovereign nations, which is why both agendas are being worked on from both ends simultaneously. This is also why you’re now seeing the UN Secretary General calling for new global “social contract” to replace the others. The reference to a social contract here refers to agreements between citizens and their governments regarding how those governments were meant to function. In the United States, the social contract our nation was founded upon is called The Constitution, ergo, UN officials calling for a new, global social contract, are doing so with the intention of replacing it:–from the essay, THE DEFUND ENDGAME PART 2: TRANSITIONING LOCAL CITIZENS TO GLOBAL CITIZENS
The video also does an excellent job in pointing out the COVID ‘crisis’ is being politically exploited and opportunized by globalists as a means to an end–an end that we would do well to prevent given some of the ‘other’ new language recently introduced into the collective consciousness during globalist exploitation of the plandemic–that would be the term “non-essential”. As in non-essential people.
That is EXACTLY the kind of ‘newspeak’ Orwell referred to–what goes right over people’s head without a second thought because it has “the power to render people incapable of grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors…” What’s behind that new term, and what it will mean going forward–and what it has already meant for millions of us for decades while being covered up–will be covered in an upcoming essay.
As much I would have preferred to bring you that essay today instead of this post, I’ve recently come up against some unusual problems when trying to save it here. While I continue that battle in the background (while simultaneously creating mirror websites), the following paragraph comes from that unreleased essay. It should leave the reader with a lot to think about because again, the ‘great reset’ is meant to permanently revise reality in ways that go far, far beyond the financial restructuring of individual nations on a global scale:
ARE YOU A NON-ESSENTIAL HUMAN BEING NOW?
I write these essays in the hopes of stopping that agenda–an agenda already publicly and FORCEFULLY redefining huge swaths of the global population as “non-essential”–a sleight of hand re-branding of the traditional “useless eater and mindless breeder” labels of the past–all for a “greater good” that will never come of it. Are you really a non-essential human being? Non-essential to what, and who is making that determination? To what end?–from the yet-to-be released Part 2 of the War on Knowledge essay series