October 19, 2014 by Crystal Clark

This second essay addresses the order-out-of-chaos principle in global revisionism, its ties to the duplicitous establishment of the green or sustainable development movement, associated economic revisions, the duplicity of pandemic narratives, and the hypocrisy of spreading democracy via illegal wars on what remains of sovereign nations and peoples. This essay also begins to identify and address the revisionists responsible.


The definition of a reality revision is being re-posted below from the previous essay with a reminder that the purpose of reality revisionism is to quite literally eliminate the competition or competing reality—the reality standing in the way of the intended replacement.


“Reality revisions are agenda-driven and thereby fictitious narratives carefully scripted to revise an entire global reality in order to meet or fulfill that agenda. These are major, major paradigm shifts of generational proportions that summarily pre and re-define the future victor and victimhood status of billions. These shifts aren’t meant to change the perception and therefore direction of reality for a day, week, or months, but permanently.” — The Roles of Social Engineering and Perception Management in Reality Revisionism


Still largely unbeknownst to most, we live in world in which two competing realities are constantly struggling for full manifestation. As one of them seeks to wholly dominate and fully replace the other through various methods of suppression and eradication, while the other entirely rejects such notions to the degree of criminal prosecution, they cannot peacefully co-exist—ever.  As long as this struggle continues, so too will global war, famine, corruption, injustice and strife, and ultimately, the continued demise of our entire planetary civilization via the purposeful destruction of its life support systems. Mankind can no longer continue to participate in their own demise out of ignorance (of this war) and escape that demise at the same time.

This struggle is between the sovereign state, country or individual owning their own thought, action, and right to self-determination, and a private group of aspiring Caesars in the global governance regime they intend to replace the other reality with. This ultimate global reality revision cannot fully manifest without transferring, to itself, all of the sovereign power and freedoms of the other. Suffering numerous mattoid impediments, from the birth of this new and competing reality, the order-out-of-chaos principle thought necessary to achieve it was also born. From the previous essay:

“The events of 911 were a tipping point in a missive, GLOBAL reality revision meant to change the perception and therefore direction of reality permanently, and it isn’t the first. Repeatedly we were told these heinous acts of terrorism were committed by those who hate freedom and free people, which is the one thing they actually told the truth about. It’s important to remember that reality revisionists use these revisions to eliminate the competition or competing reality. It is an impossibility for an oppressive, elitist global government (for and by the elite) to establish itself among free peoples with governance established for and by the people. Their power ends where our freedoms begin—it’s like turning a dial—when you turn our freedoms down you turn their power up, and when you turn our freedoms up you dial their power down. These reality revisions are designed not to simply turn the freedom dial down, but to ultimately turn it off.”


In the same way our ignorance is their strength, and our individual freedoms inhibit their collective power, SO TOO IS OUR CHAOS THEIR ORDER—they cannot have the one without the other. In other words, what we view as unfolding global chaos is actually a carefully scripted and manufactured order—the current reality is being re-sculpted, redesigned and re-ordered.

I suspect this is most easily recognized in the ordered chaos of sovereign nations (competing realities) just before the reality revision of regime change (war) introduces them to the democracy narrative, allowing for the installation of a pro new order leader (hopeful legate) as in the recent attempt in Ukraine. That being after, of course, previous successful regime changes (reality revisions) made in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, ect, ect.

Perhaps surprisingly, the order-out-of-chaos principle has been playing out over and over again in the margins of society through Hollywood movies consistently representing this theme and characterized by a particular image:  a demonic or satanic figure standing triumphantly with a scorched and destroyed earth in the background. After watching these movies we often find ourselves wondering at the “logic” behind completely destroying a planet you then intend to rule over—what was the point? And yet, that is precisely the point of the order-out-of-chaos principle—the birth of a new civilization built on the ashes of the old one. Contemplation of the doctrine may conjure up images of the two-faced, Roman God Janus, for whom the month of January was named: God of beginnings, transitions and endings.

This principle includes the Hegelian dialectic, which is why we find pro new order officials (legionaries) espousing the benefits of “never letting a good crisis go to waste”. We also find world leaders (legates) publicly espousing the same for a coming new world order with a grin while their citizens are left to marvel at what is otherwise considered to be a profound and near complete lack of competence where any other matter of importance is concerned. Notice the recent proliferation of the ‘incompetence’ meme, especially where the ebola pandemic narrative is concerned, and yet, what is chaos (incompetence) to the fly is order for the spider (Caesar).

The Incompetence Meme: A Prolific Lateral Narrative Binder

The incompetence meme is a superior lateral narrative binder as it shifts thought patterns away from identifying nefarious intent, or the mindset behind planned chaos. The use of this narrative binder is aimed at preventing dissent from the official narrative by blocking or redirecting thought patterns that would otherwise lead to exposure. This isn’t to suggest that certain world leaders (legates) aren’t actually incompetent, but again, one man’s incompetence (chaos), is another man’s competent incompetence (order). The use of this particular later narrative binder is astonishingly prolific, being found in everything from complaints that Obama rarely attends national security briefings and is constantly on vacation, to the recent Washington Post article about the NBC News chief medical editor breaking a 21-day ebola quarantine to get ‘take-out food’. Currently, an internet search for the phrase “incompetence at Fukushima” doesn’t disappoint, and along those same lines one might wonder at a link between increasing police brutality and laws that prohibit the hiring those with a high IQ in the same profession. Regarding the latter, that too may be a lateral narrative binder being used to hide something else entirely.

The Hegelian Principle: An excerpt from THE MOST SECRET SCIENCE (1998 Edition), by Archibald E. Roberts, Lieutenant Colonel, AUS, retired

Revolutionaries in government have created economic chaos, shortages in food and fuel, confiscatory taxation, a crisis in education, the threat of war, and other diversions to condition Americans for The New World Order.

The technique is as old as politics itself. It is the Hegelian principle of bringing about change in a three-step process: Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis.

The first step (thesis) is to create a problem. The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic, hysteria). The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem created in step one—change which would have been impossible to impose on the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two.

Applying the Hegelian principle, and irresistible financial influence, concealed mattoids seek to dismantle social and political structures by which free men govern themselves—ancient landmarks erected at great cost in blood and treasure.

Their objective is to emasculate states, merge nations under universal government, centralize economic powers, and control the world’s people and resources.


“Will they blame the environmental holocaust on you and get away with it?” –Mr. George Hunt (1992)

Order-out-of-chaos methodology has several tentacles which necessarily include world banking and finance, and while purposefully creating chaos to destabilize the governments of other sovereign nations to achieve their new world (order) is today easily recognized, its driving force behind the “sustainable development” movement and the purposeful destruction (chaos) of the environment is not. The magnitude of duplicity and hypocrisy, within the movement and the ideologies of those behind its invention, is so monumental as to in fact be entirely antithetical to the entire concept of “sustainable”. If you can obtain a used copy of the previously referenced book, The Most Secret Science, the logo of the Tri-Lateral Commission (showing three arrows of purpose—similar to those in the recycling logo—looping back to a central core in the form of a triangle) is on the front, the book also including a complete list of known CFR and Tri-lateral Commission members at the time of its writing. The order-out-of-chaos and Hegelian stratagems also seem heavily influenced by the Janus archetype (or perhaps vice-versa), and can be found even in the rebranding (transition) of the global warming myth:

  1. Thesis/Beginning: Greenhouse gasses/global warming [Manufactured crisis via geo-engineering]
  2. Antithesis/Transition: Climate change [Rebranded after the IPCC email release or Climategate scandal]
  3. Synthesis/Ending: Geo-engineering/solar dimming/solar remediation [The cause of the problem now being sold as the solution; parallels can be found with the Ebola vaccine in the current pandemic narrative]

Despite intermittent sound quality issues, readers may not only find the following video exceptionally helpful before moving on, but an excellent companion to the discussion in the next section. Successful reality revisionism navigation requires, at the very least, a basic understanding of the new world order philosophy behind these revisions. Is it a conspiracy? Yes. Is it a theory? No, and one would think that would be obvious when the conspirators themselves have repeatedly and publicly discussed it by name. I refer to it as ‘the new world order’ in deference to those constructing it—that’s what they call it.

This video, just under 10 minutes, begins with David Rockefeller (purportedly addressing the Tri-lateral Commission in June of 1991), thanking various MSM outlets—specifically the Washing Post, New York Times, and Time Magazine—for their 40-yrear silence which was so instrumental in avoiding the public scrutiny that would have inhibited their plans for the world—not your plans —a march towards global government. Several world leaders and politicians are in the video openly discussing the designs and progress of this new order, with former President Bush Sr. admitting this new world order is “fulfilling the promise and vision of the UN’s founders,” and former Prime Minister Gordon Brown espousing the new world order and its associated great resetting of economies. David Rockefeller and his contributing foundations are referenced throughout, including a scene of Rockefeller questioning Dick Cheney over free trade agreements, with a giddy Cheney explaining that while having been a longtime CFR member, even a director at one point, he never mentioned it while campaigning for re-election in Wyoming.


I recently came across the presentation of a Mr. George Hunt, originally produced in 1992, and found it highly significant when viewed through over 20 years of hindsight, and in a video just over 30 minutes no less. Before I share it here I would like to repost the recent comments of an Australian politician coming to understand the gravity and consequence to sovereign nations, including her own, of what he and others were trying to warn the world about so long ago. The following can be found in a previous article which includes the video of Ann Bressington’s presentation:

Of additional importance in this regard (beginning at the 1:03.55 mark), the Australian politician Ann Bressington begins to explain the 1968 origins of Agenda 21 via the Club of Rome–a think tank tasked with a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to accept global [NWO] solutions to local problems. Take note of her use of the term “social engineering” during this speech. She goes on to recount the following:

In 1997 Mikhail Gorbachev, also a member of the Club of Rome, said, “We are moving toward a New World Order—the world of communism. And we shall never turn off that road…the environmental crisis will be the international disaster that will unlock the New World Order one world government.” She further outlined it was during the 1992 Earth Summit that a document known as The Earth Charter was produced. This document was co-written by Maurice Strong [Club of Rome] and Mikhail Gorbachev. Both stated it was hoped this document would be adopted as the new 10 commandments with environmentalism as the new one world religion. She later quotes Ted Turner [Club of Rome], an outspoken advocate of depopulation, echoing the same sentiments on the Georgia guide stones encouraging a 95% reduction in global population.

Beyond the biography Mr. George Hunt provided over 20 years ago in the following presentation I know nothing more about him. At the time he recorded the VHS tape in 1992 in a Colorado video studio, he claimed to be a Business Consultant, College teacher of Small Business Management in Boulder, Colorado, and an environmental business owner. He recounts his dealings with those behind the sustainable development program, his surprise at seeing very powerful interests attend a local environmental meeting he officially hosted in 1987—some having attended other similar events throughout the country—and what he came to see as the ultimate hypocrisy and danger behind the environmental movement.

While Mr. Hunt certainly had personal opinions about the situation, which he freely shared in the video, those opinions were based on facts—not suppositions. Aside from providing audio/video recording evidence of Edmond de Rothchild and Maurice Strong (reality revisionists) being behind the environmental sustainability (order-out-of-chaos) movement, he included copies of newspaper articles and program agendas that are held up to the camera so the viewer may personally read them. At the time he was selling copies of the printed material along with the video tape.

The material being of critical importance to understanding our current predicament, aside from the brief review provided as it pertains to current topics, it will also be referred to in future essays. I highly recommend the video be downloaded and mirrored elsewhere before it gets wiped in the next round of internet scrubbing, or digital reality revisionism through electronic removal of virtually seditious material.

Mr. Hunt was witness to their two-faced turnings and rightfully highlights their preference for decree over democratic processes, a theme that can be found echoing louder in the body politic of today in everything from excessive executive orders blurring the lines between the executive and legislative branches of government, to several global trade treaties that have little to do with actual trade. As expressed in the previous essay, these treaties are critical factors to finalizing their system of global governance. Those familiar with the current Trans Pacific Partnership (or its regional/global counterparts) are aware the contents of the treaties are being written in (and kept) secret, even from congress and parliament members.

“This video will show strong evidence that the persons running the UNCED Earth Summit are actually setting a net to place the power over the earth and its peoples into their hands…Brave, bold deeds are needed by the public quickly. Once governments sign their treaties, their citizens are de jure in the hands of the world order.”

–Mr. George Hunt, 1992

Review of Mr. George Hunt’s Video:

UNCED (pronounced un-said) stands for United Nations Committee for Environment and Development. The UNCED logo for the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992, as shown in the video, included a hand formed to look like a dove holding the earth in its hands. The image was accompanied by the phrase: IN OUR HANDS. At this point Mr. Hunt rightfully asks: In whose hands?  

Several connections were made between the banking industry and the sustainable development sham (reality revision being used to transfer more individual sovereign power over to the new order), with notable banking figures attending his 1987 meeting in Colorado. This was 15 years after the first environmental congress ever held in Sweden in 1972, and 5 years before the UNCED appearance at the 1992 World Summit in Brazil.

Below is a partial list of attendees and other influential characters he referenced in the video:

  • David Rockefeller-Attendee
  • Edmond de Rothchild-Attendee
  • Secretary of state Baker (then Secretary of the Treasury)-Attendee
  • Maurice Strong-Attendee
  • Waste company management chairman and EPA Administrator William Ruckelshaus-Attendee https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Ruckelshaus#EPA_Administrator_redux
  • UN Secretary General —Attendee
  • Various other Word Bank and IMF Officials-Attendees
  • *Cecil Rhodes (Historical character whose views on race and imperialism were celebrated by attendees)
  • *David Lang (Montreal International Investment Banker)—Attendee


Celebrated ideologies of global governance revisionists not only despise competing self-governance and individual freedom ideologies, but also despise the people themselves—what they refer to as the lesser classes or races. So fueled by this disdain, the reach of its bloated and irrational contempt has been rigging elections all over the globe for decades as a result, the latest in Scotland over an *independence* referendum.  Rigged elections are reality revisions, a form of de facto decree being handed down by an illegitimate cabal working to solidify its place by creating a new reality placing them in power, the consumption of one reality by the other growing with each new revision. The process is similar to a racist, oppressive, individual freedom-hating virus invading the cells of a foreign host, slowly altering them until they too have become another virus.

At the 7:50 mark Hunt plays a video snippet of David Lang (Montreal International Investment Banker) decreeing that the environmental and economic activities of the world order not be shared with the public. As seen/heard in the video:

“I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process—that would take too long and require far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder, unfortunately, which populates the earth. We have to take an almost elitist program. That we can see beyond our swollen bellies and look to the future, in time frames and in results, which are not easily understood, or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to simplistic definition.“

Those familiar with the United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century program (Agenda 21–previously referenced by Australian politician Ann Bressington), are already well aware that bypassing normal channels of debate or the ‘democratic process’ is precisely how the program is being handled—by decree. Rosa Koire, author of Behind the Green Mask, is an excellent resource for information on Agenda 21, how it is being enacted in (y)our local communities, and also how its doctrine subsumes individuality in favor of a globalist collective.  Those who watched Hunt’s video will recall him outlining the difference between the first, second, third, and “fourth world” discussed by people like Maurice Strong—the Fourth World referring to the new order having absorbed all of the others and being the only, and final world left:

“Yogis and Shamans refer to it as the 4th World Wilderness—the lostness of the mind. The lostness of the mind refers to the collective consciousness—persons will be coerced through lies, drugs, fear and pain to surrender themselves and their ego to the collective consciousness [global governance]. The 4th World will be much like a return to Caesars or Babylon…” –George Hunt

At the 5:45 mark Hunt shows copies of material handed out by the Secretariat for World Order to attendees of an environmental meeting held in Des Moines, Iowa, which stated the following:

We are living sponsors of the great Cecil Rhodes Will of 1877, in which Rhodes devoted his fortune to the expansion of British rule throughout the world, and colonization by British subjects of the entire continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of Euphrates, the islands of Cypress and Candia, the whole of South America, islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britian, the whole of the mele archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, and the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire. We stand with Lord Milner’s Credo—we too are British race patriots and our patriotism is the speech, the traditions, the principles, the aspirations of the British race. Do you fear to take this stand at this very last moment when this purpose can be realized? Do you not see that failure now is to be pulled down by the billions of lilliputians of lesser race who care little or nothing for the anglo-saxon system?

While the entire planet is meant to be absorbed into the new order or 4th World, orchestrated crises (chaos) in Africa in the last year have been increasingly used as the means through which foreign troops may be sent for the “humanitarian aid” (order) that will save them from their entirely manufactured chaos. There are accounts that the current ebola pandemic narrative is the second attempt at a reality revision in this regard, after the first Boko Haram narrative failed—the #BringBackOurGirls campaign based on the hoaxed kidnapping of Nigerian schoolgirls by terrorists.

The following was originally reported via CNN in early October:

  • The Ebola outbreak in Africa is spreading quickly.
  • The defense department is increasing the number of troops it’s sending to West Africa to help fight the deadly virus.
  • With three thousand troops already tapped to head to Ebola ravaged West Africa, CNN has learned the US military is increasing its fight against the deadly disease. Hundreds more are being added to the plans to help the infected countries contain and control Ebola.

These methods have also been tested twice in the last year here in the United States via two separate crises deliberately manufactured as the pretext for UN troops to occupy and operate freely on American soil in the name of humanitarian aid. The first was the Detroit water crisis, the second being the current ebola pandemic narrative. Moreover, this essay would be remiss not to draw attention to the plethora of narrative binders increasingly being used, even in the form of color-coded NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming), linking together the ebola, overpopulation and ‘green’ movement (sustainable development) narratives. Ebola alone is not the issue—what the ebola narrative is being used to accomplish through order-out-of-chaos methodology—even if only a perceived chaos—is the issue.

Additional duplicitous attempts to link overpopulation, financial instability and environmental/sustainable narratives can be found in everything from Bill Gates’ involvement in vaccine-related population reduction programs with some ‘kill Granny to save money for schools’ narratives on the side, to increasingly “incompetent” CDC and EPA rulings and behaviors, refusal to apply the ‘precautionary principle’ equally to all new chemicals, gmo products, bio, nano, nuclear and atmospheric sciences, or even refusal to apply the law equally to everyone. How it became legal to literally steal *trillions* of dollars under the lawless “Too-Big-To-Fail-or-Jail” umbrella is a testament to how near that long-awaited new governance already is. The framework necessary to exempt themselves from criminal prosecution is already in place.

Other hypocrisies include the insertion of carbon emission minders and taxes into a reality in which the single greatest nuclear meltdown in known history is being summarily ignored—in both press coverage and mitigation. Families attempting to become healthier and self-sufficient by growing and supplying their own food and milk to ensure it stays free of toxic pesticides, genetically modified organisms and hormones, are being jailed after their property is destroyed by SWAT team raids, while criminal banking enterprises and corporations destroying entire eco-systems for generations to come are simply fined and allowed to carry on with business as usual. Additionally, this all before we even get to the Planned Obsolescence (chaos) business model based on the cognitive dissonance between an infinite growth ideology on a planet with finite resources. Then again, is it really cognitive dissonance or the competent incompetence being rebranded as a ‘capability gap’?


There is a final point of importance to be made and observed in this area, something Mr. Hunt touched on in his extremely succinct yet short video: Is the New World Order really saving us from ourselves? Without a doubt, THAT is the most important question of our time—the uber or super question—the one that those suffering from lostness of mind must, despite the best efforts of their competitors, come to know the answer to before they too are swallowed up by it. I once met someone heavily involved in this agenda, who openly shared their mindset with me:

“People are a bunch of goddamned sheep. They have to be told when to eat, and they have to be told when to stop. They have to be lead back out to the pasture every day because they are too caught up in their own immediate needs and wants to remember where it is from the day before.”

This was also the first person to explain, “the bad guys always tell you what they are going to do before they do it,” and they were absolutely right. Yet there is an obscurity in this that people get stuck on in trying to explain it. This is true even of those whose lives are focused on realizing this new world, when using it as their own excuse or pardon for the “necessity” of the obscene crimes against humanity used to implement it. This obscurity lies in the idea that they broadcast what they are going to do before they do it to give people an opportunity to stop it, but also, they continue to do it because they believe the inherent cowardice of lesser race or pedigree prevents people from stopping them. Given my own life experiences and the current state of affairs on this planet, sans the racial attribution, I am in complete agreement that cowardice has definitely been a major factor in their largely unhindered rise to power.  Given the numbers in the equation alone, how could it not be?

However, the “save them from themselves” philosophy in quasi toto is errantly clung to by a gross pomp—a formidable delusion of self-grandeur exaggerated to the point of logical impairment, rendering them extremely prone to a factual selectiveness.  That is to say, those who refuse to endure the personal crisis of facing the truth, simply re-write it until they can. Thus the gigantic whole in their pseudo savior philosophy always conjures up for me a famous quote by John Milton: They who have put out the people’s eyes reproach them of their blindness. In other words, they have purposefully injected untold quantities of neurotoxins, endocrine disrupters, radiation, cancerous food, medicine and chemicals into the landscape of our lives and development, while simultaneously ensuring education lacks factual cosmological models, basic understanding of intelligent design, is riddled with endless historical revisions, fallacies and nonsensical corporate pseudo-science—all of which encourage lostness of mind—and  now want to throw us away and under the bus because they consider us “lost”.

Mr. Hunt understood this—clearly. They have set the people on this planet up to fail and take the blame for the myriad of global tragedies, shortcomings, failures, poverty, lack, contamination, illness, social crises, war, strife, Frankenstein science, and even the catastrophic biosphere and biodiversity collapse currently underway that THEY are actually responsible for. Really think about that…can a sane mind even begin to comprehend the insanity of such a monstrous and backwards design? Considering those people are responsible for intentionally altering the course of an entire planetary race, stifling all forms of natural evolutionary progress and nearly bringing it to full ruin for the sole purpose of self-edification in the process, these people can’t save themselves out of a paper bag let alone save anyone else.


Mr. Hunt was incredibly thorough and left few stones unturned, including the roles of New Age philosophies (currently promoting destruction of individual ego and do-nothing cowardice) and the associated GAIA worship being instituted to further the agenda of their new order. Both are heavily managed misdirects being socially engineered into our lives via endless forms of perception management.

True to the Hegelian principle, Rothchild was positioned to be the positive synthesis of both environmentalism on the one hand—the thesis—and growth and development on the other hand— the antithesis—and that specific Rothchild combination, including the Rockefellers and most world capitalists, aim to control the global environment and development movement as the synthesis, with power moving into the house of Rothchild. This would be the same house (E.L. Rothschild LLC) that acquired a majority stake in Weather Central, LP in recent years, and Hunt also discussed their decades-old plan to suck aquifers dry and turn California (a major food basket) into a desert—a plan that, through exposure Hunt helped to create at the time, was initially thwarted in the early days by the public.

“The world order wants to create a new society out of the ashes of the chaos—a collectivist Fourth World, complete with a collectivist religion, collectivist finance, and unchecked world national socialism. The new order will offer Gaia—mother earth—to the masses as the big brother image to worship in the Fourth World. Maurice Strong has already set up a 140,000 acre ranch in Crestone, Colorado, to develop this earth religion system. Projects are funded by the Rockefeller fund and other foundations. The Earth Summit (of 1992) will link environment to industry. The lords of the UNCED conference will be the masters of who gets what, and when, if we don’t do something about it quickly.”

The order-out-of-chaos environmental movement was invented by Edmond de Rothchild, funded by the Rockefellers and others, and globally marketed by Maurice Strong who was heavily rewarded for his efforts:

“Maurice Strong, a UN Official and employee of Rockefeller and Rothchild trusts and projects, convened the first environmental congress in Stockholm , Sweden, in 1972. By 1992 Maurice Strong was the Secretary General and convener of UNCED at the World Summit Meeting.”


Mr. Hunt didn’t believe it was too late then, and over twenty years later I still share those same sentiments. Even so, it is certainly much, much later than it was before.

In summary, the fact of the matter is, there are, and always have been, two completely different realities competing for full manifestation. I ask you once more to give them both, and their inevitable outcomes, some serious consideration and deliberation while the choices are easier to make and still available. The crossroad is on (y)our doorstep, so please, share this information with others so they may do the same. Do we really want to live in a world where our personal right to self-determination—and everything that right represents—has been written out of the script? —The Roles of Perception Management & Social Engineering in Reality Revisionism




  2. Sure ur aware that I can’t share via fb. And likely traffic through here is monitored.
    You know I’ve always said to myself about unexplained marks on my forehead that I’m a nobody, why would I be targeted for monitoring, and joked when others inquired about the marks I was abducted. I really wonder now if maybe,….note: to you that monitor. You better take me down now cause I’m catch on. If you allowed me this that means two ways, I will fullfill my purpose,


    • This is but another reason eugenic globalists must be removed from their positions of power–abductions are the work of black-ops, not aliens. This topic was covered in a RWT episode, number six if i’m not mistaken. Today, everyone is monitored everywhere, not to find “terrorists” but to identify the heretics and dissenters from the “official” narrative of reality. That dissenters are slowly being re-branded as terrorists, as discussed in previous radio interviews and reality revisionism essays, only proves the point. Thank you for your comments.


      • Thx, for you response. Here is what I See, and seek ansewrs to have purpose to live for. since I’ve gotten real interest in all of this. My original plan I discovered is mostly done. FIRSTLY, I will and yes have seen people who stand up that ARE eliminated. I see everything except action is taking place. Just throwing more evidence, claiming it there action, action that no matter what’s real or disinformation, all people would at least admit there is SOMeTHING, wrong with this world. Uniting fractions that should , be the reason to do so. What can I kick start? I’ve ideas . But no way doing so


      • Thx, for you response. Here is what I See, and seek ansewrs to have purpose to live for. since I’ve gotten real interest in all of this. My original plan I discovered is mostly done. FIRSTLY, I will and yes have seen people who stand up that ARE eliminated. I see everything except action is taking place. Just throwing more evidence, claiming it there action, action that no matter what’s real or disinformation, all people would at least admit there is SOMeTHING, wrong with this world. Uniting fractions that should , be the reason to do so. What can I kick start? I’ve ideas . But no way doing so, alone. Nothing the way this is posting, hmm


  3. Thank you, Crystal, for taking the time and effort to compose this discourse, as a detailed reminder that our lives have been governed by dialectic. As usual, trying to discuss these topics with the locals often results in getting beat down yet again by those who never even heard of Hegel, albeit his principles having been unknowingly pounded up their backsides since birth.

    Mhairead: I seem to recall a statistic not long ago that allopathic medical treatment via pharma was the third leading cause of death in this country.


  4. Thanks Crystal ~ I sincerely hope this (as with all your extensive writings) will encourage people to not only see differently but to think about what they see and take up the reins of their own lives more effectively, which includes not just waiting for good souls like yourself to spell it our for them, but, to get into the research as well as the evidence that is out there ‘in plain sight’. Your perception is sharp and it is an edge we can all benefit from – I also hope the people who do read this will be able to find some appreciation for the hard work that has gone into this post, and its partner articles ~ much appreciation, R


  5. Reading Jon Rappaport’s blog just before you posted this and it contains this
    *In his 2003 Memoirs, David Rockefeller wrote: “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” -Rockefeller is acutely aware that one of the prime strategies for bringing his dream (nightmare) to fruition is: a one-world, all-embracing medical apparatus.
    There are some who welcome such an enterprise, naively believing it will mean greater health for all. For them, I cite (as I frequently do) Dr. Barbara Starfield’s shattering review: “Is US health really the best in the world?”
    Starfield was a revered public-health expert working at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Her review was published on July 26, 2000, in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Starfield concluded that, every year in the US, the medical system directly kills 225,000 people. Every year. * http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?ca=68afb5db-fa3d-40a5-a9f5-8c6c0b6f1976&c=c2257b50-4c92-11e4-84e8-d4ae527547e4&ch=c22972f0-4c92-11e4-84e8-d4ae527547e4


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s