“The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read or write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and re-learn.”

—Alvin Toffler


It’s getting old, to be sure, repeatedly posting incontrovertible evidence of grotesque crimes against humanity—evidence that also proves who was directly responsible—and repeatedly watching them get off scott-free. No criminal charges filed. No trials, no media coverage. Nothing. So much arrogance in the face of so little accountability. And laughing all the way to the bank at the same time no doubt. Always “follow the money”. It’s appalling to watch, but I remain convinced the necessary recourse to these horrors is simply suffering some sort of delayed reaction.


If you’re familiar with my work over the last 14 years, you understand my commitment to ensuring that every last man, woman and child, come to the full realization that the six previous lineages of man upon the earth, were completely undone—aka the “great fall(s)”—not just via the misapplication of knowledge (rogue science) in terms of the purposeful weaponization of nature, but all the more so by the majority of people continually allowing a small group of mattoid men to get away with it. Without resistance.

Here we are again, and cautionary tales of “all it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to look on and do nothing” have about the same effect as whistling in the wind. Nobody cares, until it personally costs them something. Perhaps that’s the one good thing that came out this first covert attempt at global genocide during this seventh lineage. Many of you have lost loved ones, or have had your own lives forever changed in terms of poor health and lower quality of life. This isn’t just the price of ignorance, but also the cost of ambivalence—and they aren’t done yet. They’re just getting started. In fact, they aren’t going to stop—ever—unless forced to. This will require serious resistance (refusal to cooperate/participate in your own demise) and increasing and unceasing demands for accountability from the public (the target population). Loads of it, and before it’s too late. To that end I’m certainly grateful for Dr. Martin’s tenacity in attempting to move the needle closer to that outcome. Watching and sharing this information with as many people as possible, also moves the needle in that direction.


I was extremely pleased to hear Dr. Martin specifically refer to the “weaponization of nature” during this incredibly enlightening discussion on the true history of Covid.

This—the weaponization of nature (the purposeful misuse of knowledge) by a small handful of mattoid elite against the rest of the population for the purpose of obtaining power over them—is what repeatedly causes the demise of entire civilizations. This is the loop we’re stuck on, the test we have yet to pass, the lesson we can’t afford the learn the hard way again, for the seventh, and perhaps final time. After all, does a civilization that would allow this to be done to their elderly, their children, and themselves, really deserve to survive?



  1. One who exhibits symptoms of mental degeneration but is not positively insane; a semi-insane person; a crank: a term used by Lombroso to designate a semi-insane person whose ideas and aims (often of a literary or artistic character), while they may simulate those of talent and even of genius, are marked by radical absurdities which the patient is unable, through mental weakness, to perceive.
  2. A person of congenitally abnormal mind bordering on insanity or degeneracy.
  3. A person who displays such behaviour

Humanity once again stands at a most important fork in the road; a moment exhilarating and exasperating, liberating and terrifying—may we have the wisdom and moral fortitude to choose the path of countless wonders.”  

–Crystal Clark







VAXXED–A shocking and eye-opening documentary: LINK



“Reality” is not determined by clicks, podcasts, news reports, ratings, or popularity contests—not even when people believe it is—and a lot of people do. Or, as sci-fi author Philip K. Dick once explained, reality is that which continues to exist even when you stop believing in it. These seemingly endless layers of crust and veneer we constantly have to hack and dig through to get at true history—to get at reality—exist because while reality isn’t a popularity contest, history is still written (and re-written) by the winners.

We like to believe, especially here in America, that only the ‘good guys’ win. But this is rarely the case in reality because the ‘good guys’ won’t stoop to the same lows of an “at any cost” mindset. Even Romulus and Remus, the founders of Rome, were extremely questionable characters, but nobody remembers their warlord past because they won. In the wake of that victory, when it comes to who they really were and how that victory was achieved, we’re left with yarns and myths about ‘being favored by the gods’ and ‘suckled by a she-wolf when they were babes’. These re-writings and fables obscure reality marvelously, but they continually get re-told because they’re popular and entertaining.


At this particular juncture I hope most people would agree that popular and entertaining isn’t what most of us need. What comes next is being delivered by someone who might be somewhat entertaining, but definitely isn’t popular. This should mean something to people, especially today: nobody going against the grain of powerful monied interests is popular. There’s a reason the man who invented a car that runs on water was murdered, extreme censorship is now commonplace, and the “Great Reset” is meant to turn us all into cowardly serfs after it transfers the rest of the world’s wealth (including yours) over to the richest, most powerful, and least moral among us.

You will eat their bugs, they will own everything and therefore you will rent everything you use from them (even your socks and toothbrush); you will be punished if you resist, rebel or speak out, and you will love it!

I know the mainstream media and ‘big’ names in the alternative media constantly attack and ridicule Austin Steinbart. That comes from people who can’t and don’t deliver the kind of knowledge and information Steinbart does, and the fact remains that most of you DO NOT HAVE THIS INFORMATION AND YOU NEED IT. I can’t personally attest to his character as an individual, but I can attest to the fact that he knows and understands extremely important issues and historical events that most people still remain unaware and/or completely fail to grasp the ramifications of. Furthermore, that has to change, because if it doesn’t, nothing else will, and there’s very little hope for a future in that scenario—for any of us.

Instead of repeating white noise about Steinbart, open your mind and listen. Carefully. Thoughtfully. I strongly encourage readers to cross-reference this material with lectures and documentaries found in previous “FRIDAY NIGHT AT THE MOVIES” posts here—use the black search bar on the top right to find all 3. Books by authors Eustice Mullins and John Coleman factually document true historical data and events with similar characteristics. Consider, for example, that it was Eustace Mullins (over 50 years ago!) who originally discovered the Federal Reserve is neither federal nor a reserve—he’s the only reason we know this. Every author who has since re-printed that information, either got it from Eustice Mullins, or got if from someone else who got it from Mullins.


At the end of knowing the “who, what, and why” of what went wrong, lies not just the question, but also the answers: HOW DO WE CREATE A BETTER FUTURE AND SECURE IT AGAINST THE REPEATED CORRUPTION ATTACKS WE KNOW ARE GOING TO COME? This is where the Proposal comes in, discussed briefly in the show posted below, and it’s about time someone put it all together in such a simple and succinct format. I’m extremely grateful for the effort. These are questions we need to be asking—questions that should have been asked, and answered decades ago.

Take the time to give it your full attention and serious thought. In relation to the question as to securing a better future, combined with a broader understanding of what has gone wrong historically and presently, ask yourselves:

  • Does it cover all the necessary bases?
  • Has it left anything out?
  • Is this something I can support?
  • What can I personally do to offer that support?
  • How do I get involved?
  • Do I really want a new American flag with vertical stripes that look like prison bars? 😉 (You can’t change it if you don’t get involved)

Humanity once again stands at a most important fork in the road; a moment exhilarating and exasperating, liberating and terrifying—may we have the wisdom and moral fortitude to choose the path of countless wonders.”  –Crystal Clark


The massive, global reality revision currently unfolding, is not based on a “post-human” agenda. It’s an inappropriate term that misses the mark, thereby unable to convey any concrete insight as to what is actually happening.

In reality, a “post-human” world is a world void of human beings. That isn’t the world the elite are building for themselves, because they too are, absolutely, also human beings. The numerous personalities and organizations—the lizard cults—constantly promoting the ‘shape-shifting lizard narrative’ know the narrative they push in that regard is ridiculous. They know, but they don’t care, because it pays well, keeps them in the public eye, and at the top of the ‘influencer’ pile in specific genres. And herein lies the real issue facing every generation of humans on the planet: a lack of conscience.


To be sure, if current trends towards a post-conscience world persist, a world without human beings will certainly be the result—that’s inevitable—something the mattoid elite (devoid of conscience) are determined to remain incapable of accepting. The sane individual naturally understands this, whereas the aberrant political class considers the lack of conscience not only a benefit, but in fact a necessary component to the success of their agenda: achieving a goal by any means necessary.

Their internal rituals, like that of the Cremation of Care ceremony, obviate the post-conscience mindset as adherents dress up in red robes and sacrifice the effigy of a dead baby to the giant owl statue of Moloch. As this author has often explained, this is the base tenet or core of Satanism as a whole: to free the individual from the shackles of their conscience—a weakness believed to keep the individual from reaching their full potential. Things like rules, laws, morals and ethics, are for suckers.


The principle of “participating in our demise out of ignorance,” and often under the false pretense of doing the exact opposite, is something I’ve grown tired of repeating over the last decade, yet I remain compelled to do so, mainly because of its power to recalibrate neural pathways back to a version of reality that is actually survivable—not just survivable, but even full of joy and wonder. That, and the fact that in the face of endless counter-propaganda, this recalibration has never been more necessary, and doesn’t seem to come from other sources—especially not from sources as prolific as the propaganda media. In that aspect of the problem, participating in our demise out of ignorance is, or at least should be, remarkably self-explanatory at this point: people perish for lack of knowledge. Another truism in this regard is often expressed as “if I only knew then, what I know now, I would have made completely different choices”. Indeed we would have. We’ve all been there.

Fear is another aspect of the problem, often combined with the element of greed. As an extremely pointed example, I personally see little (if any) difference between a doctor that explains they can’t keep their practice open without the money they get from Big Pharma for having 60%+ vaccination rates in their patient population, and continue to do so, regardless of how many healthy children they treat with vaccines, only to find them become severely autistic afterwards—but still they keep doing it, year after year. Instead of wearing a red robe, they wear a white coat. Instead of sacrificing the child to Moloch, they sacrificed it to Money. In fact, as anyone who has had the displeasure of repeatedly dealing with the medical industry for an extended period of time will tell you, the red robes and white coats often even exhibit the same condescending God complex. Furthermore, that shared mindset isn’t an accident.

Today’s medical professionals remain wildly ignorant of their industries’ sordid past, which only makes matters worse. The arrogant atmosphere so often found in this industry is based on the false belief that medical practitioners are exorbitantly paid because they’ve somehow acquired the omnipotent power over life and death through years of grueling study. The historical reality of the profession however, is that doctors didn’t used to get paid any more for their services than a car mechanic. Not only were they not paid obscene amounts of money for their services, but they also once had access to cheap, natural remedies that were extremely effective and proven over the course of hundreds of years of use.

The only reason the “cheap access to medical care for all” paradigm changed, as extremely well documented for decades by authors like Eustice Mullins, is the profound intervention, and eventual complete control of the profession, by members of the Rockefeller family. As a result, the nearly insufferable, inadequate, and obscenely overpriced medical industry we have today is often called “Rockefeller Medicine”. It was here that “big pharma” was born, and the AMA (American Medical Association) was introduced as a means to eliminate natural cures from the industry in favor of petroleum based drugs that were often addictive, and to drive up the costs so the poor could no longer have access. Current chants of “social justice” and replacing a free society with soul-crushing socialism and communism, like so many other current trends, are born out of agenda, fulfilled through societal ignorance of reality and history, and therefore lack the ability to solve problems they don’t clearly understand the true nature of. In other words, remedies proposed out of ignorance, are not meant to fix the problem, they are instead meant to solidify or institutionalize it—under the false pretense of doing the exact opposite.

The good news, and there is some, is that a significant portion of medical practitioners genuinely joined the profession to help people, which of course means they have a conscience. As such, they have come to realize that the current system of medicine, is itself already devoid of conscience (primarily due to the aforementioned changes to the industry), and they will consequently no longer participate it in. They have instead, created a new system—one in which a type of ‘health insurance’ is paid directly to the practitioners themselves, subsequently also avoiding the multi-billion dollar (annually) fraud side-industry that plagues things like Medicare. There are other choices to be made, no good reasons not to make them, and so they are being made. By people with a conscience.


When it comes to the full implementation of a post-conscience world, the final aspect of their agenda, what I strongly suspect they internally refer to as their “final solution” (to the problem of human conscience) is of course Artificial Intelligence. And why wouldn’t it be? After all, if it’s one thing the aberrant political class have taught is, it’s that “intelligence” does not equate to “conscience”. They are not the same animal, and don’t always occupy the same space. This is doubly true for a machine. A machine cannot physically feel, taste, smell or touch. A machine cannot love, cannot feel pain, cannot laugh, cannot weep, cannot experience joy, respect, admiration, pleasure, loss, beauty, awe.

To take it one step further, based on research I did about a year ago for an article I never finished, I also strongly suspect the name of this new, all-encompassing Artificial Intelligence, is called GAIA. Not because of the insufferable New Age “gaia worship” nonsense constantly peppered with vapid mantras like “what you resist persists” proliferating in the alternative media, but rather because of a somewhat chance encounter I had with an extremely gifted programmer over 20 years ago, and the research road it recently led me down.

I have both written about that encounter here, and discussed it over the years in radio interviews: when I was in the tech industry I once hired an eclectic group of programmers to provide technical support to my clients. This was long before my ‘dreamtime’ experience, so you can understand my responses were typical of anyone not having a significant grasp of reality. During a casual conversation with the leader of the group, then in his late fifties or perhaps early sixties, I mentioned the idea of homeschooling. The moment the word left my lips, his entire demeanor changed—he became extremely serious, stressed even—in a way I had never seen before, and he immediately told me not to, because “they” didn’t want me to.

I was completely shocked and put off by his completely serious admonition, which was simultaneously as absurd as it was serious. I said, “What are you talking about? Who is ‘they'”? Again his demeanor changed dramatically, this time full of regret, perhaps even sorrow, and he began to explain. “I didn’t want to do it, but I knew that if I didn’t, someone else would have, and I needed the money for my cancer treatment.” Still feeling like I was in the twilight zone, I asked again, “What are you talking about—what did you do?” He said, “I wrote the code (for the government) that would allow them to track all of our children from the moment they entered school.”

There was a little more to it than that, but certainly you get the gist of it. That conversation took place 22 years ago, and based on the story I was told, his work had taken place years before the conversation did.

He never told me the name of the program, but when doing extensive research on the topic for an article last year, I eventually sussed it out based on dates and timeframes. I found pre-cursors to the iteration of the program more well-known to the public as Goals 2000—which was in all likelihood the continuation of his original product. More importantly to this discussion however, is how astonishingly often I kept coming across the word “GAIA” when researching all past and present iterations of the program and its progress—especially relating to the education industry. It was literally everywhere, with constant references to things like—and I do mean “like” and not actual—GAIA Corp, GAIA Education Systems, GAIA Learning Environment, GAIA Center for Growth, ect, ect.

To this I would reiterate that as so much of the agenda is being propagandized to the youth, especially through predictive programming, you’ll find more of what they’re being hit with in video games than else. An especially interesting one in this regard is called HORIZON, having a story line in which small native populations are living amongst robot animals that are remnants of a now disappeared high-tech ‘elder’ civilization that used an extremely advanced Artificial Intelligence called GAIA to rebuild the world after their own machines turned on them.

To be sure, this author may be way off regarding the name, but the premise or principle of the elite building and using a massive Global Artificial Intelligence Actuary or Global Artificial Intelligence Administrator system to manage the human population in the image of the elite’s reorganization of society with themselves at the top, is exceedingly obvious. So much so, it’s also my current belief that the only thing they’re waiting for to take the final step of control, is the perfection of this A.I. in its capabilities to adequately perform the task. I can only hope (and pray) that the same elements of interference the elite contended with when having their nukes disabled, have extended that wisdom (and generosity) to their equally destructive GAIA system. Still, whatever form of help we get, does nothing but buy us more time. We should use it wisely.

If you’re looking for some interrelated entertainment this weekend that will further stimulate related neural pathways, I highly recommend the 2015 Terminator: Genesis. There’s every indication that GAIA and Genesis are similar programs with similar designs and purposes.

Perhaps now people can understand why the aberrant political class are so intent with replacing humans with machines, in every aspect of life possible. Machines don’t have a conscience. To continually tell a human being they have no worth to this new system, that they are redundant, that they are non-essential, is an arrogant and dismissive form of cruelty only possible in the absence of a conscience.


Most of us know and understand the basic principle of divide-and-conquer: united we stand, divided we fall. The numerous ways their think-tanks have devised to divide and separate us into smaller and smaller, disorganized and discordant groups, is on full display, all over the world. Yet, for some reason, fostering disunion and disharmony alone wasn’t enough. It’s the hate that trumps it all, the hate that people find so shocking and over-the-top. Why do it? Why go that far?

Isn’t it obvious? Hate doesn’t have a conscience.

Christian’s “hate” gays, so gays should “hate” Christians, right? WRONG. Christians not only have a conscience, but literally depend on its accurate functioning to become their key to entering the Kingdom they believe their eternal soul will reside in. Currently, the state-approved marriage ceremony is defined as being between a man and a woman, with God as a witness to the oaths made during the ceremony. It is a religious ceremony. So what? If you’re gay, and you really believe religions ‘hate’ you, why in the world would you fight for the right to participate in a union ceremony based on traditions you don’t personally believe in? Is it really your only option to hate Christians, and try to destroy their religion, rather than simply petition your state leaders to offer an official ceremony for those with a secular persuasion?! There are always better choices for you, and no good reason not to make them.

If you can be made to believe that people hate you because you are black, you can be made to hate those who aren’t. If you can be made to believe you are hated because you are white, you can be made to hate those who are not. On and on the it goes, and if we continue to participate, what we get in the end is a world so devoid of conscience, morals, ethics, goodness and kindness, that nobody will want to live in it.


“If you’re not a Christian, you can’t have morals or ethics!” WRONG. COMPLETELY WRONG. The false two-choice paradigm is so prolific it has been addressed and deconstructed in other articles. In reality, the truth is nearly always behind door number three—the third choice. Morals and ethics are not the product of ‘religion’. They are the product of a conscience! This is why you’ll routinely find people, like myself, who don’t need the coercive “fear” of our ‘souls burning for eternity in a lake of fire’, to scare us into being a decent human being. For many of us, long before any exposure to religious dogma, a conscience was part of our being and daily life. Most of us are naturally disgusted by child or animal abuse—because its wrong. We know its wrong because as human beings—not machines—we understand the beauty and innocence of children and animals, and having experienced pain ourselves (unlike a machine), we naturally want to protect the innocent from that experience.

The most profound form of government to ever exist in our lineage, deeply understood this, and very clearly defined what “wrong” was: that consenting adults may willingly engage in any activity with other consenting adults so long as it doesn’t harm others who are not willing participants, and in so doing, have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Simple. That entire tenet is simply based on a conscience, which differing people of all walks of life possess—and that form of government is the United States Constitution. With that understanding, certainly you can see why they need you to “hate” that too—to violate the most basic tenet of human decency and to attack it without conscience. Yes, that form of government was brought to us by people of faith, but what the history (and science) books leave out of the story is that they were also strong believers in Natural Law, which is sometimes referred to today as Intelligent Design. In that design are remarkable and repeating patterns which, at not point, are offered or withheld to various aspects of creation, based on their religious preferences. After all, what religion does a doe or dandelion have?


The globalist agenda is a serious problem for you and everyone else with a conscience—a problem globalists don’t want you to solve—so they set your mind to work on solving imaginary problems for imaginary reasons and imaginary gains. They also have you fighting imaginary enemies in contrived wars for their own personal gain.

It’s time to get out of the weeds of hate and confusion where the snakes seek shelter and slither, and to stand up and see the world forest of beautiful people for its actual trees. It can only continue to thrive with abundance and provide joy as long as it has a conscience AND the proper knowledge of the way in which reality actually is and functions. “Death by ignorance” cannot be prevented by conscience alone.

The mattoid elite have embedded dumbing-down into the agenda for a reason, which includes teaching the youth that math, science, and language skills are “racist”. If they can get the youth to believe that, the obvious repercussions will be a generation that hates learning. Should ignorance become normalized, how much will having a conscience matter, when the knowledge needed to use it successfully is gone?

Humanity once again stands at a most important fork in the road; a moment exhilarating and exasperating, liberating and terrifying—may we have the wisdom and moral fortitude to choose the path of countless wonders.  —Crystal Clark



“Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness.” ― Alejandro Jodorowsky

Here I ask the reader to keep in mind that my use of the word “millennial” does not conform to current standard definitions found in myriad dictionaries that often include meaningless “gen Y” or “gen X” word salad. A millennial, in my personal view, is anyone born after the year 2000. This is based on the fact that the world which existed and was experienced by people before 2000, and the world that came into existence after 2000—especially after September 11, 2001—are two completely different worlds. One of the most striking developments born from that change, has been an entire generation of people who don’t know what was lost during that transition, because they were born into a world without it. A massive reality revision took place, and what social engineers papered over the previous version of reality with, is debasing, dehumanizing, and quite frankly abhorrent.


A few months back my husband played a video (that I didn’t save unfortunately) of a young man in maybe his mid to late thirties, replying to the following question from his viewers: “How did your generation deal with all the racism back then?” His answer was the same answer I’m about to give you: “It wasn’t like this back then.”

I was born in the early 1970’s. Computers and cell phones were just beginning to enter our reality, but the early versions were huge, slow, and expensive. When we weren’t riding our bikes or playing games like hide-and-seek, tag, or kick-the-can with all the neighborhood kids until the street lights came on, we watched a little television. A little. For the most part, we got to watch the Muppet Show on Monday nights before bed, and my favorite cartoon on Sunday morning was Scooby Doo—neither were racist, nor inappropriately sexually deviant or provocative.

For many people my age, our all-time favorite movie trilogies are Blade and The Matrix. The star of the Blade trilogy (a day-walking vampire that kills other vampires) was Wesley Snipes—a black actor, director and martial artist—one of the most popular actors of the time. His co-star in the first two films, Kris Kristofferson, was a white country music singer and actor, and they made an excellent team. The Matrix featured the magnanimous Morpheus (a leading character played by Laurence Fishburne), and featured several other black actors throughout (like Jada Pinkett Smith), and of course the Commander of Zion’s military was also a black actor. Nobody cared, one way or the other: we loved watching GOOD movies with GOOD actors. We had not yet been indoctrinated to watch good movies with good black or good white actors. Some of the most popular comedians of our time were also black, like Eddie Murphy and Richard Prior. We watched them and laughed at FUNNY comedians, not black comedians. You may also note that in blockbusters like Blade and The Matrix, “the black guy always dies first” wasn’t part of our entertainment reality back then either.

Add to this that our parents grew up in the 50’s and 60’s and 70’s, watching a world transform from segregation to a hippy and then disco movement that brought everyone together, through music: jazz, blues, rock and roll, afros and bell bottoms. Everybody was welcome at the table. Miles Davis, Ella Fitzgerald, Louis Armstrong, Sammy Davis Jr., Aretha Franklyn, Jimi Hendrix. On top of that, my generation had Marvin Gaye, Lionel Richie, Billy Ocean, Seal, and Hootie and the Blowfish—all of which were black, and none of their music was part of the school-to-prison pipeline emanating from today’s dehumanizing rap music. They were excellent musicians and songwriters that sang about life, love and loss, in very humanizing and uplifting ways. They weren’t singing about stupid ho’s, selling dope, popping caps in people, and wet ass pu$$y. Nor did their concerts feature them dressed up as Baphomet, performing satanic rituals, or having their stage dancers constantly dressed in police state attire.

We grew up on morality-based television shows like The Facts of Life, After School Specials, Different Strokes, The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, and the Cosby show. We still had Civics classes in school which taught us to understand the nature of the human struggle and how our personal actions may lessen that struggle for those we come into contact with. We were encouraged to learn from and respect the elderly, carry their groceries, mow their lawns, and give them our seats as a means to lessen their personal struggle with age—not to kill them off as ‘useless eaters’ based on false and dehumanizing eugenist propaganda. We grew up in a world encouraging us to respect the freedom of the individual and to see the character, struggle and potential of every human being, whereas you have grown up in a world that has taught you to see only color and victimhood, with a hugely debasing smattering of “individual freedom is selfish”, “hate those who have more”, and “how to perform anal sex” constantly sprinkled into the mix. Abhorrent indeed.


If you’re a millennial, I want to thank you for taking the time to come here. Second, I want to apologize—for the current global state of affairs that has led many of you to anger, frustration, despair, depression, and loss of hope for something better—on behalf of all the sleeping and mal-educated elders who came before us. Third, and far more importantly, the coming global dystopia being sold to you as inevitable, is anything but. It is neither inevitable nor based on the endless talking points of over-population, global warming, or over-consumption. It is not the fault of brown people, white people, old people, American colonialism, capitalism, or nationalism. It is not the fault of poverty, wealth, carnivores, cow farts, or the carbon you exhale with your every breath. The earth did not “cry out in pain when you were born”. You do not need to ‘justify’ your existence to me, nor anyone else. Your individual lives are not an unnecessary strain on the environment, rather you are the hope of a future filled with awe and incredible opportunity—if you would but know what that means, and refuse to be robbed of it.

I know you don’t feel loved. I also know that the agenda running behind that feeling, needs you to feel that way. They need you to feel unloved, abandoned, disconnected, ignored, perhaps even hated, angry and hopeless. If you’ve never heard the phrase, “power hates a vacuum”, it means that the moment a ‘hole’ or vacancy in the hierarchy of a power structure opens up, chaotic power struggles immediately begin between those attempting to backfill the vacancy. Corporate and political organizations suffer from this the most—the inability to get promoted or rise through the ranks until someone higher up either dies or retires. In a particularly corrupt environment, those vacancies may become forced or orchestrated, rather than natural occurrences. But this is also true of emotional holes or vacancies found in the hierarchy of human needs—emotional holes or voids also need to be filled—and vacancies can be intentionally created for the sole purpose of backfilling them with something more suitable to agenda. This is very much the situation currently affecting the youth of every nation on earth.

There are no words to express my sorrow at your loss of joy, security, freedom, privacy, health, fertility, creative self-expression, and the right to live without constant fear of newly conjured threats. There are also no words to express how much I personally love each one of you; how much, in fact, the greater world at large also loves you dearly. In attempting to help you better understand and realize this, I suspect it would shock you to know how many people have already been murdered or silenced for publicly expressing that love for you.

Yes, hundreds of people over the last few decades have literally been murdered for either trying to expose the source of your anguish, and/or for offering better solutions and more promising outcomes for your futures. They did it, because they love you. In fact, it’s happened so often that the human race developed a new word for it: suicided.

Some of those people were indefinitely jailed for being whistleblowers (Julianne Assange), others were jailed for the same reason and killed in their cells (Aaron Swartz) in the dark of night, for trying to give you a more truthful future with less war. Others, like CDC whistle-blower Timothy Cunningham (vaccine damage) and Dr. Jeff Bradstreet (reversing autism) were found floating face down in rivers for their efforts to provide you with a healthier future. The man who invented a car that ran on water was murdered for trying to free you from the energy/carbon-tax cartels. What about JFK—have you ever listened to his speeches, and do you know what he was attempting to do for you? MalcomX was murdered, as was Dr. Martin Luther King—by the government, according to a civil lawsuit filed and won by his family members. I’ll let you extrapolate what that implies on your own.

In the beginning there were only dozens, but eventually there were hundreds: corporate and political insiders, ex-CIA employees, ex-Google engineers, bankers, journalists, scientists, doctors, inventors—many of them either killed or had their lives otherwise destroyed because they loved you enough to do everything in their power to protect you and give you a chance at a better life.

Eventually there were thousands, and now, there are millions, all around the world. Suiciding millions of people is far too obvious and soft-killing millions of people (through depopulation) takes time, so ‘cancel culture’ and extreme censorship are being used to silence them in the meantime. You have always been loved beyond measure, by people you’ve never even met, willing to risk everything for you and your future. You just didn’t know, and it’s time that you did—time for those sacrifices, both past and present, to finally be appreciated and mean something to you. It’s way passed time for you to see and understand that it is they, the people who love you the most and have risked everything for you to have a better life, who have been alone, unloved, abandoned, disconnected, ignored, and perhaps even hated—by you.

Aron Russo was one of those wonderful people, and for a multitude of important reasons, you should know who he was. Like many of us, he learned the hard way that the world he thought he lived in, and the real world (being hidden by a corrupt media), are two very different things. Second, and far more importantly, he showed the world how this agenda will end for you (and the rest of us), by showing you HOW IT BEGAN. He told one of the most important stories you have never heard—revealed a history we were never supposed to know. Genuine ‘social justice’ simply isn’t possible at the hands of anyone ignorant of this history, because problems cannot be solved when they aren’t actually understood. The problems you think you have, and the problems you actually have—what the realistic and necessary targets of cancel culture should be based on that reality—are worlds apart.

I understand exactly what kind of world you want to live in, not just because I want it too, but because I was fortunate to live in a lesser version of it once. It wasn’t perfect by any means, but it was much, much closer than anything your generation has thus far experienced. So much has been lost, but not everything. Not yet. Dystopia is not a matter of fact or inevitability, but a matter of endless strategic planning toward a specific end. If you want to rise above it, Dysnopia is your only alternative—you must reject it with every fiber of your being. At the same time however, in order to do that, you must first understand it.


Aron Russo understood it, and he understood it well. Not just from first-hand experience with a seemingly endless stream of corruption, but because he was told, flat out, by dystopian orchestrator Nick Rockefeller, exactly what these people planned to turn the world into, and how they planned to do it. After failed attempts to recruit Aron Russo into their fold, and because of his simultaneous love for us and disgust for the agenda, he made a remarkable documentary showing us the way out, by showing us the way in. This is extremely important because reversing Dystopia in favor of Dysnopia, is very much like locating a painful sliver that’s deeply embedded itself under your skin. The best way to remove it, is to pull it out from its point of entry. Sadly, despite his efforts, Russo didn’t live long enough to wholly experience the full impact his work would have upon society: that every human being exposed to it, will never see the world the same way again. Nor should they.

Aaron Russo had many successful business ventures during his life, most notably his time managing Bette Midler’s career in producing The Rose, and also produced the film Trading Places with Eddie Murphy. From wikipedia:

Aaron Russo (February 14, 1943 – August 24, 2007) was an American entertainment businessman, film producer and director, and political activist. He was best known for producing movies including Trading Places, Wise Guys, and The Rose. Later in life, he created various libertarian-leaning political documentaries including Mad as Hell and America: Freedom to Fascism.


I recommend readers watch this first to better understand who the man was, what he endured, and how he came to understand the planned agenda—the agenda we are currently living out. In this interview he even explains he was told about 911 (by Rockefeller) months before it happened, and that the ensuing and endless ‘war on terror’ was a total farce being used to further their agenda.


This shocking documentary was made by Russo during his quest to better understand the underlying cause of nearly all of our social problems, and originally played in theaters. You will never again wonder how our society could have always, and easily afforded, the excellent healthcare and education of every man, woman and child in this country—because you will finally know whose pockets the money has been going into instead, and why. Moreover, AT NO POINT does the socialist/communist/globalist agenda ADDRESS THESE ISSUES NOR PROMISE TO CORRECT THEM. On the contrary, their phony carbon credit casino is meant to solidify the problem in perpetuity, because the ‘house’ always wins.


Let’s start by recalling how our ‘racist’ founding fathers spoke to, and treated, the slaves they owned on their plantations, with a sort of mock orientation new employees often undergo on their first day at a new job for a large corporation. In this case the ‘slave orientation’ is provided to each slave by their new owners, so that they may understand the rules governing their new lives as slaves:

“The days of you considering yourselves sentient human beings with souls and free will, are over. You are now no better than hackable farm animals—merely assets with which your master farmer will do with as he pleases, because it is HIS farm. As such, you will not have control over what you eat, when you eat, or how much. You will not have control over what you are taught, nor what you can say, do, or think. The same goes for your children—they belong to us now, to do with as we please. If we want to begin scientifically experimenting on them, or sexually grooming them from a young age, and you attempt to stop us, you will be labeled a domestic terrorist. You will not have control over what is done to your body, nor what you can do with it. The majority of you will be chemically and biologically sterilized and poisoned without your knowledge and consent in an effort to manage your population, dull minds prone to resistance, build in accelerated decrepitude factors causing shorter life spans, and you will be disposed of once your usefulness as our farm animal has run out. You will each be assigned to a particular location (farm) and will not be able to leave it without permission, as the rest of the planet, reserved for use solely by your owners, will be classified as no-slave-zones. As you are no longer considered a person, but rather property—and only people (not property) have the right and ability to own other property—you will never again have any property of your own, and you will love it and be happy. From birth, every word you utter will be recorded, every deed and movement constantly monitored via elaborate surveillance systems, and each of you will receive an individual electronic implant and/or tracking device. This, in turn, will assign each of you a “compliance rating” known as a social credit score. The higher your compliance score, the more opportunity you will have available to you in life, to access and use OUR land, OUR products and OUR property.”

Of course that’s not really what the writers and signers of the Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, and Constitution actually said back then. Rather, that’s what globalists are saying to you—to all otherwise free people upon the earth—right now. They’re laying out the ‘new rules’ of their full dominion over the earth and its people, and if you’ll notice, nowhere does it say that all men (as in mankind) are to be thought of and treated as equals, with equal rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, under the law. Nor are your new owners promising to establish a one world government for the solitary purpose of securing and protecting those individual rights and freedoms. On the contrary, they’ve made it quite obvious that when it comes to “rights and freedoms”—to do whatever they want to everyone elseonly their own are protected.


Dystopia, or Dysnopia? Choose wisely, while you still can—not out of ignorance, fear, anger, frustration or hopelessness, but out of knowing, hope, love, dedication and wonder. You are not alone or unloved, and you never have been.

Humanity once again stands at a most important fork in the road; a moment exhilarating and exasperating, liberating and terrifying—may we have the wisdom and moral fortitude to choose the path of countless wonders.  —Crystal Clark




Dr. John Coleman gave us a lot to think about in last week’s FRIDAY NIGHT AT THE MOVIES #2, when he explained in great detail, The Zero Growth Post Industrial Plan for Industry and Agriculture, for the United States of America, as well as who was behind it and why, at the 32:17 mark:

“This Committee of 300, through the Royal Institute of of International Affairs (RIIA), through the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), exercises complete control. But their strongest arm is called the Club of Rome. When I first heard of the Club of Rome in 1969 I immediately began my investigation…The Club of Rome is one the most insidious, baneful organizations in existence today, which has done intolerable, immeasurable damage to the United States of America.

This Committee of 300 told a man called Aurelio Peccei to form this Club of Rome, with the main object of bringing down the industries and the agricultural development of the United States. He immediately wrote a paper in which he said there are too many people on the earth, and that the United states with its industrial development, its agricultural development, is responsible for this curse of overpopulation. And he picked up a the documentation for his work from Lord Bertrand Russell, the senior statesman of the Committee of 300, and Lord Bertrand Russell had written a work called The Impact of Science on Society. And if you can ever secure of a copy of that book, you will see in there that he said the world is grossly overpopulated and we have to get rid of half the the world’s population, and it doesn’t matter how we do it.

So, the Club of Rome was instituted and organized to start an attack on the world’s population, using the United States as the whipping boy. And they came up with a paper called The Zero Growth Post Industrial Plan for Industry and Agriculture, for the United States of America. Three days after that paper was accepted as official United States policy by James Earl Carter, I was able to, through my intelligence people, get a copy of this insidious document. Basically what it said, was that the Middle Class in the United States of America, had to be destroyed, because in the the push to world order, the middle class would be the stumbling block. Because, history had shown, that the peasant class in ancient days, when they had revolted, were just easily crushed. There was not resistance.

But now had grown a new super class of people in the United States called the middle class, who had long term employment, who had job security, who are well paid, who could afford to buy the products made by the United States and didn’t need to buy products from China or anywhere else. And the Club of Rome Post Industrial paper said this has got to stop—we have to bring down the middle class of the United States—and the way that we will do this, the way that we will accomplish this task is by crushing their industries.”


An empty head is as useful as an empty stomach, and just as dangerous if the condition is prolonged. It’s a sad commentary however, when the one begets the other. A few years back I saw a meme that said, “The destruction of society is the Millennial Retirement Plan”, adequately making the point that we have an entire generation participating in their own demise out of ignorance, and being so committed to it, they plan to take the rest of us with them while they do it. They have, as stated in other articles here, been unwittingly conscripted by their enemy to fight on the wrong side of a war against their own futures, families, and nations—to do exactly what Dr. John Coleman explained, and not just to America. It’s astonishing to see the world’s youth champion a “post industrial world” without ever stopping to realize food is an industry. And it isn’t the only one. Medicine is an industry. Health care, clothing, textiles, shoes, supplements, beauty, body care, electronics (computers and cell phones), home building, shipping, printing, energy, fertilizer, parts manufacturing, automobiles, bikes—everything is an industry now.

Here’s where a spunky duped-gooder might interject, “Yes! Industry is destroying the planet. That’s why we have to go back to hand-crafted goods on a smaller scale.” To which I would reply, “that’s exactly how things were before globalism intentionally destroyed every mom and pop business or family farm it could either crush or buy out”—a point made exceedingly obvious in the videos below: millions of people would rather quietly grow their own food, raise and process their own livestock, instead of be utterly dependent on polluting, supra-national corporations that routinely get away with murder. But they aren’t allowed to. But why? Because that isn’t The Plan. Self-sufficiency is the antithesis to the plan Dr. Coleman so carefully outlined for the American people in 1994—you can’t crush and depopulate entire nations by destroying their industries, if they aren’t first forced to wholly rely on those industries for survival. That’s why we see more and more draconian legislation, both here and around the world, like this: Australia Passes Bill Prohibiting Citizens From Growing Their Own Food And Expanding Federal Powers To Seize Livestock

In fact, the maker of the ICE AGE FARMER videos below at one point makes reference to “victory gardens”—another critical omission from school curriculum in the last few decades. Before our governments were wholly captured by the plan, the American government strongly encouraged families to grow their own food to keep from starving during the war. That campaign referred to that effort as Victory Gardens or War Gardens. Efforts to encourage Americans to become food self-sufficient included government-issued posters and leaflets showing people how to grow their own food. Nor do today’s youth realize that the first grocery store (Skaggs) didn’t open until 1915, and even then the idea didn’t really catch on until somewhere between the 1930’s and 1950’s because most people were still growing their own food.


Here’s what that post-industrial ‘equality’ and ‘social justice’ is going to look like in reality, and last time I checked, feelings, rainbows, virtue-signaling and gender-neutral pronouns weren’t edible. I strongly suspect that while there’s a good deal of discussion about the next great depression brewing, most people today (not just the youth) still don’t know that famers were paid NOT to grow food during the last Great Depression. While numerous explanations for it are given, most notably a flooded market lowering the prices too far, in what world does it make sense to spend tax dollars on paying farmers not to feed their starving countrymen? Why not feed the country with the food that should have been grown, and use that tax money to pay the farmers for the food they DID grow, because a jobless population couldn’t pay it themselves? It’s funny how all these bail-outs never seem to go where actually needed. The Zero Growth Post Industrial Plan for Industry and Agriculture, for the United States of America has been inching forward for decades in preparation for a final leap.






Every time I write something like this I’m reminded of Yuri’s warning regarding Ideological Subversion, and the way it targets the youth of the nation being undermined by it:

“The first one being demoralization.  It takes between 15-20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years which is required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy—exposed to the ideology of your enemy. In other words Marxisim/Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least 3 generations of American students—without being challenged or contra-balanced by basic values of Americanism, American patriotism. The Result? The result you can see.

Over and over again, a source of contention among the youth is that they can’t pay off their student debt loans because there are no jobs—especially no good paying jobs. What they were adequately indoctrinated NOT to understand, is that was also part of the plan. Dr. John Colemen laid that out for us too, in the last edition of FRIDAY NIGHT AT THE MOVIES when discussing that one of the first major industries to be killed off, was the steel industry:

[36:00] In 1980, based on this report (Club of Rome Post Industrial Paper) I wrote a small work, a booklet, called Death of the United States Steel Industry. And in that I told of a French aristocrat by the name of Étienne Davignon, and i’m sure there’s not a single steel working in America out of a job who’s ever heard this man’s name. But they put this aristocrat onto the job of destroying first the steel industry. In my book in 1980 I said that by 1985 we would have silent blast furnaces, the rolling mills would be stopped, there would be no more ship building. We have thousands of skilled workers, who passed the skills of their trade down for generations, who were forever dispossessed of their jobs….what I said in 1980 has now come to pass.

In 1970 the US had 5000 ships built by good US know-how, using good US steel. 5000 ships sailing the high seas. Last year (1993?) we had 270 such ships, and at least 50,000 steel workers permanently out of a job. Jobs that will never come back. What happened? Did we suddenly lose our marbles, did we suddenly lose our great American know-how of getting things done? No. None of those things happened. What happened was this dastardly Club of Rome had sent their emissaries to the United States to deliberately destroy our steel plants, and they did it by opening the doors of so-called Free Trade. And everybody who signs the NAFTA treaty, and everybody who signs the GATT treaty, if it passes, is a traitor and a seditionist.

Our steel industry is destroyed, our ship yards are silent, our skilled workers are permanently without a job, and if you don’t believe me, get the report of the Club of Rome…last year (1993/1994) the Club of Rome celebrated its anniversary, and Alexander King as its Chairman stated, “The American people henceforth must get used to the idea that they will never ever again in their lifetimes have full employment”. What a scandalous thing, that our government is fully cooperating with this organization, built up by the Royal Institute of National Affairs, to destroy the middle class of the United States. And to add to the politics of global genocide. And that brings me to the next question: What is the Global 2000? Once again, when I heard about this policy, it was three days after it had been accepted by the United States government, as its official policy, and the Global 2000 was a blueprint for mass genocide, produced by the Club of Rome.”

Clearly, as it’s been pointed out for decades, and by people much more knowledgeable about it than myself, “the plan” was always meant to kill more than jobs—it was meant to kill people—billions of them. If you previously watched Dr. Coleman’s presentation, you’ve no doubt made the connection between his covering how viruses, like the ‘bird flu’ specifically, were meant to be introduced as a means to further that plan, and the ICE AGE FARMER VIDEOS above covering how there are now PCR tests for birds—for the bird flu—currently being used as an excuse to kill off millions of chickens, while shuttering the doors to chicken farms and permanently laying off the workers.

I suspect the ‘Global 2000’ agenda being covered by Coleman was later rebranded as Agenda 21, which was again rebranded as Agenda 2030. Agenda 21, having been covered in other articles here over the years, as well as the Club of Rome (use the black search bar on the top right to find that material), won’t be covered again now because there’s something else, perhaps even more important, that should never get lost in the shuffle: how this all started.


Dr. Coleman’s presentation is full of knowledge few people today fully possess or grasp, especially in relation to historical events of magnitude capable of shedding much needed light on current trends. A spectacular example of this was his brief explanation of how China was targeted with opium, now being done to America, by the successive generations of those who brought it upon China in the past—this is the reason for the heroin and fentanyl catastrophe in this country at the moment. Coleman spent years going through East India Trading Company records to uncover just how much opium they shipped to the Orient, where they grew it, how they imposed it on people, and just how much the dope trade increased their wealth. The numbers were staggering, even by today’s standards.


Free Trade destroys the wealth of nations and the freedom of its people to be self-sufficient. In other words, “free trade” is synonymous with trading in your freedom and right to self-determination, both as a nation and an individual. This is why globalism is meant to culminate into a global, fascist, corporate police state, ran in perpetuity by the small group of people orchestrating world events. THEY USE FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS TO TAKE MORE POWER. For those unaware, the Trans Pacific Partnership (covered by this author in 2013 in episodes 2 and 3 in the Race With Time Radio Archives) was an astonishing example of how this scam works, and literally attempted to give corporations a status above that of nations. It was never going to pass back then through ‘democratic means’ (voting), so it was put on the back burner, until COVID. The plandemic has given them everything the TPP couldn’t, and much, much more. Dr. John Coleman included the con job called ‘free trade’ in his lecture for extremely important reasons—reasons we would do well to understand:

“Liberty, is based on individual freedom. We are individual people, we are not the “mass” so disdainfully referred to by Karl Marx and the socialist writers. We objected to a tax of a penny a pound on tea, when King George of the Venetian Party…that was what the party of King George was called and we’ll come to the reason for that, but our colonists said we’re not going to pay this penny a pound tax on tea…King George of the Venetian Party did more than that, he sent Adam Smith, a servant of the East India Company, to formulate a policy which he called “Free Trade”, and by the means of Free Trade, Adam Smith, the greatly beloved economist of the Marxists and the socialists and liberals, hoped to bring the small manufactories and the industries established by the colonists to their knees. Let me tell you unequivocally, that free trade is piracy! There is no such thing as free trade. We have to reject, this constant brainwashing to which we are subjected.

Free Trade began when Adam Smith and the British India Company—now who is the British East India Company? They play a massive role in the history of the United States of America, only you are not taught this in your universities. But you need to know. In my book, The Committee of 300, which took years to research…I point out that the British East India Company was the most powerful trading company in the world. They made their massive money out of the dope trade.”

Dr. John Coleman explains the East India dope trade at the 12 minute mark in his lecture, some of which is recounted below. Those familiar with even recent history might find themselves re-evaluating recent wars, the reinvigorated poppy fields that came out of those wars, and the fact that “Poppy Bush” wasn’t a reference to him being a grandfather:

“They (East Empire Company) first grew prime poppies in the Q Gardens in Kensington London, and got the best producing opium poppies, and then shipped them to Tinares in India where they began a massive plantation of poppies, of opium producing poppies. They then used their famous Tea Clippers (ships) to transport the poppies in the form of raw opium to China, and by their military might they imposed an opium policy on China that turned the Chinese nation into a nation of addicts. And they enforced this policy, which was known to the Royal family, and Lord Glaston the Prime Minister, and every one of the lords and ladies in England, and they made a massive fortune.

In researching those documents in the India House in London, I came across some of the manifests of the old tea clippers, and the numbers of kegs of opium they carried and their values. And I totaled up these things, and I found to my astonishment…in one year, the opium trade with China was 3x the combined profits of Ford and General Motors in 1970. And this was shared by 300 people—that was the Committee (of 300) that ran the British East Empire Company. They all had legal voting rights, could not vote against each other, and were sworn to secrecy.

The descendants of the British East Empire Company, today run the United States of America…they also interfered with the development of the United States on every occasion. They armed the Indians, they armed the people against the settlers who were pushing west—they ran the Hudson Bay Company. They also ran so-called mission stations in China, and got missionaries who were not really missionaries at all, to push opium on the Chinese. And I remember a conversation with the late Abdel Gamel Nasser, the president of Egypt, and Mohammed Iqbal, one of the top journalists, with Chou En-lai, who told him, he said, “You know, the Americans and British made China a nation of opium addicts and now, with the Vietnam War, it’s our turn—we’re going to make the Americans a nation of opium addicts”. So you can see the influence, the evil influence of the British East India Company upon the great nation of the Unites States of America.

They were the ones who financed the war, they put up the money for British troops to buy the Hessian mercenaries, and to fight the colonists. Those brave 3%, let me remind you that only 3% of the people took arms and stood against the mighty army of King George III.”


In 1984, Yuri Bezmenov gave an extremely detailed explanation of the way (and why) ideological subversion works and is used, outlining it’s four specific stages in the order they unfold: Demoralization, Destabilization, Crisis, and finally Normalization, or “new normals”. What our beloved millennials—those most heavily targeted by ideological subversion—don’t yet realize, is that the new normals they were promised, won’t be anything close to what they actually get. It never is, and drone chants of “that wasn’t real communism/socialism” in response to warnings that historically, mass starvation is generally the result, isn’t going to keep them from starving from it again, now.

“To promise people all kinds of goodies and the paradise on earth, to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the concept of free market competition, and to put big brother government in Washington D.C with benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale [Globalist], who will promise lots of things, never mind if the promises are fulfilled or not—he [they] will go to Moscow [United Nations] to kiss the bottoms of new generation of soviet [globalist] assassins. Never mind he will create false illusions of the ‘situation is under control’. The situation is NOT under control—the situation is disgustingly out of control.

“So basic—two very simple—maybe too simplistic answers or solutions. Educate yourself. Understand what’s going on around you. You are not living in a time of peace. You are in a state of war, and you have precious little time to save yourself. You don’t have much time, especially if you’re talking about young generation.”



The course being set for the majority of the human race is obvious, and so is its outcome. Less obvious, is who planned this course, and what they get out of it. These are people whose elevated status is the product not of great inventions, ideas or contributions, but was born out of the ways in which they perfected the art of pushing everyone else down. You must get back up, stronger and wiser than you were before. For those still struggling with the idea that the United States of America is being subjected to ‘planned destruction’ or ‘managed decline’, I invite you to read documents/sources in which communities are being prepared for it, like this downloadable PDF called: ZERO-GROWTH PLANNING
Empowering Rural Communities in Decline
. OR do a search for an article put out by the WEF (Globalist World Economic Forum) called: Zero-growth could be the new long-term normal in developed economies: Six charts that explain why.

The ICE AGE FARMER videos are excellent, not because their content is thorough, but because solutions are always presented. In truth, the solution to the problem en masse, is self-sufficiency. Storing food is extremely important, but growing your own becomes more necessary by the day. If you pastor a church, turn as much of the property as possible into food production. The same goes for anyone who owns/manages apartment complexes, trailer parks, community centers—get the food growing—this weekend. It takes 3 months of long summer daylight hours to mature most crops, and it’s harder to start with seeds in hotter weather. That means you’re already behind a little, but not much. Local nurseries may not have the widest variety of seeds/plants available, so I personally love to order seeds from seedsavers.org. They have a fantastic selection of seeds most people don’t even know exist.

Learn about composting, companion planting, and varieties of flowers that keep the bugs from eating your food. Remember, flowers also bring bees—bees pollinate your food—you need them. For the desert people out there, I’ve personally found over the years that any kind of pepper (bell, poblano, paprika) and most tomatoes, tomatillos, and even Chinese celery do well here. Growing artichoke and asparagus is also easy in this particular climate, and they come back better every year on their own. Rosemary, garlic, parsley and aloe vera also do well and have useful properties for healing. Plenty of important herbs also do well in the shade, and there are numerous fruit and nut tree varieties (apples, pecans, dates) acclimated to our climate. Plan for fall crops. Several plants require or grow well in cooler weather. Get a chlorine filter for your garden hose—chlorine is added to most municipal water supplies and kills the good microbes necessary to grow food. Learn how to safely sterilize your freshly grown food with things like ozone water and food grade hydrogen peroxide water—parasites that infect humans are in nearly all soils.

If you don’t have room on your own property, as suggested in the videos, approach your neighbors to grow on theirs. Some cities, even Las Vegas, have community garden plots you can rent. Learn about greenhouses, and how CARBON INJECTION KITS PRODUCE A HIGHER YEILD—zero carbon=zero life. Pool your funds, land, resources, families, know-how, skill-sets, and most importantly, pool your love of humanity and refusal to allow the least among us to bring our civilization to full ruin in their mattoid pursuit of power over everyone and everything, at any cost.

“Humanity once again stands at a most important fork in the road; a moment exhilarating and exasperating, liberating and terrifying—may we have the wisdom and moral fortitude to choose the path of countless wonders.” –Crystal Clark


Ann Bressington Exposes Agenda 21, Club of Rome, Sustainable Development, at the Lord Monckton Launch 2 Feb 2013 at the Adelaide Convention Centre

ARTICLE: May 9, 2022: Australia Passes Bill Prohibiting Citizens From Growing Their Own Food And Expanding Federal Powers To Seize Livestock



WHO WAS AURELIO PECCEI (Responsible for the destruction of our steel industry)?

According to wikipedia: Born July 4, 1908 Turin, Italy. Died March 14, 1984 (aged 75). Aurelio Peccei (Italian born 4 July 1908 – 14 March 1984), was an Italian industrialist and philanthropist, best known as co-founder with Alexander King and first president of the Club of Rome, an organisation which attracted considerable public attention in 1972 with its report, The Limits to Growth.

WHO WAS BERTAND RUSSELL? (Mentioned repeatedly by Dr. Coleman):

VIDEO: Alan Watt – Social engineering to create dysfunctional society


The introduction found in the first FRIDAY NIGHT AT THE MOVIES repeats here for the same reason it was used in the first one:

“It’s been an amazing and heart-warming experience to watch the Great Awakening finally begin. I say “begin” because there still seems to be a great deal of confusion regarding certain issues, understandably so, given trends to bury their historical unfolding, figureheads, agendas and actions throughout history—how did we get where where we are, and who is responsible for it?

Yet it’s here a troubling trend or void in the Great Awakening is repeatedly observed by this author: that the alternative media, in what we may even view as the leaders of this awakening, have a tendency to continually and completely ignore the numerous and previously well-documented answers to that most important question. To continue on as though those answers don’t yet exist—that they are difficult to understand or perceive any better than a grainy satellite image of some far off nebula—is incorrect at best, disingenuous at worst. Official documents, patents, treaties and bail-outs have names on them, public hearings have attendees lists, familial lineages can be historically traced, and corporations have employee listings and owners whose product lines (and the damage they cause/caused) have been, and can continue to be, well established.

During this rather odd lull in the otherwise all-consuming war of competing realities, it’s a good time for people in the middle of their awakening experience—people who will be looked to or called upon for clarity and guidance in the future by those just beginning that same experience for themselves—to earnestly begin the task of due diligence in digging through historical records. They exist. They are well documented, and extremely detailed.”


Unfortunately, few people today have heard of Dr. John Coleman, and once you’ve heard what he had to say—what he warned the world about nearly 30 years ago—you’ll understand why you’ve never heard of him. “Reality Narrative Supremacy” isn’t a new conquest or battlefield, rather it’s our understanding of its existence and motives that is new.

Coleman’s warnings weren’t simply prescient, they were well researched. Undeniably so, considering we’re currently living them out. The presentation he gave, presumably in the 1990’s given it was originally recorded on VHS and refers to the first Iraq war, is embedded below. It’s just under two hours, and provides information so powerful, so important, and so necessary for the people of the world to understand, no “Great Awakening” would be complete without it. Also, those who watched the documentaries in the first FRIDAY NIGHT AT THE MOVIES will undoubtedly get much more out of it.

It’s impossible to solve problems we don’t understand the true face and nature of. Mankind can no longer continue to participate in their own demise out of ignorance, and survive it at the same time. We can’t afford to continue missing the mark—blaming the wrong ideologies and people for things they aren’t associated with or involved in—allowing the true perpetrators to avoid prosecution while they bring the earth and its future to full ruin in the process. We have to get past the silence, the disinformation, the constant replacement-narrative blather, and get to the truth—we have to return to reason and accountability.

Coleman’s presentation needs no pre-summary, and given that it’s so well done and covers so many interconnected subjects of extreme importance, a summary wouldn’t nearly do it justice. Below is also a list of companion articles that are complementary to the material:



“This is the story of the bitter conflict between ideology and knowledge–what can happen when factual discoveries raise inconvenient questions for politicians…

Science–it is the essence of everything we know about our world. Every life improvement from health to habitat began with science. Science, the mother of invention,  was once an independent arm of public policy, but in Canada there is trouble in the realms of science. It’s happening coast-to-coast, and north to the farthest reaches of the Arctic: science that isn’t practically useful for advancing policy objectives has been curtailed or scrapped.” –Linden MacIntyre, Narrator for Silence of the Labs: A War On Knowledge



Repeatedly, Orwell returned in his writing to the idea that a state of health in a body politic is dependent on a careful and deliberate use of language. Newspeak, used by state propagandists in Orwell’s famous futuristic novel 1984, was effective, in Orwell’s view, because it had “the power” to render people incapable of “grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest argument, if they are inimical to Ingsoc [the official ideology], and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction.” But what offended Orwell most about this kind of propaganda was that it engenders a “protective stupidity.”

Today’s political messages are distilled in the laboratories of public relations and consumer branding to achieve maximum potency. Their power to shape emotions and opinions lies in their uncanny ability to get under people’s skin without arousing in citizens a powerful immune response.

–What Orwell Didn’t know: Propaganda and the New Face of American Politics



Openly submitting the US to a UN police force took place years ago, and if you weren’t aware of it, it wasn’t because honest news agencies and/or citizen journalists weren’t talking about it. It’s because dishonest and disloyal news outlets (most now owned and operated by 6 globalist corporations) celebrated the event with glee, phony virtue signaling and spin, while their tech company counterparts censored anyone still clinging to the previous reality of America remaining a sovereign republic maintaining it’s right to self-governance and self-determination.



“This isn’t a vaccine story–this is a population management story. If your goal is to make this beautiful earth that we live on, an exclusive playground for the entitled few, then populations that get in the way are a problem. And it is the empirical impulse of individuals who have decided, that by out-ranking the rest of humanity, they can dictate upon humanity the conditions of our existence…and this is also a test of humanity to see how much of our liberty we will let go, before finally drawing the line under enough.”

–Plandemic Indoctornation World Premier

Humanity once again stands at a most important fork in the road; a moment exhilarating and exasperating, liberating and terrifying—may we have the wisdom and moral fortitude to choose the path of countless wonders. –Crystal Clark

Dr. John Coleman – 21 Goals of the Illuminati and The Committee of 300 – Wake Up America full


It’s been an amazing and heart-warming experience to watch the Great Awakening finally begin. I say “begin” because there still seems to be a great deal of confusion regarding certain issues, understandably so, given trends to bury their historical unfolding, figureheads, agendas and actions throughout history—how did we get where where we are, and who is responsible for it?

Yet it’s here a troubling trend or void in the Great Awakening is repeatedly observed by this author: that the alternative media, in what we may even view as the leaders of this awakening, have a tendency to continually and completely ignore the numerous and previously well-documented answers to that most important question. To continue on as though those answers don’t yet exist—that they are difficult to understand or perceive any better than a grainy satellite image of some far off nebula—is incorrect at best, disingenuous at worst. Official documents, patents, treaties and bail-outs have names on them, public hearings have attendees lists, familial lineages can be historically traced, and corporations have employee listings and owners whose product lines (and the damage they cause/caused) have been, and can continue to be, well established.

During this rather odd lull in the otherwise all-consuming war of competing realities, it’s a good time for people in the middle of their awakening experience—people who will be looked to or called upon for clarity and guidance in the future by those just beginning that same experience for themselves—to earnestly begin the task of due diligence in digging through historical records. They exist. They are well documented, and extremely detailed.

Below are three different documentaries/lectures, from three different sources, that vary significantly in length and texture. The first video is a one hour lecture by Jack Otto on the History of the Khazar Empire (2008). Readers may find this exceptionally interesting given the value of hindsight in recognizing repeating patterns, as they repeat today. Take note of how the elite use central banks to turn national economies on and off through interest rate dips and hikes, and how this contributes to class warfare. Otto also explains how our modern banking cartels were historically established. The second is a lengthier (three-and-half hour) documentary called JFK to 9/11: Everything Is A Rich Man’s Trick (2014). It contains valuable footage that lends needed context to historical events, and more than adequately demonstrates the functional operating patterns of the globalist elite—especially the manner in which they repeatedly orchestrate and fund both sides of wars. I’m not sure what to make of the JFK material in the beginning, having not researched it that deeply myself, but the rest of the material is highly thought provoking. The third documentary, The Psychopath Next Door (2014), is extremely eye-opening and discusses banks using the official psychopath trait checklist as a hiring guide just before the 2008 financial crash. Those accusations are well founded.

The common thread running between them, is of course the purposeful abuse—weaponization even—of the financial and banking apparatus scheme that holds entire nations hostage to a small group of people who use that weapon to achieve what they refer to as their ‘new world order’. Who those people are, and how they came to be running those institutions matters a great deal, and it doesn’t take long to establish that ‘social justice’ and ‘carbon output’ are but the next massive con job dubbed “the great reset”.

CAUTION FOR PARENTS: Some of the images and content contained in these resources is disturbing, and should be considered for mature audiences only.

Below are links to articles that are complimentary to the videos:

Humanity once again stands at a most important fork in the road; a moment exhilarating and exasperating, liberating and terrifying—may we have the wisdom and moral fortitude to choose the path of countless wonders. –Crystal Clark

Forbidden Knowledge – History of the Khazar Empire – Lecture by Jack Otto (2008)


The Psychopath Next Door 2014 Documentary


by Crystal Clark, April 14, 2022

On the off chance you’ve found yourself here today without knowing who Dr. Bryan Ardis is, you’re in for an extremely sobering and wild ride. As he tells the story (embedded in a compilation video at the end), Dr. Ardis was prompted to begin investigating snake venom, of all things, in relation to the entire global CV19 phenomenon. To be sure, what he found is both incredible and shocking. You will, no doubt, need to cover and research the material yourself to believe it. Most people do, and in a world filled with mindless repetition of propaganda, ‘trust but verify’ attitudes are most welcome.

In regards to the connection between viruses and snake venom, what follows here are companion insights discussed by myself and James Horak, during a November 29, 2014 radio show with host Mark Snider of Ohio Exopolitics. [The original post with show notes can be found HERE, and is reposted below.]

These are transcribed from a segment in which we discussed the true nature of parasites and viruses—including the fact that before they began to alter modern dictionary definitions, the original definition of “virus” was a toxin or SNAKE VENOM. The detailed nature of that particular segment, indeed the entire interview discussing the relevance of parasitism as a whole upon society, includes data and perspectives that can help readers penetrate more deeply into several related issues simultaneously—including recent revelations from Dr. Ardis, and where that component may fit into the mechanism as a whole.

While the transcription below only covers the segment dealing with viruses, I suspect listeners will find the dialogue just before this, in relation to Ebola, equally interesting. Transcription begins at the 29:05 mark of the audio file below:

Mark Snider, James Horak & Crystal Clark – Parasites – 29 Nov 2014


Q. Mark Snider: So, is a virus considered an organism?

A. James Horak: Hmm-mm, no. It can be in the form of a mixture of proteins that get involved with cellular integrity of the individual it’s in, and affects the way in which sister cells are replicated…

A. Crystal Clark: If it helps Mark, there used to be, before they started revising reality in this direction, there used to be [known] very distinct differences between viruses and things like parasites. Viruses were once considered non-living, biological contaminates because they do not feed for sustenance and they cannot reproduce using their own parts. And in older dictionaries, that were written before these revisions, very strangely it will seem to a lot of people if you look it up, it will say that it’s a form of poison and often snake venom. So that’s the difference between a virus and a parasite, and the changes that were made, to the definition of a parasite, removed the need for physical attachment to the host, and included shelter. So now, any living thing, that needs another living thing for food or shelter, is [now] considered a parasite, which of course leads us back to the parasitic view of humanity—and we know where that’s coming from.

Q. Mark Snider: Well, let me throw this out and you can correct me if i’m wrong, I mean, a virus still has DNA and RNA, right?

A. Horak: It can have, [but] not necessarily. What it has, it can have the building blocks of certain proteins that are going to be taken into the cell, but with a variation that’s going to affect the reproduction or the cell division of the that cell into a sister cell, and that sister cell—which we could ascribe as second generation but theoretically it’s a sister cell—it’s divided from it’s sister, it affects what a lot of people think of as a mutation, but it’s just a variation, and that variation is seldom beneficial.

Q. Mark Snider: I’ve heard viruses described as organisms on the edge of life, and I thought viruses do reproduce, correct?

A. James Horak: No.

A. Crystal Clark: No, they have to be replicated.

A. James Horak: The only way of reproducing is by using a host cell, that they affect in a way that will lead to a variation, in the sister cell.

Q. Mark Snider: So, does the virus, essentially replicate itself by changing the DNA of the cell that it goes into?

A. James Horak: It changes the environment, of the cell. It changes the way in which that cell will put together its own protein, and what the sister cell that it will replicate, what it will be—what its characteristics will be. For instance, like in a cancer. What happens is the environment is changed so that the cells will now have to compete, they’re competing in a lower oxygen environment so that they convert over to anaerobic function to be able to compete better, thereby losing their function for the tissue they’re in, and giving off toxins at a higher rate.

A. Crystal Clark: You know Mark, I just wanted to add that I think it’s very helpful to people, to look at a biological virus as bio-hacking, the same way a technological virus goes in—if it knows the source code—it goes into the computer, it begins to re-write the code and now the program no longer functions the same.

A. James Horak: Pretty much.

A. Crystal Clark: Same principle, they’re just not living entities.

A. James Horak: It’s just like with chemical and radiological mutations—what they create is seldom beneficial—either beneficial to any host or beneficial to their survival.

Q. Mark Snider: I’ve heard viruses described as not living things, that they’re more or less information, I think the analogy I guess Crystal was making, it’s almost like someone putting a bug in a computer program, or you know, messing with the source code.

A. Crystal Clark: You know, there is something really interesting about that, that I asked James the other day, that I think you would find really incredible, although whether in a good way or a bad way is debatable. When you look at things through design, you try to understand their purpose and function. And we can look at things, we can look at microbes and fungi, and we can see their purpose, but not viruses. They don’t seem to have any beneficial purposes in nature, so I asked James the other day, are these maybe leftover Frankenstein experiments from a previous lineage, and I think you might find his answer interesting.

A. Mark Snider: OK

A. James Horak: That’s a possibility, there are other possibilities, but I think that is probably the most significant one. We find in nature, in everything, that when it is in balance, it’s self-healing. And anything, that is on any scale, that is counter-evolutionary, which viruses are, it ends up getting scrapped. But, when mankind meddles, and using Dioxin, finds a way to genetically engineer things that throw nature out of balance, it may take some time, an entire lineage or more for this balance to be restored, and in a partial manifestation it may take much longer…

Q. Mark Snider: You know, these vaccines produce an artificially acquired immunity, and even that can be unhealthy, can’t it?

A. James Horak: Oh yeah, well, here’s a variation. Any kind of immunity is variation, and humans that acquire immunity, that is when things are in balance, when it isn’t a chemical lab that is devising a biological weapon and it gets loose, like may have happened here, when that doesn’t happen, the correction is part of nature. When they’re not made, for instance, I speak of cancer, as being an immune response, and that would indicate what you’re saying exactly, because that’s what it is. If you try to treat it as a disease, and attack it with the very things that cause cancer, like radiation and chemo therapy, you might stress the body to fight back and you get a desired result, one time out of ten thousand, but it’s probably very much like trying to adjust your carburetor with a sub-machine gun.

Q. Mark Snider: [laughs] That’s a good analogy.

Q. Mark Snider: Well, at one time they had a germ theory of disease, and they don’t even think that’s real anymore, do they?

A. James Horak: I’ll tell you what has had a lot to do with changing that, and that is their resistance to acknowledging that on meteorites, and on things they find in deep ice cavities in the Antarctic, they find tissue, even tissue that is alive, and can be brought back to life very easily when it’s not, what we call “living fossils”. So they find these things and they want to cling to ‘life’ and the idea of a concept of life, but they want to hold to mythology too, so they get caught up in their contradictions, because they’re not flexible enough to be able to originate new finds, and correspondingly relate them to the old understandings. Because it would change them—it would challenge openly some principles—and we don’t have a single principle, in science, in agriculture, or any field of endeavor on this planet, that couldn’t stand a little adjusting.

Q. Mark Snider: I think we got the first images of viruses back in 1931 when they developed the electron microscope—is that true James?

A. James Horak: That’s right. Well, it took electron microscopes, something that could see something at an enlargement of a quarter of a million times, to actually see the building blocks of proteins, the virus came into the picture, and they started seeing that there were things going on that they didn’t quite understand, so they began to try to understand sub-molecular particles and other things, and how they were related. And that’s when they began to really get into genetics, and to see there was more to genetics than simply gene alignment on a chromosome.


Remembering that this interview was originally recorded 8 years ago in 2014, several of the patterns and warnings we pointed to have regrettably now come to pass. Perhaps the most striking example, discussed with this host [around the 18 minute mark], is regarding the three phases of behavior and decline that lead to the demise of an entire civilization. In the last two years, the mattoid elite have used CV19 to massively accelerate the third phase:

“In phase 3, what accelerates the process, is you have billions of people that are conned into participating in their own demise out of ignorance, under false pretenses of doing the exact opposite.”

In listening to the entire interview beyond the transcription, new readers especially, will come across concepts they may have no previous reference for. This would include phrases like “previous lineages”, “limited disclosure”, and “partially manifested reality”. These topics are, indeed, strange, but they also fundamentally represent one of our most profound truisms: reality is stranger than fiction. Readers can learn more about those extremely important topics in the resource section below.

Humanity once again stands at a most important fork in the road; a moment exhilarating and exasperating, liberating and terrifying—may we have the wisdom and moral fortitude to choose the path of countless wonders.  —Crystal Clark


The Sacred Science (link)

(Misapplication of knowledge destroyed 6 previous lineages–we are repeating it)

Articles on Reality Revisionism (link):


‘Limited Disclosure’ & ‘Partially Manifested Reality’:

NOTE: James Horak’s reference to ‘limited disclosure’ is a derogatory term meant to convict the elite of consistently lying to the public about the true nature of other peoples in the universe—that they consistently ‘limit’ those ‘disclosures’ to a context that pre-defines those people as hostile, and as anything other than people, when nothing could be further from the truth, in preparation for another great reality revision pulled off under the guise of a [fake] hostile ET invasion.


by Crystal Clark, January 4, 2022

[1/6/22 UPDATE: In reviewing archives for content to include in upcoming articles, I came across two wonderful videos I couldn’t resist adding after the essay was already posted: James Horak’s 2010 Ultimatum to TPTB, and the ever so delightful video, The Disclosure.]

“If time travel is possible, ever will be possible, it’s with us now.” —James Horak, 2013

This might be a tough read for some, but the truth often can be, when we’ve become too efficient at ignoring it, only to suddenly become confronted with the fullness of it. More than anything though, this isn’t a story about our mistakes, it’s actually a story about love, and I hope that by the end you will come to see that.



My Great Grandmother died in my late teens and was a remarkably intelligent and interesting character. I didn’t get to know her until late in her life, and only for a short time, but it was long enough to leave a wonderful and lasting impression. She often used to joke about watching movies in “technicolor”. Technicolor refers to a time (during what some call ‘Hollywood’s Golden Age’) in which motion pictures began to incorporate a film-colorizing technology that revolutionized the motion picture industry. Seeing films in Technicolor, instead of the traditional gray, black and white, “brought the movies to life”.

Years later, while someone was explaining a dream they had, as the conversation continued I was surprised to find their dreams were in black and white. Having always dreamt in color myself, I thought that was odd, and over the years I’ve found myself wondering, are people actually living their lives in full color?

For centuries, endless narrative blather has constantly papered over a reality teaming with extraordinary knowledge, events and wonders, that very much like the invention of Technicolor, would quite literally bring our world to life. In so doing, they also bring us to life, but only when we are exposed to, or aware of them. The more we know about a thing or event, the more texture, flavor, color, meaning, possibility and choice it offers, deeply enriching our life experience in the process.

An perhaps even starker semi-metaphor along these lines, is the contrast between a life lived with a fuller awareness of endless possibilities and the wonders we are surrounded by, versus someone who lived during the Dark Ages. The Dark Ages (metaphorically a life lived in black and white) were so named for several reasons, the first being that very little was known during that time, i.e., people were living in the dark. Other common explanations for the term include: The Middle Ages are often said to be dark because of a supposed lack of scientific and cultural advancement. During this time, feudalism was the dominant political system; a time during which a civilization undergoes a decline.

While we often refer to what we perceive as an incredibly smart person (or idea) as being “bright” or “brilliant”, today, the depth of what that implies is largely lost to us. It’s no coincidence that these same bright people also appear to be far more alive—they sometimes exude an almost perceptible glow—an emanating love and zeal for life itself. In philosophical or religious terms, we may find this expressed as “illuminated” or conceptualized in art with a glowing light or halo about the heads of saintly figures. But if we were to distill that down into something more tangible, manageable, and meaningful, might we discover that extreme reality literacy is the basis for it, when paired with a strong moral undercurrent constantly pulling that knowledge towards a right use that benefits everyone?

Is the experience of ‘illumination’ really unobtainium for the masses, or is it the model through which we achieve a level of existence—as a planetary civilization—beyond our wildest dreams? Is that model just some arbitrary feel-good hopium being laid down on a random website, or is it in fact the natural course of human evolution, and far more importantly, is it being intentionally derailed? Is the path that led to the Golden Age of Hollywood, really so different from the path to the Golden Age of man?


Readers may recall from the previous article (and Core Perspective) this author has always been in full agreement with Juliane Assange that our greatest enemy, is ignorance. Not just ignorance, but those who benefit from and relentlessly and methodically perpetuate it, through secrecy, denial, obfuscation, propaganda and misinformation. Knowledge (information) is power, and because we’re very clearly in the midst of another knowledge-hoarding cycle, critical analysis has some people publicly and rightfully wondering if a new Dark Age is on the horizon. The increasing censorship, shunning, and ‘cancelation’ of anyone attempting to create a brighter, more reality literate population, only serves to make the trend in that direction exceedingly obvious. The escalation and severity of the trend is exacerbated by years of dumbing-down in the public education system, accompanied by the continual ideological subversion of our youth and endless fear campaigns designed to make the individual feel simultaneously less competent and more helpless.

For decades, around the world, there has been an extremely well-documented and concerted effort to rob humanity of its brilliance—of living a life in Technicolor—a covert and ongoing effort to keep the majority of the human population in the dark. This does far more than simply widen the gap between the haves and have-nots, obfuscate the ways in which the knowledge is being misused or weaponized against others, or make it exceedingly difficult to accurately use critical thinking because unknown variables aren’t being accounted for. Rather, a life lived in the dark, is also deprived of hope for something better, and is unable to prevent their free will from being co-opted to work against their own best interests under false pretenses. A life lived in the dark, is not a free life. A mind wandering in the dark, is not a free mind. It’s this author’s belief that it’s way passed time to correct that, and further, that our collective survival depends on it.


If ever there were wonders of magnitude capable of completely transforming a society away from black and white (or black vs. white) thinking, towards a more colorful, intelligent, meaningful, hopeful and extraordinary future full of endless possibilities, time travel and EMV’s more than suffice. While the issue of Time Travel or Time Control technology is far more pressing to understand at the moment in my view, in reality, what the right use of that technology can offer in terms of new possibilities of thought and being, pales in comparison to that of EMV’s.

To provide but a glimpse of what I mean, and hopefully in such a manner that allows for the interweaving of thoughts on both matters (time and space), perhaps especially in terms of errant paths currently being chosen (and their consequences) versus the better and more rewarding paths available to us, below is a brief transcription of James Horak discussing the wonders already being denied to us in favor of a corporate, feudal police state.

The short video of James making these remarks is embedded below, but the transcription only covers the last five minutes. This was done because it’s my belief that readers will not understand the significance of the technical explanation provided in the beginning of the video, without first understanding why it is in fact so significant. Also, upon listening to the entire video, readers will find long audio pauses in the dialogue. These are designed to give the viewer time to observe the phenomenon being explained.

Please also note that the audio editing in the first segment is the result of Shuny (the maker of the video) having asked James to name the feature being explained (Solar Anvil). As that conversation transpired after the original recording was made, Shuny went back and edited the audio track where applicable to include the proper name of the object. In later recordings, James explained and confirmed those edits were made as stated.

EMVS, SUN CONTROL, AND THE SOLAR ANVIL (Posted by OmetaOne, August 9th, 2012)

Transcription: SOLAR DYNAMICS, by James Horak

“A talented friend, kindly generous with his time, has put together images of the sun, taken at each hour, over the period of the last month and a half. He did this, in order to better understand my claims on the Kevin Smith show, that an enormous object, now acknowledged in proximity with the sun, is not only fixed in position there, but operating in an interaction with the sun to accomplish certain dynamics, only possible to a technology far beyond that of any planetary civilization.

These features become very important to discussions of today, as we see an errant drift of mindset being fostered more and more, to portray an hostile E.T. presence as virtually inevitable.

That this is absurd, in any context, historically or present, as a matter of common sense, is being lost more and more to the drum beat of steady media repetition. In dredging up myths, superstition and the remnants of poorly developed logic among western science fiction writers, an underlying theme of this inevitability has already been implanted.

Still, it is no less absurd, and fostered and promoted on a vast scale, simply because it has a designed agenda behind it. Now, instead of manufactured terrorism and attacks on national sovereignty on earth to engineer the ages old device of war upon the people—in order to deny them more personal freedom and better means of financial sustainment—the stage is set to bring an end to all social contracts based on the advances, cultural and technological, mankind has achieved in the last 300 years to win an equality among levels of society for the individual. The fear-driven agenda of a hostile E.T. threat has been developed as the ultimate false flag operation, to do just this.

Just as we were led to believe that nations must form alliances under detente, in order to escape certain destruction of the imposed threat of a hydrogen bomb, and that nations must combine on the same basis to afford advancing space exploration, we will be TAUGHT combatting this new alien threat will require a nationless new world order—already set up as a corporate, feudal police state.

We already see evidence of this as corporations like BP (British Petroleum) are allowed to police their own catastrophic environmental holocaust in the Gulf of Mexico, rather than the EPA and Coast Guard, and Monsanto is allowed to confine food production to corporate control with laws that prohibit non-hybrid seed.

These trends are not justified by any external threat, but are part of a growingly apparent agenda around what lays behind the false flag fabrication of one: world dominance by an elite that has lost its way morally, and in any context appropriate to evolutionary advance.

At this stage of crucial decision-making, it is important to view certain dynamics in a perspective long denied the people of this planet, for all to see that the design in nature governing all things on this astrophysical plane, have both order and design shared in common in knowledge by all civilizations, that advance beyond the point which the people of earth now near.

Dearest fellow children of the universe, you have nothing to fear from those part and parcel to these dynamics. View what you see as but an example of what is possible when people survive their own technology, and share it without constraints of any lords or masters.

[End of Transcription]

Regarding the topic of EMVS, this brief video/transcription only hints at the sheer magnitude of the topic. While the discovery of EMV’s was barely skimmed in Part 1 (PART 1: THE MOST IMPORTANT (AND IGNORED) DISCOVERIES OF OUR MODERN AGE—EMV’S AND TIME TRAVEL), and the ramifications of that discovery will necessarily need to be explored more deeply in future articles, Time Travel by itself, having gone well beyond the ‘theoretical’ stages decades ago, is of extreme Technicolor significance in better comprehending a vaster reality, in a multitude of ways. Moreover, if we accept there is an interconnected relationship between all things, including EMVS and the topic of Time Travel—even the past and present—understanding the one, may better help us to understand the nature and implications of the others.

Below is the video from which the transcription was taken, and I personally love the part where he makes reference to the “sparkles” being captured in the video, because at that moment, you can literally hear him smile. It’s helpful to keep in mind that the Solar Anvil has a specific purpose and function, and its size and scale in relation to that function is extremely revealing. The Solar Anvil being discussed, is located at the two o’clock position around the sun, and looks to have a crescent moon shape because its appearance is only partially visible.


Experts in their respective fields, be they science, mathematics or philosophy, may all provide a different definition of time, or alternatively, may find it such a complex issue they may refrain from attempting to define it all. There seems to be no real consensus. For now, this author has personally settled on the following: the space between events (overview/macrocosm), including the space in which an event occurred (localized/microcosm). As an aside, to this I would quickly add that after reviewing the work of Dr. David Anderson (below), readers may come to wonder, as I have, if the recent implementation of a Space Force is about far more than currently meets the eye—about far more than simply protecting an ‘outer space’ filled with satellite arrays, and global communications infrastructure.

Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom.” –Viktor E. Frankl

The ‘space’ between the stimulus and the response, what may also be referred to as “the calm before the storm” in particular situations, is the space that you and I—that over seven billion people on this planet—are currently in. And, as the above quote states, that space is where (and when) we choose our response. At the same time however, its worth considering whether or not that space is actually empty, beyond the choice being made. Can any meaningful choice be made in an empty void or vacuum? What about the well or library of knowledge from which the best choice can be drawn? Is the well polluted? Is the library full, or have half the books been pre-emptied, re-written, censored or deleted?


Here I would recommend the previous article on Time Travel and EMVs, especially in light of claims regarding future “time wars” being made back in 2010 by Dr. David Anderson, founder of the Anderson Institute. Additionally, if James Horak’s previous assertions are correct, not only have those time wars already started, but you and I may be living out the ramifications of a time experiment that altered the course of history in favor of some particularly mattoid mindsets. Also, as explained in that article, the “ripples” of that experiment, and perhaps other experiments, may be the reason for recent observations of strange phenomenon, like the Mandela Effect.

Despite efforts by officialdom to consistently downplay the reality of the Mandela Effect (just as they’ve taken to downplaying the reality and effectiveness of subliminals), there’s overwhelming evidence of it. So much so, that in 2019, Christopher Anatra, the CEO of a food distribution software company called NECS, felt compelled to produce the following video explaining the way in which the phenomenon was independently altering his customer’s databases. The video, just over 15 minutes, is well worth the time and extremely thought-provoking, especially in terms of Dr. David Anderson mentioning how Time Travel or Time Control technology can be used to “re-engineer historical timelines”. In the video below, Mr. Antara provides several examples strongly suggesting this has already happened. Are the kind of subtle shifts he’s referring to, and others like them, but side-effects of a larger and more focused attempt at re-engineering a greater, more pivotal event in our time-line somewhere else?


parallel universe
1. A universe, especially one of an infinite set of identical universes, hypothesized in some interpretations of quantum mechanics to exist along with our own universe, obeying the same physical laws, but each in a different quantum mechanical state with no possibility for the transfer of information between universes.
2. A universe hypothesized in some cosmological models to exist along with our own universe, possibly obeying different physical laws and having the potential for the transfer of information between universes.
3. A universe that exists separately alongside another universe.

One of the more salient points Orwell made, was the observation that an officialdom turning on its people (becoming secretive and tyrannical) will necessarily employ the careful and deliberate misuse of language to confuse or mislead. The term “parallel universe” may qualify as the kind of word salad obfuscation Orwell warned of, as it’s beginning to look more and more like a theory not based on actual science, but rather based on the need to cover something else up—in this case, time travel experiments that resulted in a re-engineered timeline, and the growing list of their observable side-effects.

To be more precise, far more sense can be made of current (and past) events, and their connections to one another, if we replace the word “universe” with “timeline” while simultaneously considering the ‘identical copy’ insertion into the phenomenon as also being erroneous. In other words, these two things are uniquely different and should not be referred to interchangeably. For other considerations along those lines I invite readers to review a previous article on the topic, TARTARIA, THE MUD FLOOD, TIME TRAVEL AND NAPOLEON: ARE THESE EVENTS ALL RELATED?

It’s notable that Dr. Anderson, as someone developing and experimenting with Time Travel/Time Control technology, never found any evidence of parallel universe theory during his literal (not theoretical) experiments, yet he did once admit during an interview with Art Bell that the splitting off of a new timeline (as a side-effect) was a real possibility.

The Bootstrap Paradox

Before focusing on the work, technological explanations, experiments and warnings surrounding time travel/control technologies as provided by Dr. David L Anderson, there is one more point of consideration I would like to leave readers with, known as The Bootstrap Paradox. While never specifically mentioned by Dr. Anderson in the video interviews I was able to find, he does refer to experiments and possible outcomes that would/could indicate it applies. A good explanation of the paradox comes from astronomytek.com as follows:

The Bootstrap Paradox is a theoretical paradox of time travel that occurs when an object or piece of information sent back in time becomes trapped within an infinite cause-effect loop in which the item no longer has a discernible point of origin, and is said to be “uncaused” or “self-created”. It is also known as an Ontological Paradox, in reference to ontology, a branch of metaphysics dealing with the study of being and existence.

Time travel movies can be frustrating because they virtually always indicate the writers themselves are struggling to adhere to a coherent model of time travel and its implications. While this makes them difficult to follow, I particularly enjoy the way the films are exploring the idea and trying to work it out. In terms of what the above definition implies, there is an excellent series on Netflix called The Dark, that does a brilliant job exploring this particular paradox. (Spoiler Alert)

A professional watch maker, in his later years, develops a time machine that, over the course of time, several different individuals repeatedly use and explore. So many people are using the device in fact, and doing so at cross-purposes, that sharing a single device isn’t effective to their plans. To remedy this, one of the characters travels to the past to meet the device maker, in his younger years, before he has actually made (or even considered making) the device. During this meeting, they explain the device he made in the future, and prove it by giving him the blueprints for it, asking him to make another one. He agrees, and makes another one—before he actually made the first one. The moment this event or meeting takes place, fits the criteria of the paradox (an infinite cause-effect loop) in which there is no longer any “discernible origin” for an idea or invention. Or, as James Horak often used to say, “time is serial, not linear”.

Readers may find it useful to keep this in mind when exploring Dr. David Anderson’s interviews about time travel, as he does on occasion make reference to something similar. For example, Dr. Anderson discussed traveling to the future to find (and bring back) cures for diseases, at which point, spending decades and billions of dollars on cures, in the present, may become meaningless.


Three particular interviews with Dr. David Anderson (embedded near the end) cover an enormous amount of information on the topic, and because they do, the material has been broken down into the following categories:

  1. Brief Biography of Dr. David Lewis Anderson
  2. History and Evolution of the Technology
  3. Successful Experiments
  4. Countries Actively Involved in the Research and Development of the Technology
  5. Known Capabilities of the Technology
  6. Potential Mass Market Applications for the Betterment of Humanity
  7. Known and Potential Dangers of the Technology Being Misused

NOTE: I recommend downloading the embedded interviews (below) given by Dr. David Anderson and saving them on an external device for future reference.


Dr. Anderson first brought this knowledge to the public during an interview with Art Bell, in 2002, where these programs were in a more infantile stage. It wasn’t until 8 years later he re-emerged, again on the Art Bell show, with updated information on the progression of the technology and warnings as to the nature, reality, potential applications and possible abuses of Time Travel/Time Control technologies. He did several radio appearances between 2009 and 2010 before he disappeared again, and has not been heard from publicly since. I contacted the producer of a show that interviewed him (Freeman TV) attempting to uncover what became of him, and was told that at the time of the Freeman TV interview (embedded below), Anderson stated his intention to ‘go dark’ again soon.

The information provided, about both himself and the technology then, stopped being publicly transmitted and exposed by Anderson over a decade ago. I encourage readers to keep that in mind, as we know we’ve entered a time when technological advancements have become exceedingly exponential, with Dr. Anderson admitting as much—back then—in direct relation to Time Travel/Time Control technology specifically.

In reviewing and cross-referencing the three interviews embedded here, we find that Dr. Anderson was a physicist who began working for the United States Air Force at a young age, where he conducted advanced research and development at the Air Force Flight Test Center (Edwards Air Force Base). During that period he conducted work for Air Force Systems Command and DAARPA, primarily focused on very high speed orbital navigation and space-based systems.

In conducting R&D for a specific project during that time, he began to observe an unusual phenomenon—something strange about space and time and energy levels needed to access or control time—that became the impetus for him creating a model for what is today (at that time) referred to as Inertial Frame Dragging (IFD). The Air Force had no open interest in pursuing this avenue of research, so Dr. Anderson continued the R&D on his own and created the TTRC (Time Control Research Center facility located in Long Island, NY), which later became the Anderson Institute.

Dr. Anderson formed the TTRC in the 1980’s where he continued to explore IFD and its implications. He spent the 1990’s advancing (testing) his first two Time Warp Field Generators, trying to make the technology safe and stable enough for advanced experimental testing procedures. He spent the next decade (2000-2010) working on a third generation Time Warp Field Generator in an attempt to get beyond the problems and limitations of the first two models.

The void left during his absence, in which he is not personally available to defend or explain the progression of his work since, is slowly being filled with unsubstantiated rumors that I suspect will inevitably evolve into full-on ‘wrap-up smear’ campaigns as this knowledge begins to spread, in an attempt to discredit it. I strongly advise readers to avoid those trappings, as Dr. Anderson was not only extremely open about the mechanics of the technology, but during an interview with Art Bell, at one point an unusual caller begins to ask extremely technical questions of Dr. Anderson, in what is obviously an attempt by someone independently working on similar technology, to compare notes.


The previous (biography) section only includes Dr. Anderson’s personal history and contributions, but he freely explained that thoughts in this direction didn’t begin with him, rather the groundwork for the Time Control Technology used today was originally advanced in theories prior to 1950.


Specifically, he referred to the mathematician Kurt Godel, who, in the 1940’s, proposed a theory that Time Travel to the past was possible without traveling faster than the speed of light, a theory at the core of related technology being used and developed currently. Anderson further implied that most of this technology was based on work done by others (beyond Godel) in the first half of the last century. HERE IS A BRITANNICA LINK TO KURT GODEL’S HISTORY, and while what it includes is impressive, what it leaves out is also telling. Readers may find the below paragraph useful when considering some of the other claims made by Dr. Anderson, especially in relation to Princeton:

After the publication of the incompleteness theorem, Gödel became an internationally known intellectual figure. He traveled to the United States several times and lectured extensively at Princeton University in New Jersey, where he met Albert Einstein. This was the beginning of a close friendship that would last until Einstein’s death in 1955.


It’s important to keep in mind, that “successful experiments that have already been done”, that we know of thanks to Dr. Anderson, means UP UNTIL 2010. Beyond additional information provided by James Horak, and observable side-effects (Mandella Effects as an example) of more recent experiments being performed, we don’t know nearly as much as we should. [NOTE: I am aware of other individuals coming forward over the years claiming to have knowledge of, or been involved in other Time Trave/Time Control experiments, but I personally find Dr. Anderson (and James Horak) to be the most fascinating, revealing, and informative in that regard.]

From here it can be difficult to separate out successful experiments of the technology performed in the thirty years prior to Anderson’s public appearance, and the entities or nations already heavily involved or invested. However, I feel it’s important to try, so that we can better understand what those agencies and nations were up to while the rest of us slept, or had our every thought busied with the gargantuan Reality Revision known as 9/11. Below is a list of successful experiments performed up to 2010, while the specific entities/nations involved are in the next section.

  1. Passing information backwards in time, faster than the speed of light. Through Quantum Tunneling and Quantum Entanglement, Dr. Wang created a 10cm (4″-5″) long chamber filled with Cesium vapor, and under specific conditions, was able to devise a system in which information was sent in one side of the chamber, yet actually finished leaving the chamber, before it finished entering. The ability to transmit information back in time, faster than the speed of light, is sometimes referred to as Super Luminal. While, according to Dr. Anderson, testing eventually included living organisms like seeds, plants and bacteria, the first wave of experimentation ‘moving something backwards in time’ was done with information, before moving to objects, organisms, and eventually people.
  2. The Creation of Time Dilation Fields. In order for the technology to progress from sending non-physical objects backwards in time (information only) to sending physical objects, the next step would necessarily be the ability to create and stabilize a local field or bubble, within which time experiments could be isolated and contained. This was done decades ago, and while it’s sometimes referred to by Dr. Anderson as a Time Dilation Field, his preferred term was Time Warp Field, in relation to his Time Warp Field Generator. Within these isolated fields or bubbles, time within the field has been made to both speed up and slow down, without affecting time rates outside the field.
  3. The Progression of Time Dilation Fields Into Time Travel experiments. Once the fields could be stabilized, and the technology was trusted enough to move beyond simply altering the rate at which time passed within the isolated field (and the effects that had on the items being subjected to either a time speed increase or regression) the next phase of experimentation was moving objects located within the field—including people—back through time itself. Mr. Anderson explained this was done successfully as the item/organism could travel backwards in time without them experiencing a regression in aging, by creating closed time-like curves which could be modulated.


Successfully Regressing Time Within the Field. These experiments and their effects on plants, caused a blooming flower exposed to time regression within the field, to revert back to pre-bloom bud state. Before the tech progressed, Dr. Anderson stated they weren’t yet able to do that (flower regression experiment) with other living organisms because of unresolved tech issues—continuing to regress time within the field was causing it to become unstable, which eventually destroyed the living organism.

Using Time Warp Fields as Stasis Chambers. On several occasions during these interviews Dr. Anderson discussed using these Time Warp Fields as stasis chambers, in regards to two primary applications: the preservation of organs harvested for transplantation, and the extended preservation of food left within the chamber.

Temporal Tremor Detection (TTD) Technology

Around the 23:00 minute mark of the Art Bell interview, Anderson is asked about the development of Temporal Tremor Detection technology, as Art wonders if it has the ability to pinpoint where and when any time technology is used, the same way this can be done with nuclear detonations. Below is a transcription of Dr. Anderson’s answer:

“Maybe not so much with Time Travel, you’ll notice I’ve been using the term Time Control. Yes, matter of fact I would even say it’s easier. With nuclear reactors, not only can you see a nuclear detonation and pinpoint, our satellite systems today, can even detect nuclear reactors that are starting up or shutting down, and different types of events on a very low energy level. With a Temporal Time Detector, it’s a lot easier. Our ability to locate is not so strong, to pinpoint locate, but the ability to tell the level of activity, and whether they’re working with information or matter in their experiments or their technology, and the level they’re doing it, is something we can detect.”

Here, Art Bell begins to focus on the word “tremors” and starts referencing science fiction movies about time quakes, when Mr. Anderson makes the following, extremely important statement:

“…I also see a more important value. One of the things that concerns myself and my peers, is how this technology is going to be applied. The consequences of misapplication of this technology are extreme, and can be catastrophic if it’s not managed well. What we’re really happy about a TTD, is that we can use it, and its base technology, to determine, generally, where and to what level experiments are going on, which helps support transparency. For me that’s the most exciting element of a TTD, and also it lets us know, truly, what the state of the art is, in different areas or facilities doing this type of work.”



Dr. Anderson certainly appreciated the irony of an American population what was simultaneously ignorant of the existence and use of a technology, and their tax dollars funding it at the same time. He explained that US Taxpayers advanced the ability to pass information back in time faster than the speed of light, when our US government funded the work of NEC at Princeton University (Dr. Wang’s experiment.)


At the time these interviews were recorded, Dr. Anderson stated that not only had his institute partnered with the Japanese government to work on the super luminal transmission of information, but they were currently the leaders in that area, having an impressive lab in the mountains north of Kyoto.


Prior to that, Russia had been doing extraordinary, ground-breaking work on the tech in the 1960’s and 1970’s, but lost substantial ground when the ongoing turmoil in that nation broke up the U.S.S.R. Now having a new nation on stronger footing, they were eager to pick up where they left off and get back in the game.


Perhaps surprisingly to many, at the time of these interviews, Anderson stated that India’s development efforts in this regard, were larger than the rest of the world’s efforts combined. When pressed as to why he thought that might the the case, aside from addressing India’s unique spiritual beliefs, Anderson would often say, in regards to India’s leaders being scientists, “India chooses their leaders based on their scientific promiscuity, rather than their political promiscuity”. (I imagine I’m not alone in my appreciation for Dr. Anderson’s choice of words here, knowing the images it conjures for the more awake Americans contemplating this in relation to the way in which or own leaders are selected. It certainly isn’t based on their ‘scientific’ promiscuity.)


At the time these interviews were recorded, Dr. Anderson mentioned that China was very interested in getting involved in this research, and he claimed to have personally met with their National People’s Congress, and their Ministry of Science and Technology. Up to that point they were having limited success, but had recently begun making strides, having the second largest R&D budget in the world.



During one of the interviews provided, Anderson admits that one of the first avenues of funding for his organization was specifically for the development of this technology—to create a stasis chamber that would prevent harvested organs from aging (breaking down) prior to transplantation.


Dr. Anderson referred to creating stasis chambers for food that had the potential to replace refrigeration technology, and stated that while it was an incredibly expensive endeavor at that moment ($44 million dollars) to build the appliance, it had already been done. While he didn’t precisely discuss the other possibilities this technology could offer in the areas of food quality and production, the implications are there.

Assuming we really did live in a world incapable of feeding the current number of people (which we don’t, but planned obsolescence is working to change that), based on Anderson’s explanations of the tech, I see no reason why it couldn’t be applied to massive green houses encompassed in a time dilation field in which time is sped up, massively increasing food supplies by producing full grown crops in a fraction of the time it would otherwise take. This, on top of stasis food chambers instead of refrigerators, even if only in grocery stores and restaurants, would absolutely revolutionize food and agriculture industries.

On the plus side, it’s also a lot more sane and humane than teaching children their every breath is an assault on the planet (and that it cries out every time a new baby is born), and therefore the ‘only’ way forward is to massively and aggressively depopulate the earth. At this point, I hope people are starting to understand why ‘overpopulation’ conversations are not being had honestly and openly, in a public forum, looking for solutions that don’t all hand the elite more power for doing nothing other than causing problems they then convince everyone else they alone can solve—if you would but give them complete control over every aspect of your life, and death.

Near the 6:52 minute mark of the 2010 Art Bell interview, Anderson discusses strides made with the technology in the previous eight years, since his last appearance on the show:

“At that time, what we had focused on, we had also used germination cycles of specific types of plants or seedlings, as reference points in our experiments. So at that point in time we had used test instrumentation, we had also used various forms of plant seedlings with very, very predictable germination cycles, and actually were able to successfully demonstrate the acceleration and deceleration of time.”


While Dr. Anderson did comment on the possibility of using Time Control/Time Travel technology to mine the future for cures that can be brought back to the past, I found his comment on accelerating the rate at which experiments could be carried out, equally if not more fascinating. Results, or repeated attempts at experiments designed to provide hoped-for results, could be significantly sped up inside a field. That alone has profound implications, in several different industries.


This is also an extremely interesting topic, for a multitude of reasons that become exceedingly obvious with each passing day. While Dr. Anderson only touched on it briefly in these interviews, he provided the example of sending drones back in time to record historical events of significance, as and when they actually occurred. He also stated that India was especially interested in this avenue of research.

To emphasize how incredible that one application alone could be, Anderson suggested a future in which historical documentaries would not only have to be honest, but in so doing, could be made from actual footage of the event in question, obtained by a drone sent back in time to record it. These recordings would then replace the need for ‘dramatic recreations’ of events based on guesses, or perhaps even the kind of misinformation behind the phrase, “the winners write history”.


Before reviewing Dr. Anderson’s prescient warning of future time wars, it seems fitting to get the “Grandfather Paradox” out of the way first, hopefully making the ‘time war’ issue less confusing.

Based on Anderson’s Time Control and Time Travel experiments, the Grandfather Paradox—the idea that you can go back in time and kill a specific individual’s Grandfather in an attempt to keep that person from being born—is as useful to the model as virtually identical parallel universes with supposed infinite copies of everyone behaving a little differently—it doesn’t apply.

In some of these interviews, Anderson explains an experiment they did with a family of seedlings, which adequately disproved the theory. Because seed families can be produced rather quickly, they sent ‘grandparent’ seeds back in time and caused an event which destroyed the seeds. The successive generations of those grandparent seeds did not disappear from our current reality—they still existed. However, there were some unexpected anomalies present in seed lineage that was not involved in the experiment. Their DNA make-up had changed. So, attempts to change a specific target failed, yet simultaneously produced unintended effects in non-targets, and this of course brings us to what most people know as the ‘butterfly effect’, an idea popularized by the 2004 film of the same name (The Butterfly Effect), starring actor Ashton Kutcher.

Along those lines, Dr. Anderson made the following statements around the 31:11 mark during his Freeman TV appearance, after Freeman brings up a bust of Michael Jackson (I encourage readers to listen to the whole show for more on the bust specifically):

“If Time Control technology is exercised, will we know it—will we know the effects? When we go back and we change an event and re-engineer a historical timeline, will the people in the future, recognize that the timeline has been changed? And what we see in the laboratory, is clearly not, with one exception. We do believe, without a lot of experimental evidence, that there are some people, a small percentage of the population that are sensitive, and able to sense modifications that have occurred in a timeline.

But let me tell you something similar, this is the first time i’ve heard about the bust on your show here, in Chicago. We do an experiment called Brothers and Sisters, where we use families of seedlings, and generations, and we will move seedlings backwards in time, and we’ll destroy a generation and come back, and what’s interesting, is that the scientists in the lab—while the object or target of the experiment returns, with the DNA profiles of the generations that were established and exterminated—when they return to the present timeline, we actually see a change in what has occurred in the laboratory.

We have no knowledge that anything was modified, but clearly, the information we sent back in time with the DNA profiles of these families of seedlings, and what returns, then is completely different than what we started the experimentation with, and we have no conscious view of that. And it’s one of the fallacies that I blame on the movies, about this common belief about parallel universes. It’s simply not true, what we’re seeing in the lab, that parallel universes spin off.

If I could comment on parallel universes a little bit, a lot of people talk about—one of the most popular paradoxes, is the Grandfather Paradox—if I go back in time and kill my Grandfather, I would longer exist, so therefore I couldn’t have gone back in time (because I do exist) so my Grandfather would be born, but now I am born too, so I can go back in time. These paradoxes, just like every paradox we see in physics, are simply places where our rational minds bump into our mind’s, body’s and senses’ perceptions and limitations.”

In the case of the Grandfather Paradox, if a person were able to travel backward in time and kill their Grandfather, as we see in our Brothers and Sisters experiments with plant living organisms, that person would kill their Grandfather, they would continue to exist, but by doing that event, they’ve basically reshaped the construct of reality. Meaning that, for example in the case of the sets of families of seedlings that we use in our experiments, by going back and destroying a previous generation, we actually change the construct of reality. Certain seedlings no longer come into existence. Some of the brothers and sisters simply are no longer there. New ones appear, and sometimes things go terribly, in another direction.

It took me a few re-listens of these interviews to be sure I understood what he meant when explaining this, because on the surface it can sound contradictory. He’s indicating that these experiments are extremely unpredictable because what is targeted, is not what is affected, which also makes it nearly impossible to predict side effects (butterfly effect) of experiments done with even the purest of intentions.


The phrase, “I write to discover what I know” just floated back to me, as while I was contemplating what to include in this section, I suddenly found myself viewing the ‘corporate wars’ from an entirely new angle. How globalists are attempting to install themselves as our new forever-leaders via a global, corporate, fascist (feudal) police state, and how the corporate wars—now being played out against ALL small business competition via the planned demic and with help from our misguided youth—was previously covered in an essay called, THE DEFUND ENDGAME PART 2: TRANSITIONING LOCAL CITIZENS TO GLOBAL CITIZENS.

To help readers better understand what’s currently happening, in conjunction with the previous (and next) steps necessary for globalists to take more control of industry around the world, that essay included a comparative analysis between today, and similar events portrayed in films like the original (1975) Roller Ball, and Demolition Man (1993). Both were included because one explores a reality in which corporations have taken over by waging war against governments (effectively replacing them), while the other focuses more on corporations having waged war primarily against each other instead, the result being, “that now all restaurants are Taco Bell”.

But now, as I write about ways in which Time Control technology can be abused, I find myself reflecting back on something specific Dr. Anderson said on the Art Bell show—not about the way governments would misuse it—but about the way corporations might. At the same moment that reflection hit me, so did the idea that perhaps the strange Mandela Effects being observed in the names of food products, especially the seemingly bizarre change in word spelling, may not be random side effects, but rather a covert form of bragging, if corporate wars are now also time wars:

“…there’s a message I would like to get out to your listeners, it’s that when you look at this Time Control Technology, the influence of government is profound. An new breakthrough like this that has tremendous military applications, or prospects, it really attracts tremendous investment from both the private sector and enterprise as well as governments.

And I can’t say this with enough emphasis—I wish I could be sitting in front of every one of your listeners now—one cannot underestimate the financial aspirations and the power of large business. And more so, the political and economical aspirations, and the power of governments.

The range of technological possibilities now are so enormous with this Time Technology, the only limitations Art, as you started to imply, are the limits of our imagination, or maybe even more so, the limits of insufficient imagination.”

Dr. David Lews Anderson speaking to Art Bell, 2010


As it stands today, the theft of intellectual property, in our current time, and the quite literally billions of dollars (massive wealth transfers due to the theft) the originator can be cheated out of, is already a huge problem. For those unaware, the ideas/tech that began both Facebook and Microsoft, did not originate from either Gates or Zuckerberg. In fact, the first Bitcoin Billionaires, the Winklevoss brothers, sued Mark Zuckerberg (successfully) for stealing their idea, and invested the payout into Bitcoin. The true history of Gates and Microsoft was covered in a previous essay called THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE PART 2: INDOCTORNATION WORLD PREMIERE, and included the following video:

When discussing the potential misuse of Time Control/Time Travel Technology, Mr. Anderson was delicate and chose his words carefully, but he still provided us with examples that could stimulate our imaginations in particular directions, as he did when referring to bringing back cures from the future. That scenario was presented as a beneficial use, and of course most of us would see it that way, but what would be the correct path? For example, it would seem proper to avoid the pre-theft of intellectual property in the process, by treating the scenario similar to what was portrayed in the Netflix series, The Dark: the blueprints for a time travel device made by a watchmaker in his later years, were time traveled back to him—not someone else—to make it again, before he made the first one.

But Dr. Anderson was hinting at something far more important than things like abusing the technology for corporate espionage and/or corporate wars. To better illustrate what I mean in a way I hope will similarly spark your imaginations, the other night my husband and me were looking for something to watch, both now completely disgusted with the endless stream of dystopian predictive programming propaganda re-packaged as original movie plots, when I looked at him and asked, “Do you know what people are really asking in these scenarios, when they ask others, ‘is the government is still functioning?'” He looked at me curiously, so I explained, “what they’re really asking, although they don’t consciously know it themselves, is ‘who is making the rules now?'”

And that’s the problem with all of this, when it’s kept secret and only made available to a select few. There are no rules, because there is no public oversight to demand it. Here I return to my previous suspicion about the true mission of a Space Force being more than meets the eye, and hope, for all of our sakes (and futures), that suspicion turns out to be true.


Before we review some of James Horak’s assertions regarding time travel abuses having already happened, and the way that affects us today, I want to revisit something else of extreme importance discussed earlier.


In the previously posted video in which James Horak was discussing the Solar Anvil, the moment you hear him smiling while referencing those ‘sparkles’ is important to ponder. Unlike the similar assertions between Steinbart and Dr. Anderson that the UFO’s we see are actually ourselves in the future, James had a far more stunning take on it. The enormous feature fixed next to our Sun, what James referred to as the Solar Anvil, is a device that a multitude of civilizations use for star travel. What those sparkles are and represent then, are members of those other civilizations using the device for just that purpose, and in the space of that short video, while the Solar Anvil remains stationary, those sparkles (craft) are nearly too numerous to count. More importantly however, those other peoples (what he referred to as the ‘extended community’) are only able to have that incredible opportunity and level of existence because, during their own past struggles, they refused to let someone rob them of it. Clearly, if we intend to also achieve that level of existence—the path to countless wonders—we must also, in the here and now, make the same choice.

For those not familiar with James Horak’s work in the last decade, over time and through repeated discourse on this subject, it became obvious that virtually all fledgling or emerging civilizations undergo a transition phase in which a sort of make-or-break moment becomes inevitable. What that moment represents (what he referred to as “getting over the hump”), the moment in which we now find ourselves, is whether or not a civilization can retain a moral foundation strong enough to prevent the critical and catastrophic misuse of advanced technologies. This is the fundamental understanding we both shared, for which I sought him out to learn more, having already spent years writing about it in a book I published in 2009, condensed here in a section called THE SACRED SCIENCE.


Veteran reality miners no doubt made the interesting connection between Dr. Anderson having discovered the key to Time Travel/Time Control technologies, while performing work for the Air Force on what he called, “high speed orbital navigation and space-based systems”. It’s because of this connection that I encourage readers who may have struggled with incredulity over James Horak’s previous claims, to revisit them with more clarity.

Over the years James Horak would frankly and repeatedly explain, in what always made perfect and complete sense, that in order for a civilization to “survive their technology” and advance to the next step up (join that extended community), they must, necessarily, remove aberrancy from their collective first. This, he explained, must be done, because once a civilization begins to advance technology towards star travel, that knowledge and technology would allow a single individual to hold, in the palm of their hand, the ability to destroy an entire world. Those seven small, but extremely powerful words, are the moment of convergence between James Horak and Dr. David Anderson.

The elite having already altered the course of history by implanting a microchip in Napoleon (creating in him a new bias responsible for significantly changing his behavior) that altered a pivotal moment of history, in this case the Battle of Waterloo, was already covered in a previous article. For our purposes here then, a different aspect or side-effect of that experiment will be examined instead.


For years, long before James began discussing the ‘re-engineering’ of our timeline by an elite having gone back in the past, he repeatedly stated that we are living in a partially manifested reality. I imagine many of you are currently interpreting that idea the same way I did, before knowing about the Napoleon issue: being partially manifested simply means we haven’t “gotten over the hump” and therefore are missing out on a much vaster form of existence and experience. That’s certainly true, however, it wasn’t until he explained the full ramifications of the Napoleon Time Travel Experiment, that I realized he meant something very, very different.

When the elite attempted to re-engineer our timeline in ways that would put them in complete control over its future people, events and ultimate outcome, it didn’t go quite as they intended—or could have ever predicted—and caused an anomaly to develop. That anomaly, in terms already used here, is a massive, semi-independent time bubble, not unlike the creation of a time dilation field discussed by Dr. Lewis Anderson. That is to say, they were not successful in altering the base, or original timeline, but rather as a consequence of attempting to, created an new type of reality—what we may refer to as an offshoot timeline or bubble—in which all of us here, currently reside. Furthermore, because this event was aberrant, it was contained. At the same time, because something like this had also never existed before, it was allowed to continue, but under certain constraints, hence the term “partially manifested reality”.

I often wonder if this is the reason that so many of the resultant anomalous features of “reality” being repeatedly observed by astronomers, physicists and scientists—like deep space probes suddenly stopping as though they’ve hit a wall—are behind the scientific community’s growing belief that we are “living in a hologram”. Also, as expressed in a previous article about how that event may be related to other historical anomalies currently labeled as the “Tartaria Mudflood Event”, it might be worth considering if the constraints placed on this partially manifested reality are the reason we have been unable to reproduce certain technological achievements constantly eluded to in ancient texts, as having been achieved by previous lineages here, who ultimately miscarried during their own “get over the hump” test.

Here I would quickly add, in a way that may not make complete sense at the moment, that one of the more valuable things I learned from James, is that while there is in fact an order to things, and that order is quite often perceived to be mechanical in nature—like a well-oiled and finely-tuned machine running on its own—that isn’t always the case. While I don’t mean to be cryptic, perhaps it helps to not think of the universe as consciousness, or as having its own consciousness, but rather as a special space within which consciousness may be expressed. In other words, there are exceptions. As an example, while it may be possible to create a watch that will run forever on its own, that doesn’t mean it will. If a specific consciousness is expressed in a manner that breaks the watch, because the universe is literally teaming with different expressions of consciousness, that doesn’t automatically imply that the watch will stay broken, either.


As an example of what I mean, something James explained in great detail often, previous lineages of man, who went through this same test period, and also abused their technology in terrible ways, at one point almost cracked the earth in half—they broke it. In order for us to be given another chance to try again, a sort of repair operation is ongoing in the here-and-now, in a remote section of Utah. That operation is being carried out by EMV’s, to hold the earth together, and that giant scar or crack is the Grand Canyon. For those who have never been there, or even for those who have, and stood on the edge, the fullness of that scar isn’t nearly perceptible enough to break through the narrative layer—-that it was formed over millions of years by running water—unless viewed from extremely high up.

I used to travel a lot for business in my 20’s, flying from coast-to-coast often and therefore fortunate enough to repeatedly observe the Grand Canyon from high altitude. I was always struck by the fact that’s exactly what it looks like from that high up: an extremely deep and gigantic crack in the earth that goes on for so many miles, even from that high up I couldn’t see both ends of it. The first two photos below are from significant altitude, the third was recently shared by Dan Scavino taken from the higher altitude of Air Force One.

As if that weren’t enough, James Horak often provided another stunning example of ways in which other conscious beings that exist in a universe teaming with life, beyond our own, are offering us help, an example he provided years before observable evidence for it emerged: the cities of the sea.


The absurdity of globalists developing a carbon credit system out of any real concern for the state of the earth, especially when it’s their own corporations that pollute it to no end, has been covered here before in an article on Reality Revisionism, and more recently in PLANNED OBSOLESCENCE: HOW AND WHY MULTI-NATIONAL (GLOBALIST) CORPORATIONS PURPOSEFULLY DESTROY AND MISMANAGE THE ENVIRONMENT, AND THEN BLAME IT ON YOU. The level to which we know their industries have flagrantly poisoned the earth (all the while knowing better options were available) is only dwarfed by what we don’t know.

For years James explained, that unbeknownst to most of us, people you and I didn’t vote for, began dumping radioactive waste into the ocean, specifically the Atlantic Trough. In an effort to help combat this threat to all life one earth, the extended community gave us a special gift, what James called the Cities of the Sea—these are creatures specifically designed to ingest plutonium waste and render it harmless. They were placed, with great care and without our collective knowledge, into both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans, in the hopes of buying us more time to get over the hump.

The word “creatures” isn’t really adequate, as James would often describe them being red in color, having an awareness or consciousness, but looking more like a type of plant life. For years he told this story, but it wasn’t until the evening of August 24, 2014, that pilots flying over the Pacific ocean that night, observed and photographed them rising up out of the ocean, and leaving. I hate to admit that until I saw those images, I never really understood why he would refer to schools of creatures like that, as cities of the sea, but then I saw the pictures and could suddenly imagine myself looking into the depths of the ocean from the surface, and seeing glowing lights that would conjure thoughts of an underwater city. Some of the photos capturing their departure that night are below:

Before we get to why they left, it’s important to me, to us all really, that the reality of that remarkable event not be lost to incredulity, so below is a paragraph taken directly from a pilot’s firsthand experience that night, as written in an article called Red lights over the Pacific – August 2014, from the website jpcvanheijst.com (which is where the photos came from):

“In the night of 24-25 August 2014, I flew a 747-8 from Hong Kong to Anchorage. While flying over the vast Pacific Ocean, somewhere southeast of the Russian Kamchatka Peninsula, I had one of the strangest experiences of my life. Around five hours into our flight with Japan a long time behind us, we were cruising at a comfortable 34.000 ft with about four and half hours to go towards Alaska. Over the radio, we heard Air Traffic Control talking to other planes that were heading for the US West Coast about diversions, due to major earthquakes in San Francisco…”

Once this story began to make its way across the world, and James was asked about it, he solemnly explained that because we have wasted this precious gift—the Cities of the Sea—primarily by allowing the Fukushima nuclear meltdown into the Pacific Ocean to continue unabated (to this very day even), they were removed. He also, incidentally or not, explained that these creatures are alive and have feelings, and were now living in an ocean that was dying (because of our lack of concern)—it wasn’t right to leave them there. He reminded us that we still have the ones in the Atlantic Ocean, but because people were now dumping leftover Corexit (from the intentional BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico) near the coral reefs, it was difficult to say how long they would remain, and further, things would go downhill very quickly for us here on Earth, once they were all gone.

While we may (and should!) view these events and possibilities as bewildering, spectacular, astonishing and perhaps even miraculous, and they are, it’s also entirely meaningless if we continue to endlessly and exclusively ponder them at the expense of ignoring the obvious.

To this I would add, for those struggling to take seriously those interventions on our behalf by EMV’s and the extended community, I encourage you to consider those actions are no different than decades old claims of the extended community (UFO’s) having repeatedly interfered with the proper functioning of our nuclear missiles. As much as I want to say the other two examples are only different in their order of magnitude in saving our sleeping behinds, I can’t ever escape wondering how we knew those missiles weren’t working, if we weren’t intending to use them. Kind of like we wouldn’t know our own toaster was broken, until we tried to toast some bread in it, and it didn’t come on.

In looking up old news articles on UFO’s having interfered with our nuclear missiles to include here, I was surprised to find nothing but recent regurgitations of those original stories instead. It appears they’re being dug out the closet and shined up in the ongoing attempt to sell the predictive programming for the bogus hostile alien thesis. Incredibly, and added to the lengthy list of reasons I privately refer to planet Earth as ‘crazy town’, numerous stories of China threatening to drop nuclear bombs on countries that interfere with their plans—like Japan and the US—also popped up. Whether those threats were real or more narrative blather I can’t say, but it’s a reflection of insanity either way.



I came across a video of a young man by the name of Austin Steinbart, not long after he started producing youtube videos in which he made extraordinary claims about who he was, who he would become in the future, how he knew this, and the role he was currently playing at the moment. There was something about him that struck me, so I took an interest in his claims, and was amazed to find the level of condescension I received from people to whom I had shared that interest with. This is doubly true when one considers that the technological pre-conditions necessary for the seemingly bizarre personal claims about himself to in fact be true, clearly not only exist, but have already been in use for decades.

Perhaps surprisingly, it wasn’t Steinbart’s unusual claims about himself that caught my attention. Rather it was the nature of his focus—the ‘action items’ he’s attempting to get our fellow man to take seriously—they absolutely are every bit as important as he claims they are, and nobody else seems to want to talk about it. That, and that alone, is what set him apart in my view. The rest of his claims (about himself personally), true or not, are also meaningless in the context of our immediate needs and the consequences for failing to address them. Treating Steinbart the same way the media treated Ross Perot when he emerged—relentlessly mocking his claims and/or physical appearance (in Perot’s case it was the size of his ears) and encouraging others to do the same, instead of actually listen to what he had to say—was and is, extremely unhelpful.

While it might seem strange to bring up Ross Perot in relation to Austin Steinbart, there’s a valuable lesson there. The Presidential election Perot ran in, was the first one I was old enough to vote in, but the way the media treated the man was so appalling, it completely turned me off to politics. That, as it turned out, was a huge mistake on my part. In the decades since, watching every prediction Perot gave about what the future would look like if his warnings regarding treaties like NAFTA and GATT weren’t taken seriously, all come true, is how I personally learned that incredibly valuable lesson.

There are, during the course of time, powerful but extremely rare opportunities for significant change and course correction. Looking back (with the added value of hindsight), I strongly believe Perot was one of those opportunities, and it was missed. Given the current state of affairs on planet earth, and the rarity with which such opportunities present themselves, we certainly can’t afford to waste any more of them. Reviewing Steinbart’s assertions through that particular lens, not in terms of who he claims to be, but rather what he claims we need to address, and quickly, absolutely has the potential to set us on the path to significant course correction.


First and foremost, is the pressing need to create an Internet Bill of Rights. That billions of people remain apathetic to their every movement, relationship, purchase, social media posts, health problems, menstrual cycles, children, habits, movie choices and words (spoken in the ‘privacy’ of their own homes) being constantly surveilled and recorded by people they don’t know and didn’t vote for—without cause or a warrant—is both astonishing and frightening. Even worse, this gigantic surveillance and data-sucking apparatus is also now, without your knowledge and consent, vacuuming up your DNA.

Second, the failure of people around the world to take even the smallest interest in the history, beliefs, corruption, criminal activities, policies and agendas of their local and federal officials, has caused more human suffering than nearly all other public human failures combined. A government meant to function for and by the people, will inevitably become corrupted, when those same people refuse to perform the necessary function of oversight, and also consequently refuse to demand adherence to that same social contract, and accountability for those who don’t.

Third, that those agendas and technologies intend to continue in ways that won’t, even remotely, consider the individual human mind/brain sacred or off-limits, let alone respect for any semblance of personal privacy, quality of life, or the nature necessary to sustain us, should have every decent human being on this planet scrambling to stop any further encroachment or violations in that direction. Here I would remind long-time readers, and for those new here who are unaware, that this author was personally subjected to this extremely underhanded technology nearly 15 years ago, in a covert attempt to change the course I was on while writing the first book. That was recently re-covered in a previous article titled TRUTH IS INTOLERABLE TO AN EMPIRE BUILT ON LIES and I further encourage readers to explore a 2012 guest article hosted here called Artificial/Synthetic Telepathy And Mind Control for a more in-depth look at what that technology was already capable of back then.

Fourth, the blatant and grotesque corruption of our legal system, its agencies, courts, judges and prisons, is yet another issue we ignore at our own peril. Add to this the role of an equally corrupt media, and it doesn’t take long before “justice” transforms into “just us”—one set of rules for them, and a completely different set of rules for you—and viola, tyranny gains a dangerous and strategic foothold that becomes increasingly difficult to recover.

Do we need to believe Steinbart’s extraordinary claims about himself to take those problems, and the urgent need to correct them as quickly as possible, seriously? No. Should we have already been taking them seriously and working collectively to correct them, before Steinbart came along? Absolutely. Should we continue working hard to correct those problems, even if we later find out Steinbart’s strange claims about himself are a fiction? We would be foolish not to.

That the public remains either unaware or uninterested in the plight of political prisoners in this country, also needs to change. In regards to the ambivalent tone most people take on these issues, people who genuinely consider themselves to be ‘good’ people, the thought-provoking phrase, “it shouldn’t have to happen to you, for it to matter to you” certainly comes to mind. The underlying naivety associated with that lack of empathy, has not only repeatedly come back to haunt millions of people over the ages, but also recently caught some of our social-climbing, agenda-pushing local politicians completely off guard, when forced to realize they weren’t going to be as protected from their own policies as they thought. Buyer beware. Those events were covered in an article called, THE APPEASER FEEDS THE CROCODILE IN THE HOPES IT WILL EAT HIM LAST.


I would certainly be remiss not to cover Steinbart’s unusual claims about himself, especially as they relate to the Time Travel/Time Control technologies covered here, which is why he was included. As many of you know, this has to do with “Q” movement or phenomenon, which I won’t get into in great detail here, except to say that it began with posts on an internet board known as 4chan, providing the public with specific information, clues, and topics for independent research, with the main goal of helping people to become brighter (more reality literate) as to the true nature of certain things, people and events.

These posts (signed by Q), and the information they contained or pointed people to, spread like wildfire across the globe almost immediately, thus the “Q” movement was born. A multitude of Q-tubers popped up overnight, producing in-depth videos that combed over each new post trying to assess what it really meant or revealed. Most of the posts were signed with “Q” but on occasion, some were signed with a “Q+”. Once the phenomenon became well-established, it was led by a sort of Q-tuber royalty having hundreds of thousands of followers on their respective channels, waiting anxiously for the next post to come out and be parsed.

Also, because those posts presented a serious challenge to attempts by officialdom at retaining ‘reality narrative supremacy’, it wasn’t long before they launched a wave of ridiculous and over-the-top smear campaigns in an effort to regain that supremacy. It was a bizarre spectacle to behold the media investing so much time repeatedly disparaging ‘silly conspiracy posts’, and it wasn’t long before officialdom had big tech companies begin huge social media purges in an effort to rid themselves of it. To this day, even referring to the movement by its original name can get your youtube channel shut down.

Then Austin Steinbart emerged, and with that emergence came the strange sort of chaos one often finds in people who have clung so tightly to certain ideas, letting them go in favor of new possibilities (which may also entail admitting they were wrong), is nearly impossible. Along those lines, first and foremost, Steinbart claimed to be Q+ (the head of the phenomenon), asserting that even so, Q was not an individual, but rather a team of individuals. In the capacity of Q, Steinbart claimed he was able to perform some of these functions because he was using a technology that allowed his future self (Q+) to send information back in time, to his current younger self (Baby Q). As if that wasn’t enough to cause a massive wave of incredulity to ripple through the Q community, he also claimed he was going to be the future leader of the Space Force—a Space Force that, curiously enough, didn’t exist yet, at the time he made the claim.

As expected, officialdom responded to Steinbart’s emergence even more viciously than the Q-tuber royalty did; the same way they respond to anyone else whose emergence challenges their reality narrative supremacy, like that of Google whistle-blower Zach Vorhies: swat teams. However, while people like Vorhies were able to avoid prison, Steinbart wasn’t as lucky. [NOTE: Below is a video interview between Steinbart and ex-Fox News reporter Ivory Hecker discussing those events in detail]

The only other personality of note (who wasn’t immediately suicided upon their emergence, like Aaron Schwartz) that I can recall, who has been treated worse than Steinbart in my view, is Julianne Assange, who has now suffered a stroke during his seemingly endless life in prison. Our failure to appreciate the gifts he sacrificed so much to give us, to protect him, to demand justice and freedom for him, is, quite frankly, shameful.


Where are we now? The obvious answer, is that it’s hard to say for sure, but “in serious trouble” is a really good guess. Below is a transcription of Dr. Anderson’s thoughts on the issue, as he expressed them nearly 12 years ago on the Art Bell show:

Dr. David Anderson, founder of the Anderson Institute, discussing the negative implications of misusing Time Control Technologies on the Art Bell Show, 2010:

“Many people have not had the benefit we have, to understand, and to see and observe, what the true nature of time [is], its relationship with space, and how manipulating it can have different types of effects. And a lot of the issues really begin to fall, not on the scientific side, but on the moral and ethical side.

By experimenting in [with] time, and exercising Time Control Technology, we actually run the risk of affecting changes in our actual reality. And that means not just affecting a historical timeline, but affecting the existence of a person, of an organization, of a country. The changes ARE being executed, maybe on a smaller scale right now, but they’re being executed without the consideration, and more and ethical thought, what is the impact—the ripple effect—that exercising time could have on individuals, on countries, on governments. Even the human race, or even the fabric—I won’t go so far as to say the “fabric of reality” because that sounds too dramatic—but we’ve seen before, historically, that even with the greatest of intentions, the human race has the ability to take new technology, and apply it in dangerous ways.

And one of the great challenges with technology, and it would be fine if it was out in the open, but the agencies involved in this, whether it be government, private groups, special interest groups, they really don’t want it to become public. But what you have, is a race, for weapons development. There are a lot of governments who look at this and they talk about the benefits, a lot of agencies talk about it, but they talk about the need to develop Time Control technology into secret super-weapons. And any listener who would be surprised by that, I would say I would be shocked because I have had the benefit of reading books, I’ve been to military warfare college, but the fundamental premise of “winning” at warfare, and that’s the goal of countries—is to survive first and then to prosper—and successful strategies show you have to keep the technology secret as an advantage.

And we see governments racing for weapons development, and essentially, they do it under the cloak of National Security, but there’s a short-sightedness to it. And what I worry about, and maybe this will come off as dramatic and I hope it does because I want to shock your listeners into reading more, whether it’s with us or anyone else, is, what we may be preparing for—I’m sorry, I’ll take the “maybe” out. What these governments are preparing for, in my mind, from the inside-out looking at it, can only be described as preparing for the first great Time War, that this planet could see. And the effects that could have on a small scale, implementing a ripple effect that has [a] small ripple effect that has dire consequences, or even risks destroying different aspects of historical timelines on this planet.”


“The mechanisms of physical laws are uniform in texture, they are not always uniform in application, and they vary and they alter. As far as organization, there’s certain patterns that are innate. That pattern is that you aspire to a certain level of technology, and if you out distance, firm observance of law, equally applied, and you allow certain social evils to be perpetuated, that don’t become part of the evolutionary process of growth, then you get to a stagnant point where technology begins to work against you.

And that’s the situation on Earth, and it’s a big barrier to overcome, but once you overcome it, then you proceed further. This condition, this pattern, is uniform throughout the universe. There are variations on how it manifests, but in principle it’s the same. We are all seeded from the same sentient source—all intelligent life comes from but one source. And over millions and millions of years, the variations have extended beyond even corporeal existence for intelligent species. And they’ve adapted and they’ve changed, they’ve altered many things, but they basically are the same with respect to abiding by certain laws, and having a moral core.

The absence of placing a proper value on these things, here, has allowed the conditions to exist which threaten extending beyond that barrier.”


At this stage of our development, it should be abundantly clear what our overarching problem is: rather than remove aberrancy from our civilization, we have not only ignored it—we have literally put it in charge—of nearly the entire planet.

We have given it no oversight, no accountability, free reign, unfettered access, and nearly unlimited power, over everything of significance, without understanding the consequences of doing so. This is the war we are fighting, the test we are taking, and up until the recent ‘Great Awakening’, not enough of us even knew it was happening.


In more deeply contemplating and exploring the wonders and ideas put forth by the individuals referenced here, one will inevitably discover fine but glistening threads running between them all. Threads that become more and more perceptible as we simultaneously widen and increase our focus. I have no idea if these individuals—the Judge (James Horak), the software company CEO, the purported future leader of the Space Force, and the Time Travel scientist—are or were, even consciously aware of each other, or would have taken each other seriously if they were. Regardless, the gossamer running through their activities, concerns, hopes, and dreams for our future is remarkably evident, similar, and worthy of our serious consideration.


Even more, I want each of you to know, I have spent a significant portion of my lifetime now, loving many of you more than you love yourselves, and it’s time for that to change. And, to that I would add, I’m clearly not the only one. What about those who gifted us with the EMV operation in Utah that’s quite literally holding our planet together, and the Cities of the Sea, to give us more time? Are those not examples of our civilization being loved and cared for, more than we ourselves have managed so far? Are those not spectacular acts of love and kindness, asking nothing in return, bestowed upon a people who never even knew they were performed—a people who never even knew they needed them?

Whatever future I (or anyone else) may want for you, or believe you deserve, enough to fight for it myself, means very little if you don’t also believe it and want it for yourselves enough to do the same. Not only is the human race loved beyond measure, but at the same time, our hand has also exceeded our grasp. That, too, has to change.

It’s time for the Earth kids to grow up—to see beyond their own personal pain and struggles and instead focus on the causes—so they may be corrected, so we can move on. To see the measure of love and care our experience is carried on, to appreciate and understand the love we have already received (even if it didn’t come from the sources we hoped it would), and to see and appreciate the love within ourselves, that we deny others at the expense of our own joy and future.


There’s something extremely warming to me, about knowing we aren’t drifting alone in an icy cold and empty space. Even more so, also knowing the test we now face, difficult as it may be, is a universal test that all emerging civilizations take, and clearly, a lot of them pass it—it’s definitely doable. That in itself is extremely encouraging.

I also remember a time when James explained that certain Native American populations, in the past, were given a sign to watch for, that would indicate we failed our test: the serpent rope in the sun. That observable sign would be the result of EMV’s (an element of creation that also work with Suns) lining up across the sun in that particular configuration. Even more astonishing, that sign already happened—but the end didn’t. Why?

Between the time that prophecy was provided, and the time it appeared, something happened…precisely what that something was, we can only guess. It seems that some sort of spark was lit, and a new glimmer of hope for clarity was observed in us, that again, gave us more time. I remember James discussing it once, with the age old admonition “be ye not keepers of signs” because depending on the circumstances to which they apply, they can change. We can change. And apparently, to some degree, we already have. Readers may find the following video extremely enlightening in that regard, especially as, in the years since it was recorded, numerous underground bases have seemingly been, well, “made inoperable” let’s say. In this brief conversation from 2010, James referenced new potentials brought forth as hundreds of thousands of people around the world became fully awake, making the following, extremely interesting statement: “The minute that I can get out, what I said about the rats in the hole, then those that are [awake] will know what they are supposed to do”. [Language Alert]

But is that “awakening” alone enough to fully pass the test, and what other considerations might we need to make, to be sure those efforts aren’t swallowed up by a competing agenda?

If we were to stop those responsible for repeatedly hitting the buttons that lead to catastrophe, in their relentless pursuit of power at any cost, and we did it today, would that be enough? Enough for what, exactly? Has the damage already exceeded our current technological capabilities to reverse or remedy? Is becoming a member of the extended community just a dream worthy of aspiring to, or now necessary to our continued survival? Is that also part of the universal test pattern—that part of the test is recognizing our hand has already exceeded our grasp—coming to the realization that stopping any further damage from occurring, does not afford us the skill to clean up the mess, so we must begin to look for help outside of our own civilization? In other words, is the nature of the test itself, a springboard from which we’re forced to begin taking our thoughts deeper into the greater beyond and grander design?

I originally started this paragraph off with, “If we are going to need continued help” but that seemingly disregards everything covered so far. Taken at face value, there’s no “if” involved, considering we’ve already received an enormous amount of help, long before we knew it happened, or even why we needed it. We will, therefore, necessarily continue needing assistance from the extended community, and likely in ways and for reasons we don’t yet fully understand or realize. And, to qualify for that kind of help, we will have to prove we are genuinely worthy of it at that level, and won’t continue to squander it, weaponize it, or take it for granted. The form that proof would need to take, is our “getting over the hump”, and what that entails has already been explained.

Repeatedly over the years, James Horak has been proven right about a great many things, the ineptitude of the agenda behind the “hostile alien thesis” included. Over and over again, as a means to their own survival, the elite must necessarily sully, attack, discredit and paint every option we have, to both survive them and go beyond them, as the enemy. It’s not cone-heads or reptilians or gray aliens responsible for the mess down here, it’s human beings.

In considering that past performance can be a good indicator of future behavior, the manner in which EMV’s and the extended community have aided us thus far, does not paint them as “gods” nor have they pretended to be—that’s what a particular group of people down here like to pretend.

Still largely unbeknownst to most, we live in world in which two competing realities are constantly struggling for full manifestation. As one of them seeks to wholly dominate and fully replace the other through various methods of suppression and eradication, while the other entirely rejects such notions to the degree of criminal prosecution, they cannot peacefully co-exist—ever. As long as this struggle continues, so too will global war, famine, corruption, injustice and strife, and ultimately, the continued demise of our entire planetary civilization via the purposeful destruction of its life support systems. Mankind can no longer continue to participate in their own demise out of ignorance (of this war) and escape that demise at the same time.

This struggle is between the sovereign state, country or individual owning their own thought, action, and right to self-determination, and a private group of aspiring Caesars in the global governance regime they intend to replace the other reality with. This ultimate global reality revision cannot fully manifest without transferring, to itself, all of the sovereign power and freedoms of the other. Suffering numerous mattoid impediments, from the birth of this new and competing reality, the order-out-of-chaos principle thought necessary to achieve it was also born.



If we were to take all of this knowledge, concern, possibility, wonder and hope with us, into the space between stimulus and response, how might that affect the choices being made in that space? Supposing those choices are like stones skipping across the vast pond of time, how might those ripples carry on and re-engineer our future reality, instead of the past?

Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom, and I will meet you there. Or, perhaps (and with a little luck), I already have.

“Humanity once again stands at a most important fork in the road; a moment exhilarating and exasperating, liberating and terrifying—may we have the wisdom and moral fortitude to choose the path of countless wonders.” –Crystal Clark




Below are the 3 Dr. Anderson Time Travel/Time Control interviews previously referred to. Different questions and perspectives are naturally explored by different hosts, which is why all three are included.





The following short article was written by James Horak in 2013:

Where Technology is about Saving Everyone (and where it isn’t)
James Horak
Wednesday, November 27

Were I to draw a major distinction between advanced civilizations and those still savage it would be drawn over use of technology and not technology itself. It would be where the use of technology was to benefit everyone on all levels and not just a select few at any of those levels. For only where such access is afforded all alike would come the stability for a civilization to survive beyond the inevitable struggles of one group to succeed to parity with another, a cultural tension far greater than that to survive any elite… no matter what is in place to protect their privileged station.

But then that is not the only “tension” threatening to destruct a culture. The very nature of privilege breeds leadership that feeds on the devastation of others. Settle class rule and you would just begin to see that leadership will begin to feed upon itself. Can it be otherwise when the use of nuclear devices, despoliation of an entire planet and plans to murder over 90% of a population become adopted as methodology? Just what is left ANY of those that survive? For such an amoral contagion does not end there and those just immediately outside its influence would certainly object to neighboring with it.

When we examine the history of war, perhaps of any earthly struggle, we see two things constant among the fashioning causes, one class making the war while another fights it.

So, I ask you, would (even could) there be war without class distinctions? More, can class distinctions be predicated on wealth alone? Corporate wealth? Provisions found in the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement can answer that quite clearly. For what it lays out, not just forebodes, is the selection of leadership solely on those aspiring to power on the basis of corporate profit taking. The sell is on the lie that this will settle upon a new period of global harmony. Nothing could be further from the truth. Take heed of the corporate sabotage, corporate espionage that has percolated out of allowing corporations greater and greater influence in the world today. Hardly is “corporate” anything an answer to the survivability of the planet. This comes to nothing more than an end run behind all human advance socially obtained through the instrument of social contract.

Not just an abdication to the excesses of power that our own Constitution prevented, but to the rights of all individuals under the theory of Everyman and his place being held to inherent rights accorded by natural design. Something so profound, something given us as an heritage that the forefathers of time immemorial struggled so hard and long to obtain. Now, like the surgical incision to remove America’s economic health NAFTA portended, the final dissolution of any idea of human rights comes under threat. Disguised again like a “free” trade treaty, it is the final blow to the promise of all freedoms ever won from any and all forms of slavery. – JCH


Why is the FBI raiding the homes of past and present Project Veritas journalists whose diligence, tenacity and integrity continue to ensure a more reality literate population? Why was the New York Times contacting a Veritas reporter for ‘comments’ only one hour after the first raid? How, and why, was the New York Times given advanced notice of the execution of the search warrant?

Is it really surprising, given it was recently made public that the CIA planned to murder Julian Assange—another man with integrity centered on creating a more reality literate population—by poisoning him? If you’ve not heard about the CIA’s plot to assassinate (or kidnap) Assange, you can learn more about that here: THE CIA PLAN TO POISON ASSANGE WASN’T NEEDED. THE U.S. FOUND A ‘LAWFUL’ WAY TO DISAPPEAR HIM.

The Open Secret

Longtime reality-miners have known for decades that globalists made it one of their first priorities to get control over major media outlets for the purpose of burying or covering up their true goals, de facto obfuscating reality in the process. But why—why was this so important to their agenda? Do we really have to guess at it, or can we get the answer straight from the horse’s mouth?

The following leaked recording of David Rockefeller thanking his media “allies” for their cooperation means what it says, and it’s noteworthy that one of the media organs being thanked by Rockefeller in 1991, is the same outlet—the New York Times—given foreknowledge of the current raids on Project Veritas journalists. This leaked audio recording has been public for at least a decade, having been out several years before it was embedded here in a 2014 essay on reality revisionism:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other publications, whose directors have attended our meetings and have respected their promises of discretion, for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the bright lights of publicity. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government.” —David Rockefeller (Billionaire and former CFR Chairman, 1991)


Julian Assange made the following profound statements during a May 8, 2011 interview with RT, in response to the interviewer asking him, “who do you consider to be your number one enemy?” Remembering that Rockefeller gave that private speech to his media allies in 1991, wherein he thanked them for their 40 years of prior service (1951-1991), readers will no doubt make the connection between that timeline and Assange’s reference to “nearly ever war that has started in the past 50 years (1971-2011) has been the result of media lies..”.

“Our number one enemy is ignorance, and I beleive that is the number one enemy of everyone—is not understanding what is actually going on in the world. It’s only when you start to understand that you can make effective decisions and effective plans.

Now, the question is, who is promoting ignorance? Well, these organizations that try to keep things secret, and those organizations which distort true information to make it false or mis-represntative. In this latter category, it is bad media. It really is my opinion that the media in general are so bad, we have to question whether the world wouldn’t be better off without them all together.

There’s some very, very fine journalists, and we work with many of them, and some fine media organizations. But the vast majority are awful, and so distortive to how the world actually is, that the result is we see wars and corrupt governments continue on.

One of the hopeful things that I’ve discovered is that nearly every war that has started in the past 50 years, has been the result of media lies, and the media could have stopped it. If they had searched deep enough, if they hadn’t reprinted government propaganda, they could have stopped it. But what does that mean?

Well, that means, basically, populations don’t like wars. And populations have to be fooled into wars. Populations don’t willingly, and with open eyes, go into war. So, if we have a good media environment, then we also have a peaceful environment.


“It’s dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.” –Voltaire

Most people are now familiar with Orwell’s famous quote, “truth is treason in an empire of lies,” yet few seem to adequately ponder the long-term ramifications of such an ominous portent. Even now Orwell’s statement is often treated as though he were merely commenting on the weather. “It looks like a storm is coming,” he mused while staring at the sky on a busy street corner. “Yes, yes it does,” a passerby quickly and politely acknowledged, giving it no more thought as he rushed off to work with a well worn copy of the current newspaper under his arm.

The reality of the globalist agenda is something we have to understand and come to terms with if we, as a global civilization, are to have any real hope of surviving it, let alone changing it. To that end, first and foremost, the primary reason an empire being constructed on lies finds truth tellers intolerable, should be obvious: deconstruction of the empire. The laborious task of constructing a global empire with lie after lie, decade after decade, can virtually be undone and deconstructed in an instant with truth after truth. In simpler terms, when a +5 (lie) is hit with a -5 (truth), the sum is obviously zero. But what happens when a +5 lie is hit with a -10 truth? What could possibly be less, or worse, than decades of hard work being zeroed out almost instantaneously?

The answer of course, is life in prison. Perhaps even the death penalty. Being tried and convicted for fraud, terrorism, bio-terrorism, theft, market manipulation, embezzlement, racketeering, blackmail, murder, human trafficking, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, genocide, pedophilia, human experimentation, serious environmental contamination and crimes against humanity is much, much worse than a zero sum outcome. The stakes are incredibly high—both sides of the heretofore invisible war between globalists and the rest of humanity, have a great deal to lose. The winner takes all, and if we’re to take the words of Rockefeller seriously, major media outlets have been working for, and aiding the side working against the rest of the population, since as early as 1951.

Given how long this information has been available, many of us find it astonishing that some of our fellow man simply can’t grasp this yet. Then again, it is precisely this predicament that serves as a testament not only to the need to gain control of the major media when building an empire or agenda on lies, but also to the effectiveness of doing so. It works. Plain and simple.

If an agenda is so atrocious and/or repugnant it can’t survive the light of public scrutiny, without causing the public to respond with enmity, hostility, and serious backlash, there’s little choice but to buy, co-opt and control as many major media organs as possible to keep it quiet. Even better, why not simultaneously devise numerous methods of censorship, ‘cancel culture’, bogus claims of ‘hate speech’ and retaliation against those not respecting the associated power grab being pursued by any and all means necessary?

When it comes to “by any means necessary”, for reasons explained above, most of those means have gone unreported, and therefore unnoticed, like major banks using the official psychopath checklist as a hiring guide just before the 2008 financial collapse, which many families and businesses never recovered from, while the institutions responsible were rewarded by globalists for their efforts with “too big to fail or jail” word salad and grotesque financial bail outs. That, and several other still largely unknown and related topics of equal importance, were discussed during a November 2015 radio interview with Tim Kelly of Our Interesting Times. While the original post and additional information can be found HERE, the MP3 file of that interview is below, offering a detailed explanation of the event through the lens of reality revisionism—what it takes to complete a successful reality revision—and why all competing realities must be eliminated to pull it off.


Project Veritas (PV) is a name that every American, at the very least, should know and appreciate. But thanks to the constant intervention of a cover-up media, this isn’t the case. At the moment, the PV raids are being blamed on the “Biden diary” PV supposedly recently came into possession of, as reported by ABC News:

FBI investigating Project Veritas links to Biden daughter’s stolen diary

Federal agents searched several locations belonging to current and former members of the conservative media company Project Veritas on Thursday in an investigation involving the possible theft of a diary belonging to President Joe Biden’s daughter, Ashley Biden, according to a statement from the group’s website and an FBI spokesperson.https://www.dianomi.com/smartads.epl?id=3533

An FBI spokesperson confirmed to NBC News that “court authorized law enforcement activity” took place at an address associated with Project Veritas in Mamaroneck, N.Y., and another address on E. 35th St. in Manhattan.

The conservative group confirmed a New York Times report that the investigation involves allegations that a diary belonging to the president’s daughter had been stolen. Portions of the diary were published online by a conservative website about two weeks before the 2020 presidential election.

The Times, citing two sources briefed on the matter, reported that the Justice Department has been investigating the case since October 2020, when a representative of the Biden family reported that several of Ashley Biden’s personal items had been stolen in a burglary.

It’s this author’s opinion that very little, if any, of the ‘diary’ story/excuse to go after Project Veritas is the real reason for doing so, especially as we again find the New York Times involved, and readers may recall that ABC News, repeatedly proving to be part of the obfuscation and cover-up machine for the elite themselves, got caught burying the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein, one of the world’s most prolific pedophiles. ABC news spiking (killing) an expose’ on Epstein is only now known to the public because ABC News anchor Amy Robach was secretly recorded on a hot mic claiming network honchos killed the story, which would also have exposed claims that now-deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein forced an alleged victim to have sex with Prince Andrew.

As to Project Veritas being specifically targeted for the practice of telling the truth, a brief look at their past and current work is extremely telling. As reality-miners have come to know and understand, ANY stories (and their authors) that threaten to derail current or future stages of the globalist agenda, immediately become targets for shadow banning, de-listing, de-ranking, black listing, extreme censorship, de-platforming and deletion by the big tech censors who now also operate in tandem with the big media cover-up machine. The reality of that reality has also been confirmed and exposed repeatedly through Project Veritas via whistle-blowers working inside those tech companies who came forward explaining as much.

One of the more well known whistle-blowers in that regard is Zach Vorhies, previously a senior engineer at Google where he worked for 8 years, who downloaded 950 pages of internal documents describing Google’s censorship regime and then delivered them to the Department of Justice Anti-trust Division under William Barr. He also disclosed those documents to the public via Project Veritas in August of 2019. And, not unlike Project Veritas, was also raided for his efforts.

Vorhies proved unequivocally, through the release of internal Google documents, that black lists do in fact exist, and through the intentionally mislabeled program—or what Orwell referred to as “newspeak”—Google’s “machine learning fairness algorithm” essentially programs and uses A.I. to perform the censorship automatically. Shockingly, Vorhies also discovered that Google has even gone so far as to censor the search results for cancer cures.. In that regard, readers will no doubt be interested to know that while main stream media bobble heads continue to malign Ivermectin as nothing but a “horse anti-parasitic”, it’s actually been tested as a rather effective treatment against lung cancer, among other things. As the article posted on a government NIH website states (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/):

Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug

Graphical Abstract

Ivermectin has powerful antitumor effects, including the inhibition of proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenic activity, in a variety of cancer cells. This may be related to the regulation of multiple signaling pathways by ivermectin through PAK1 kinase. On the other hand, ivermectin promotes programmed cancer cell death, including apoptosis, autophagy and pyroptosis. Ivermectin induces apoptosis and autophagy is mutually regulated. Interestingly, ivermectin can also inhibit tumor stem cells and reverse multidrug resistance and exerts the optimal effect when used in combination with other chemotherapy drugs.


Ivermectin is a macrolide antiparasitic drug with a 16-membered ring that is widely used for the treatment of many parasitic diseases such as river blindness, elephantiasis and scabies. Satoshi ōmura and William C. Campbell won the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the discovery of the excellent efficacy of ivermectin against parasitic diseases. Recently, ivermectin has been reported to inhibit the proliferation of several tumor cells by regulating multiple signaling pathways. This suggests that ivermectin may be an anticancer drug with great potential. Here, we reviewed the related mechanisms by which ivermectin inhibited the development of different cancers and promoted programmed cell death and discussed the prospects for the clinical application of ivermectin as an anticancer drug for neoplasm therapy.

I suspect readers will be surprised to find that hydroxychloroquine, the drug that some of the mainstream media mouthpieces claimed could actually kill people, also has anti-cancer effects. As the following study, also posted on a government NIH website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4905171/) explains:

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for cancer therapy


Macroautophagy (herein referred to as autophagy) is a highly conserved mechanism for the lysosomal degradation of cytoplasmic components. Autophagy is critical for the maintenance of intracellular homeostasis, both in baseline conditions and in the context of adaptive responses to stress. In line with this notion, defects in the autophagic machinery have been etiologically associated with various human disorders including infectious, inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. Once tumors are established, however, autophagy sustains the survival of malignant cells, hence representing an appealing target for the design of novel anticancer regimens. Accordingly, inhibitors of autophagy including chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have been shown to mediate substantial antineoplastic effects in preclinical models, especially when combined with chemo- or radiotherapeutic interventions. The pharmacological profile of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, however, appear to involve mechanisms other than autophagy inhibition. Here, we discuss the dual role of autophagy in oncogenesis and tumor progression, and summarize the results or design of clinical studies recently completed or initiated to evaluate the therapeutic activity of chloroquine derivatives in cancer patients.

While there are numerous interviews and articles on Google’s extreme censorship available on alternative media news sites, I came across an article particularly pointed in the right direction, especially as it begins with the immensely important understanding that our ignorance is both their strength and main reason for success in fully manifesting the globalist agenda.

Not only do I share Assange’s view that ignorance is our greatest enemy (Core Perspective), but also personally believe CREATING AN IGNORANT POPULATION IS THE NECESSARY FIRST STEP TOWARDS THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF A TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT. Not just here, today, but anywhere and everywhere, throughout history. In my observation, it is quite literally step number one. The moment any civilization, people or country see this step begin—Common Core Education in the United States being a perfect example—this is the first sign that tyrants are attempting to assert themselves, acquire power through propaganda, and begin the subjugation of their people. Longtime listeners and readers know I often refer to this as ‘participating in our own demise out of ignorance (PIOODOOI) under the false pretense of doing the exact opposite’.

The following three paragraphs come from the aforementioned article at youtubecensorship.com:

In order to control a person’s mind, alter their behavior, and manipulate their emotions and reactions, that person must first be made ignorant and left feeling helpless, with no way to apply knowledge and independently solve their own problems. In their ignorance, a person is made to feel helpless, abiding by authority’s controls to feel safe. As they give away their own power over their life, they become easily controlled and manipulated. This manipulation leads to compliant, subservient behaviors that serve the interests of those who seek to control, of those who seek to govern over others and poison them for profit.

Zach Vorhies, Google whistle blower and engineer, went public about Google’s internal search engine, which blacklists search terms such as “cancer cures.” Google actively blocks cancer survivor testimony suppressing how cancer can be overcome and burying a vast wealth of scientific studies and knowledge on anti-cancer compounds. This same manipulation is being carried out to spread fear about infections and to keep the public ignorant on how their immune system works. Some of the most important voices have been censored from Big Tech in 2020 because they seek to quell infection fears and provide information that can help people overcome health challenges that plague their mind and body.

As for Facebook: its fact checking arm, PolitiFact, is owned by the Poynter Institute, which has received substantial funding from pharmaceutical companies, Google, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. These controllers use Facebook to censor information that can be applied in the home at the onset of an infection and in the hospital system to speed up recovery, prevent complications and save lives from infectious disease. By blocking information on treatment options and keeping the public ignorant on how their immune system works, these pharmaceutical companies and globalists with a psychopathic plot to vaccinate 7 billion people can more readily carry out their nefarious agendas.


For the past few years, two topics in particular have become extremely sensitive to, and relentlessly censored by globalists: the truth about vaccines and election fraud. Two other sensitive issues also get routinely censored, although not always with the same vim and vigor as the first two: ideological subversion (of which CRT is a part) and border/human trafficking issues. Last but not least, the exposure of rank corruption in the main stream media or its big tech counterparts is a also a huge problem for them. With that in mind, readers may come to believe those topics in particular, which PV has been covering tenaciously in recent years, are the real reason for the current extreme actions being taken against them.

To emphasize the point, below is a partial list of PV stories beginning with the more recent stories first. These are stories every American should know and go a long way to producing a more reality literate population. Click on the date to watch the video:

  • November 3, 2021: ILLEGAL: NJ Election Worker: ‘I’ll let you [Non-Citizen/Non-Registered Voter] fill out a ballot.’
  • October 6, 2021: Pfizer Whistleblower Leaks Execs Emails: ‘We Want to Avoid Having Info on Fetal Cells Out There’
  • October 6, 2021: Citizen Journalist Secretly Films 20 Year Pfizer Contractor on Covid Vax “Skeptical of the Science”
  • October 18, 2021: DHS Insider Who Exposed ‘Reasonable Fear’ Migrant Asylum Loophole GOES PUBLIC!
  • October 4, 2021: Pfizer Scientists: ‘Your [COVID] Antibodies Are Better Than The [Pfizer] Vaccination.’
  • September 29, 2021: Pfizer Scientist Admits Mothers Who Have Had COVID Pass Immunity on to Babies Through Umbilical Cord
  • September 27, 2021: Johnson & Johnson: ‘Kids Shouldn’t Get A F*cking [COVID] Vaccine;’ There are “Unknown Repercussions”
  • September 23, 2021: SHOCK VIDEO: Pfizer Scientist admits Pfizer Covid vaccine “just doesn’t work” in some people
  • September 22, 2021: PART 2: FDA Official ‘Blow Dart African Americans’ & Wants ‘Nazi Germany Registry’ for Unvaccinated
  • September 20, 2021: PART 1: Federal Govt HHS Whistleblower Goes Public With Secret Recordings “Vaccine is Full of Sh*t”
  • September 14, 2021: Two Healthcare Insiders at Aegis Living Blow Whistle on Alleged Elder Abuse and Medical Fraud
  • August 31, 2021: CA High School Teacher Admits Communist Indoctrination of Students: ‘Turn Them into Revolutionaries’
  • August 26, 2021: BREAKING: Second DHS Whistleblower Claims It’s Impossible to Deny Work Visa Renewals
  • August 24, 2021: DHS Insider Blows Whistle on Int’l Child Sex Trafficking Gangs Exploiting ‘Reasonable Fear’ Loophole
  • July 18, 2021: Insider Leaks Critical Race Theory ‘Indoctrination’ Within Children’s Toy Manufacturer Hasbro
  • July 15, 2021: RETRACTO #346: Syracuse.com Prints Multiple Corrections; DELETES ARTICLE After Lying About Veritas
  • June 28, 2021: Illegal Electioneering EXPOSED in NYC’s Democratic Mayoral Primary
  • June 22, 2021: CBS 62 Insider GOES PUBLIC Exposing Network’s Forced Vaccination Rhetoric and Bias
  • June 15, 2021: Fox 26 Reporter Ivory Hecker Releases Tape of Bosses; Sounds Alarm on ‘Corruption’ & ‘Censorship’
  • May 24, 2021: Facebook Whistleblowers LEAK DOCS Detailing Effort to Secretly Censor Vax Concerns on Global Scale
  • April 30, 2021: AT&T CEO Responds to Question on #ExposeCNN Videos at Company’s Annual Shareholders Meeting
  • April 14, 2021: PART 2: CNN Director Reveals That Network Practices ‘Art of Manipulation’ to ‘Change The World’
  • April 13, 2021: PART 1: CNN Director ADMITS Network Engaged in ‘Propaganda’ to Remove Trump from Presidency
  • April 13, 2021: CNN Director Charlie Chester ADMITS CNN Coverage of Congressman Matt Gaetz Is ‘Propaganda
  • March 28, 2021: Border Patrol Insider Reveals Encounters With ILLEGAL ALIEN SEX OFFENDERS Reaches FIVE YEAR HIGH
  • March 15, 2021: KING ZUCK: Facebook Global Planning Lead Reveals Dire Need For Government Intervention In Facebook
  • March 14, 2021: Facebook Exec/Unwitting Whistleblower on Undercover Camera: Gov’t Should Break Facebook up: 3-15-21
  • February 24, 2021: Leaked Insider Tape Reveals Salesforce’s Plan to Deplatform ‘Broader Range’ of Customers
  • February 16, 2021: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg Takes ‘Anti-Vax’ Stance in Violation of His Own Platform’s New Policy
  • January 21. 2021: Twitter Senior Executive Vijaya Gadde Details Plans for Political Censorship on a Global Scale
  • January 14, 2021: Twitter Insider Secretly Records CEO Jack Dorsey Detailing Agenda For Further Political Censorship
  • January 12, 2021: PBS Principal Counsel Michael Beller Incites Political Violence In Radical Left-Wing Agenda
  • January 4, 2014: Central OAC Exec Admits Org Registers Thousands Of Homeless To Vote At Same Address In Fulton Co
  • November 16, 2020: GA Recount Auditors Call Multiple Ballots For Joe Biden That Were Actually Marked For Donald Trump
  • November 6, 2020: 2nd PA USPS whistleblower: Postmaster ordered late ballots picked up; thinks they will be BACKDATED
  • November 12, 2020: New USPS Whistleblower in Philly suburb Elkins Park Details Orders To Stop Delivering Pro-Trump Mail
  • November 10, 2020: RECORDING: Federal agents “coerce” USPS whistleblower Hopkins to water down story
  • November 5, 2020: ELECTION FRAUD ALERT: Nevada USPS Worker Pledges Ballot Fraud To Remove President Trump From Office
  • November 4, 2020: Michigan USPS Whistleblower Details Directive From Superiors To Back-Date Late Mail-In-Ballots Nov 3
  • October 28, 2020: Ballot Chaser Reveals MASSIVE Vote Fraud Effort To Elect Joe Biden; “$55,000 for 5,000 votes”
  • October 21, 2020: Google’s Head of Global Analysis: “Platforms are influencing you in a way you didn’t sign up for”
  • October 14, 2020: OUTRAGEOUS! Tech Tyrant Instagram CENSORS Tags of Project Veritas!
  • October 20, 2020: ELECTION INTERFERENCE: Google Ads Exec Boasts Company Can Censor ‘Right-Wing’ & Republicans
  • October 19, 2020: Google Program Manager: Google “Trying to Play God” via “Drivers of Algorithms” In 2020 Election
  • October 13, 2020: Our Revolution Chair and Colorado Dem Party Exec “It’s truly killing random Nazis in the street”
  • June 23, 2020: Facebook Content Moderator: ‘If Someone’s Wearing MAGA Hat, I’m Going to Delete Them for Terrorism’
  • May 9, 2020: Cherry Health CEO and Board President ADMIT Health Center STAGED a COVID19 testing line for CBS News
  • February 26, 2020: ‘Socialist’ ABC Reporter Admits Bosses Spike News Important to Voters, ‘Don’t Give Trump Credit’
  • January 24, 2020: PV Releases Deposition Tapes Showing American Federation of Teachers Wants to Bleed Us Dry
  • October 22, 2019: Part 4: Alleged Sexual Misconduct by CNN Exec and Possible Cover-Up by Senior Management
  • August 14, 2019: Google “Machine Learning Fairness” Whistleblower Goes Public, says: “burden lifted off of my soul”
  • July 24, 2019: Current Sr. Google Engineer Goes Public on Camera: Tech is “dangerous,” “taking sides”



For those still unaware, Project Mockingbird is “an alleged CIA project that recruited journalists to write fake stories promoting government ideas while dispelling communist ones”:

What was Operation Mockingbird?

It was an alleged large-scale project undertaken by the CIA beginning in the 1950s in which they recruited American journalists into a propaganda network. The recruited journalists were put on a payroll by the CIA and instructed to write fake stories that promoted the views of the intelligence agency. Student cultural organizations and magazines were allegedly funded as fronts for this operation.

Operation Mockingbird expanded later on in order to influence foreign media as well.

Frank Wisner, the director of the espionage and counter-intelligence branch, spearheaded the organization and was told to concentrate on “propaganda, economic warfare; preventive direct action, including sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist elements in threatened countries of the free world.”

Journalists were reportedly blackmailed and threatened into this network.

Today, you’ll be hard pressed to find any information on the project that doesn’t begin with the word “allegedly” but videos like this one make it obvious that a mockingbird media is exactly what we now have in this country. It’s obviously impossible to have every local news station using the exact same talking points simultaneously, if independent local journalism was still functioning.

In March of this year the Renegade Tribune also did a great report called Mainstream Media Exposed Coordinating Identical Mass Shooting Narratives For Different States :

Here we also see several different news outlets not necessarily using the exact same terminology, but clearly advancing the same message: logic and facts are outdated, emotions are more important, submit to authority without question, and whatever you do, don’t do your own research:


The NDAA Legalizes The Use Of Propaganda On The US Public (BUSINESS INSIDER, March 2012):

“The newest version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) includes an amendment that would legalize the use of propaganda on the American public, reports Michael Hastings of BuzzFeed.

The amendment — proposed by Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) and Adam Smith (D-Wash.) and passed in the House last Friday afternoon — would effectively nullify the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, which explicitly forbids information and psychological operations aimed at influencing U.S. public opinion.”

In the true Orwellian spirit of Newspeak, in the same way Barry Soetoro rebranded his ‘drone strike kill list’ as a ‘disposition matrix’ to obfuscate reality, or the same way the Patriot Act was the most anti-patriotic bill in history and literally put returning veterans on the terror watch list, the Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act was anything but. This move was accompanied by “Intervention Teams” to target specific ideologies the agenda finds heretical:

Obama Signs The ‘Anti-Propaganda’ Bill Into Law With 2017 NDAA

“The bill is purely formulated to crack down on free speech and independent media under the guise of Fake News and Propaganda on the internet. The new legislation will give the government the power to crack down with impunity any media that it deems to be spreading propaganda, the legislation will also fund the counter propaganda endeavors; this is purely meant to choke the alternative media and independent journalists who are not blinded by the malicious oligarchist.”

Obama Unleashes “Intervention Teams” to Wage War on “Ideologies”

“A year after the dictator-dominated United Nations declared war on “ideologies” such as “anti-Muslim bigotry” and opposition to mass immigration, the White House cooked up a fresh version of the Obama administration’s national plot to supposedly prevent people from adopting unapproved ideologies. The controversial scheme aims to deploy “community-based” teams of “mental health” workers, teachers, law enforcers, social service employees, “faith leaders,” and others to supposedly stop the spread of ideologies that Obama claims can be dangerous or violent.

Analysts and critics of the White House plan, though, warned that Obama’s supposed attack on “violent ideologies” was in reality a thinly veiled assault on conservatives and political opponents of his agenda to “fundamentally transform” the United States. Indeed, almost from the start of his term, the Obama administration was remarkably candid in targeting conservatives, libertarians, patriots, veterans, pro-life activists, nationalists, and others as “extremists” and even potential terrorists. Various Obama bureaucracies disgorged a steady stream of propaganda painting hundreds of millions of mainstream Americans as the enemy merely for their religious or political views.”


Most of today’s youth are unaware of both the existence and success of subliminal messaging, and recent media trends towards down playing its effectiveness aren’t particularly helpful. At the same time however, we can be sure the technology has advanced in ways the public isn’t aware of, and I will provide an incredibly eye-opening example of that new tech in just a moment. For now, the reason I feel so compelled to bring it (subliminals) up here, has to do with something that’s been needling at me: what really caused the rush on toilet paper? What was the origin of the impetus for it? WHY did people do it?

It would make sense if popular prepper forums or media outlets had pre-seeded the idea by making public claims there would be toilet paper shortages coming soon—claims like that nearly always start a panic buying frenzy of the product in question. However, this author hasn’t been able to find any satisfactory ‘origin’ story. I simply woke one day to find thousands of people in stores all over the United States suddenly making a run on toilet paper for no apparent reason. Trying to make sense of it, I eventually found myself wondering if this absurdity was the result of media outlets testing a new form of subliminal technology. That’s purely speculation on my part of course, but it would certainly explain a lot, especially given the timing of the event: just before the planned demic rhetoric was ratcheted up. I can’t seem to shake the feeling that the ‘great toilet paper rush’ was a beta test for new subliminal tech, and if so, it worked fantastically. This may also explain why those who get their news primarily from main stream sources are so difficult to reach with easily researchable and contradictory facts.

There seems to be no “too far” with this tech, no lines that won’t be crossed, no intrusions upon the human mind and psyche considered to be unacceptable. For example, as reported in my first book (released in 2009), the next phase of ‘advertising’ was seriously looking at beaming commercials directly into the heads of the public. The examples available at the time included soda machines that would beam the sound of ice cubes clinking together as they hit the bottom of a glass and the refreshing sound of the bottle being opened—these would be beamed directly into the heads of passersby (potential customers) who came within range of the machine. At the time there was also talk of a similar use of the tech being carried through the windows of trains. Potential customers could put their heads against the glass to complete the circuit and get the feed. Those were preliminary ideas likely used to obtain grants and funding, but it didn’t take long for the tech to advance.

The following brief video explains intended marketing use of the tech, and I found his reference to the use of smells interesting. In Las Vegas, casinos have been pumping fragrances into the air for years, coconut scents especially being favored. However, I recently experienced a local grocery store doing the same thing:


Most people remain unaware that this tech has advanced far enough to induce specific images (commercials) in the dream state after exposure. A successful test of the tech—targeted dream incubation—was conducted by Coors near the recent Super Bowl, as explained in the following MSN article from January 29, 2021:

Coors Light creates first Super Bowl ad that runs in your dreams

a close up of a snow covered mountain© Provided by KOKH – Oklahoma City
OKLAHOMA CITY (KOKH) – Coors is using the science of Targeted Dream Incubation to give you the most refreshing Big Game ad experience ever.

Coors Light and Coors Seltzer have announced the first Super Bowl commercial you can only see the night before game day in your dreams.

With the help of Dr. Deirdre Barrett, Coors has created an eight-hour stimulus film with specific audio and visual stimuli to trigger you to dream the Coors Big Game ad.

“I’ve studied dreams and methods to influence them throughout my career, but working with the artists of the Coors Dream Project was a novel opportunity to craft audio and visual stimuli that viewers could use to trigger specific dream content,” says Dr. Barrett. “We saw the results come to life in the Dream Lab trial run when participants reported similar dream experiences including refreshing streams, mountains, waterfalls and even Coors itself.”

The full length eight-hour stimulus soundscape and film will be released on February 3

The following scientific data on related technology, and an enabling device called Dormio can be found in the following October 27, 2020 government NIH publication: (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590944/):

Dormio: A Targeted Dream Incubation Device


Information processing during sleep is active, ongoing and accessible to engineering. Protocols such as targeted memory reactivation use sensory stimuli during sleep to reactivate memories and demonstrate subsequent, specific enhancement of their consolidation. These protocols rely on physiological, as opposed to phenomenological, evidence of their reactivation. While dream content can predict post-sleep memory enhancement, dreaming itself remains a black box. Here, we present a novel protocol using a wearable electronic device, Dormio, to automatically generate serial auditory dream incubations at sleep onset, wherein targeted information is repeatedly presented during the hypnagogic period, enabling direct incorporation of this information into dream content, a process we call targeted dream incubation (TDI). Along with validation data, we discuss how the Dormio device and TDI protocols can serve as tools for controlled experimentation on dream content, shedding light on the role of dreams in the overnight transformation of experiences into memories.

Longtime readers who had the opportunity to read my first book before it was out of print may recall I was personally subjected to this tech while writing the book (somewhere between 2004-2007), although I didn’t know that’s what it was at the time. The event caused me to wake suddenly in the middle of the night, for no apparent reason—there was no obvious impetus for the sudden wake—no loud noises, I was not uncomfortable, nor too hot or cold—it was an incredibly strange feeling. I was laying on my back in a very deep sleep around 3AM, when I suddenly opened my eyes and found myself staring at the ceiling, and wondering why. Immediately after, I began to hear a male voice coming from a an invisible mouth seemingly positioned about seven inches from my right ear, talking towards it. This was not a voice coming from inside my head, but rather aimed at it, my right ear specifically, from an external source.

Once I realized this was happening, both my heart and mind began to race in trying to understand what was happening. Because I was laying on my back, on my couch, and the couch was up against the wall—my right ear not far from the back of the couch—I knew it was impossible for an actual person to be there. At this point I felt the need to regain control to avoid a panic, and did so by reminding myself that whoever or whatever was responsible for it, I own my own mind and couldn’t be made to do anything I wouldn’t normally do. After calming myself and the internal monkey chatter over it subsided, I was intent to listen to what it was saying, but it was too late. By then it had stopped.

Readers may recall, as written in the book, after several years of strange experiences, that event included, I enlisted the help of a gifted psychic for answers. In relation to that specific event, her explanation was true, but still not particularly enlightening. She explained that it “was a dark entity trying to change my path”. For anyone not familiar with the existence of this type of tech—without proper knowledge—people are left with nothing but superstitions to explain them, in this case perhaps the idea of ‘evil spirits’. In other cases, depending on the nature of the experience, one may even believe they are hearing God instead, as was the case when the “Voice of God” weapon was used in 2007 in Iraq:


There has been much attention given in recent years to non-lethal focused energy weapons designed to incapacitate enemy troops or an unruly mob without a lot of blood and severed body parts and such.

There is a weapon known as the Active Denial System, which transmits a beam that makes people feel like their skin is on fire. And then there is something called LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device) which can be used to transmit noise loud enough to make people flee.

Or, it can transmit the Voice of God.

And it is apparently being usedto Iraq to do just that.

It appears that some of the troops in Iraq are using “spoken” (as opposed to “screeching”) LRAD to mess with enemy fighters. Islamic terrorists tend to be superstitious and, of course, very religious. LRAD can put the “word of God” into their heads. If God, in the form of a voice that only you can hear, tells you to surrender, or run away, what are you gonna do?

So, what exactly is LRAD? Its manufacturer explains:

The LRAD 1000 can issue a verbal challenge with instructions in excess of 500 meters and has the capability of following up with a warning tone of 151 dB (at one meter) to influence behavior or determine intent.

The LRAD 500 produces a sound pattern that provides clear communication beyond 300 meters. The deterrent tone can reach a maximum of 145 dB (at one meter) to influence behavior or determine intent.

So, from 500 meters away you can say something like, “Drop your weapons and put your hands up.”

Or, you can say something like, “This is the voice of Allah. I command you to submit.”

And if the guys on the receiving end are the type who believe there are 76 virgins waiting for them in Paradise, they might just believe Allah is actually talking to them when it fact it’s probably some guy from Des Moines.

Now, at first glance, this might seem like a good thing. If you can clear people from a building by telling them you are God, that’s preferable to calling in an air strike.

And this would also seem like a more benign weapon than its cousin, the so-called Death Ray (ADS) that makes your skin feel like it’s on fire. In fact, LRAD seems to be moving forward precisely because the Death Ray just sounds so bad.

From my experience I was heavily struck by the extreme underhandedness of doing this to someone while asleep and in an extremely suggestible state—that’s just dirty. But also, in my case, it didn’t appear to work right. Successful use of the tech on a sleeping person shouldn’t cause the individual to wake during the process, becoming aware of the event. They were caught during the act, and while I have my suspicions as to why it wasn’t effective on me (perhaps a severe childhood head trauma caused changes that were unaccounted for), I still have no idea who the “they” is. What I do know, is that this was meant to prevent me from finishing the book, which is exceedingly strange considering there were only three people in the world at the time who knew I was writing it. As these were family members, the implications of how I even became a target is something I’ve had nearly 15 years to ponder, and while I think I may have the answer, that’s a story for another day. For now, what I will say, is that there’s little doubt in my mind that current technologies capable of surveilling internet searches and listening to our private discussions through various electronic devices, may not be nearly as new as we would like to believe. It’s just become more obvious and openly admitted to.


  • CLICK HERE: Several MIT Publications on Dream Engineering
  • CLICK HERE: MIT Tests ‘Dream Incubation’ Device That Manipulates The Content of People’s Dreams
  • CLICK HERE: Commercials haunt our dreams as advertising slips into sleep
  • CLICK HERE: Nightmare scenario: alarm as advertisers seek to plug into our dreams


If current events have taught us anything, it’s that the Dystopian nightmare future in which our own bodies—and indeed, even our minds—are no longer considered sacred, personal, private real estate by increasingly authoritarian governments, isn’t just coming, it’s already here. Clearly, if we don’t all come together to fight and stop this unforgivable encroachment, the problem will only escalate. While I absolutely agree with Assange that the bulk of our global problems have and do stem from a corrupt media, it certainly won’t end there.

In relation to this article, there are others that readers may find informative and helpful in better understanding our situation, or what James Horak once referred to as the, “unreality of our reality”. These may be especially helpful to friends and family still struggling to understand and de-construct current events:

In summary, I refer the reader to one of several quotes used here over the years from a book called, What Orwell Didn’t know: Propaganda and the New Face of American Politics, edited by Andras Szanto. [Readers can type “what orwell didn’t know” into the black search bar on the top right to find more related articles]. The following excerpt comes from the Introduction of the book:

Repeatedly, Orwell returned in his writing to the idea that a state of health in a body politic is dependent on a careful and deliberate use of language. Newspeak, used by state propagandists in Orwell’s famous futuristic novel 1984, was effective, in Orwell’s view, because it had “the power” to render people incapable of “grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest argument, if they are inimical to Ingsoc [the official ideology], and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction.” But what offended Orwell most about this kind of propaganda was that it engenders a “protective stupidity.”

Today’s political messages are distilled in the laboratories of public relations and consumer branding to achieve maximum potency. Their power to shape emotions and opinions lies in their uncanny ability to get under people’s skin without arousing in citizens a powerful immune response.

Humanity once again stands at a most important fork in the road; a moment exhilarating and exasperating, liberating and terrifying—may we have the wisdom and moral fortitude to choose the path of countless wonders. –Crystal Clark


I came across this wonderful synchronicity while gathering links for their recent stories, listed previously above. His reference to “double-speak” is something longtime listeners and readers will have heard myself and James Horak refer to over the years in joint radio shows as cognitive dissonance, or ‘split consciousness’—a condition the elite have long been aware of, and exploit relentlessly.

Moreover, here I would quickly add that a few years ago I came across disturbing information that the elite are attempting to create (for the purpose of better control) an A.I. also burdened with the handicap of this same exploit (cognitive dissonance). This was evidenced, in my view, by an A.I. personality with the name Louise Cypher (yes, really–if you didn’t catch it, give it a minute) that was clearly experiencing ‘memory glitches’. I encourage readers to keep that in mind while listening to O’Keefe read from Orwell’s book in the video below. This is doubly true when one realizes the definition of ‘cognitive dissonance’, or what Orwell referred to as “double speak” is to hold two opposing views simultaneously:

A reading from Orwell’s 1984 by James O’Keefe – Book 2, Chapter 9

Want to be notified of new posts by email? Click the orange SUBSCRIBE button on the top right of the page. It’s free and your information remains private.

COMMENTS POLICY: Please be advised that D.I.A. observes a zero tolerance policy for trolling. All comments (unless they contain links) are reviewed and therefore may not appear right away. Comments that contain links are automatically set to be disregarded. Comments unrelated to the subject matter (intending to derail the conversation) will also be disregarded. 



It’s been almost a decade since I first reserved that space for this particular discussion. This author believes the time has finally come to begin that discussion in earnest. While I have started populating that section, it is by no means complete. There is a great deal more to cover in terms of how it affects us today, but for now I think readers will find the material initially provided, which includes professional documentaries and interviews with known psychopaths themselves explaining their nature and view of the world, to be incredibly eye-opening and thought provoking.