THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE PART 2: INDOCTORNATION WORLD PREMIERE

THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE PART 2: INDOCTORNATION WORLD PREMIERE (THE LOCK STEP PLANNED DEMIC)

August 28, 2020

INDOCTORNATION WORLD PREMIERE

The following documentary is excellent, and it’s everything the main stream media should have reported on and didn’t–something they should one day be held accountable (legally liable) for. This documentary is a huge service to us all and has also personally saved me hours of writing this second WOK (War on Knowledge) essay.

I caution the reader against a listen-only review as there are two streams of data being offered simultaneously. While those in the film are narrating and paraphrasing what they uncovered, on the screen they are showing copies of the documents, articles, memos and patents that big tech censors will inevitably try to remove any trace of–they are showing visual proof of their assertions–some of which is far more detailed and shocking than their paraphrasing.

Because the documentary covers so many things I had intended to cover here (and so many I didn’t), and does such a brilliant job of it, there are only a few points I would like to highlight because they add depth and context to so many other interrelated happenings. First and foremost, in an effort to encourage the reader to watch and share it with friends and family, the video starts (10:52), with testimony being provided by an Intelligence Analyst and founder of IQ100 Index (NYSE):

“I’m the developer of Linguistic Genomics, the platform on which you could determine the intent of communication, rather than the literal artifact, but we’ve also used that technology for a number of other applications, in defense, intelligence and finance, and most notably for bringing down what was, at the time, the largest tax fraud in U.S. history. We maintained a series of inquiries into every individual, every organization, and every company that is involved in anything that either blurs the line of biological and chemical weapons, or crosses that line–in any of the 168 countries.

In 1999 there were a million patents digitized by IBM, and those million patents were the first time human innovation had been put into an electronic digital searchable format. We took that information and we did a very simple exercise using our linguistic genomics technology. I made the horrific assessment that approximately one-third of all patents filed in the United States were functional forgeries. Meaning that, while they had linguistic variations, they actually covered the same subject matter. In 1999 patents on corona viruses started showing up, and thus began the rabbit trail.

In 2003, the CDC saw the possibility for a gold strike, and that was the corona virus outbreak that happened in Asia. They saw a virus they knew could be easily manipulated and as something that was very valuable. In 2003 they sought to patent it, and they made sure they controlled the proprietary rights to the disease, to the virus, and to its detection and all measurement of it. We know, that Anthony Fauci, that Ralph Banic, that the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and a laundry list of people who wanted to take credit for inventing corona virus, were at the hub of this story. From 2003-2018 they controlled 100% of the cash flow that built the empire around the industrial complex of corona virus.

While we knew that corona virus manipulation started with Dr. Ralph Baric in 1999 (Ralph Baric, PhD, Professor or Microbiology and Immunology)–Ralph Baric does research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, who’s famous for his chimeric corona virus research. In 2000, there was a recognition that the corona virus was seen as an exploitable mechanism for both good and ill. On March 25, 2003 the US CDC filed a patent (patent numbers are provided on screen) on the corona virus transmitted to humans.

Under 35 Code US Section 101, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either, SARS corona virus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal, or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws. If it was natural, filing a patent on it was illegal. In either case, both are illegal.

In the spring (May 14) of 2007 the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their application confidential and private. They actually filed patents on not only the virus, but the they also filed patents on its detection, and a kit to measure it. Because of that CDC patent, they had the ability to control who was authorized, and who was not authorized, to make independent inquiries into corona viruses. You cannot look at the virus, you cannot measure it, and you cannot develop a test kit for it. And by ultimately receiving the patents that constrained anyone from using it, they had 1. the means, 2. the motive, 3. and most of all, they had the monetary gain, from turning corona virus from a pathogen to profit.

Those shocking revelations suggest, at the very least, the CDC is another rogue agency that has illegally patented a corona virus (with the intent to keep that secret) while also patenting its detection and a kit to measure it. The latter two measures read more like an insurance policy that would go a long way in keeping ‘unauthorized’ prying eyes from conducting independent investigations. Interestingly enough, and perhaps through using the Emergency Use Authorization Act in an attempt to get around that monopoly (and anything nefarious it may be concealing), that may explain why Trump held a press conference on March 29, 2020 and made the following statement:

“On Friday the FDA authorized a new (covid) test developed by Abbot labs that delivers lightening fast results in as little as five minutes. That’s a whole new ballgame. I want to thank Abbot labs for the incredible work they’ve done–they have been working around the clock. Normally this approval process from the FDA would take 10 months or longer, but we did it in 4 weeks. (Reported the same day by CBS New York: Trump: Corona Virus Rapid Tests on the Way.)

A few months later (in July 2020) the main stream media was littered with the headline, “Trump Strips CDC of Control of Coronavirus Data,” which they then used as a bludgeon to imply he was incompetent at handling the situation. Yet, based on what this documentary reveals, remembering that all three patents are visually presented, it would appear Trump was far more competent (and informed) than the CDC especially, would have appreciated. In stripping the CDC of their control over Corona virus data, hospitals were ordered to bypass the CDC (National Healthcare Safety Network site–the primary CDC system) and instead send all patient data directly to a central database in Washington. The corrupt media, in unison, all framed the move as a ‘Trump admin hates transparency’ issue, but clearly, when it comes to the corona virus, its the CDC that has transparency issues.

There’s no indication Abbott intended to produce these tests for other nations, which is unfortunate given that Tanzanian president John Magufuli, attempting to vet the efficacy of the tests he was provided, submitted samples from goats, sheep and a pawpaw fruit with human names–all of which came back with positive results for the virus. The reader may also recall, as discussed in a previous post, the President of Madagascar claimed the World Health Organization (WHO) offered a $20m bribe to poison an herbal remedy called COVID-19 Organics made from Artemisia–a remedy he claims can cure COVID-19 patients within ten days.

I realize people don’t want to believe this level of corruption has been (and still is) happening for decades, especially when so many lives are at stake, but also covered in the documentary (but again not by the main stream media) was another shocking revelation from ex-Google engineer turned whistle-blower Zach Vorhies. Given that depopulation is a major goal of globalism, and Google is a globalist corporation, this really shouldn’t shock people anymore:

Zach Vorhies (22:16) “The ‘blacklist’ is something that Google said, didn’t exist–and they testified that under oath. Now me, as an engineer, I just did a search on Google’s internal search engine, and guess what I found? It had blacklisted search terms for [things like] “cancer cures”. Why is Google deciding what people can and cannot search for?”

THE REALITY REVISIONISM TRIFECTA: MOCKING BIRDS, NARRATIVE ENFORCERS & FAKE FACT CHECKERS

“What was once an efficient tool for navigating the world of information, is now a network for global surveillance, data collection, and social engineering.”

–documentary narrator

Operation Mockingbird

Operation Mockingbird is covered around the 31:00 mark, and includes vintage footage of Ex-C!A officer John Stockwell answering the following question during a television interview: How often does the C!A manipulate media this way?

John Stockwell (31:53): It goes beyond your wildest imagination. Setting up student organization so they can draw radical students in, 5000 university professors co-opted to help the C!A manipulate people’s minds, journalists in the US, including big name journalists co-opted to function routinely to help the C!A put out stories and biases to the world. As this 1952 C!A memo says, the aim is “controlling an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will.”

Operation Mockingbird is why you can find compilation videos showing dozens of local news stations from around the nation all parroting the exact same talking points on the same day–literally word for word–clearly indicating those talking points are pushed down from higher up the chain. Instead of thousands of local media reporters, we have thousands of local (and national) media repeaters. Most reality miners have been aware of Operation Mockingbird for years, but in exploring what was done to Dr. Judy Mikovits, the film does a fantastic job illustrating the true reach and power of the reality revisionism trifecta. 

Fake Fact Checkers 

“Most fact checkers are neither independent nor factual–they are political.”

The documentary briefly covers funding sources of ‘fact checker’ organs, which includes the usual suspects (Google, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Soros). A deeper dive into the people and money driving fake fact-checking was done by award-winning journalist Sharyl Attkisson while investigating Facebook’s formation of an “independent oversight board” with authority to allow or remove content from Facebook and Instagram, and its assurances as to the diversity of the board members. What she found to be true instead, is that “18 of its 20 members collaborated with or are tied to groups that have received funding from George Soros’ Open Society Foundations – which is one of the most well-funded and influential progressive organizations in the country.” Attkisson included a complete list of those board members and their individual ties to Soros.

These same fake fact checkers also lied about Dr. Mikovits:

(23:51)  When Dr. Mikovits claimed she was arrested without a warrant and jailed without charge (for trying to warn the world about vaccines contaminated with XMRVs), Snopes rated the comment as false. Had they bothered to explore the arrest documents, they would have seen that indeed, there was neither a warrant nor signatures to officiate a charge. In fact I confirmed this with members of the Mikovits legal team. [24:12 is a video clip of Mikovits’ attorney, David J. Follin admitting this is 100% correct–Judy has never been charged with any crime].

Where the rona is concerned especially, the trifecta operates a tight ship in censoring and slandering anyone and anything that doesn’t abide the scripted narrative. The film necessarily covers the sordid history of Snopes and how they and other fact checking sites (factcheckdotorg) raced to quash the fact that the virus, its testing and treatments, was indeed patented. Anything outside of the preferred narrative (also being pushed down from higher up the chain) was and is being censored and slapped with a “false” label. Facebook joined in when it vowed to remove any information it didn’t deem factual–aka anything not falling in line with narratives presented (pushed down) by the WHO & NIH–especially when it comes to vaccines. This phenomenon is well covered in the film:

“See, the problem with all of this is right in front of our face, and when confronted with evidence, we are told the fact-checkers are transcendent.”

Weaponized Wikipedia

Wikipedia has been known to be a cog in the smear machine, but in so doing, is also a form of fake fact checking. This was also done to the biography page of Dr. Mikovits and covered in the documentary:

“Wikipedia, what has been an unbiased open source platform, is now weaponized to undermine the work and reputation of anyone deemed a threat to its stakeholders [the new narrative]. And once they smear you [on your personal wikipedia biography page] they lock you out from making corrections to your own bio.”

Unfortunately for victims of a weaponized wikipedia, Alexa is programmed to regurgitate the smears. This is demonstrated at the 25:26 mark as Alexa provides the following response to being asked, “Who is Dr. Judy Mikovits?”

“According to wikipedia…a former American research scientist who is known for her discredited medical claims, she has been described as an anti-vaccination activist and promoter of conspiracy theories, and has been accused of scientific misconduct.”

The media

One of the hopeful things that I’ve discovered is that nearly every war that has started in the past 50 years has been a result of media lies. The media could have stopped it if they’d searched deep enough–if they hadn’t reprinted government propaganda they could have stopped it. But what does that mean? Well, that means basically populations don’t like wars, and populations have to be fooled into wars. Populations don’t willingly and with open eyes go into war. So, if we have a good media environment, then you will also have a peaceful environment.

Our number one enemy is ignorance, and I believe that is the number one enemy that everyone is not understanding–not understanding what is actually going on in the world. It’s only when you start to understand that you can make effective decisions and effective plans. Now, the question is, who is promoting ignorance? Well, those organizations that try to keep things secret, and those organizations which distort true information to make it false, or misrepresentative. In this latter category, it is bad media. It really is my opinion that the media in general are so bad, we have to question whether the world wouldn’t be better off without them altogether. –Julianne Assange (2011)

While Assange referred to the problem as “bad” media–a far more respectable label than they deserve–if we bottom-line the role of bad media in the drowning in absurdity (death by ignorance) paradigm, we ultimately find that a hell of a lot more people would still be alive today without them. Smelling blood in the water, and having apparently developed a taste for it, the main stream media is being no more honest with the public over the rona than they were about all those wars. The appalling role of the media in this scenario was also covered in depth in the first WOK (war on knowledge) essay:

Is it a crime for the media to know about a cure for a disease or global pandemic (!) and either refuse to report it, or even propagandize the public into believing it might actually kill you instead?! Is it a crime for big tech to do the same by erasing it from the collective consciousness as quickly as possible and planting ‘we removed this because it’s dangerous and misleading content’ gibberish in its place?! If not, it certainly should be. There’s something very, very wrong when main stream news outlets around the world have sided with a power-hungry, fanatical, global death cult trying to install themselves as our new forever-leaders, and in so doing, are purposefully hiding or slandering life-saving medicines from the global populace. Are the days of red purges ‘on the wall’ being replaced with something more silent and sinister, including silence itself?

Dr. Simone Gold’s comments (during her appearance with Tucker Carlson) were extremely eye-opening while explaining why they (doctors)  felt so compelled to hold their own press conference to begin with:

“We came to Washington because we’re so distressed. You know, front line doctors like myself are seeing patients not get what they need–we’re seeing the doctor-patient relationship completely eroded–that the governors are empowering pharmacists to override doctors who have conversations with their patients. It’s really something that America should be concerned about.”

Tucker Carlson’s follow-up question is also extremely thought provoking regarding current trends in today’s cancel culture:

“Shouldn’t you, as a practicing physician with a medical degree, be allowed to express your views on science as you practice it without being censored?”

One of the doctors in the aforementioned press conference explained she had personally and successfully treated (meaning none of them died) over 300 COVID patients with HCQ, some elderly and some having serious ‘co-morbidity’ factors–and she did it with the same therapeutic the media has literally been calling deadly. When did the media bobble-heads get medical degrees allowing them to legally give the entire country ‘medical advice’? The same goes for your local governors and mayors following suit by actually banning the use of this life-saving drug. The class action lawsuits over this should be numerous, spectacular and filed with haste. [In case you missed it, Dr. Gold rebuilt the website big tech censors canceled–you can find it here: America’s Front Line Doctors Summit]

Assange discovered that if lies can be used to start wars (kill people) then the truth can be used to end them (save people). I whole-heartedly agree yet would love to expand that understanding beyond the borders of some far off middle-eastern war theater. There is not ‘a’ war happening in some far off place to people we don’t know. Rather THE war is happening to everyone around the world at the same time–the globalist war against 9 out of every 10 people on the earth–which includes (but is not limited to) kinetic wars in far off places, depending on your location. These seemingly disparate events are all aspects of a singular war against a reality that globalism is attempting to revise and replace with itself–just like a virus.

Because most people really are good people and therefore have to be lied (fooled) into wars–have to be lied into participating in the demise of themselves and others–the media has become the source of an infection once referred to as a lie virus or lierus. In scientific terms (modified from wikipedia):

Lierus replication is the formation of mind viruses during the infection process (media propaganda) in the target host cell (audience mind). Lieruses must first get into the cell (mind) before lieral replication can occur. Through the generation of abundant copies (Project Mockingbird) and propaganda packaging these copies, the lierus continues infecting new hosts. Replication of lieruses is greatly varied depending on the goodness (conscience) and health of the immune response (factual knowledge base) of the host.

THE PLANNED DEMIC–WAS ALL OF THIS REALLY PLANNED?

The evidence supporting that conclusion is voluminous and overwhelming, yet still largely hidden from the general public by a complicit cover-up media. The evidence in my view, necessarily includes Dr. Mikovits’ early discoveries of the XMRV’s and subsequent attempts to murder, slander, and destroy her life, finances, career and reputation for trying to warn the world about her discoveries.

Becoming more reality literate with a history lesson on John D.  Rockefeller

In 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation produced a paper on global pandemic scenarios called SCENARIOS FOR THE FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY & INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT–A FICTIONAL SCENARIO. While the documentary does cover the paper briefly, more important to the machinery of the beast, is the backstory (also in the film) of the Rockefeller take-over of medicine, covered at the 48:30 mark. These events were massive, massive reality revisions that still haunt us today:

“Around the same time John D. Rockefeller seized US media he also hijacked US medicine. When it was discovered drugs could be produced with petroleum, America’s top oil mogul ordered his army of propagandists to invert reality accordingly. [Natural] Medicines used for thousands of years were suddenly classified as ‘alternative’–while the new, petroleum-based, highly addictive and patentable drugs were declared the new gold standard.

After buying the German pharmaceutical company that manufactured chemicals of war for Adolf Hitler, Rockefeller leveraged his political influence by pressing congress to declare natural healing modalities ‘unscientific quackery’. Rockefeller then took control of the American Medical Association (AMA) and began offering massive grants to top medical schools, under the mandate, that only his approved curriculum be taught. Any mention of the healing power of herbs, plants or diet, was erased from most medical text books. Doctors and Professors who objected to Rockefeller’s plan were crucified by the media, removed from the AMA, and stripped of their licenses to teach and practice medicine. Those who dared to speak out where arrested and jailed. 

When it began to emerge that petroleum-based medicines were causing cancer, Mr. Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society, through which he suppressed that information. John D. Rockefeller is duly credited as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry, and the reason that medical error is currently the 3rd leading cause of death in America.

This is not an indictment against doctors. More than anyone, they are under the stranglehold of the single greatest lobbying power in Washington. Every year, the pharmaceutical industry spends at least twice the amount as big oil to influence laws, policies, and public perception. Thanks to Mr. Rockefeller, the architect of American monopolies, no industry has more power over our lives than big pharma.”

Destroying the reputations of doctors/scientists who speak out against these agendas, or arresting and jailing them, as Dr. Judy Mikovits discovered the hard way, is not a new phenomenon–this has all happened before. This history lesson also helps us better understand the events behind the origin of the FDA proclamation that “only a drug can cure, prevent or treat a disease,” which is also why its illegal for anyone healing with ‘alternative’ medicine (live Vitamin C) to make those same claims–Vitamin C can’t be patented–drugs can.

The 2010 Rockefeller Foundation program called SCENARIOS FOR THE FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY & INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT–A [NOT SO] FICTIONAL SCENARIO.

While Rockefeller’s role in shaping our current reality is worth watching the documentary for alone, when it comes to the 2010 paper put out by the Rockefeller Foundation, here’s a link to secondary source discussing a particularly revealing section of the program called Lock Step. The gentleman being interviewed about this paper–particularly the Lock Step section–is clearly extremely disturbed by what it says, as we all would have been if the media had reported on it a decade ago.

In the first few minutes, the guest being interviewed (secondary source) makes reference to Ebola before going into Lock Step, which I thought was interesting given something the Planned Demic documentary covered at 18:16 when interviewing Maryl Nass, MD, Physician, Researcher and Writer. The very first thing she says is shocking:

I was the first person in the world to look at an epidemic and study its characteristics and prove it was due to biological warfare–it’s not a natural occurrence. So I published that 28 years ago [Anthrax: Epizootic in Zimbabwe, 1978-1980: Due to Deliberate Spread]. Early in this [corona] pandemic, I did not think this pandemic was a natural occurrence from bats. I felt quite convinced this was a laboratory designed organism. There have been hundreds and hundreds of leaks from high containment labs that do research on pathogenic corona viruses and other potentially lethal organisms.

I was particularly interested in a paper that came out in Nature Medicine by 5 scientists [one of which was Ian Lipkin] claiming it was definitely a natural occurrence rather than a lab construct. But the arguments they used did not hold water, they didn’t really make a lot of scientific sense, and yet all kinds of ‘very important’ people started parroting what this paper said, and so that of course go me scratching my head saying, why are all these people risking their reputations when it’s obviously illogical–doesn’t hold water–somebody must have made them publish this AND somebody must have told these other people that they have to say its a great piece of science.”

That’s a serious claim–somebody must have made them publish this AND somebody must have told them support it as legitimate science–should the claim be taken seriously? Most certainly, especially after whistle-blower claims made in the recently released documentary ShadowGate, explained how the program was used to ‘micro-target’ individuals to get them to move in specific directions or behave in certain ways. How that may be exploited was covered in the WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE post. Below are some highlights:

At the 6:47 mark of the documentary, Tore (Linguist, Naval Intelligence contractor) explains her job was called “localization,” a strategy wherein particular groups are specifically targeted, ranging from “a whole country, city, a certain religious group, a 6-block radius like CHAZ,” and you then try to get into their heads: what they eat, how they walk, talk, think, what makes them happy or sad, what drives them nuts and what buttons to push to get the required response–and then you opportunize that data (use it against them). She points out this can be done to alter ideology, sell certain products, or function as a form of behavioral modification in getting people to move in a “pre-determined direction”.

The use of data harvesting in these operations also, and perhaps even more importantly, includes mining a key (targeted) individual’s data to look for blackmail material, which of course is an extremely powerful motivator for getting people to fall in line. Threatening to fire people, ruin their careers and destroy their reputations is also a common technique, as was the case with Dr. Judy Mikovits. Her refusal to ‘modify her behavior’ as requested soon became an example to others as the threats were made good on, including an attempt on her life. In Part 1 of this WOK (War on Knowledge) essay series there were also numerous examples of dead ‘natural medicine’ doctors, biologists, and even an CDC whistle-blower whose body was found in a river two months after he disappeared.

Lock Step

Returning to the paper published by the Rockefeller Foundation, SCENARIOS FOR THE FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY & INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT–A FICTIONAL SCENARIO, the Lock Step section begins on page 18 of the document, and starts out with a critical admission as to what these ‘scenarios’ are really meant to achieve:

“A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen push-back.”

The documentary displays this section (Lock Step) of the paper at the 43:07 mark:

“During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from mandatory wearing of face masks to body temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.”

Event 201

Event 201 was another global pandemic scenario exploration event covered in the documentary at the 37:55 mark:

“My systems flagged anomalies when I started seeing non-profits and corporates and cover financing for corona virus programs in the late summer and fall of 2019. Our first red flag came when we read, A WORLD AT RISK SCENARIO. Now there is an organization called the Global Monitoring Preparedness Board. This organization is a part of the World Health Organization (WHO), and this board includes Dr. Chris Elias of the Gates Foundation, and Anthony Fauci from NIAID. These individuals, plus the Director General for the Center for Disease Control in China, came out with a recommendation that says by September of 2020, two global pandemic exercises have to be completed. And one of them has to be done on the release of a respiratory pathogen. That then gave rise to an October event–Event 201. Event 201 took place months before covid was declared a pandemic. It was a scripted, multi-camera event broadcast globally via the internet–something Fauci and Bill Gates have been predicting for years.

Every single thing you have seen play out in their ‘tabletop’ exercise–which, by the way, fact checkers have said, has nothing to do with the covid outbreak–just happenstance. This is the wonderful universe of improbabilities where events just co-emerge and then nature conveniently backs itself into our architecture [predicted scenario]. That’s the scenario [narrative] we’re supposed to accept.

Event 201 was not the first scripted exercise to prophesize the future with astounding accuracy. Leaders of global health and businesses have been seeding reality with fictional scenarios for several decades. A year before event 201, many of the same sponsors, hosts and actors came together to produce a tabletop pandemic simulation for a fictional virus they branded CLADEX.”

PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING IS USED FOR PRE-PLANNED EVENTS

The changes being made to the world under the guise of a pandemic are the the most sweeping globalist reality revisions yet. And while social engineering and perception management are the main tools used to pull off a reality revision, they have a cousin that also often shows up to the party, usually arriving first: predictive programming. Predictive Programming is used to bypass and pre-empty the otherwise normal response to sudden, dramatic events that deviate wildly from ‘normalcy’–that reaction being shock, followed by disbelief and then rejection. In order to avoid that public reaction to an upcoming planned event, predictive programming operates slowly, over long periods of time, through continually and repeatedly re-introducing (seeding) the idea of the event into the collective consciousness. This not only bypasses the normal shock/rejection response, but effectively numbs the public to it while also creating an expectation for it: “It wouldn’t surprise me if a real pandemic happens soon”. Exactly.

Predictive programming as a foreshadowing of events, when understood this way, can be used by reality miners very much the same way as having historical knowledge of the way anti-intellectualism (dumbing down and purging intellectuals from society) can and should be read as a portent–something wicked this way comes. Very much like observing the changes in language coming from officialdom, not only does reading predictive programming tell you a change is coming, but will also tell you what that change is.

Predictive programming can also be weaponized for the kind of ‘micro-targeting’ revealed in WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE and IDEOLOGICAL SUBVERSION. There’s a reason today’s tween and twenty-something ‘social just warriors’ were micro-targeted repeatedly during their childhood with age-specific repetition of ‘global warming’ and/or ‘the world is dying because it’s overpopulated’. That was, for all intents and purposes, a rather effective and decades long recruitment campaign that now has them acting as agents of the globalist agenda in handing the entire world over to globalist corporations under the false pretense of doing the exact opposite. That issue was covered in depth in a previous essay called THE DEFUND ENDGAME PART 2: TRANSITIONING LOCAL CITIZENS TO GLOBAL CITIZENS.

That remarkably successfully recruitment campaign was accomplished through social engineering, perception management, ideological subversion, predictive programming, AND the exact same kind of military grade social media weaponization (including micro-targeting) exposed in the ShadowGate documentary. The exact same kind of campaign used to get locals in a foreign nation to side with the Taliban, in my view, has been used against our own children to get them to unwittingly side with globalism:

“For people who didn’t take the time to watch the documentary before it was scrubbed, the impact crater of him saying, “because the same thing I was hired to do by General Jones overseas, is what i’m seeing them doing right now, here in America,” isn’t going to sink in any deeper than the “fake news is the enemy of the people” slogan.

However, for those that did take the time, I trust you’ll recall the other individual featured in the documentary (Tore) explaining how ‘localization’ was used against the citizens of a foreign nation in trying to get them to side with the Taliban—a political group that was now becoming militant (physically violent)–and trying to convince locals that siding with them would keep things like their local businesses from being destroyed. If that doesn’t sound hauntingly familiar to what’s been happening in this country lately, you haven’t been paying attention.” –WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE (ShadowGate)

Predictive programming requires a broadcast medium with both broad and micro-targeted reach. Hollywood produces most of it and the media (all forms) sell and market it. As an example, it’s not a coincidence that two of the most recent blockbuster film series, Marvel’s Universe and Godzilla, had story lines centered on needing to depopulate the earth/universe as means to ‘save’ it. This can also be done in other subtle, more sub-conscious ways, like the Nike poster advertising a new shoe with an image of it being worn on a leg that had the flesh blown off, just before the Boston marathon bombing took place.

In fact, a startling example of this was also in the latest Godzilla film, and it was done in such a way that only veteran reality miners and pre-targeted youth–being micro-targeted in the absence of parental knowledge and guidance–would have noticed. Every good campaign has a slogan and logo, and in this case it was the “extinction rebellion” symbol splattered throughout the Godzilla movie in a culty, product placement kind of way. The symbol is made from two triangles that youth adherents to the movement are told represents an hour glass, but the historical significance of the symbol comes from metal slave collars worn around the neck–these had four, long, protruding metal arms extending from the center ring around the neck–two on each side, forming a double triangle. Perhaps even more telling, was the use of the symbol throughout Godzilla in a sideways position (more akin to the slave collar), which would be more representative of that “form of behavioral modification in getting people to move in a “pre-determined direction,” and “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen push-back,” we’ve been hearing so much about–all to ‘keep us safe’ from mythical global warming and a patented, pre-planned pandemic. An image of the slave collar, and the interrelated (with current events) story behind it, can be found at the 12:58 mark of a fascinating interview with Bishop Larry Gaiters. 

Predictive programming (often in conjunction with ideological subversion, social engineering and perception management) is done over an extended period of time, often many decades, for the sole reason the event IS BEING PRE-PLANNED. Where pandemic narratives and scenarios are specifically concerned we can look back over the last 20 years and see it’s endless and intensive streaming into the collective mind. But above and beyond the litany of re-worked plague, contagion and zombie movies, the most startling example for many of us was the 2012 London Olympics opening ceremony.

That was a particularly disturbing display for reality miners around the world at the time, and included everything from laid out rows of hospital beds, the giant effigy of a dead baby, a reaper (as Voldemort with a magic wand), police state elements (police in riot gear with fences), dancing nurses, bizarre creatures with glowing green eyes going after the children, a giant phoenix (representing a new world being built on the ashes of the old one) flying over the world’s nations in flames below while the band Take That sang “Rule the World,” and eventually John Lennon was even shown singing “imagine there’s no countries”–all being performed in an arena rimmed by 15 metal pyramids with capstones on them. The Vigilante Citizen wrote a great article on the event and its symbology, and I’m not surprised to see others now wondering if certain elements of both the arena and strange choreography being performed within weren’t meant to represent the virus itself.

THE GATES OF HELL: MAKING A KILLING

It’s a standing joke that someone who isn’t a doctor or scientist, and wasn’t able to keep viruses out of his own software, has no business trying to save the human race from viruses. What most people today don’t consider, something that was more of a hot topic when writing my first book over a decade ago, is that software developers are the most likely source for the viruses that infected their own software. Not only do they have the most motive because they then turn around and sell the anti-virus software, but it’s one of the first and most deviously brilliant technological shake downs perpetrated on consumers in that industry.

More importantly, at this point I think it would be foolish not to heavily consider that the same thing is now being done to the biological operating systems of human beings, with viruses being made by those who will profit the most from the sale of biological anti-virus software (vaccines)–at the very least. All things considered, although they never came right and said it, isn’t that the real underlying premise of the data collected in the documentary? The same people involved in the creation and patenting of the virus are also the ones involved in pimping the vaccines for it? Even to the point of attempting to forcibly mandate the vaccine for seven billion people. The profit margins on that aspect alone would be obscene, especially when, as the documentary points out, the research and development of the vaccines is paid for by the taxpayers.

Gates is an extremely controversial person for numerous reasons, some of which were covered in the first WOK essay, especially where anti-intellectualism (dumbing down) is concerned in relation to the Common Core curriculum that Bill Gates pushed for, which also includes the sexualization of young children (pedophilic grooming). When people don’t know this, the fact that Gates was a known funder and associate of Jeffrey Epstein, the character of man trying to force vaccines on seven billion people doesn’t get the attention it deserves. Fortunately, this too was covered in the documentary–what kind of man is he? If we do a product review of Gates and his previous attempts at ‘philanthropy’ what comes up? For those who haven’t read it, this particular review came from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and was included in the first WOK essay. https://fort-russ.com/2020/04/robert-f-kennedy-jr-exposes-bill-gates-vaccine-dictatorship-plan-cites-gates-twisted-messiah-complex/

“Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India ‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines.

In 2014, the GatesFoundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.

During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers”

The Planned Demic Documentary does it’s own product review of Gates which is equally revealing and disturbing. Below are 2 clips from that section of the documentary (freely provided for distribution by the makers of the documentary) which include the following topics:

  • Gates did not come from humble beginnings–his grandfather and great grandfather were banking moguls and his father was a prominent Seattle-based lawyer and political activist
  • Gates did not invent the windows operating system–he bought it, had it modified, and licensed it to IBM
  • Bill Gates admitted in a television interview that when it comes to vaccines, the financial return on investment is 20-1
  • Bill Gates 2.0: Gates opened the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation as part of re-branding (reality revision) campaign after the anti-trust lawsuit gave him the reputation of a ruthless tech monopolizer. It worked so well his net worth doubled giving him the title of the richest man in the world
  • While Microsoft’s co-founder Paul Allen was battling cancer and undergoing chemo therapy, Gates attempted to cheat him out of his share of the company fortune
  • Gates’ involvement with and ties to the world’s most notorious pedophile (Epstein)
  • Gates’ funding of an experiment to literally block out the sun (in the name of fighting the mythical global warming)–what some rightfully refer to as planetary genocide
  • Gates’ funding of a global satellite surveillance system to monitor the personal activity of every human being on earth 24/7
  • Gates’ partnership with MIT relating to an “immunity passport” and vaccines that can be injected under the skin along with medical records which can be scanned by authorities to prove vaccine compliance (the quantum dot tattoo)
  • The Gates vaccine scandal in India investigated by their government–after his vaccines killed and damaged their children

BILL GATES AND PROJECT ARTEMIS

The reader may have noticed I have not been using the correct title or spelling for the documentary, nor have I provided a direct link beyond that found in the graphic image at the beginning of this page. The reason for that, in my opinion, is Project Artemis. Before I explain, below are three different comments copied directly from the page hosting the documentary (keeping in mind that texting/English as a second language are comment variables):

“will [with] the censorship of posting they can justify it through their community rules the fact that we can’t send the link in a private message on Facebook is a federal crime. It means they have acces to our private correspondence. I hope a very big law suit is coming their way”

“Cannot share on facebook in the UK – message reads ‘Your message couldn’t be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.’ Abusive? What a joke…”

“I’m not allowed to share the link to this video by fb Messenger”

Anti-intellectualism in the form of digital censorship (the big tech arm of cancel culture designed to eliminate competing views and realities) has nearly gone nuclear. While shadows of where they once stood have been burned onto the walls of our memories, even those will be painted over soon, as thousands and thousands of websites, FB pages, Youtube and twitter accounts have been deleted and purged by big tech censors in the last few months alone. This is a common and necessary tactic tyrants use, and it’s history (purge of intellectuals from society) was covered in the first WOK essay.

The progression of digital censorship intensified with going after public pages and accounts first, but soon the admins of private groups, some with hundreds of thousands of individual subscribers, were getting notices from FB saying their ‘group’ reach was being diminished because the group was posting ‘fake news’. This obviously means content and conversations happening in private groups is being monitored and censored, but people still hoped that personal, private messages were still considered a sacred cow unsullied by the censorship and surveillance apparatus. As the comments shared above indicate, people were clinging to that last vestige of privacy in the hopes of getting around the censorship–if you can no longer share knowledge with each other openly or in private groups, there’s still private messages. That too, it would seem, is being subjected to thought police voyeurism and tyranny.

Considering that private conversations, being had even in our homes, are also being listened to in the presence of cell phones, computers and in some cases perhaps even televisions (many smart TV’s now also equipped with cameras), should we really be surprised? What concerns me about this new form of censorship however, is not just its ties to Bill Gates and this latest venture coinciding with private message and chat monitoring, but also how that too may be used against people in the future. Even worse, keeping in mind this is coming from a man responsible for Common Core and who had business dealings with Epstein, this new surveillance program was released under the guise of “looking for pedophiles”. Before we get to that, I would first like to share the more common definitions of ‘grooming’:

grooming
n. Preparing a person for a position requiring skilled behavior, especially by providing opportunity for practice and guidance in making the right decisions.
n. The activity of getting dressed, washed and generally of neat appearance.
n. The activity of cleaning oneself or others by removing lice, ticks, dirt, etc. from the fur; — of animals.

Rarely (if ever) does one find any mention of pedophiles in relation to the word, yet there are few among us who don’t know what pedophilic grooming is. But here, in relation to Project Artemis, and the way people were forced to resort to private messages for information-sharing, I find the the first definition extremely important. As covered earlier, reality literate populations won’t tolerate drowning in absurdity (death by ignorance) because most people really are good people. In that sense, I personally believe that the real ‘grooming’ being targeted by Project Artemis has a lot more do with people trying to get around the thought police via private messages and chats–for the purpose of providing each other with “opportunities for practice and guidance in making the right decisions”— to be the true target of the project. With that in mind, the following information on Project Artemis comes from fightthenewdrugdotorg:

Project Artemis’ job is to spot patterns of communication in conversations. Then, based on those patterns of speech and the words being used in the conversation, the system will assign a rating for the likelihood that one of the participants is trying to groom the other. The rating part of the system is incredibly useful because it allows those using the system to flag higher risk conversations for human moderator review and, in some cases, to immediately send conversations that exhibit an imminent threat to law enforcement.

In tracking the movements, manipulative language, and grooming techniques used by sexual predators in flaggable conversations, the system will also provide experts with more information on how sexual predators operate online—which will allow Microsoft to increase the accuracy of the system’s flagging mechanism.

And while, according to the company’s chief digital safety officer, Courtney Gregoire, Microsoft has only been utilizing these techniques for several years on its own products, including on Skype and its Xbox platform, it has invited further contribution and engagement from other technology companies and organizations with the goal to improve and refine the system further.

In order to know how to improve and refine the system though, we first need to talk about how it works—let’s dive in.

So, then, how does Project Artemis actually work? Well, the truth is, we don’t really know. In fact, very few outside of Microsoft know, but that’s actually the key to the whole thing.

Why?

Because if Microsoft explains the precise words or patterns the tool hunts for, sexual predators could potentially adjust their behaviors to hide their activities and, essentially, rendering Project Artemis useless.

While the system still has some risks in that it might throw up false positives, since automated systems still struggle to understand the meaning and context of language, and in that it assumes that users permit their private communications to be read, Project Artemis has enough merit to make sexual predators think twice before they use online chat functions for exploiting children.

This is my personal perspective on Project Artemis, and given that Gates is a globalist, and covid is being used to install their long-held vision of a global, corporate, fascist, (surveillance) police state, and we know the thought police are attempting to also globalize a ‘social credit score’ based on personal disposition matrixes (grading our personal conformity and compliance to that agenda), I would personally find this particular rendition of the first paragraph on Project Artemis more believable:

Project Artemis’ job is to spot patterns of communication in conversations. Then, based on those patterns of speech and the words being used in the conversation, the system will assign a rating (social credit score) for the likelihood that one of the participants is trying to groom (provide meaningful knowledge outside of the pre-approved narrative) the other. The rating part of the system is incredibly useful because it allows thought police using the system to flag higher risk conversations for human moderator review and, in some cases, to immediately send conversations that exhibit an imminent threat to the narrative to thought police enforcement officers.

SUMMARY

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. –Voltaire

Not only do I hope the reader will take the time to watch and share the documentary with friends and loved ones (grooming them to become more reality literate so they may make better choices), but I hope the reader will also take the time to read the first WOK essay, before Part 3 is released. I understand some of these essays can be long, but again, the SUM TOTAL of these events is so much greater than their individual parts, and parting them out almost defeats their purpose-especially during a time when long-term memory has a way of getting lost in the shuffle. There are things we can’t afford to forget anymore, or fail to connect to other cogs in the wheel of an agenda working overtime take what’s left of every joy and freedom we have. Mankind can longer participate in their own demise out of ignorance and escape that demise at the same time.

All hands on deck.

“This isn’t a vaccine story–this is a population management story. If your goal is to make this beautiful earth that we live on, an exclusive playground for the entitled few, then populations that get in the way are a problem. And it is the empirical impulse of individuals who have decided, that by out-ranking the rest of humanity, they can dictate upon humanity the conditions of our existence…and this is also a test of humanity to see how much of our liberty we will let go, before finally drawing the line under enough.”

–Plandemic Indoctornation World Premier

 

 

 

 

UNSUSTAINABLE REALITY REVISIONS AND THE ORDER-OUT-OF-CHAOS BIRTH

janus_1UNSUSTAINABLE REALITY REVISIONS AND THE ORDER-OUT-OF-CHAOS BIRTH

October 19, 2014 by Crystal Clark

This second essay addresses the order-out-of-chaos principle in global revisionism, its ties to the duplicitous establishment of the green or sustainable development movement, associated economic revisions, the duplicity of pandemic narratives, and the hypocrisy of spreading democracy via illegal wars on what remains of sovereign nations and peoples. This essay also begins to identify and address the revisionists responsible.

REITERATION: REALITY REVISIONISM AND THE WAR OF COMPETING REALITIES

The definition of a reality revision is being re-posted below from the previous essay with a reminder that the purpose of reality revisionism is to quite literally eliminate the competition or competing reality—the reality standing in the way of the intended replacement.

REALITY REVISIONS BY DEFINITION

“Reality revisions are agenda-driven and thereby fictitious narratives carefully scripted to revise an entire global reality in order to meet or fulfill that agenda. These are major, major paradigm shifts of generational proportions that summarily pre and re-define the future victor and victimhood status of billions. These shifts aren’t meant to change the perception and therefore direction of reality for a day, week, or months, but permanently.” — The Roles of Social Engineering and Perception Management in Reality Revisionism

WARRING REALITIES: NEITHER VERSION IS FREE TO FULLY MANIFEST AS LONG AS THE OTHER ONE STILL EXISTS

Still largely unbeknownst to most, we live in world in which two competing realities are constantly struggling for full manifestation. As one of them seeks to wholly dominate and fully replace the other through various methods of suppression and eradication, while the other entirely rejects such notions to the degree of criminal prosecution, they cannot peacefully co-exist—ever.  As long as this struggle continues, so too will global war, famine, corruption, injustice and strife, and ultimately, the continued demise of our entire planetary civilization via the purposeful destruction of its life support systems. Mankind can no longer continue to participate in their own demise out of ignorance (of this war) and escape that demise at the same time.

This struggle is between the sovereign state, country or individual owning their own thought, action, and right to self-determination, and a private group of aspiring Caesars in the global governance regime they intend to replace the other reality with. This ultimate global reality revision cannot fully manifest without transferring, to itself, all of the sovereign power and freedoms of the other. Suffering numerous mattoid impediments, from the birth of this new and competing reality, the order-out-of-chaos principle thought necessary to achieve it was also born. From the previous essay:

“The events of 911 were a tipping point in a missive, GLOBAL reality revision meant to change the perception and therefore direction of reality permanently, and it isn’t the first. Repeatedly we were told these heinous acts of terrorism were committed by those who hate freedom and free people, which is the one thing they actually told the truth about. It’s important to remember that reality revisionists use these revisions to eliminate the competition or competing reality. It is an impossibility for an oppressive, elitist global government (for and by the elite) to establish itself among free peoples with governance established for and by the people. Their power ends where our freedoms begin—it’s like turning a dial—when you turn our freedoms down you turn their power up, and when you turn our freedoms up you dial their power down. These reality revisions are designed not to simply turn the freedom dial down, but to ultimately turn it off.”

ORDER-OUT-OF CHAOS METHODOLOGY IN REALITY REVISIONISM: THE INCOMPETENCE MEME AND HEGELIAN PRINCIPLE

In the same way our ignorance is their strength, and our individual freedoms inhibit their collective power, SO TOO IS OUR CHAOS THEIR ORDER—they cannot have the one without the other. In other words, what we view as unfolding global chaos is actually a carefully scripted and manufactured order—the current reality is being re-sculpted, redesigned and re-ordered.

I suspect this is most easily recognized in the ordered chaos of sovereign nations (competing realities) just before the reality revision of regime change (war) introduces them to the democracy narrative, allowing for the installation of a pro new order leader (hopeful legate) as in the recent attempt in Ukraine. That being after, of course, previous successful regime changes (reality revisions) made in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, ect, ect.

Perhaps surprisingly, the order-out-of-chaos principle has been playing out over and over again in the margins of society through Hollywood movies consistently representing this theme and characterized by a particular image:  a demonic or satanic figure standing triumphantly with a scorched and destroyed earth in the background. After watching these movies we often find ourselves wondering at the “logic” behind completely destroying a planet you then intend to rule over—what was the point? And yet, that is precisely the point of the order-out-of-chaos principle—the birth of a new civilization built on the ashes of the old one. Contemplation of the doctrine may conjure up images of the two-faced, Roman God Janus, for whom the month of January was named: God of beginnings, transitions and endings.

This principle includes the Hegelian dialectic, which is why we find pro new order officials (legionaries) espousing the benefits of “never letting a good crisis go to waste”. We also find world leaders (legates) publicly espousing the same for a coming new world order with a grin while their citizens are left to marvel at what is otherwise considered to be a profound and near complete lack of competence where any other matter of importance is concerned. Notice the recent proliferation of the ‘incompetence’ meme, especially where the ebola pandemic narrative is concerned, and yet, what is chaos (incompetence) to the fly is order for the spider (Caesar).

The Incompetence Meme: A Prolific Lateral Narrative Binder

The incompetence meme is a superior lateral narrative binder as it shifts thought patterns away from identifying nefarious intent, or the mindset behind planned chaos. The use of this narrative binder is aimed at preventing dissent from the official narrative by blocking or redirecting thought patterns that would otherwise lead to exposure. This isn’t to suggest that certain world leaders (legates) aren’t actually incompetent, but again, one man’s incompetence (chaos), is another man’s competent incompetence (order). The use of this particular later narrative binder is astonishingly prolific, being found in everything from complaints that Obama rarely attends national security briefings and is constantly on vacation, to the recent Washington Post article about the NBC News chief medical editor breaking a 21-day ebola quarantine to get ‘take-out food’. Currently, an internet search for the phrase “incompetence at Fukushima” doesn’t disappoint, and along those same lines one might wonder at a link between increasing police brutality and laws that prohibit the hiring those with a high IQ in the same profession. Regarding the latter, that too may be a lateral narrative binder being used to hide something else entirely.

The Hegelian Principle: An excerpt from THE MOST SECRET SCIENCE (1998 Edition), by Archibald E. Roberts, Lieutenant Colonel, AUS, retired

Revolutionaries in government have created economic chaos, shortages in food and fuel, confiscatory taxation, a crisis in education, the threat of war, and other diversions to condition Americans for The New World Order.

The technique is as old as politics itself. It is the Hegelian principle of bringing about change in a three-step process: Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis.

The first step (thesis) is to create a problem. The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic, hysteria). The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem created in step one—change which would have been impossible to impose on the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two.

Applying the Hegelian principle, and irresistible financial influence, concealed mattoids seek to dismantle social and political structures by which free men govern themselves—ancient landmarks erected at great cost in blood and treasure.

Their objective is to emasculate states, merge nations under universal government, centralize economic powers, and control the world’s people and resources.

REALITY REVISIONISM IS CONSTRUCTING THE NEW WORLD REALITY AND ORDER

“Will they blame the environmental holocaust on you and get away with it?” –Mr. George Hunt (1992)

Order-out-of-chaos methodology has several tentacles which necessarily include world banking and finance, and while purposefully creating chaos to destabilize the governments of other sovereign nations to achieve their new world (order) is today easily recognized, its driving force behind the “sustainable development” movement and the purposeful destruction (chaos) of the environment is not. The magnitude of duplicity and hypocrisy, within the movement and the ideologies of those behind its invention, is so monumental as to in fact be entirely antithetical to the entire concept of “sustainable”. If you can obtain a used copy of the previously referenced book, The Most Secret Science, the logo of the Tri-Lateral Commission (showing three arrows of purpose—similar to those in the recycling logo—looping back to a central core in the form of a triangle) is on the front, the book also including a complete list of known CFR and Tri-lateral Commission members at the time of its writing. The order-out-of-chaos and Hegelian stratagems also seem heavily influenced by the Janus archetype (or perhaps vice-versa), and can be found even in the rebranding (transition) of the global warming myth:

  1. Thesis/Beginning: Greenhouse gasses/global warming [Manufactured crisis via geo-engineering]
  2. Antithesis/Transition: Climate change [Rebranded after the IPCC email release or Climategate scandal]
  3. Synthesis/Ending: Geo-engineering/solar dimming/solar remediation [The cause of the problem now being sold as the solution; parallels can be found with the Ebola vaccine in the current pandemic narrative]

Despite intermittent sound quality issues, readers may not only find the following video exceptionally helpful before moving on, but an excellent companion to the discussion in the next section. Successful reality revisionism navigation requires, at the very least, a basic understanding of the new world order philosophy behind these revisions. Is it a conspiracy? Yes. Is it a theory? No, and one would think that would be obvious when the conspirators themselves have repeatedly and publicly discussed it by name. I refer to it as ‘the new world order’ in deference to those constructing it—that’s what they call it.

This video, just under 10 minutes, begins with David Rockefeller (purportedly addressing the Tri-lateral Commission in June of 1991), thanking various MSM outlets—specifically the Washing Post, New York Times, and Time Magazine—for their 40-yrear silence which was so instrumental in avoiding the public scrutiny that would have inhibited their plans for the world—not your plans —a march towards global government. Several world leaders and politicians are in the video openly discussing the designs and progress of this new order, with former President Bush Sr. admitting this new world order is “fulfilling the promise and vision of the UN’s founders,” and former Prime Minister Gordon Brown espousing the new world order and its associated great resetting of economies. David Rockefeller and his contributing foundations are referenced throughout, including a scene of Rockefeller questioning Dick Cheney over free trade agreements, with a giddy Cheney explaining that while having been a longtime CFR member, even a director at one point, he never mentioned it while campaigning for re-election in Wyoming.

THE DUPLICITY AND HYPOCRISY OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT REALITY REVISION

I recently came across the presentation of a Mr. George Hunt, originally produced in 1992, and found it highly significant when viewed through over 20 years of hindsight, and in a video just over 30 minutes no less. Before I share it here I would like to repost the recent comments of an Australian politician coming to understand the gravity and consequence to sovereign nations, including her own, of what he and others were trying to warn the world about so long ago. The following can be found in a previous article which includes the video of Ann Bressington’s presentation:

Of additional importance in this regard (beginning at the 1:03.55 mark), the Australian politician Ann Bressington begins to explain the 1968 origins of Agenda 21 via the Club of Rome–a think tank tasked with a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to accept global [NWO] solutions to local problems. Take note of her use of the term “social engineering” during this speech. She goes on to recount the following:

In 1997 Mikhail Gorbachev, also a member of the Club of Rome, said, “We are moving toward a New World Order—the world of communism. And we shall never turn off that road…the environmental crisis will be the international disaster that will unlock the New World Order one world government.” She further outlined it was during the 1992 Earth Summit that a document known as The Earth Charter was produced. This document was co-written by Maurice Strong [Club of Rome] and Mikhail Gorbachev. Both stated it was hoped this document would be adopted as the new 10 commandments with environmentalism as the new one world religion. She later quotes Ted Turner [Club of Rome], an outspoken advocate of depopulation, echoing the same sentiments on the Georgia guide stones encouraging a 95% reduction in global population.

Beyond the biography Mr. George Hunt provided over 20 years ago in the following presentation I know nothing more about him. At the time he recorded the VHS tape in 1992 in a Colorado video studio, he claimed to be a Business Consultant, College teacher of Small Business Management in Boulder, Colorado, and an environmental business owner. He recounts his dealings with those behind the sustainable development program, his surprise at seeing very powerful interests attend a local environmental meeting he officially hosted in 1987—some having attended other similar events throughout the country—and what he came to see as the ultimate hypocrisy and danger behind the environmental movement.

While Mr. Hunt certainly had personal opinions about the situation, which he freely shared in the video, those opinions were based on facts—not suppositions. Aside from providing audio/video recording evidence of Edmond de Rothchild and Maurice Strong (reality revisionists) being behind the environmental sustainability (order-out-of-chaos) movement, he included copies of newspaper articles and program agendas that are held up to the camera so the viewer may personally read them. At the time he was selling copies of the printed material along with the video tape.

The material being of critical importance to understanding our current predicament, aside from the brief review provided as it pertains to current topics, it will also be referred to in future essays. I highly recommend the video be downloaded and mirrored elsewhere before it gets wiped in the next round of internet scrubbing, or digital reality revisionism through electronic removal of virtually seditious material.

Mr. Hunt was witness to their two-faced turnings and rightfully highlights their preference for decree over democratic processes, a theme that can be found echoing louder in the body politic of today in everything from excessive executive orders blurring the lines between the executive and legislative branches of government, to several global trade treaties that have little to do with actual trade. As expressed in the previous essay, these treaties are critical factors to finalizing their system of global governance. Those familiar with the current Trans Pacific Partnership (or its regional/global counterparts) are aware the contents of the treaties are being written in (and kept) secret, even from congress and parliament members.

“This video will show strong evidence that the persons running the UNCED Earth Summit are actually setting a net to place the power over the earth and its peoples into their hands…Brave, bold deeds are needed by the public quickly. Once governments sign their treaties, their citizens are de jure in the hands of the world order.”

–Mr. George Hunt, 1992

Review of Mr. George Hunt’s Video:

UNCED (pronounced un-said) stands for United Nations Committee for Environment and Development. The UNCED logo for the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992, as shown in the video, included a hand formed to look like a dove holding the earth in its hands. The image was accompanied by the phrase: IN OUR HANDS. At this point Mr. Hunt rightfully asks: In whose hands?  

Several connections were made between the banking industry and the sustainable development sham (reality revision being used to transfer more individual sovereign power over to the new order), with notable banking figures attending his 1987 meeting in Colorado. This was 15 years after the first environmental congress ever held in Sweden in 1972, and 5 years before the UNCED appearance at the 1992 World Summit in Brazil.

Below is a partial list of attendees and other influential characters he referenced in the video:

  • David Rockefeller-Attendee
  • Edmond de Rothchild-Attendee
  • Secretary of state Baker (then Secretary of the Treasury)-Attendee
  • Maurice Strong-Attendee
  • Waste company management chairman and EPA Administrator William Ruckelshaus-Attendee https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Ruckelshaus#EPA_Administrator_redux
  • UN Secretary General —Attendee
  • Various other Word Bank and IMF Officials-Attendees
  • *Cecil Rhodes (Historical character whose views on race and imperialism were celebrated by attendees)
  • *David Lang (Montreal International Investment Banker)—Attendee

REALITY REVISIONS BY DECREE: SIDESTEPPING NORMAL PATHWAYS TO PUBLIC DEBATE, OVERSIGHT AND CONSENT

Celebrated ideologies of global governance revisionists not only despise competing self-governance and individual freedom ideologies, but also despise the people themselves—what they refer to as the lesser classes or races. So fueled by this disdain, the reach of its bloated and irrational contempt has been rigging elections all over the globe for decades as a result, the latest in Scotland over an *independence* referendum.  Rigged elections are reality revisions, a form of de facto decree being handed down by an illegitimate cabal working to solidify its place by creating a new reality placing them in power, the consumption of one reality by the other growing with each new revision. The process is similar to a racist, oppressive, individual freedom-hating virus invading the cells of a foreign host, slowly altering them until they too have become another virus.

At the 7:50 mark Hunt plays a video snippet of David Lang (Montreal International Investment Banker) decreeing that the environmental and economic activities of the world order not be shared with the public. As seen/heard in the video:

“I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process—that would take too long and require far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder, unfortunately, which populates the earth. We have to take an almost elitist program. That we can see beyond our swollen bellies and look to the future, in time frames and in results, which are not easily understood, or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to simplistic definition.“

Those familiar with the United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century program (Agenda 21–previously referenced by Australian politician Ann Bressington), are already well aware that bypassing normal channels of debate or the ‘democratic process’ is precisely how the program is being handled—by decree. Rosa Koire, author of Behind the Green Mask, is an excellent resource for information on Agenda 21, how it is being enacted in (y)our local communities, and also how its doctrine subsumes individuality in favor of a globalist collective.  Those who watched Hunt’s video will recall him outlining the difference between the first, second, third, and “fourth world” discussed by people like Maurice Strong—the Fourth World referring to the new order having absorbed all of the others and being the only, and final world left:

“Yogis and Shamans refer to it as the 4th World Wilderness—the lostness of the mind. The lostness of the mind refers to the collective consciousness—persons will be coerced through lies, drugs, fear and pain to surrender themselves and their ego to the collective consciousness [global governance]. The 4th World will be much like a return to Caesars or Babylon…” –George Hunt

At the 5:45 mark Hunt shows copies of material handed out by the Secretariat for World Order to attendees of an environmental meeting held in Des Moines, Iowa, which stated the following:

We are living sponsors of the great Cecil Rhodes Will of 1877, in which Rhodes devoted his fortune to the expansion of British rule throughout the world, and colonization by British subjects of the entire continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of Euphrates, the islands of Cypress and Candia, the whole of South America, islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britian, the whole of the mele archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, and the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire. We stand with Lord Milner’s Credo—we too are British race patriots and our patriotism is the speech, the traditions, the principles, the aspirations of the British race. Do you fear to take this stand at this very last moment when this purpose can be realized? Do you not see that failure now is to be pulled down by the billions of lilliputians of lesser race who care little or nothing for the anglo-saxon system?

While the entire planet is meant to be absorbed into the new order or 4th World, orchestrated crises (chaos) in Africa in the last year have been increasingly used as the means through which foreign troops may be sent for the “humanitarian aid” (order) that will save them from their entirely manufactured chaos. There are accounts that the current ebola pandemic narrative is the second attempt at a reality revision in this regard, after the first Boko Haram narrative failed—the #BringBackOurGirls campaign based on the hoaxed kidnapping of Nigerian schoolgirls by terrorists.

The following was originally reported via CNN in early October:

  • The Ebola outbreak in Africa is spreading quickly.
  • The defense department is increasing the number of troops it’s sending to West Africa to help fight the deadly virus.
  • With three thousand troops already tapped to head to Ebola ravaged West Africa, CNN has learned the US military is increasing its fight against the deadly disease. Hundreds more are being added to the plans to help the infected countries contain and control Ebola.

These methods have also been tested twice in the last year here in the United States via two separate crises deliberately manufactured as the pretext for UN troops to occupy and operate freely on American soil in the name of humanitarian aid. The first was the Detroit water crisis, the second being the current ebola pandemic narrative. Moreover, this essay would be remiss not to draw attention to the plethora of narrative binders increasingly being used, even in the form of color-coded NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming), linking together the ebola, overpopulation and ‘green’ movement (sustainable development) narratives. Ebola alone is not the issue—what the ebola narrative is being used to accomplish through order-out-of-chaos methodology—even if only a perceived chaos—is the issue.

Additional duplicitous attempts to link overpopulation, financial instability and environmental/sustainable narratives can be found in everything from Bill Gates’ involvement in vaccine-related population reduction programs with some ‘kill Granny to save money for schools’ narratives on the side, to increasingly “incompetent” CDC and EPA rulings and behaviors, refusal to apply the ‘precautionary principle’ equally to all new chemicals, gmo products, bio, nano, nuclear and atmospheric sciences, or even refusal to apply the law equally to everyone. How it became legal to literally steal *trillions* of dollars under the lawless “Too-Big-To-Fail-or-Jail” umbrella is a testament to how near that long-awaited new governance already is. The framework necessary to exempt themselves from criminal prosecution is already in place.

Other hypocrisies include the insertion of carbon emission minders and taxes into a reality in which the single greatest nuclear meltdown in known history is being summarily ignored—in both press coverage and mitigation. Families attempting to become healthier and self-sufficient by growing and supplying their own food and milk to ensure it stays free of toxic pesticides, genetically modified organisms and hormones, are being jailed after their property is destroyed by SWAT team raids, while criminal banking enterprises and corporations destroying entire eco-systems for generations to come are simply fined and allowed to carry on with business as usual. Additionally, this all before we even get to the Planned Obsolescence (chaos) business model based on the cognitive dissonance between an infinite growth ideology on a planet with finite resources. Then again, is it really cognitive dissonance or the competent incompetence being rebranded as a ‘capability gap’?

REALITY REVISIONISM AND THE SUPER QUESTION

There is a final point of importance to be made and observed in this area, something Mr. Hunt touched on in his extremely succinct yet short video: Is the New World Order really saving us from ourselves? Without a doubt, THAT is the most important question of our time—the uber or super question—the one that those suffering from lostness of mind must, despite the best efforts of their competitors, come to know the answer to before they too are swallowed up by it. I once met someone heavily involved in this agenda, who openly shared their mindset with me:

“People are a bunch of goddamned sheep. They have to be told when to eat, and they have to be told when to stop. They have to be lead back out to the pasture every day because they are too caught up in their own immediate needs and wants to remember where it is from the day before.”

This was also the first person to explain, “the bad guys always tell you what they are going to do before they do it,” and they were absolutely right. Yet there is an obscurity in this that people get stuck on in trying to explain it. This is true even of those whose lives are focused on realizing this new world, when using it as their own excuse or pardon for the “necessity” of the obscene crimes against humanity used to implement it. This obscurity lies in the idea that they broadcast what they are going to do before they do it to give people an opportunity to stop it, but also, they continue to do it because they believe the inherent cowardice of lesser race or pedigree prevents people from stopping them. Given my own life experiences and the current state of affairs on this planet, sans the racial attribution, I am in complete agreement that cowardice has definitely been a major factor in their largely unhindered rise to power.  Given the numbers in the equation alone, how could it not be?

However, the “save them from themselves” philosophy in quasi toto is errantly clung to by a gross pomp—a formidable delusion of self-grandeur exaggerated to the point of logical impairment, rendering them extremely prone to a factual selectiveness.  That is to say, those who refuse to endure the personal crisis of facing the truth, simply re-write it until they can. Thus the gigantic whole in their pseudo savior philosophy always conjures up for me a famous quote by John Milton: They who have put out the people’s eyes reproach them of their blindness. In other words, they have purposefully injected untold quantities of neurotoxins, endocrine disrupters, radiation, cancerous food, medicine and chemicals into the landscape of our lives and development, while simultaneously ensuring education lacks factual cosmological models, basic understanding of intelligent design, is riddled with endless historical revisions, fallacies and nonsensical corporate pseudo-science—all of which encourage lostness of mind—and  now want to throw us away and under the bus because they consider us “lost”.

Mr. Hunt understood this—clearly. They have set the people on this planet up to fail and take the blame for the myriad of global tragedies, shortcomings, failures, poverty, lack, contamination, illness, social crises, war, strife, Frankenstein science, and even the catastrophic biosphere and biodiversity collapse currently underway that THEY are actually responsible for. Really think about that…can a sane mind even begin to comprehend the insanity of such a monstrous and backwards design? Considering those people are responsible for intentionally altering the course of an entire planetary race, stifling all forms of natural evolutionary progress and nearly bringing it to full ruin for the sole purpose of self-edification in the process, these people can’t save themselves out of a paper bag let alone save anyone else.

GAIA: THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT RELIGION OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE

Mr. Hunt was incredibly thorough and left few stones unturned, including the roles of New Age philosophies (currently promoting destruction of individual ego and do-nothing cowardice) and the associated GAIA worship being instituted to further the agenda of their new order. Both are heavily managed misdirects being socially engineered into our lives via endless forms of perception management.

True to the Hegelian principle, Rothchild was positioned to be the positive synthesis of both environmentalism on the one hand—the thesis—and growth and development on the other hand— the antithesis—and that specific Rothchild combination, including the Rockefellers and most world capitalists, aim to control the global environment and development movement as the synthesis, with power moving into the house of Rothchild. This would be the same house (E.L. Rothschild LLC) that acquired a majority stake in Weather Central, LP in recent years, and Hunt also discussed their decades-old plan to suck aquifers dry and turn California (a major food basket) into a desert—a plan that, through exposure Hunt helped to create at the time, was initially thwarted in the early days by the public.

“The world order wants to create a new society out of the ashes of the chaos—a collectivist Fourth World, complete with a collectivist religion, collectivist finance, and unchecked world national socialism. The new order will offer Gaia—mother earth—to the masses as the big brother image to worship in the Fourth World. Maurice Strong has already set up a 140,000 acre ranch in Crestone, Colorado, to develop this earth religion system. Projects are funded by the Rockefeller fund and other foundations. The Earth Summit (of 1992) will link environment to industry. The lords of the UNCED conference will be the masters of who gets what, and when, if we don’t do something about it quickly.”

The order-out-of-chaos environmental movement was invented by Edmond de Rothchild, funded by the Rockefellers and others, and globally marketed by Maurice Strong who was heavily rewarded for his efforts:

“Maurice Strong, a UN Official and employee of Rockefeller and Rothchild trusts and projects, convened the first environmental congress in Stockholm , Sweden, in 1972. By 1992 Maurice Strong was the Secretary General and convener of UNCED at the World Summit Meeting.”

MANKIND CAN NO LONGER CONTINUE TO PARTICIPATE IN THEIR OWN DEMISE OUT OF IGNORANCE AND ESCAPE IT AT THE SAME TIME

Mr. Hunt didn’t believe it was too late then, and over twenty years later I still share those same sentiments. Even so, it is certainly much, much later than it was before.

In summary, the fact of the matter is, there are, and always have been, two completely different realities competing for full manifestation. I ask you once more to give them both, and their inevitable outcomes, some serious consideration and deliberation while the choices are easier to make and still available. The crossroad is on (y)our doorstep, so please, share this information with others so they may do the same. Do we really want to live in a world where our personal right to self-determination—and everything that right represents—has been written out of the script? —The Roles of Perception Management & Social Engineering in Reality Revisionism