THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE PART 2: INDOCTORNATION WORLD PREMIERE (THE LOCK STEP PLANNED DEMIC)
August 28, 2020
INDOCTORNATION WORLD PREMIERE
The following documentary is excellent, and it’s everything the main stream media should have reported on and didn’t–something they should one day be held accountable (legally liable) for. This documentary is a huge service to us all and has also personally saved me hours of writing this second WOK (War on Knowledge) essay.
I caution the reader against a listen-only review as there are two streams of data being offered simultaneously. While those in the film are narrating and paraphrasing what they uncovered, on the screen they are showing copies of the documents, articles, memos and patents that big tech censors will inevitably try to remove any trace of–they are showing visual proof of their assertions–some of which is far more detailed and shocking than their paraphrasing.
Because the documentary covers so many things I had intended to cover here (and so many I didn’t), and does such a brilliant job of it, there are only a few points I would like to highlight because they add depth and context to so many other interrelated happenings. First and foremost, in an effort to encourage the reader to watch and share it with friends and family, the video starts (10:52), with testimony being provided by an Intelligence Analyst and founder of IQ100 Index (NYSE):
“I’m the developer of Linguistic Genomics, the platform on which you could determine the intent of communication, rather than the literal artifact, but we’ve also used that technology for a number of other applications, in defense, intelligence and finance, and most notably for bringing down what was, at the time, the largest tax fraud in U.S. history. We maintained a series of inquiries into every individual, every organization, and every company that is involved in anything that either blurs the line of biological and chemical weapons, or crosses that line–in any of the 168 countries.
In 1999 there were a million patents digitized by IBM, and those million patents were the first time human innovation had been put into an electronic digital searchable format. We took that information and we did a very simple exercise using our linguistic genomics technology. I made the horrific assessment that approximately one-third of all patents filed in the United States were functional forgeries. Meaning that, while they had linguistic variations, they actually covered the same subject matter. In 1999 patents on corona viruses started showing up, and thus began the rabbit trail.
In 2003, the CDC saw the possibility for a gold strike, and that was the corona virus outbreak that happened in Asia. They saw a virus they knew could be easily manipulated and as something that was very valuable. In 2003 they sought to patent it, and they made sure they controlled the proprietary rights to the disease, to the virus, and to its detection and all measurement of it. We know, that Anthony Fauci, that Ralph Banic, that the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and a laundry list of people who wanted to take credit for inventing corona virus, were at the hub of this story. From 2003-2018 they controlled 100% of the cash flow that built the empire around the industrial complex of corona virus.
While we knew that corona virus manipulation started with Dr. Ralph Baric in 1999 (Ralph Baric, PhD, Professor or Microbiology and Immunology)–Ralph Baric does research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, who’s famous for his chimeric corona virus research. In 2000, there was a recognition that the corona virus was seen as an exploitable mechanism for both good and ill. On March 25, 2003 the US CDC filed a patent (patent numbers are provided on screen) on the corona virus transmitted to humans.
Under 35 Code US Section 101, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either, SARS corona virus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal, or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws. If it was natural, filing a patent on it was illegal. In either case, both are illegal.
In the spring (May 14) of 2007 the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their application confidential and private. They actually filed patents on not only the virus, but the they also filed patents on its detection, and a kit to measure it. Because of that CDC patent, they had the ability to control who was authorized, and who was not authorized, to make independent inquiries into corona viruses. You cannot look at the virus, you cannot measure it, and you cannot develop a test kit for it. And by ultimately receiving the patents that constrained anyone from using it, they had 1. the means, 2. the motive, 3. and most of all, they had the monetary gain, from turning corona virus from a pathogen to profit.
Those shocking revelations suggest, at the very least, the CDC is another rogue agency that has illegally patented a corona virus (with the intent to keep that secret) while also patenting its detection and a kit to measure it. The latter two measures read more like an insurance policy that would go a long way in keeping ‘unauthorized’ prying eyes from conducting independent investigations. Interestingly enough, and perhaps through using the Emergency Use Authorization Act in an attempt to get around that monopoly (and anything nefarious it may be concealing), that may explain why Trump held a press conference on March 29, 2020 and made the following statement:
“On Friday the FDA authorized a new (covid) test developed by Abbot labs that delivers lightening fast results in as little as five minutes. That’s a whole new ballgame. I want to thank Abbot labs for the incredible work they’ve done–they have been working around the clock. Normally this approval process from the FDA would take 10 months or longer, but we did it in 4 weeks. (Reported the same day by CBS New York: Trump: Corona Virus Rapid Tests on the Way.)
A few months later (in July 2020) the main stream media was littered with the headline, “Trump Strips CDC of Control of Coronavirus Data,” which they then used as a bludgeon to imply he was incompetent at handling the situation. Yet, based on what this documentary reveals, remembering that all three patents are visually presented, it would appear Trump was far more competent (and informed) than the CDC especially, would have appreciated. In stripping the CDC of their control over Corona virus data, hospitals were ordered to bypass the CDC (National Healthcare Safety Network site–the primary CDC system) and instead send all patient data directly to a central database in Washington. The corrupt media, in unison, all framed the move as a ‘Trump admin hates transparency’ issue, but clearly, when it comes to the corona virus, its the CDC that has transparency issues.
There’s no indication Abbott intended to produce these tests for other nations, which is unfortunate given that Tanzanian president John Magufuli, attempting to vet the efficacy of the tests he was provided, submitted samples from goats, sheep and a pawpaw fruit with human names–all of which came back with positive results for the virus. The reader may also recall, as discussed in a previous post, the President of Madagascar claimed the World Health Organization (WHO) offered a $20m bribe to poison an herbal remedy called COVID-19 Organics made from Artemisia–a remedy he claims can cure COVID-19 patients within ten days.
I realize people don’t want to believe this level of corruption has been (and still is) happening for decades, especially when so many lives are at stake, but also covered in the documentary (but again not by the main stream media) was another shocking revelation from ex-Google engineer turned whistle-blower Zach Vorhies. Given that depopulation is a major goal of globalism, and Google is a globalist corporation, this really shouldn’t shock people anymore:
Zach Vorhies (22:16) “The ‘blacklist’ is something that Google said, didn’t exist–and they testified that under oath. Now me, as an engineer, I just did a search on Google’s internal search engine, and guess what I found? It had blacklisted search terms for [things like] “cancer cures”. Why is Google deciding what people can and cannot search for?”
THE REALITY REVISIONISM TRIFECTA: MOCKING BIRDS, NARRATIVE ENFORCERS & FAKE FACT CHECKERS
“What was once an efficient tool for navigating the world of information, is now a network for global surveillance, data collection, and social engineering.”
Operation Mockingbird is covered around the 31:00 mark, and includes vintage footage of Ex-C!A officer John Stockwell answering the following question during a television interview: How often does the C!A manipulate media this way?
John Stockwell (31:53): It goes beyond your wildest imagination. Setting up student organization so they can draw radical students in, 5000 university professors co-opted to help the C!A manipulate people’s minds, journalists in the US, including big name journalists co-opted to function routinely to help the C!A put out stories and biases to the world. As this 1952 C!A memo says, the aim is “controlling an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will.”
Operation Mockingbird is why you can find compilation videos showing dozens of local news stations from around the nation all parroting the exact same talking points on the same day–literally word for word–clearly indicating those talking points are pushed down from higher up the chain. Instead of thousands of local media reporters, we have thousands of local (and national) media repeaters. Most reality miners have been aware of Operation Mockingbird for years, but in exploring what was done to Dr. Judy Mikovits, the film does a fantastic job illustrating the true reach and power of the reality revisionism trifecta.
Fake Fact Checkers
“Most fact checkers are neither independent nor factual–they are political.”
The documentary briefly covers funding sources of ‘fact checker’ organs, which includes the usual suspects (Google, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Soros). A deeper dive into the people and money driving fake fact-checking was done by award-winning journalist Sharyl Attkisson while investigating Facebook’s formation of an “independent oversight board” with authority to allow or remove content from Facebook and Instagram, and its assurances as to the diversity of the board members. What she found to be true instead, is that “18 of its 20 members collaborated with or are tied to groups that have received funding from George Soros’ Open Society Foundations – which is one of the most well-funded and influential progressive organizations in the country.” Attkisson included a complete list of those board members and their individual ties to Soros.
These same fake fact checkers also lied about Dr. Mikovits:
(23:51) When Dr. Mikovits claimed she was arrested without a warrant and jailed without charge (for trying to warn the world about vaccines contaminated with XMRVs), Snopes rated the comment as false. Had they bothered to explore the arrest documents, they would have seen that indeed, there was neither a warrant nor signatures to officiate a charge. In fact I confirmed this with members of the Mikovits legal team. [24:12 is a video clip of Mikovits’ attorney, David J. Follin admitting this is 100% correct–Judy has never been charged with any crime].
Where the rona is concerned especially, the trifecta operates a tight ship in censoring and slandering anyone and anything that doesn’t abide the scripted narrative. The film necessarily covers the sordid history of Snopes and how they and other fact checking sites (factcheckdotorg) raced to quash the fact that the virus, its testing and treatments, was indeed patented. Anything outside of the preferred narrative (also being pushed down from higher up the chain) was and is being censored and slapped with a “false” label. Facebook joined in when it vowed to remove any information it didn’t deem factual–aka anything not falling in line with narratives presented (pushed down) by the WHO & NIH–especially when it comes to vaccines. This phenomenon is well covered in the film:
“See, the problem with all of this is right in front of our face, and when confronted with evidence, we are told the fact-checkers are transcendent.”
Wikipedia has been known to be a cog in the smear machine, but in so doing, is also a form of fake fact checking. This was also done to the biography page of Dr. Mikovits and covered in the documentary:
“Wikipedia, what has been an unbiased open source platform, is now weaponized to undermine the work and reputation of anyone deemed a threat to its stakeholders [the new narrative]. And once they smear you [on your personal wikipedia biography page] they lock you out from making corrections to your own bio.”
Unfortunately for victims of a weaponized wikipedia, Alexa is programmed to regurgitate the smears. This is demonstrated at the 25:26 mark as Alexa provides the following response to being asked, “Who is Dr. Judy Mikovits?”
“According to wikipedia…a former American research scientist who is known for her discredited medical claims, she has been described as an anti-vaccination activist and promoter of conspiracy theories, and has been accused of scientific misconduct.”
One of the hopeful things that I’ve discovered is that nearly every war that has started in the past 50 years has been a result of media lies. The media could have stopped it if they’d searched deep enough–if they hadn’t reprinted government propaganda they could have stopped it. But what does that mean? Well, that means basically populations don’t like wars, and populations have to be fooled into wars. Populations don’t willingly and with open eyes go into war. So, if we have a good media environment, then you will also have a peaceful environment.
Our number one enemy is ignorance, and I believe that is the number one enemy that everyone is not understanding–not understanding what is actually going on in the world. It’s only when you start to understand that you can make effective decisions and effective plans. Now, the question is, who is promoting ignorance? Well, those organizations that try to keep things secret, and those organizations which distort true information to make it false, or misrepresentative. In this latter category, it is bad media. It really is my opinion that the media in general are so bad, we have to question whether the world wouldn’t be better off without them altogether. –Julianne Assange (2011)
While Assange referred to the problem as “bad” media–a far more respectable label than they deserve–if we bottom-line the role of bad media in the drowning in absurdity (death by ignorance) paradigm, we ultimately find that a hell of a lot more people would still be alive today without them. Smelling blood in the water, and having apparently developed a taste for it, the main stream media is being no more honest with the public over the rona than they were about all those wars. The appalling role of the media in this scenario was also covered in depth in the first WOK (war on knowledge) essay:
Is it a crime for the media to know about a cure for a disease or global pandemic (!) and either refuse to report it, or even propagandize the public into believing it might actually kill you instead?! Is it a crime for big tech to do the same by erasing it from the collective consciousness as quickly as possible and planting ‘we removed this because it’s dangerous and misleading content’ gibberish in its place?! If not, it certainly should be. There’s something very, very wrong when main stream news outlets around the world have sided with a power-hungry, fanatical, global death cult trying to install themselves as our new forever-leaders, and in so doing, are purposefully hiding or slandering life-saving medicines from the global populace. Are the days of red purges ‘on the wall’ being replaced with something more silent and sinister, including silence itself?
Dr. Simone Gold’s comments (during her appearance with Tucker Carlson) were extremely eye-opening while explaining why they (doctors) felt so compelled to hold their own press conference to begin with:
“We came to Washington because we’re so distressed. You know, front line doctors like myself are seeing patients not get what they need–we’re seeing the doctor-patient relationship completely eroded–that the governors are empowering pharmacists to override doctors who have conversations with their patients. It’s really something that America should be concerned about.”
Tucker Carlson’s follow-up question is also extremely thought provoking regarding current trends in today’s cancel culture:
“Shouldn’t you, as a practicing physician with a medical degree, be allowed to express your views on science as you practice it without being censored?”
One of the doctors in the aforementioned press conference explained she had personally and successfully treated (meaning none of them died) over 300 COVID patients with HCQ, some elderly and some having serious ‘co-morbidity’ factors–and she did it with the same therapeutic the media has literally been calling deadly. When did the media bobble-heads get medical degrees allowing them to legally give the entire country ‘medical advice’? The same goes for your local governors and mayors following suit by actually banning the use of this life-saving drug. The class action lawsuits over this should be numerous, spectacular and filed with haste. [In case you missed it, Dr. Gold rebuilt the website big tech censors canceled–you can find it here: America’s Front Line Doctors Summit]
Assange discovered that if lies can be used to start wars (kill people) then the truth can be used to end them (save people). I whole-heartedly agree yet would love to expand that understanding beyond the borders of some far off middle-eastern war theater. There is not ‘a’ war happening in some far off place to people we don’t know. Rather THE war is happening to everyone around the world at the same time–the globalist war against 9 out of every 10 people on the earth–which includes (but is not limited to) kinetic wars in far off places, depending on your location. These seemingly disparate events are all aspects of a singular war against a reality that globalism is attempting to revise and replace with itself–just like a virus.
Because most people really are good people and therefore have to be lied (fooled) into wars–have to be lied into participating in the demise of themselves and others–the media has become the source of an infection once referred to as a lie virus or lierus. In scientific terms (modified from wikipedia):
Lierus replication is the formation of mind viruses during the infection process (media propaganda) in the target host cell (audience mind). Lieruses must first get into the cell (mind) before lieral replication can occur. Through the generation of abundant copies (Project Mockingbird) and propaganda packaging these copies, the lierus continues infecting new hosts. Replication of lieruses is greatly varied depending on the goodness (conscience) and health of the immune response (factual knowledge base) of the host.
THE PLANNED DEMIC–WAS ALL OF THIS REALLY PLANNED?
The evidence supporting that conclusion is voluminous and overwhelming, yet still largely hidden from the general public by a complicit cover-up media. The evidence in my view, necessarily includes Dr. Mikovits’ early discoveries of the XMRV’s and subsequent attempts to murder, slander, and destroy her life, finances, career and reputation for trying to warn the world about her discoveries.
Becoming more reality literate with a history lesson on John D. Rockefeller
In 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation produced a paper on global pandemic scenarios called SCENARIOS FOR THE FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY & INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT–A FICTIONAL SCENARIO. While the documentary does cover the paper briefly, more important to the machinery of the beast, is the backstory (also in the film) of the Rockefeller take-over of medicine, covered at the 48:30 mark. These events were massive, massive reality revisions that still haunt us today:
“Around the same time John D. Rockefeller seized US media he also hijacked US medicine. When it was discovered drugs could be produced with petroleum, America’s top oil mogul ordered his army of propagandists to invert reality accordingly. [Natural] Medicines used for thousands of years were suddenly classified as ‘alternative’–while the new, petroleum-based, highly addictive and patentable drugs were declared the new gold standard.
After buying the German pharmaceutical company that manufactured chemicals of war for Adolf Hitler, Rockefeller leveraged his political influence by pressing congress to declare natural healing modalities ‘unscientific quackery’. Rockefeller then took control of the American Medical Association (AMA) and began offering massive grants to top medical schools, under the mandate, that only his approved curriculum be taught. Any mention of the healing power of herbs, plants or diet, was erased from most medical text books. Doctors and Professors who objected to Rockefeller’s plan were crucified by the media, removed from the AMA, and stripped of their licenses to teach and practice medicine. Those who dared to speak out where arrested and jailed.
When it began to emerge that petroleum-based medicines were causing cancer, Mr. Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society, through which he suppressed that information. John D. Rockefeller is duly credited as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry, and the reason that medical error is currently the 3rd leading cause of death in America.
This is not an indictment against doctors. More than anyone, they are under the stranglehold of the single greatest lobbying power in Washington. Every year, the pharmaceutical industry spends at least twice the amount as big oil to influence laws, policies, and public perception. Thanks to Mr. Rockefeller, the architect of American monopolies, no industry has more power over our lives than big pharma.”
Destroying the reputations of doctors/scientists who speak out against these agendas, or arresting and jailing them, as Dr. Judy Mikovits discovered the hard way, is not a new phenomenon–this has all happened before. This history lesson also helps us better understand the events behind the origin of the FDA proclamation that “only a drug can cure, prevent or treat a disease,” which is also why its illegal for anyone healing with ‘alternative’ medicine (live Vitamin C) to make those same claims–Vitamin C can’t be patented–drugs can.
The 2010 Rockefeller Foundation program called SCENARIOS FOR THE FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY & INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT–A [NOT SO] FICTIONAL SCENARIO.
While Rockefeller’s role in shaping our current reality is worth watching the documentary for alone, when it comes to the 2010 paper put out by the Rockefeller Foundation, here’s a link to secondary source discussing a particularly revealing section of the program called Lock Step. The gentleman being interviewed about this paper–particularly the Lock Step section–is clearly extremely disturbed by what it says, as we all would have been if the media had reported on it a decade ago.
In the first few minutes, the guest being interviewed (secondary source) makes reference to Ebola before going into Lock Step, which I thought was interesting given something the Planned Demic documentary covered at 18:16 when interviewing Maryl Nass, MD, Physician, Researcher and Writer. The very first thing she says is shocking:
“I was the first person in the world to look at an epidemic and study its characteristics and prove it was due to biological warfare–it’s not a natural occurrence. So I published that 28 years ago [Anthrax: Epizootic in Zimbabwe, 1978-1980: Due to Deliberate Spread]. Early in this [corona] pandemic, I did not think this pandemic was a natural occurrence from bats. I felt quite convinced this was a laboratory designed organism. There have been hundreds and hundreds of leaks from high containment labs that do research on pathogenic corona viruses and other potentially lethal organisms.
I was particularly interested in a paper that came out in Nature Medicine by 5 scientists [one of which was Ian Lipkin] claiming it was definitely a natural occurrence rather than a lab construct. But the arguments they used did not hold water, they didn’t really make a lot of scientific sense, and yet all kinds of ‘very important’ people started parroting what this paper said, and so that of course go me scratching my head saying, why are all these people risking their reputations when it’s obviously illogical–doesn’t hold water–somebody must have made them publish this AND somebody must have told these other people that they have to say its a great piece of science.”
That’s a serious claim–somebody must have made them publish this AND somebody must have told them support it as legitimate science–should the claim be taken seriously? Most certainly, especially after whistle-blower claims made in the recently released documentary ShadowGate, explained how the program was used to ‘micro-target’ individuals to get them to move in specific directions or behave in certain ways. How that may be exploited was covered in the WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE post. Below are some highlights:
At the 6:47 mark of the documentary, Tore (Linguist, Naval Intelligence contractor) explains her job was called “localization,” a strategy wherein particular groups are specifically targeted, ranging from “a whole country, city, a certain religious group, a 6-block radius like CHAZ,” and you then try to get into their heads: what they eat, how they walk, talk, think, what makes them happy or sad, what drives them nuts and what buttons to push to get the required response–and then you opportunize that data (use it against them). She points out this can be done to alter ideology, sell certain products, or function as a form of behavioral modification in getting people to move in a “pre-determined direction”.
The use of data harvesting in these operations also, and perhaps even more importantly, includes mining a key (targeted) individual’s data to look for blackmail material, which of course is an extremely powerful motivator for getting people to fall in line. Threatening to fire people, ruin their careers and destroy their reputations is also a common technique, as was the case with Dr. Judy Mikovits. Her refusal to ‘modify her behavior’ as requested soon became an example to others as the threats were made good on, including an attempt on her life. In Part 1 of this WOK (War on Knowledge) essay series there were also numerous examples of dead ‘natural medicine’ doctors, biologists, and even an CDC whistle-blower whose body was found in a river two months after he disappeared.
Returning to the paper published by the Rockefeller Foundation, SCENARIOS FOR THE FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY & INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT–A FICTIONAL SCENARIO, the Lock Step section begins on page 18 of the document, and starts out with a critical admission as to what these ‘scenarios’ are really meant to achieve:
“A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen push-back.”
The documentary displays this section (Lock Step) of the paper at the 43:07 mark:
“During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from mandatory wearing of face masks to body temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.”
Event 201 was another global pandemic scenario exploration event covered in the documentary at the 37:55 mark:
“My systems flagged anomalies when I started seeing non-profits and corporates and cover financing for corona virus programs in the late summer and fall of 2019. Our first red flag came when we read, A WORLD AT RISK SCENARIO. Now there is an organization called the Global Monitoring Preparedness Board. This organization is a part of the World Health Organization (WHO), and this board includes Dr. Chris Elias of the Gates Foundation, and Anthony Fauci from NIAID. These individuals, plus the Director General for the Center for Disease Control in China, came out with a recommendation that says by September of 2020, two global pandemic exercises have to be completed. And one of them has to be done on the release of a respiratory pathogen. That then gave rise to an October event–Event 201. Event 201 took place months before covid was declared a pandemic. It was a scripted, multi-camera event broadcast globally via the internet–something Fauci and Bill Gates have been predicting for years.
Every single thing you have seen play out in their ‘tabletop’ exercise–which, by the way, fact checkers have said, has nothing to do with the covid outbreak–just happenstance. This is the wonderful universe of improbabilities where events just co-emerge and then nature conveniently backs itself into our architecture [predicted scenario]. That’s the scenario [narrative] we’re supposed to accept.
Event 201 was not the first scripted exercise to prophesize the future with astounding accuracy. Leaders of global health and businesses have been seeding reality with fictional scenarios for several decades. A year before event 201, many of the same sponsors, hosts and actors came together to produce a tabletop pandemic simulation for a fictional virus they branded CLADEX.”
PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING IS USED FOR PRE-PLANNED EVENTS
The changes being made to the world under the guise of a pandemic are the the most sweeping globalist reality revisions yet. And while social engineering and perception management are the main tools used to pull off a reality revision, they have a cousin that also often shows up to the party, usually arriving first: predictive programming. Predictive Programming is used to bypass and pre-empty the otherwise normal response to sudden, dramatic events that deviate wildly from ‘normalcy’–that reaction being shock, followed by disbelief and then rejection. In order to avoid that public reaction to an upcoming planned event, predictive programming operates slowly, over long periods of time, through continually and repeatedly re-introducing (seeding) the idea of the event into the collective consciousness. This not only bypasses the normal shock/rejection response, but effectively numbs the public to it while also creating an expectation for it: “It wouldn’t surprise me if a real pandemic happens soon”. Exactly.
Predictive programming as a foreshadowing of events, when understood this way, can be used by reality miners very much the same way as having historical knowledge of the way anti-intellectualism (dumbing down and purging intellectuals from society) can and should be read as a portent–something wicked this way comes. Very much like observing the changes in language coming from officialdom, not only does reading predictive programming tell you a change is coming, but will also tell you what that change is.
Predictive programming can also be weaponized for the kind of ‘micro-targeting’ revealed in WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE and IDEOLOGICAL SUBVERSION. There’s a reason today’s tween and twenty-something ‘social just warriors’ were micro-targeted repeatedly during their childhood with age-specific repetition of ‘global warming’ and/or ‘the world is dying because it’s overpopulated’. That was, for all intents and purposes, a rather effective and decades long recruitment campaign that now has them acting as agents of the globalist agenda in handing the entire world over to globalist corporations under the false pretense of doing the exact opposite. That issue was covered in depth in a previous essay called THE DEFUND ENDGAME PART 2: TRANSITIONING LOCAL CITIZENS TO GLOBAL CITIZENS.
That remarkably successfully recruitment campaign was accomplished through social engineering, perception management, ideological subversion, predictive programming, AND the exact same kind of military grade social media weaponization (including micro-targeting) exposed in the ShadowGate documentary. The exact same kind of campaign used to get locals in a foreign nation to side with the Taliban, in my view, has been used against our own children to get them to unwittingly side with globalism:
“For people who didn’t take the time to watch the documentary before it was scrubbed, the impact crater of him saying, “because the same thing I was hired to do by General Jones overseas, is what i’m seeing them doing right now, here in America,” isn’t going to sink in any deeper than the “fake news is the enemy of the people” slogan.
However, for those that did take the time, I trust you’ll recall the other individual featured in the documentary (Tore) explaining how ‘localization’ was used against the citizens of a foreign nation in trying to get them to side with the Taliban—a political group that was now becoming militant (physically violent)–and trying to convince locals that siding with them would keep things like their local businesses from being destroyed. If that doesn’t sound hauntingly familiar to what’s been happening in this country lately, you haven’t been paying attention.” –WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE (ShadowGate)
Predictive programming requires a broadcast medium with both broad and micro-targeted reach. Hollywood produces most of it and the media (all forms) sell and market it. As an example, it’s not a coincidence that two of the most recent blockbuster film series, Marvel’s Universe and Godzilla, had story lines centered on needing to depopulate the earth/universe as means to ‘save’ it. This can also be done in other subtle, more sub-conscious ways, like the Nike poster advertising a new shoe with an image of it being worn on a leg that had the flesh blown off, just before the Boston marathon bombing took place.
In fact, a startling example of this was also in the latest Godzilla film, and it was done in such a way that only veteran reality miners and pre-targeted youth–being micro-targeted in the absence of parental knowledge and guidance–would have noticed. Every good campaign has a slogan and logo, and in this case it was the “extinction rebellion” symbol splattered throughout the Godzilla movie in a culty, product placement kind of way. The symbol is made from two triangles that youth adherents to the movement are told represents an hour glass, but the historical significance of the symbol comes from metal slave collars worn around the neck–these had four, long, protruding metal arms extending from the center ring around the neck–two on each side, forming a double triangle. Perhaps even more telling, was the use of the symbol throughout Godzilla in a sideways position (more akin to the slave collar), which would be more representative of that “form of behavioral modification in getting people to move in a “pre-determined direction,” and “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen push-back,” we’ve been hearing so much about–all to ‘keep us safe’ from mythical global warming and a patented, pre-planned pandemic. An image of the slave collar, and the interrelated (with current events) story behind it, can be found at the 12:58 mark of a fascinating interview with Bishop Larry Gaiters.
Predictive programming (often in conjunction with ideological subversion, social engineering and perception management) is done over an extended period of time, often many decades, for the sole reason the event IS BEING PRE-PLANNED. Where pandemic narratives and scenarios are specifically concerned we can look back over the last 20 years and see it’s endless and intensive streaming into the collective mind. But above and beyond the litany of re-worked plague, contagion and zombie movies, the most startling example for many of us was the 2012 London Olympics opening ceremony.
That was a particularly disturbing display for reality miners around the world at the time, and included everything from laid out rows of hospital beds, the giant effigy of a dead baby, a reaper (as Voldemort with a magic wand), police state elements (police in riot gear with fences), dancing nurses, bizarre creatures with glowing green eyes going after the children, a giant phoenix (representing a new world being built on the ashes of the old one) flying over the world’s nations in flames below while the band Take That sang “Rule the World,” and eventually John Lennon was even shown singing “imagine there’s no countries”–all being performed in an arena rimmed by 15 metal pyramids with capstones on them. The Vigilante Citizen wrote a great article on the event and its symbology, and I’m not surprised to see others now wondering if certain elements of both the arena and strange choreography being performed within weren’t meant to represent the virus itself.
THE GATES OF HELL: MAKING A KILLING
It’s a standing joke that someone who isn’t a doctor or scientist, and wasn’t able to keep viruses out of his own software, has no business trying to save the human race from viruses. What most people today don’t consider, something that was more of a hot topic when writing my first book over a decade ago, is that software developers are the most likely source for the viruses that infected their own software. Not only do they have the most motive because they then turn around and sell the anti-virus software, but it’s one of the first and most deviously brilliant technological shake downs perpetrated on consumers in that industry.
More importantly, at this point I think it would be foolish not to heavily consider that the same thing is now being done to the biological operating systems of human beings, with viruses being made by those who will profit the most from the sale of biological anti-virus software (vaccines)–at the very least. All things considered, although they never came right and said it, isn’t that the real underlying premise of the data collected in the documentary? The same people involved in the creation and patenting of the virus are also the ones involved in pimping the vaccines for it? Even to the point of attempting to forcibly mandate the vaccine for seven billion people. The profit margins on that aspect alone would be obscene, especially when, as the documentary points out, the research and development of the vaccines is paid for by the taxpayers.
Gates is an extremely controversial person for numerous reasons, some of which were covered in the first WOK essay, especially where anti-intellectualism (dumbing down) is concerned in relation to the Common Core curriculum that Bill Gates pushed for, which also includes the sexualization of young children (pedophilic grooming). When people don’t know this, the fact that Gates was a known funder and associate of Jeffrey Epstein, the character of man trying to force vaccines on seven billion people doesn’t get the attention it deserves. Fortunately, this too was covered in the documentary–what kind of man is he? If we do a product review of Gates and his previous attempts at ‘philanthropy’ what comes up? For those who haven’t read it, this particular review came from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and was included in the first WOK essay. https://fort-russ.com/2020/04/robert-f-kennedy-jr-exposes-bill-gates-vaccine-dictatorship-plan-cites-gates-twisted-messiah-complex/
“Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India ‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines.
In 2014, the GatesFoundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.
In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.
During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers”
The Planned Demic Documentary does it’s own product review of Gates which is equally revealing and disturbing. Below are 2 clips from that section of the documentary (freely provided for distribution by the makers of the documentary) which include the following topics:
- Gates did not come from humble beginnings–his grandfather and great grandfather were banking moguls and his father was a prominent Seattle-based lawyer and political activist
- Gates did not invent the windows operating system–he bought it, had it modified, and licensed it to IBM
- Bill Gates admitted in a television interview that when it comes to vaccines, the financial return on investment is 20-1
- Bill Gates 2.0: Gates opened the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation as part of re-branding (reality revision) campaign after the anti-trust lawsuit gave him the reputation of a ruthless tech monopolizer. It worked so well his net worth doubled giving him the title of the richest man in the world
- While Microsoft’s co-founder Paul Allen was battling cancer and undergoing chemo therapy, Gates attempted to cheat him out of his share of the company fortune
- Gates’ involvement with and ties to the world’s most notorious pedophile (Epstein)
- Gates’ funding of an experiment to literally block out the sun (in the name of fighting the mythical global warming)–what some rightfully refer to as planetary genocide
- Gates’ funding of a global satellite surveillance system to monitor the personal activity of every human being on earth 24/7
- Gates’ partnership with MIT relating to an “immunity passport” and vaccines that can be injected under the skin along with medical records which can be scanned by authorities to prove vaccine compliance (the quantum dot tattoo)
- The Gates vaccine scandal in India investigated by their government–after his vaccines killed and damaged their children
BILL GATES AND PROJECT ARTEMIS
The reader may have noticed I have not been using the correct title or spelling for the documentary, nor have I provided a direct link beyond that found in the graphic image at the beginning of this page. The reason for that, in my opinion, is Project Artemis. Before I explain, below are three different comments copied directly from the page hosting the documentary (keeping in mind that texting/English as a second language are comment variables):
“will [with] the censorship of posting they can justify it through their community rules the fact that we can’t send the link in a private message on Facebook is a federal crime. It means they have acces to our private correspondence. I hope a very big law suit is coming their way”
“Cannot share on facebook in the UK – message reads ‘Your message couldn’t be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.’ Abusive? What a joke…”
“I’m not allowed to share the link to this video by fb Messenger”
Anti-intellectualism in the form of digital censorship (the big tech arm of cancel culture designed to eliminate competing views and realities) has nearly gone nuclear. While shadows of where they once stood have been burned onto the walls of our memories, even those will be painted over soon, as thousands and thousands of websites, FB pages, Youtube and twitter accounts have been deleted and purged by big tech censors in the last few months alone. This is a common and necessary tactic tyrants use, and it’s history (purge of intellectuals from society) was covered in the first WOK essay.
The progression of digital censorship intensified with going after public pages and accounts first, but soon the admins of private groups, some with hundreds of thousands of individual subscribers, were getting notices from FB saying their ‘group’ reach was being diminished because the group was posting ‘fake news’. This obviously means content and conversations happening in private groups is being monitored and censored, but people still hoped that personal, private messages were still considered a sacred cow unsullied by the censorship and surveillance apparatus. As the comments shared above indicate, people were clinging to that last vestige of privacy in the hopes of getting around the censorship–if you can no longer share knowledge with each other openly or in private groups, there’s still private messages. That too, it would seem, is being subjected to thought police voyeurism and tyranny.
Considering that private conversations, being had even in our homes, are also being listened to in the presence of cell phones, computers and in some cases perhaps even televisions (many smart TV’s now also equipped with cameras), should we really be surprised? What concerns me about this new form of censorship however, is not just its ties to Bill Gates and this latest venture coinciding with private message and chat monitoring, but also how that too may be used against people in the future. Even worse, keeping in mind this is coming from a man responsible for Common Core and who had business dealings with Epstein, this new surveillance program was released under the guise of “looking for pedophiles”. Before we get to that, I would first like to share the more common definitions of ‘grooming’:
n. Preparing a person for a position requiring skilled behavior, especially by providing opportunity for practice and guidance in making the right decisions.
n. The activity of getting dressed, washed and generally of neat appearance.
n. The activity of cleaning oneself or others by removing lice, ticks, dirt, etc. from the fur; — of animals.
Rarely (if ever) does one find any mention of pedophiles in relation to the word, yet there are few among us who don’t know what pedophilic grooming is. But here, in relation to Project Artemis, and the way people were forced to resort to private messages for information-sharing, I find the the first definition extremely important. As covered earlier, reality literate populations won’t tolerate drowning in absurdity (death by ignorance) because most people really are good people. In that sense, I personally believe that the real ‘grooming’ being targeted by Project Artemis has a lot more do with people trying to get around the thought police via private messages and chats–for the purpose of providing each other with “opportunities for practice and guidance in making the right decisions”— to be the true target of the project. With that in mind, the following information on Project Artemis comes from fightthenewdrugdotorg:
Project Artemis’ job is to spot patterns of communication in conversations. Then, based on those patterns of speech and the words being used in the conversation, the system will assign a rating for the likelihood that one of the participants is trying to groom the other. The rating part of the system is incredibly useful because it allows those using the system to flag higher risk conversations for human moderator review and, in some cases, to immediately send conversations that exhibit an imminent threat to law enforcement.
In tracking the movements, manipulative language, and grooming techniques used by sexual predators in flaggable conversations, the system will also provide experts with more information on how sexual predators operate online—which will allow Microsoft to increase the accuracy of the system’s flagging mechanism.
And while, according to the company’s chief digital safety officer, Courtney Gregoire, Microsoft has only been utilizing these techniques for several years on its own products, including on Skype and its Xbox platform, it has invited further contribution and engagement from other technology companies and organizations with the goal to improve and refine the system further.
In order to know how to improve and refine the system though, we first need to talk about how it works—let’s dive in.
So, then, how does Project Artemis actually work? Well, the truth is, we don’t really know. In fact, very few outside of Microsoft know, but that’s actually the key to the whole thing.
Because if Microsoft explains the precise words or patterns the tool hunts for, sexual predators could potentially adjust their behaviors to hide their activities and, essentially, rendering Project Artemis useless.
While the system still has some risks in that it might throw up false positives, since automated systems still struggle to understand the meaning and context of language, and in that it assumes that users permit their private communications to be read, Project Artemis has enough merit to make sexual predators think twice before they use online chat functions for exploiting children.
This is my personal perspective on Project Artemis, and given that Gates is a globalist, and covid is being used to install their long-held vision of a global, corporate, fascist, (surveillance) police state, and we know the thought police are attempting to also globalize a ‘social credit score’ based on personal disposition matrixes (grading our personal conformity and compliance to that agenda), I would personally find this particular rendition of the first paragraph on Project Artemis more believable:
Project Artemis’ job is to spot patterns of communication in conversations. Then, based on those patterns of speech and the words being used in the conversation, the system will assign a rating (social credit score) for the likelihood that one of the participants is trying to groom (provide meaningful knowledge outside of the pre-approved narrative) the other. The rating part of the system is incredibly useful because it allows thought police using the system to flag higher risk conversations for human moderator review and, in some cases, to immediately send conversations that exhibit an imminent threat to the narrative to thought police enforcement officers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. –Voltaire
Not only do I hope the reader will take the time to watch and share the documentary with friends and loved ones (grooming them to become more reality literate so they may make better choices), but I hope the reader will also take the time to read the first WOK essay, before Part 3 is released. I understand some of these essays can be long, but again, the SUM TOTAL of these events is so much greater than their individual parts, and parting them out almost defeats their purpose-especially during a time when long-term memory has a way of getting lost in the shuffle. There are things we can’t afford to forget anymore, or fail to connect to other cogs in the wheel of an agenda working overtime take what’s left of every joy and freedom we have. Mankind can longer participate in their own demise out of ignorance and escape that demise at the same time.
All hands on deck.
“This isn’t a vaccine story–this is a population management story. If your goal is to make this beautiful earth that we live on, an exclusive playground for the entitled few, then populations that get in the way are a problem. And it is the empirical impulse of individuals who have decided, that by out-ranking the rest of humanity, they can dictate upon humanity the conditions of our existence…and this is also a test of humanity to see how much of our liberty we will let go, before finally drawing the line under enough.”
–Plandemic Indoctornation World Premier