SILENCE OF THE LABS: THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE
By Crystal Clark, August 1, 2020
[NOTE: If you enjoy these posts you can subscribe by hitting the orange button on the top right. From 911 to microbes, the black search bar underneath the subscribe button is a great tool for rummaging.]
SILENCE OF THE LABS 2014: THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE
“This is the story of the bitter conflict between ideology and knowledge–what can happen when factual discoveries raise inconvenient questions for politicians…
Science–it is the essence of everything we know about our world. Every life improvement from health to habitat began with science. Science, the mother of invention, was once an independent arm of public policy, but in Canada there is trouble in the realms of science. It’s happening coast-to-coast, and north to the farthest reaches of the Arctic: science that isn’t practically useful for advancing policy objectives has been curtailed or scrapped.” –Linden MacIntyre, Narrator for Silence of the Labs: A War On Knowledge
CANCEL CULTURE AS THE MILITANT ARM OF GLOBALIST REALITY REVISIONISM
“Cancel Culture” is its new label, although it isn’t a new phenomenon. It’s gone by other names in the past, but the necessary role it plays during a reality revision is far more important–and it is necessary. Reality revisions would be nearly (if not totally) impossible without it. Two recent essays that dissected both the “defunding police” and “defunding you” cancel culture campaigns, not only addressed their individual purposes, but also highlighted their shared purpose towards a singular goal: globalist reality revisions can only be successful when ALL competing realities are eliminated. That is the entire purpose of cancel culture:
REALITY REVISIONS BY DEFINITION
“Reality revisions are agenda-driven and thereby fictitious narratives carefully scripted to revise an entire global reality in order to meet or fulfill that agenda. These are major, major paradigm shifts of generational proportions that summarily pre and re-define the future victor and victimhood status of billions. These shifts aren’t meant to change the perception and therefore direction of reality for a day, week, or months, but permanently.”
WARRING REALITIES: NEITHER VERSION IS FREE TO FULLY MANIFEST AS LONG AS THE OTHER ONE STILL EXISTS
“Still largely unbeknownst to most, we live in world in which two competing realities are constantly struggling for full manifestation. As one of them seeks to wholly dominate and fully replace the other through various methods of suppression and eradication, while the other entirely rejects such notions to the degree of criminal prosecution, they cannot peacefully co-exist—ever. As long as this struggle continues, so too will global war, famine, corruption, injustice and strife, and ultimately, the continued demise of our entire planetary civilization via the purposeful destruction of its life support systems. Mankind can no longer continue to participate in their own demise out of ignorance (of this war) and escape that demise at the same time.
This struggle is between the sovereign state, country or individual owning their own thought, action, and right to self-determination, and a private group of aspiring Caesars in the global governance regime they intend to replace the other reality with. This ultimate global reality revision cannot fully manifest without transferring, to itself, all of the sovereign power and freedoms of the other.”
During a January 2016 radio show I shared my expectation the next phase (of destroying competing realities) would include shunning–as in “shun the non-believers”–something every fanatical tyrant or cult does for a reason. Because globalism is working at break-neck speed to cancel every other version of reality opposed to it, “cancel culture” has become part of the vernacular. In reality revisionism, what we today call cancel culture, is the imposing militant or enforcement arm of the intended new reality: dissent will not be tolerated. You will accept it and conform or be punished. Cancel culture then, is the umbrella term for the various groups and methods being used to forcefully eliminate the competition. This would include big tech censorship (censoring competing views and news), propaganda media organs (publicly smearing and doxxing supporters of competing realities while simultaneously promoting those in favor of the revision), and of course the more literal militant groups like Antifa, BLM, and BAMN (by any means necessary).
Where the physically violent and destructive sub-groups are concerned, the order-out-of chaos principle is repeatedly portrayed (predictive programming) in pop culture. As an example, how many movies have you watched wherein some sort of demonic figure is standing triumphantly in front of a scorched earth in the background? And we wonder at the logic of that, don’t we? Why would you destroy a world or civilization you intend to rule over? What’s the point? Well, that’s exactly the point–‘scorched earth’ means building your new world on the ashes of the old one. It wasn’t until this year (2020) however, that we started seeing the more literal use of it as violent cancel culture mobs started to burn down cities, small businesses, police departments and churches, while simultaneously destroying historical statues and monuments. Those are anchors to a competing reality that globalism is attempting to overwrite and replace with something else: a global government.
Every small and seemingly disparate set of revisions happening in nations around the world simultaneously are building that one, singular, and final global reality. This is true to the degree, as discussed in great detail in a previous essay, cancel culture’s social justice warriors are currently in the process of waging the “corporate wars” warned about in films like Rollerball (1975) and Demolition Man. The job of cancel culture is to literally ensure that there are NO competing realities–including independently-owned businesses or sovereign nations–left standing. Only large, multi-national corporations owned and operated by globalists are meant to survive, and the absurd COVID “lockdowns” are a huge part of that process. The duplicitous hypocrisy of forcing all small businesses (around the world) to stay closed indefinitely–for your safety of course–while the Walmarts of the world remain open unabated only confirms it. Social justice warriors aren’t “working for the little guy” by waging war against them all on behalf of globalist corporations.
CANCEL CULTURE’S WAR ON KNOWLEDGE: SILENCE OF THE LABS
Throughout history, under different slogans, banners and flags, cancel culture has been waging war against knowledge and people for thousands of years for tyrants of the times. We see it more clearly today (2020) because it’s now on our doorstep and in our face, but for many years prior there were signs of it on the horizon–the Silence of the Labs documentary was one of those signs. It’s been almost seven years since it was first produced, and it, along with so many other warnings that were ignored, was a sign of things to come.
The first victim of the war on knowledge covered in the documentary is an archaeologist. Certainly, in 2014, it would have been impossible to tell people the destruction of statues and historical monuments all over the world was next, but here we are, so we should better understand how the process started so we aren’t as slow to recognize it happening again. That’s important because it IS happening again, and this time, what’s being ‘canceled’ is costing people more than just their jobs.
While environmental scientists were also being terminated in Canada en masse during this same time period, others, like archaeologist Pat Sutherland, were also victims of the purge. As narrator Linden MacIntyre explains at the 4:00 mark of the documentary, archaeologist Pat Sutherland and her research at Baffin Island were getting world-wide attention just before she was ‘canceled’:
“Her work was admired internationally and she was close to proving that Norse explorers based in Greenland had been here earlier and for a longer time than anyone had previously known–a finding that was making headlines in scientific circles. It even excited mainstream media attention. On CBC TV “The Nature of Things” did an hour on her in June of 2013. She got a photo and feature spread in National Geographic. The European media was fascinated–the kind of exposure academics only dream about–and it should have been a cause for celebration by her employer, The Canadian Museum of Civilization. Behind the tourist-friendly facade, there’s always been a serious purpose here: original research exploring 20,000 years of human history through science, biology, geology, archaeology. But if Sutherland expected high-end media publicity, she was in for a disappointment.”
While interest in her work first waned, then turned from indifferent to nearly hostile with Sutherland admitting she was eventually ‘monitored’, at the time she didn’t recognize the seriousness of what was happening. Unbeknownst to her, not only was a smear program being put into her personnel file in preparation for her upcoming dismissal, but this all coincided with upper management preparing to “re-brand” the facility from The Canadian Museum of Civilization to The Canadian Museum of History, meaning her years of work wouldn’t be part of its revised image. The museum’s new and narrow focus was primarily British history, including a healthy dose of British war propaganda via a campaign costing nearly 28 million dollars just to recreate and promote the war of 1812–“glorification of…the kind of history that’s consistent with the ideology of the current government”.
The events encapsulated in the above paragraph–both the way she was treated and the fact that it happened during a ‘re-branding’ attempt–are typical of reality revision attempts:
“We have seen extremely blatant examples of rebranding coming from our government(s) the past decade, an example I point to often being the President’s rebranding of a Drone-strike Kill List to a Disposition Matrix. Rebranding is often thought of as a method whereby a harsh truth can be softened and made to become more palatable. This is certainly true, happens often and quells resistance. But what about the kind of rebranding one finds in the old bait-and-switch technique, which is, in itself, a pre-condition or necessary companion of a reality revision?
Rebranding for the sake of redefining can be read as a harbinger of reality narrative revisions. This is important: rebranding for the sake of redefining can be read as a harbinger of reality narrative revisions. For example, when a story-line is becoming more complicated to set the expectation of a nearing twist or drama, either a new character is introduced or an existing character is redefined as somehow being duplicitous or disloyal to the others—this is where the plot thickens…”
REALITY REVISIONISM AND THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE: THE PURGE OF INTELLECTUALS
Besides archaeologist Pat Sutherland, more widely covered in the documentary is the purge of environmental scientists during this war on knowledge, especially those monitoring the industrial pollution of rivers, lakes and oceans–even veteran climate scientists with decades of data and experience were cut loose. As narrator Linden MacIntyre explains this he does somewhat miss the mark however, because this isn’t the result of ‘an obsessive political focus on economics’ but rather an obsessive political focus on achieving a global government that will only employ scientists driving pre-selected narratives:
“Hundreds of programs and world-renown research facilities have lost their funding in the last 5 years. More than 2000 government scientists and researchers have been dismissed. Programs that monitored smoke stack emissions, food inspection, oil spills, water quality and climate change were drastically cut or ended–the downside of an obsessive political focus on economics that critics warn ignored environmental peril and even re-writes history.”
The most impacting moments of the documentary however, are found in the unmistakable shakiness in their voices and the frightening chill that covers their faces and permeates the air as they recount what happened to them. Moreover, those are totally appropriate responses to the purge because ‘cancel culture’ isn’t new–this has all happened before. If accurate history was still being taught, reminders wouldn’t be necessary–reminders that clearly demonstrate which direction these purges take next, and in some instances, have already taken.
Unfortunately, while some still cling to the “it can’t happen here” false promise and will write the following examples off as alarmism, at the same time some of you are already too afraid to publicly share essays like this for fear of being ‘canceled’ yourselves–by your friends, families, lovers, and even employers. Cancel culture is a very, very dangerous thing, and if we cower in the face of it there’s no question dark days are ahead.
“Anti-intellectualism is hostility towards, and mistrust of, intellect, intellectuals, and intellectual pursuits, usually expressed as the derision of education, philosophy, literature, art, and science as impractical and contemptible. Moreover, allegations of anti-intellectualism can constitute an appeal to authority or an appeal to ridicule which attempts to discredit an opponent rather than specifically addressing his or her arguments.
Governmental anti-intellectualism ranges from closing public libraries and public schools to segregating intellectuals in an Ivory Tower ghetto to official declarations that intellectuals tend to mental illness, thus facilitating psychiatric imprisonment, then scapegoating to divert popular discontent from the dictatorship.”
“Lenin’s Private War” by Lesley Chamberlain, is a significant new contribution to this reparative effort. Out of the many millions of Communism’s victims, she focuses on a group of 67 intellectuals, arrested on Lenin’s direct orders on the night of August 16, 1922, and deported to Germany that autumn. They were not all philosophers — they included historians, economists, literary critics, journalists, and mathematicians — and they were not all deported on a single ship; it took two tourist steamers, sailing six weeks apart, to deposit them and their families at the Baltic port of Stettin.”
Great Purge (from Historydotcom)
“The Great Purge, also known as the “Great Terror,” was a brutal political campaign led by Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin to eliminate dissenting members of the Communist Party and anyone else he considered a threat. Although estimates vary, most experts believe at least 750,000 people were executed during the Great Purge, which took place between about 1936 and 1938. More than a million other people were sent to forced labor camps, known as Gulags. This ruthless and bloody operation caused rampant terror throughout the U.S.S.R. and impacted the country for many years…Stalin also signed a decree that made families liable for the crimes committed by a husband or father. This meant that children as young as 12 could be executed. In all, about one-third of the Communist Party’s 3 million members were purged.
Gulag Labor Camps
There’s no doubt the brutal tactics of Stalin paralyzed the country and promoted a climate of widespread terror. Some victims claimed they would rather have been killed than sent to endure the torturous conditions at the infamous Gulag labor camps. Many who were sent to the Gulag camps were ultimately executed.”
For those unaware, we already have political operatives in the “feel the Bern” camp on undercover video making similar suggestions because they too intend to eliminate competing realities and dissenters, which includes both conservatives AND liberals:
- An undercover video published by Project Veritas on Tuesday shows a field organizer for Sen. Bernie Sanders’ 2020 campaign saying Soviet gulags were actually a positive phenomenon, suggesting that some similar program could re-educate Trump supporters and billionaires.
- Undercover footage released by Project Veritas on Tuesday shows a field organizer for Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I-VT) 2020 campaign warning that liberals will “get the fucking wall first” in a socialist revolution.
THE RETURN OF ANTI-INTELLECTUALISM: ANOTHER SIGN OF THINGS TO COME
The following comes from psychologydotwikiadotorg regarding Anti-Intellectualism:
“Anti-intellectualism describes a sentiment of hostility towards, or mistrust of, intellectuals and intellectual pursuits. This may be expressed in various ways, such as attacks on the merits of science, education, art, or literature
Anti-intellectualism is often used by dictators or those seeking to establish dictatorships. Educated people as a social group have often been seen by totalitarian elements as a threat because of the tendency of intellectuals to question existing social norms and to dissent from established opinion. Thus, often violent anti-intellectual backlashes are common during the rise and rule of authoritarian political movements, such as Fascism, Stalinism and Theocratic rule…
The most extreme dictatorships, such as that of the Khmer Rouge, simply murdered anyone with more than a rudimentary education. Other expressions of anti-intellectualism range from the closure of public libraries and places of learning, to keeping intellectuals and scientists isolated from the world in an “ivory tower,” to official declarations that intellectuals are prone to mental illness and enacting laws to have them placed under psychiatric care. In addition, intellectuals in countries ruled by authoritarian governments are often subject to popular condemnation and used as scapegoats to divert the anger of the public away from those in power.”
Anti-Intellectualism and the War Against Experts in America (from raywilliamsdotca):
“Anti-intellectuals present themselves and are perceived as champions of common folk—populists against political and academic elitism—and tend to see educated people as a status class that dominates political discourse and higher education while being detached from the concerns of ordinary people.
Totalitarian governments manipulate and apply anti-intellectualism to repress political dissent. During the Spanish Civil War and the following dictatorship of General Francisco Franco, the reactionary repression of the White Terror was notably anti-intellectual, with most of the 200,000 civilians killed being the Spanish intelligentsia, the politically active teachers and academics, artists and writers of the deposed Second Spanish Republic. In the communist state of Democratic Kampuchea, the Khmer Rouge régime condemned all of the non-communist intelligentsia to death in the Killing Fields. And of course, history graphically chronicles the book burnings and persecution of intellectuals in Nazi Germany.”
Anti-intellectualism Becomes Institutionalized In American Schools
While it’s nearly impossible to find the video now, one of the individuals involved in developing and institutionalizing the Common Core curriculum, openly admitted during an interview that it was purposefully designed NOT to lift up those with educational disadvantages to a higher level of learning, but rather to push everyone else down to the same level of a lesser education. Is today’s trend towards anti-intellectualism (and the resultant ‘anti-white’ campaign) really about racism then, or something else entirely?
- Seattle Public Schools Say Math Is Racist
- Professor: ‘Mathematics Itself Operates as Whiteness’
- “Math Is Racist” — CNN Goes Full Retard
- Leftist Student-Activist: Science Is Racist and Should Be ‘Decolonized’
- Watch Leftist Students Say Science Is Racist and Should Be Abolished
- Rutgers Declares Grammar Racist
- Proper English Grammar Is Now Racist
Even worse, and to the horror of awakening parents everywhere, Common Core also has pedophilic grooming built in to the curriculum, and even fewer people know that in conjunction with the UN, Bill Gates was the primary driving force behind the program:
“…surrendering control over K-12 education through the controversial so-called “Common Core” national standards — and the outrage is still growing. A peek beneath the surface, however, reveals that the nationalization of American schools is actually just one component of a much broader global agenda being pushed by the Obama administration, the United Nations, Bill Gates, and others: the globalization of education.
In fact, just this week, an invitation-only conference hosted by former Florida Governor and pro-Common Core ringleader Jeb Bush entitled “Globalization of Higher Education” took place in Texas. Among the attendees: Hillary Clinton, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan, former World Bank President Robert Zoellick, UNESCO officials, university presidents, and more. While higher education appears to be the next target of reformers, the globalization of K-12 schooling is on the verge of completion — at least if the American people do not rise up and stop it–“right and left.”
“If something is not done soon, the vast majority of American K-12 school children will be taught using dubious, federally backed national education “standards” that have come under fire from across the political spectrum. America’s kids, as well as their parents, will also be monitored and tracked in unprecedented ways from early childhood into the workforce. Opposition is growing by leaps and bounds, but government officials are not yet backing down.
The controversial “standards” scheme, known informally as “Common Core,” is being foisted on state governments all across the country with a combination of taxpayer-funded bribes, outright deception, and federal bludgeoning. Despite America’s long traditions of local governance and separation of powers, the Obama administration and its establishment allies in both parties are determined to get the standards rolled out nationwide. So far, their progress has been remarkable.”
Towards the end of my corporate days in the tech industry (2001) I hired a local group of programmers to provide tech support to some of my clients. They were extremely good at what they did, all having unique backgrounds–one having worked at Area 51 for over a decade previously. During the course of a personal conversation with the head of the group, I expressed the desire to home-school. To my complete shock (this being before my ‘woke’ days), his entire demeanor changed dramatically, and he warned me, “don’t do it–they don’t want you to”. Of course I thought he was being ridiculous, but after asking him to explain what he meant, and who “they” were, he told me a story I will never forget.
He first began apologizing repeatedly for being involved, saying he did it because he needed the money for his cancer treatments, and he also knew that if he didn’t do it someone else would have–then he told me what he did: he wrote a program for the government that would begin tracking and surveilling children from the time they entered kindergarten. There was a little more to it than that, and while he didn’t tell me the name of the program, given the time-frame of the work he did, there’s no question it coincided with GOALS 2000–A Clinton administration educational program passed in 1994 that began the nationalization (the interim step towards globalization) of education. This was often referred to as “outcome-based” education, where ‘teaching-to-the-test’ began the dumbing-down process of children in America, as having students memorize test answers replaced teaching them how to think critically and deduce the answers on their own–the beginning of anti-inellectualism in a now federalized school system.
Mining this topic indicates movement in this direction began with President Bush in 1989 under a previous program called ‘America 2000’ when governors from around the country met in Virginia for a bipartisan Education Summit. The program began with Bush (America 2000), was insitutionalized by Clinton (Goals 2000), and then cemented and commandeered by Bill Gates and the UN through Common Core. It’s unsurprising then, to find cities like New York–cities that signed on to be ‘model regions’ for a UN program aimed at installing global police forces locally for the purpose of policing a new generation of “global citizens”–to currently announce they are teaming up with Bill Gates to “re-imagine” education again. Translation: another reality revision is coming, and if we listen carefully, they are telling us what it is.
Cuomo to Join with Common Core’s Bill Gates Foundation to ‘Reimagine’ Education[posted May 6, 2020]
“New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) announced Tuesday his state will partner with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to “reimagine” its school system as New Yorkers navigate toward a post-coronavirus “new normal.”
Cuomo said New York will work with the Gates Foundation – the primary private financier and promoter of the Obama-era Common Core State Standards – because “the old model of our education system where everyone sits in a classroom is not going to work in the new normal.”
The “new normal” slogan being spoon-fed to citizens world-wide is the direct result of ideological subversion, with Common Core now mainlining it into primary education beginning in kindergarten while simultaneously tracking (and tweaking) its effects in real-time while building ‘disposition matrixes’ on our children. This is a final push to permanently globalize education standards designed to intentionally dumb children down, and as it stands now, schools all over the world are currently closed with many local governments refusing to re-open them until a new set of “standards” is accepted, including mandatory vaccination wherever they can push it through–regardless of the fact that doing so is a violation of the Nurmeberg Code.
Again we find depopulation advocate Bill Gates behind the push not only for mandatory vaccines as being part of that new normal, but for a digital compliance tracking system of same. This, coming from a man who is not a doctor nor a scientist. In fact, if we do a product review of Gates’ previous work in this area, like the product reviews we did on the UN and multinational corporations in previous essays, what do we find?
“Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India ‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines.
In 2014, the GatesFoundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.
In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.
During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers”
SILENCE OF THE LABS 2020: CANCEL CULTURE AND CENSORSHIP HITTING A DANGEROUS FEVER PITCH IN WAR ON (REAL) SCIENTISTS AND DOCTORS
I don’t remember the source, but it often rings true: the underlying purpose of all propaganda is to make one group of people matter less than another. If not always true, it’s certainly true today, and again, history shows us how this progresses: the verbal attacks, smears and public diminishment are pre-cursors to the violent physical attacks that come next. Or, at least that’s true when the agenda is casting a wider net and going public. In that case propaganda is meant to get public buy-in to pre-empty resistance or backlash to what would otherwise be considered abhorrent, shameful and shocking. But agendas like this take time to build. They start out slowly, quietly, covertly, and hidden from public view. Of course that’s only made possible by a complicit media burying, obfuscating and covering up any signs that something wicked this way comes–like they did for Jeffrey Epstein.
Scientists Who Were Already Canceled
Important points because while we see the propaganda media constantly and viciously flailing about in attack mode, and we know what that portends for the future, it doesn’t show us how many victims the agenda has already claimed while operating in the shadows under a blanket of media silence. Veteran reality miners know the first wave of ‘canceled’ scientists, hundreds of them, were microbiologists. Again, thanks to the big tech arm of cancel culture (censorship), a complete list of these dead scientists is difficult to find–that particular list was compiled in 2005.
The second wave of cancel culture victims were doctors–doctors that were using unconventional methods of healing illnesses and ailments that main stream doctors were unable and/or unwilling to address and resolve, things like retro-viruses, autoimmune diseases and autism. While the count may be even higher now, in March of this year the count was 102 of them, who, like the biologists, died under unusual circumstances with an unacceptable number of them obviously misidentified as suicides. [NOTE: I started writing this essay a week ago, and before I finished it, another scientist was murdered. This story came out yesterday: A successful cancer research scientist and mother-of-two was murdered and her body dumped in a creek while on her daily run in Texas this past weekend.]
Those aren’t the only scientists to suffer this fate, but they are the most well-known and important scientists to consider for our purposes here. We can’t go back and save them, but we can protect those among us today who are desperately trying to save lives, and are consequently being canceled for doing it. Some of these brave new warriors have already survived attempts on their lives, others are being destroyed through the smear machine, had their jobs canceled for speaking out, were thrown in prison without any formal charges filed, had their research confiscated, or have experienced all of the above as targets of today’s cancel culture. We can’t afford a continuation of this trend–not just because it’s morally right to protect them, but also because they are literally being attacked for trying to save YOUR lives.
The world cannot afford another ‘cancellation’ wave of people like CDC whistle-blower Tony Cunningham. He did what he thought was right, was smeared by the cover-up media during his disappearance, and then his literal life was canceled. As widely reported in April of 2018, he was found dead in a river two months after he disappeared, and he disappeared after he tried to blow the whistle on the flu vaccine. You can learn more about that in the resources provided and I encourage the reader to deeply consider the importance of both his life and death given current events:
“Who is Timothy Cunningham? He worked for the CDC, but he was a special CDC officer. He was an Epidemic Intelligence Service officer. What’s that? Epidemic Intelligence Service Officers deal with diseases and biowarfare. He was on the team for H1N1, Ebola, and the Zika virus.
According to exclusive sources, he was startled with findings over the years in respects to how flu vaccines amplify the side effects of viral infections rather than inoculate patients effectively.
In December of 2017, Cunningham was assigned to what was at the time a new project unofficially known as “Shogun”. According to our exclusive sources, testing and manipulation of the SARS strand was being used against a new drug that could eliminate a virus [trying] to infect your cells. It’s important to understand HOW viruses function to understand WHAT Timothy Cunningham’s whistleblower report had.” –toresaysdotcom
I personally have no way of confirming reports that these new viruses are being engineered to include anti-fertility agents, but these reports are coming from multiple sources and I remind the reader that depopulation is one of the highest priorities of globalism. And let’s not forget what happened in Kenya. Would they do it if they could? Yes. Can they? Probably. But have they? It’s certainly starting to look that way:
- SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic and repercussions for male infertility patients: A proposal for the individualized provision of andrological services
- Coronavirus may cause testicular damage, male infertility, research finds Source:Global Times Published: 2020/3/12 15:45:24
“The novel coronavirus may cause testicular damage and male infertility, Chinese experts found, suggesting infected men who want to have children or maintain the quality of their sex life take tests for semen quality and hormone levels.
For those with a history of COVID-19 infection, especially men with fertility needs, it is best to carry out inspections after recovery, according to an expert team led by Li Yufeng, a professor from the Center for Reproductive Medicine of Tongji Medical College in Wuhan, Central China’s Hubei Province.
The report was published on the website of the hospital on March 10, and reposted by the official website of Hubei Province on Thursday. But they were later removed after the news went viral on Chinese social media.”
The coronavirus could invade cells through the combination of spike protein (S protein) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), causing tissue damage.
As well as the lungs, many other organs of the human body, such as the testes, small intestine, kidney, heart, and thyroid are affected by the ACE2, the team said.
The male reproductive function could be affected, as a large amount of ACE2 shows up in testes, mainly concentrated in testicular spermatogonia.
Although no research has confirmed that novel coronavirus damages the testes and affects male fertility, it is highly similar to the SARS virus and these infections invade the same cell receptor, namely ACE2. The SARS virus infection can cause severe immune damage to the testes, causing orchitis and dysfunction of some reproductive-related cells.”
The censorship arm of cancel culture has made penetrating information on Cunningham hard to find–search returns are largely filled with vacuous propaganda resembling what was done to Archaeologist Pat Sutherland. I appreciate the maker of the above video and I’m willing to share the love with other reality miners doing good work. You may want to save or mirror it. At around the 7:36 mark the video discusses a Japanese company claiming to have developed a drug that can kill ANY virus that invades the human body. The cover-up media is again silent on something that should be front page news around the world (just like Epstein, Gates’ history with vaccines, dead doctors and scientists).
Current Attempts to Silence Scientists and Doctors
Despite a cover-up media and relentless censorship from the big tech arm of cancel culture, millions of people around the world still know that hundreds of doctors have come forward this year in protest of the media constantly lying about a therapeutic these doctors have used successfully on their COVID patients. The more famous and recent video was removed by big tech from every major social media platform almost immediately. Cancel culture also shut down their website:
“Website hosting provider Squarespace has shut down the website of the group America’s Frontline Doctors following a press conference they held in Washington D.C., according to Dr. Simone Gold. According to a screenshot posted by Gold, the web hosting service shut down the group’s website for “activity that’s false, fraudulent, inaccurate or deceiving.”
Breitbart News recently reported that the Masters of the Universe quickly censored a live stream published by Breitbart News of a press conference held in Washington D.C. by the group America’s Frontline Doctors and organized and sponsored by the Tea Party Patriots. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) was featured at the event and doctors at the event shared their views on the coronavirus pandemic and the medical community’s treatment of the virus.”
Footage of the livestream on Periscope, Twitter’s livestreaming platform, had generated 1 million views before being removed by the site. Footage on Facebook had accumulated over 17 million views within 8 hours and had 185,000 concurrent viewers at the time it was streamed. On YouTube, a clip from the event received 80,000 views before being removed by the platform for “violating YouTube’s Community Guidelines.”
Now, the founder of America’s Frontline Doctors, Dr. Simone Gold, stated in a recent tweet: “Our website host @Squarespace has just completely and arbitrarily shut down our website, claiming a violation of their terms of service.”
In case the reader is unaware, Dr. Simone Gold’s reference (in the video below) to hiring attorney Lin Wood is significant because Wood is the same attorney currently winning cases against big media corporations whose smear apparatus fronted for cancel culture against children in the now famous Covington Kids scandal. Going forward, that would be my advice: class action lawsuits.
Is it a crime for the media to know about a cure for a disease or global pandemic (!) and either refuse to report it, or even propagandize the public into believing it might actually kill you instead?! Is it a crime for big tech to do the same by erasing it from the collective consciousness as quickly as possible and planting ‘we removed this because it’s dangerous and misleading content’ gibberish in its place?! If not, it certainly should be. There’s something very, very wrong when main stream news outlets around the world have sided with a power-hungry, fanatical, global death cult trying to install themselves as our new forever-leaders, and in so doing, are purposefully hiding or slandering life-saving medicines from the global populace. Are the days of red purges ‘on the wall’ being replaced with something more silent and sinister, including silence itself?
Dr. Simone Gold’s comments (during her appearance with Tucker Carlson) were extremely eye-opening while explaining why they felt so compelled to hold the press conference to begin with:
“We came to Washington because we’re so distressed. You know, front line doctors like myself are seeing patients not get what they need–we’re seeing the doctor-patient relationship completely eroded–that the governors are empowering pharmacists to override doctors who have conversations with their patients. It’s really something that America should be concerned about.”
Tucker Carlson’s follow-up question is also extremely thought provoking regarding current trends in today’s cancel culture:
“Shouldn’t you, as a practicing physician with a medical degree, be allowed to express your views on science as you practice it without being censored?
One of the doctors in the aforementioned press conference explained she had personally and successfully treated (meaning none of them died) over 300 COVID patients with HCQ, some elderly and some having serious ‘co-morbidity’ factors–and she did it with the same therapeutic the media has literally been calling deadly. When did the media bobble-heads get medical degrees allowing them to legally give the entire country ‘medical advice’? The same goes for your local governors and mayors following suit by actually banning the use of this life-saving drug. The class action lawsuits over this should be numerous, spectacular and filed with haste. [In case you missed it, Dr. Gold rebuilt the website big tech censors canceled–you can find it here: America’s Front Line Doctors Summit]
I think highly of Tucker Carlson, but do disagree with his assertion that this is about the Biden campaign, implying it’s about the Democrats using this as a political tool to regain power. This is isn’t the case–it’s about globalism attempting to take power through opportunizing a global plandemic–at the expense of other people’s lives. But then again, that’s typical of globalist reality revisions:
Reality revisions are agenda-driven and thereby fictitious narratives carefully scripted to revise an entire global reality in order to meet or fulfill that agenda. These are major, major paradigm shifts of generational proportions that summarily pre and re-define the future victor and victimhood status of billions. These shifts aren’t meant to change the perception and therefore direction of reality for a day, week, or months, but permanently. These revisions are as horrendous as they are gargantuan in sheer size and scope, their purpose is to forever alter the organic course of the human race in the writers’ favors, and with a body count already in the multi-millions, will stop at nothing to achieve it.
WHY REALITY REVISIONISM’S CANCEL CULTURE NEEDS TO CANCEL GRANNY
Because the big tech arm of cancel culture is scrubbing these videos (of Bill Gates discussing death panels and killing off granny to save a few bucks) as fast as they pop back up, I’ve again transcribed it:
“That’s a trade-off society is making because of very high medical costs and a lack of willingness to say, is spending a million dollars on the last 3 months of life for that patient–would it be better not to lay off those 10 teachers, and to make that trade-off in medical costs. But that’s called Death Panels, uh, and you’re not supposed to have that discussion.” –Bill Gates
Here again I STRONGLY advise the reader to save and/or mirror the videos in these essays so that reality as it is and was, is not lost to future generations. As it stands now, because of cancel culture’s big tech censorship and resulting fake fact checking mechanisms, a search for “Bill Gates killing granny death panels” pulls up nothing but anti-intellectual ‘de-bunking’ articles claiming it’s a right wing conspiracy theory started by Sarah Palin in 2009–that’s not Sarah Palin in the video making those statements–it’s Bill Gates. If YOUR material was linked to anywhere in these essays, I strongly advise you to mirror and/or save copies of it elsewhere.
“Getting rid of granny’ is included here because it absolutely is tied to the reemergence of anti-intellectualism, as well as that in itself being tied to reality revisionism’s current cancel culture agenda. As an immediate example, if that were not the case, why then did Gates immediately begin peddling the case for killing off granny as the most efficient way to save the country money to hire teachers, instead of FIRST looking to recover the funds through well-documented medical, insurance and medicare fraud, or even stopping the $15 BILLION DOLLAR A YEAR trade deficit with China?! In globalist reality revisionism, two main objectives are accomplished with the ‘get rid of granny’ campaign. First, it begins to pre-condition future generations to accept a lower quality of life along with further revisions (depopulation events) that will begin purges of people our new forever-leaders deem non-essential to their new system. Or, as stated earlier, “In that case propaganda is meant to get public buy-in to pre-empty resistance or backlash to what would otherwise be considered abhorrent, shameful and shocking.”
Second, the elderly, just by being alive and having been present for historical events of significance, are anchors to a pre-existing version of reality that globalists are attempting over-write. What they know, observed, witnessed and lived through is competition for the new narrative, and competition must be eliminated. That said, there’s a reason Common Core and ‘killing off granny’ discussions are happening simultaneously: what the elderly know about true history and real reality, is meant to be phased out at the same time Common Core is refusing to reintroduce any of it, while instead using a replacement narrative that will be more difficult to dispute in the absence of living witnesses.
“There are two very different realities competing for full manifestation upon the earth. In order for reality revisions to be successfully, ALL OTHER anchors, memories, and references to the previous reality–the competing reality–MUST be eliminated. This includes the elderly, newspapers, books, tweets, movies, art, campaign ads, true history, and yes, even statues. A fully successful globalist reality revision requires censorship on a massive, massive scale, of the previous (competing) reality, and every person, place or thing who reminds, refers, remembers, shows or reflects it back into the collective consciousness.”
GLOBALIST REALITY REVISIONISM AND THE DEHUMANIZATION DIRECTIVE
Remembering that Reality Revisionism is primarily a globalist construct, and as current revisions can be read as harbingers of intended future revisions as discussed in a previous essay, current trends suggest far more nefarious and disturbing elements of dehumanization on the horizon.
This particular harbinger can be found in the “killing off granny” to save money dialogue in conjunction with dwindling economic stability. The not-so-subliminal (nor subtle) message here is that caring for the infirm is a massive financial drain on society, and further, if we want to continue to direct our financial resources to their care, other essential societal needs—like hiring more teachers—will no longer be met. In other words, at some point you’re going to have to make a choice; you’re going to have to choose who lives and who dies to keep business-as-usual going.
This is a spectacularly dehumanizing and contrived crisis with horrifying consequences should it continue. We are not only looking at the revision of “health care” to “death care” but also the pubic admittance of it. Moreover, while a sane mind will naturally want to dismiss the culpability or even measured influence of depravity on the issue, numerous and otherwise absurd laws banning access to proven methods of healing and disease prevention only confirm it…
The confluence of poisoning an entire population against their will with the intent to later deny them adequate care—or even the right to continue living at all in the face of a manufactured financial collapse—won’t just create millions upon millions more throw-away-people, it is a massive human rights violation accurately referred to as genocide..
Concurrently, globalist influence on educational curriculum is grooming successive generations at younger and younger ages to more readily accept living in a further dehumanized and debased society through errant sustainability movements. Dehumanizing society in the name of ‘saving the planet’ can be found in erroneous overpopulation memes suggesting, to children, the earth cries out every time a new child is born. This is done fully expecting the child to interpret their own birth the same way and become more accepting of what will one day become more cruel and covert methods of depopulation or sterilization.
GLOBALIST REALITY REVISIONISM AND THE DUMBING-DOWN DIRECTIVE
As the Common Core lecture video [below] more than adequately demonstrates pedophilic grooming worked in to every aspect of the curriculum, and the predatory/pedophilic nature of globalists has been covered elsewhere here, focus will be dedicated to an equally serious issue: the connection between killing off granny at the same time the younger generations are being so severely dumbed-down. This is the direct result of the war of competing realities and a consequence of globalist reality revisionism attempts.
For those unaware, several years ago a commercial was produced that didn’t get the kind of reception they expected, perhaps because it too realistically portrayed the seriousness of their agenda:
CANCELING THE ELDERLY PICKING UP STEAM DURING THE PLANDEMIC–COINCIDENCE OR CONFLUENCE?
There were significant revelations in the video posted here about CDC whistle-blower Tony Cunningham, namely:
- He was an Epidemic Intelligence Service officer
- Epidemic Intelligence Service Officers deal with diseases and bio-warfare
- He was on the team for H1N1, Ebola, and the Zika virus
- Before his death he tried to blow the whistle on flu vaccines amplifying the side effects of viral infections rather than inoculate patients effectively
- He discovered the Japanese created a drug effective against every virus that replicates in human cells
- SARS was being manipulated to become “smart”–capable of remaining dormant and undetected (until activated)
By all appearances, CDC whistle-blower Tony Cunningham was murdered in 2018 after publicly stating his concern flu vaccines were making people more susceptible to other viruses. That’s certainly thought provoking, even more so when you find cancel culture currently trying to slander of bury information like this: Flu Vaccine Increases Coronavirus Risk 36% Says Military Study:
“I started digging into this topic on the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) advice two weeks ago when I noticed the agency’s top advice about coronavirus was to “get a flu shot”.
This advice seemed a bit too simplistic when given to a population of largely elderly veterans with significant disabilities, vaccine histories, and exposures to various pathogens worldwide.”
Here we are months later now, waiting for investigations to hold local leadership all over the country accountable for the wave of elderly patients killed in nursing homes that were stuffed full of COVID patients. You may remember that in places like New York, COVID patients were purposefully sent to nursing homes instead of the large medical naval vessels docked in their port. Stories like this mean something:
New York Post (June 27, 2020) Article: Almost half of US COVID-19 deaths are linked to nursing homes
“Nursing homes are tied to nearly half of the 124,000 fatalities from the coronavirus in the US, according to a troubling new analysis of data from 12,000 senior facilities.
Eleven percent of people killed by the virus died in nursing homes or long-term-care centers, but the facilities are linked to many more COVID-19 fatalities — more than 54,000, or 43 percent of the national toll when accounting for workers who contracted the disease at the facilities, according to a New York Times database.
In at least 24 states, the majority of deaths were nursing-home-related. New Hampshire recorded the largest percentage of nursing-home COVID-19 deaths, with 80 percent, or 293, of the state’s fatalities coming from the facilities. Rhode Island and Minnesota followed, each with 77 percent, according to the database, which includes stats from the facilities, along with local, state and federal governments.
The data also show the death rate is a staggering 17 percent among infected nursing-home patients, compared with 5 percent nationwide.”
Newsmax (Monday, 15 June 2020) Article: 5 Dem Govs Called to Answer for Nursing Home Mandates
“Republican members of the House Oversight Committee are investigating five Democratic governors for their decision to mandate nursing homes to take untested, if not COVID-19 positive, patients during the pandemic…
“The decision of several governors to ignore federal protocols and instead mandate COVID positive patients be forced back to their nursing homes ended up being a death sentence for tens of thousands of our nation’s most vulnerable citizens,” Ranking Member Steve Scalise, R-La., wrote in a statement to Newsmax TV’s Emerald Robinson.
“We owe it to those who died and their grieving families to get to the bottom of why these deadly decisions were made by these governors, ensure we stop this from still taking place, and prevent tragedies like these from happening again as we continue to battle this deadly virus.”
The five Democratic governors, most of the leading Trump administration antagonists in some of the blue states where the coronavirus caused the most infections and deaths in the U.S., received letters:
California Gov. Gavin Newsom.
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy.
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf.
“We write to you seeking information, at a granular level, about the science and information used to inform your decision to mandate nursing homes and long-term care facilities admit untested and contagious COVID-19 patients from hospitals,” the letters, obtained by Newsmax TV’s Robinson, read. “This decision likely contributed to the thousands of elderly deaths in [state specific].”
MORE RELATES STORIES:
- Forbesdotcom (June 16, 2020) Nursing Homes Account For Over 40% Of U.S. Coronavirus Deaths
- USATodaydotcom (June 1, 2020) ‘A national disgrace’: 40,600 deaths tied to US nursing homes
- Las Vegas nursing home under investigation after COVID-19 deaths
- How to Track COVID-19 Nursing Home Cases and Deaths in Your State
- Janice Dean, who lost in-laws to coronavirus, demands ‘full’ investigation into NY nursing home deaths
- State not tracking all COVID-19 deaths at elderly homes
- How many nursing home residents died of COVID in New York? What we know (and don’t know)
For now (Part 1) I think this meme says it all…”Look how many agendas you can fit in this baby!”
COMMENTS POLICY: Please be advised that D.I.A. observes a zero tolerance policy for trolling. All comments (unless they contain links) are reviewed and therefore may not appear right away. Comments that contain links are automatically set to be disregarded. Comments unrelated to the subject matter (intending to derail the conversation) will also be disregarded.