THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE PART 2: INDOCTORNATION WORLD PREMIERE

THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE PART 2: INDOCTORNATION WORLD PREMIERE (THE LOCK STEP PLANNED DEMIC)

August 28, 2020

INDOCTORNATION WORLD PREMIERE

The following documentary is excellent, and it’s everything the main stream media should have reported on and didn’t–something they should one day be held accountable (legally liable) for. This documentary is a huge service to us all and has also personally saved me hours of writing this second WOK (War on Knowledge) essay.

I caution the reader against a listen-only review as there are two streams of data being offered simultaneously. While those in the film are narrating and paraphrasing what they uncovered, on the screen they are showing copies of the documents, articles, memos and patents that big tech censors will inevitably try to remove any trace of–they are showing visual proof of their assertions–some of which is far more detailed and shocking than their paraphrasing.

Because the documentary covers so many things I had intended to cover here (and so many I didn’t), and does such a brilliant job of it, there are only a few points I would like to highlight because they add depth and context to so many other interrelated happenings. First and foremost, in an effort to encourage the reader to watch and share it with friends and family, the video starts (10:52), with testimony being provided by an Intelligence Analyst and founder of IQ100 Index (NYSE):

“I’m the developer of Linguistic Genomics, the platform on which you could determine the intent of communication, rather than the literal artifact, but we’ve also used that technology for a number of other applications, in defense, intelligence and finance, and most notably for bringing down what was, at the time, the largest tax fraud in U.S. history. We maintained a series of inquiries into every individual, every organization, and every company that is involved in anything that either blurs the line of biological and chemical weapons, or crosses that line–in any of the 168 countries.

In 1999 there were a million patents digitized by IBM, and those million patents were the first time human innovation had been put into an electronic digital searchable format. We took that information and we did a very simple exercise using our linguistic genomics technology. I made the horrific assessment that approximately one-third of all patents filed in the United States were functional forgeries. Meaning that, while they had linguistic variations, they actually covered the same subject matter. In 1999 patents on corona viruses started showing up, and thus began the rabbit trail.

In 2003, the CDC saw the possibility for a gold strike, and that was the corona virus outbreak that happened in Asia. They saw a virus they knew could be easily manipulated and as something that was very valuable. In 2003 they sought to patent it, and they made sure they controlled the proprietary rights to the disease, to the virus, and to its detection and all measurement of it. We know, that Anthony Fauci, that Ralph Banic, that the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and a laundry list of people who wanted to take credit for inventing corona virus, were at the hub of this story. From 2003-2018 they controlled 100% of the cash flow that built the empire around the industrial complex of corona virus.

While we knew that corona virus manipulation started with Dr. Ralph Baric in 1999 (Ralph Baric, PhD, Professor or Microbiology and Immunology)–Ralph Baric does research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, who’s famous for his chimeric corona virus research. In 2000, there was a recognition that the corona virus was seen as an exploitable mechanism for both good and ill. On March 25, 2003 the US CDC filed a patent (patent numbers are provided on screen) on the corona virus transmitted to humans.

Under 35 Code US Section 101, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either, SARS corona virus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal, or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws. If it was natural, filing a patent on it was illegal. In either case, both are illegal.

In the spring (May 14) of 2007 the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their application confidential and private. They actually filed patents on not only the virus, but the they also filed patents on its detection, and a kit to measure it. Because of that CDC patent, they had the ability to control who was authorized, and who was not authorized, to make independent inquiries into corona viruses. You cannot look at the virus, you cannot measure it, and you cannot develop a test kit for it. And by ultimately receiving the patents that constrained anyone from using it, they had 1. the means, 2. the motive, 3. and most of all, they had the monetary gain, from turning corona virus from a pathogen to profit.

Those shocking revelations suggest, at the very least, the CDC is another rogue agency that has illegally patented a corona virus (with the intent to keep that secret) while also patenting its detection and a kit to measure it. The latter two measures read more like an insurance policy that would go a long way in keeping ‘unauthorized’ prying eyes from conducting independent investigations. Interestingly enough, and perhaps through using the Emergency Use Authorization Act in an attempt to get around that monopoly (and anything nefarious it may be concealing), that may explain why Trump held a press conference on March 29, 2020 and made the following statement:

“On Friday the FDA authorized a new (covid) test developed by Abbot labs that delivers lightening fast results in as little as five minutes. That’s a whole new ballgame. I want to thank Abbot labs for the incredible work they’ve done–they have been working around the clock. Normally this approval process from the FDA would take 10 months or longer, but we did it in 4 weeks. (Reported the same day by CBS New York: Trump: Corona Virus Rapid Tests on the Way.)

A few months later (in July 2020) the main stream media was littered with the headline, “Trump Strips CDC of Control of Coronavirus Data,” which they then used as a bludgeon to imply he was incompetent at handling the situation. Yet, based on what this documentary reveals, remembering that all three patents are visually presented, it would appear Trump was far more competent (and informed) than the CDC especially, would have appreciated. In stripping the CDC of their control over Corona virus data, hospitals were ordered to bypass the CDC (National Healthcare Safety Network site–the primary CDC system) and instead send all patient data directly to a central database in Washington. The corrupt media, in unison, all framed the move as a ‘Trump admin hates transparency’ issue, but clearly, when it comes to the corona virus, its the CDC that has transparency issues.

There’s no indication Abbott intended to produce these tests for other nations, which is unfortunate given that Tanzanian president John Magufuli, attempting to vet the efficacy of the tests he was provided, submitted samples from goats, sheep and a pawpaw fruit with human names–all of which came back with positive results for the virus. The reader may also recall, as discussed in a previous post, the President of Madagascar claimed the World Health Organization (WHO) offered a $20m bribe to poison an herbal remedy called COVID-19 Organics made from Artemisia–a remedy he claims can cure COVID-19 patients within ten days.

I realize people don’t want to believe this level of corruption has been (and still is) happening for decades, especially when so many lives are at stake, but also covered in the documentary (but again not by the main stream media) was another shocking revelation from ex-Google engineer turned whistle-blower Zach Vorhies. Given that depopulation is a major goal of globalism, and Google is a globalist corporation, this really shouldn’t shock people anymore:

Zach Vorhies (22:16) “The ‘blacklist’ is something that Google said, didn’t exist–and they testified that under oath. Now me, as an engineer, I just did a search on Google’s internal search engine, and guess what I found? It had blacklisted search terms for [things like] “cancer cures”. Why is Google deciding what people can and cannot search for?”

THE REALITY REVISIONISM TRIFECTA: MOCKING BIRDS, NARRATIVE ENFORCERS & FAKE FACT CHECKERS

“What was once an efficient tool for navigating the world of information, is now a network for global surveillance, data collection, and social engineering.”

–documentary narrator

Operation Mockingbird

Operation Mockingbird is covered around the 31:00 mark, and includes vintage footage of Ex-C!A officer John Stockwell answering the following question during a television interview: How often does the C!A manipulate media this way?

John Stockwell (31:53): It goes beyond your wildest imagination. Setting up student organization so they can draw radical students in, 5000 university professors co-opted to help the C!A manipulate people’s minds, journalists in the US, including big name journalists co-opted to function routinely to help the C!A put out stories and biases to the world. As this 1952 C!A memo says, the aim is “controlling an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will.”

Operation Mockingbird is why you can find compilation videos showing dozens of local news stations from around the nation all parroting the exact same talking points on the same day–literally word for word–clearly indicating those talking points are pushed down from higher up the chain. Instead of thousands of local media reporters, we have thousands of local (and national) media repeaters. Most reality miners have been aware of Operation Mockingbird for years, but in exploring what was done to Dr. Judy Mikovits, the film does a fantastic job illustrating the true reach and power of the reality revisionism trifecta. 

Fake Fact Checkers 

“Most fact checkers are neither independent nor factual–they are political.”

The documentary briefly covers funding sources of ‘fact checker’ organs, which includes the usual suspects (Google, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Soros). A deeper dive into the people and money driving fake fact-checking was done by award-winning journalist Sharyl Attkisson while investigating Facebook’s formation of an “independent oversight board” with authority to allow or remove content from Facebook and Instagram, and its assurances as to the diversity of the board members. What she found to be true instead, is that “18 of its 20 members collaborated with or are tied to groups that have received funding from George Soros’ Open Society Foundations – which is one of the most well-funded and influential progressive organizations in the country.” Attkisson included a complete list of those board members and their individual ties to Soros.

These same fake fact checkers also lied about Dr. Mikovits:

(23:51)  When Dr. Mikovits claimed she was arrested without a warrant and jailed without charge (for trying to warn the world about vaccines contaminated with XMRVs), Snopes rated the comment as false. Had they bothered to explore the arrest documents, they would have seen that indeed, there was neither a warrant nor signatures to officiate a charge. In fact I confirmed this with members of the Mikovits legal team. [24:12 is a video clip of Mikovits’ attorney, David J. Follin admitting this is 100% correct–Judy has never been charged with any crime].

Where the rona is concerned especially, the trifecta operates a tight ship in censoring and slandering anyone and anything that doesn’t abide the scripted narrative. The film necessarily covers the sordid history of Snopes and how they and other fact checking sites (factcheckdotorg) raced to quash the fact that the virus, its testing and treatments, was indeed patented. Anything outside of the preferred narrative (also being pushed down from higher up the chain) was and is being censored and slapped with a “false” label. Facebook joined in when it vowed to remove any information it didn’t deem factual–aka anything not falling in line with narratives presented (pushed down) by the WHO & NIH–especially when it comes to vaccines. This phenomenon is well covered in the film:

“See, the problem with all of this is right in front of our face, and when confronted with evidence, we are told the fact-checkers are transcendent.”

Weaponized Wikipedia

Wikipedia has been known to be a cog in the smear machine, but in so doing, is also a form of fake fact checking. This was also done to the biography page of Dr. Mikovits and covered in the documentary:

“Wikipedia, what has been an unbiased open source platform, is now weaponized to undermine the work and reputation of anyone deemed a threat to its stakeholders [the new narrative]. And once they smear you [on your personal wikipedia biography page] they lock you out from making corrections to your own bio.”

Unfortunately for victims of a weaponized wikipedia, Alexa is programmed to regurgitate the smears. This is demonstrated at the 25:26 mark as Alexa provides the following response to being asked, “Who is Dr. Judy Mikovits?”

“According to wikipedia…a former American research scientist who is known for her discredited medical claims, she has been described as an anti-vaccination activist and promoter of conspiracy theories, and has been accused of scientific misconduct.”

The media

One of the hopeful things that I’ve discovered is that nearly every war that has started in the past 50 years has been a result of media lies. The media could have stopped it if they’d searched deep enough–if they hadn’t reprinted government propaganda they could have stopped it. But what does that mean? Well, that means basically populations don’t like wars, and populations have to be fooled into wars. Populations don’t willingly and with open eyes go into war. So, if we have a good media environment, then you will also have a peaceful environment.

Our number one enemy is ignorance, and I believe that is the number one enemy that everyone is not understanding–not understanding what is actually going on in the world. It’s only when you start to understand that you can make effective decisions and effective plans. Now, the question is, who is promoting ignorance? Well, those organizations that try to keep things secret, and those organizations which distort true information to make it false, or misrepresentative. In this latter category, it is bad media. It really is my opinion that the media in general are so bad, we have to question whether the world wouldn’t be better off without them altogether. –Julianne Assange (2011)

While Assange referred to the problem as “bad” media–a far more respectable label than they deserve–if we bottom-line the role of bad media in the drowning in absurdity (death by ignorance) paradigm, we ultimately find that a hell of a lot more people would still be alive today without them. Smelling blood in the water, and having apparently developed a taste for it, the main stream media is being no more honest with the public over the rona than they were about all those wars. The appalling role of the media in this scenario was also covered in depth in the first WOK (war on knowledge) essay:

Is it a crime for the media to know about a cure for a disease or global pandemic (!) and either refuse to report it, or even propagandize the public into believing it might actually kill you instead?! Is it a crime for big tech to do the same by erasing it from the collective consciousness as quickly as possible and planting ‘we removed this because it’s dangerous and misleading content’ gibberish in its place?! If not, it certainly should be. There’s something very, very wrong when main stream news outlets around the world have sided with a power-hungry, fanatical, global death cult trying to install themselves as our new forever-leaders, and in so doing, are purposefully hiding or slandering life-saving medicines from the global populace. Are the days of red purges ‘on the wall’ being replaced with something more silent and sinister, including silence itself?

Dr. Simone Gold’s comments (during her appearance with Tucker Carlson) were extremely eye-opening while explaining why they (doctors)  felt so compelled to hold their own press conference to begin with:

“We came to Washington because we’re so distressed. You know, front line doctors like myself are seeing patients not get what they need–we’re seeing the doctor-patient relationship completely eroded–that the governors are empowering pharmacists to override doctors who have conversations with their patients. It’s really something that America should be concerned about.”

Tucker Carlson’s follow-up question is also extremely thought provoking regarding current trends in today’s cancel culture:

“Shouldn’t you, as a practicing physician with a medical degree, be allowed to express your views on science as you practice it without being censored?”

One of the doctors in the aforementioned press conference explained she had personally and successfully treated (meaning none of them died) over 300 COVID patients with HCQ, some elderly and some having serious ‘co-morbidity’ factors–and she did it with the same therapeutic the media has literally been calling deadly. When did the media bobble-heads get medical degrees allowing them to legally give the entire country ‘medical advice’? The same goes for your local governors and mayors following suit by actually banning the use of this life-saving drug. The class action lawsuits over this should be numerous, spectacular and filed with haste. [In case you missed it, Dr. Gold rebuilt the website big tech censors canceled–you can find it here: America’s Front Line Doctors Summit]

Assange discovered that if lies can be used to start wars (kill people) then the truth can be used to end them (save people). I whole-heartedly agree yet would love to expand that understanding beyond the borders of some far off middle-eastern war theater. There is not ‘a’ war happening in some far off place to people we don’t know. Rather THE war is happening to everyone around the world at the same time–the globalist war against 9 out of every 10 people on the earth–which includes (but is not limited to) kinetic wars in far off places, depending on your location. These seemingly disparate events are all aspects of a singular war against a reality that globalism is attempting to revise and replace with itself–just like a virus.

Because most people really are good people and therefore have to be lied (fooled) into wars–have to be lied into participating in the demise of themselves and others–the media has become the source of an infection once referred to as a lie virus or lierus. In scientific terms (modified from wikipedia):

Lierus replication is the formation of mind viruses during the infection process (media propaganda) in the target host cell (audience mind). Lieruses must first get into the cell (mind) before lieral replication can occur. Through the generation of abundant copies (Project Mockingbird) and propaganda packaging these copies, the lierus continues infecting new hosts. Replication of lieruses is greatly varied depending on the goodness (conscience) and health of the immune response (factual knowledge base) of the host.

THE PLANNED DEMIC–WAS ALL OF THIS REALLY PLANNED?

The evidence supporting that conclusion is voluminous and overwhelming, yet still largely hidden from the general public by a complicit cover-up media. The evidence in my view, necessarily includes Dr. Mikovits’ early discoveries of the XMRV’s and subsequent attempts to murder, slander, and destroy her life, finances, career and reputation for trying to warn the world about her discoveries.

Becoming more reality literate with a history lesson on John D.  Rockefeller

In 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation produced a paper on global pandemic scenarios called SCENARIOS FOR THE FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY & INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT–A FICTIONAL SCENARIO. While the documentary does cover the paper briefly, more important to the machinery of the beast, is the backstory (also in the film) of the Rockefeller take-over of medicine, covered at the 48:30 mark. These events were massive, massive reality revisions that still haunt us today:

“Around the same time John D. Rockefeller seized US media he also hijacked US medicine. When it was discovered drugs could be produced with petroleum, America’s top oil mogul ordered his army of propagandists to invert reality accordingly. [Natural] Medicines used for thousands of years were suddenly classified as ‘alternative’–while the new, petroleum-based, highly addictive and patentable drugs were declared the new gold standard.

After buying the German pharmaceutical company that manufactured chemicals of war for Adolf Hitler, Rockefeller leveraged his political influence by pressing congress to declare natural healing modalities ‘unscientific quackery’. Rockefeller then took control of the American Medical Association (AMA) and began offering massive grants to top medical schools, under the mandate, that only his approved curriculum be taught. Any mention of the healing power of herbs, plants or diet, was erased from most medical text books. Doctors and Professors who objected to Rockefeller’s plan were crucified by the media, removed from the AMA, and stripped of their licenses to teach and practice medicine. Those who dared to speak out where arrested and jailed. 

When it began to emerge that petroleum-based medicines were causing cancer, Mr. Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society, through which he suppressed that information. John D. Rockefeller is duly credited as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry, and the reason that medical error is currently the 3rd leading cause of death in America.

This is not an indictment against doctors. More than anyone, they are under the stranglehold of the single greatest lobbying power in Washington. Every year, the pharmaceutical industry spends at least twice the amount as big oil to influence laws, policies, and public perception. Thanks to Mr. Rockefeller, the architect of American monopolies, no industry has more power over our lives than big pharma.”

Destroying the reputations of doctors/scientists who speak out against these agendas, or arresting and jailing them, as Dr. Judy Mikovits discovered the hard way, is not a new phenomenon–this has all happened before. This history lesson also helps us better understand the events behind the origin of the FDA proclamation that “only a drug can cure, prevent or treat a disease,” which is also why its illegal for anyone healing with ‘alternative’ medicine (live Vitamin C) to make those same claims–Vitamin C can’t be patented–drugs can.

The 2010 Rockefeller Foundation program called SCENARIOS FOR THE FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY & INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT–A [NOT SO] FICTIONAL SCENARIO.

While Rockefeller’s role in shaping our current reality is worth watching the documentary for alone, when it comes to the 2010 paper put out by the Rockefeller Foundation, here’s a link to secondary source discussing a particularly revealing section of the program called Lock Step. The gentleman being interviewed about this paper–particularly the Lock Step section–is clearly extremely disturbed by what it says, as we all would have been if the media had reported on it a decade ago.

In the first few minutes, the guest being interviewed (secondary source) makes reference to Ebola before going into Lock Step, which I thought was interesting given something the Planned Demic documentary covered at 18:16 when interviewing Maryl Nass, MD, Physician, Researcher and Writer. The very first thing she says is shocking:

I was the first person in the world to look at an epidemic and study its characteristics and prove it was due to biological warfare–it’s not a natural occurrence. So I published that 28 years ago [Anthrax: Epizootic in Zimbabwe, 1978-1980: Due to Deliberate Spread]. Early in this [corona] pandemic, I did not think this pandemic was a natural occurrence from bats. I felt quite convinced this was a laboratory designed organism. There have been hundreds and hundreds of leaks from high containment labs that do research on pathogenic corona viruses and other potentially lethal organisms.

I was particularly interested in a paper that came out in Nature Medicine by 5 scientists [one of which was Ian Lipkin] claiming it was definitely a natural occurrence rather than a lab construct. But the arguments they used did not hold water, they didn’t really make a lot of scientific sense, and yet all kinds of ‘very important’ people started parroting what this paper said, and so that of course go me scratching my head saying, why are all these people risking their reputations when it’s obviously illogical–doesn’t hold water–somebody must have made them publish this AND somebody must have told these other people that they have to say its a great piece of science.”

That’s a serious claim–somebody must have made them publish this AND somebody must have told them support it as legitimate science–should the claim be taken seriously? Most certainly, especially after whistle-blower claims made in the recently released documentary ShadowGate, explained how the program was used to ‘micro-target’ individuals to get them to move in specific directions or behave in certain ways. How that may be exploited was covered in the WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE post. Below are some highlights:

At the 6:47 mark of the documentary, Tore (Linguist, Naval Intelligence contractor) explains her job was called “localization,” a strategy wherein particular groups are specifically targeted, ranging from “a whole country, city, a certain religious group, a 6-block radius like CHAZ,” and you then try to get into their heads: what they eat, how they walk, talk, think, what makes them happy or sad, what drives them nuts and what buttons to push to get the required response–and then you opportunize that data (use it against them). She points out this can be done to alter ideology, sell certain products, or function as a form of behavioral modification in getting people to move in a “pre-determined direction”.

The use of data harvesting in these operations also, and perhaps even more importantly, includes mining a key (targeted) individual’s data to look for blackmail material, which of course is an extremely powerful motivator for getting people to fall in line. Threatening to fire people, ruin their careers and destroy their reputations is also a common technique, as was the case with Dr. Judy Mikovits. Her refusal to ‘modify her behavior’ as requested soon became an example to others as the threats were made good on, including an attempt on her life. In Part 1 of this WOK (War on Knowledge) essay series there were also numerous examples of dead ‘natural medicine’ doctors, biologists, and even an CDC whistle-blower whose body was found in a river two months after he disappeared.

Lock Step

Returning to the paper published by the Rockefeller Foundation, SCENARIOS FOR THE FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY & INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT–A FICTIONAL SCENARIO, the Lock Step section begins on page 18 of the document, and starts out with a critical admission as to what these ‘scenarios’ are really meant to achieve:

“A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen push-back.”

The documentary displays this section (Lock Step) of the paper at the 43:07 mark:

“During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from mandatory wearing of face masks to body temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.”

Event 201

Event 201 was another global pandemic scenario exploration event covered in the documentary at the 37:55 mark:

“My systems flagged anomalies when I started seeing non-profits and corporates and cover financing for corona virus programs in the late summer and fall of 2019. Our first red flag came when we read, A WORLD AT RISK SCENARIO. Now there is an organization called the Global Monitoring Preparedness Board. This organization is a part of the World Health Organization (WHO), and this board includes Dr. Chris Elias of the Gates Foundation, and Anthony Fauci from NIAID. These individuals, plus the Director General for the Center for Disease Control in China, came out with a recommendation that says by September of 2020, two global pandemic exercises have to be completed. And one of them has to be done on the release of a respiratory pathogen. That then gave rise to an October event–Event 201. Event 201 took place months before covid was declared a pandemic. It was a scripted, multi-camera event broadcast globally via the internet–something Fauci and Bill Gates have been predicting for years.

Every single thing you have seen play out in their ‘tabletop’ exercise–which, by the way, fact checkers have said, has nothing to do with the covid outbreak–just happenstance. This is the wonderful universe of improbabilities where events just co-emerge and then nature conveniently backs itself into our architecture [predicted scenario]. That’s the scenario [narrative] we’re supposed to accept.

Event 201 was not the first scripted exercise to prophesize the future with astounding accuracy. Leaders of global health and businesses have been seeding reality with fictional scenarios for several decades. A year before event 201, many of the same sponsors, hosts and actors came together to produce a tabletop pandemic simulation for a fictional virus they branded CLADEX.”

PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING IS USED FOR PRE-PLANNED EVENTS

The changes being made to the world under the guise of a pandemic are the the most sweeping globalist reality revisions yet. And while social engineering and perception management are the main tools used to pull off a reality revision, they have a cousin that also often shows up to the party, usually arriving first: predictive programming. Predictive Programming is used to bypass and pre-empty the otherwise normal response to sudden, dramatic events that deviate wildly from ‘normalcy’–that reaction being shock, followed by disbelief and then rejection. In order to avoid that public reaction to an upcoming planned event, predictive programming operates slowly, over long periods of time, through continually and repeatedly re-introducing (seeding) the idea of the event into the collective consciousness. This not only bypasses the normal shock/rejection response, but effectively numbs the public to it while also creating an expectation for it: “It wouldn’t surprise me if a real pandemic happens soon”. Exactly.

Predictive programming as a foreshadowing of events, when understood this way, can be used by reality miners very much the same way as having historical knowledge of the way anti-intellectualism (dumbing down and purging intellectuals from society) can and should be read as a portent–something wicked this way comes. Very much like observing the changes in language coming from officialdom, not only does reading predictive programming tell you a change is coming, but will also tell you what that change is.

Predictive programming can also be weaponized for the kind of ‘micro-targeting’ revealed in WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE and IDEOLOGICAL SUBVERSION. There’s a reason today’s tween and twenty-something ‘social just warriors’ were micro-targeted repeatedly during their childhood with age-specific repetition of ‘global warming’ and/or ‘the world is dying because it’s overpopulated’. That was, for all intents and purposes, a rather effective and decades long recruitment campaign that now has them acting as agents of the globalist agenda in handing the entire world over to globalist corporations under the false pretense of doing the exact opposite. That issue was covered in depth in a previous essay called THE DEFUND ENDGAME PART 2: TRANSITIONING LOCAL CITIZENS TO GLOBAL CITIZENS.

That remarkably successfully recruitment campaign was accomplished through social engineering, perception management, ideological subversion, predictive programming, AND the exact same kind of military grade social media weaponization (including micro-targeting) exposed in the ShadowGate documentary. The exact same kind of campaign used to get locals in a foreign nation to side with the Taliban, in my view, has been used against our own children to get them to unwittingly side with globalism:

“For people who didn’t take the time to watch the documentary before it was scrubbed, the impact crater of him saying, “because the same thing I was hired to do by General Jones overseas, is what i’m seeing them doing right now, here in America,” isn’t going to sink in any deeper than the “fake news is the enemy of the people” slogan.

However, for those that did take the time, I trust you’ll recall the other individual featured in the documentary (Tore) explaining how ‘localization’ was used against the citizens of a foreign nation in trying to get them to side with the Taliban—a political group that was now becoming militant (physically violent)–and trying to convince locals that siding with them would keep things like their local businesses from being destroyed. If that doesn’t sound hauntingly familiar to what’s been happening in this country lately, you haven’t been paying attention.” –WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE (ShadowGate)

Predictive programming requires a broadcast medium with both broad and micro-targeted reach. Hollywood produces most of it and the media (all forms) sell and market it. As an example, it’s not a coincidence that two of the most recent blockbuster film series, Marvel’s Universe and Godzilla, had story lines centered on needing to depopulate the earth/universe as means to ‘save’ it. This can also be done in other subtle, more sub-conscious ways, like the Nike poster advertising a new shoe with an image of it being worn on a leg that had the flesh blown off, just before the Boston marathon bombing took place.

In fact, a startling example of this was also in the latest Godzilla film, and it was done in such a way that only veteran reality miners and pre-targeted youth–being micro-targeted in the absence of parental knowledge and guidance–would have noticed. Every good campaign has a slogan and logo, and in this case it was the “extinction rebellion” symbol splattered throughout the Godzilla movie in a culty, product placement kind of way. The symbol is made from two triangles that youth adherents to the movement are told represents an hour glass, but the historical significance of the symbol comes from metal slave collars worn around the neck–these had four, long, protruding metal arms extending from the center ring around the neck–two on each side, forming a double triangle. Perhaps even more telling, was the use of the symbol throughout Godzilla in a sideways position (more akin to the slave collar), which would be more representative of that “form of behavioral modification in getting people to move in a “pre-determined direction,” and “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen push-back,” we’ve been hearing so much about–all to ‘keep us safe’ from mythical global warming and a patented, pre-planned pandemic. An image of the slave collar, and the interrelated (with current events) story behind it, can be found at the 12:58 mark of a fascinating interview with Bishop Larry Gaiters. 

Predictive programming (often in conjunction with ideological subversion, social engineering and perception management) is done over an extended period of time, often many decades, for the sole reason the event IS BEING PRE-PLANNED. Where pandemic narratives and scenarios are specifically concerned we can look back over the last 20 years and see it’s endless and intensive streaming into the collective mind. But above and beyond the litany of re-worked plague, contagion and zombie movies, the most startling example for many of us was the 2012 London Olympics opening ceremony.

That was a particularly disturbing display for reality miners around the world at the time, and included everything from laid out rows of hospital beds, the giant effigy of a dead baby, a reaper (as Voldemort with a magic wand), police state elements (police in riot gear with fences), dancing nurses, bizarre creatures with glowing green eyes going after the children, a giant phoenix (representing a new world being built on the ashes of the old one) flying over the world’s nations in flames below while the band Take That sang “Rule the World,” and eventually John Lennon was even shown singing “imagine there’s no countries”–all being performed in an arena rimmed by 15 metal pyramids with capstones on them. The Vigilante Citizen wrote a great article on the event and its symbology, and I’m not surprised to see others now wondering if certain elements of both the arena and strange choreography being performed within weren’t meant to represent the virus itself.

THE GATES OF HELL: MAKING A KILLING

It’s a standing joke that someone who isn’t a doctor or scientist, and wasn’t able to keep viruses out of his own software, has no business trying to save the human race from viruses. What most people today don’t consider, something that was more of a hot topic when writing my first book over a decade ago, is that software developers are the most likely source for the viruses that infected their own software. Not only do they have the most motive because they then turn around and sell the anti-virus software, but it’s one of the first and most deviously brilliant technological shake downs perpetrated on consumers in that industry.

More importantly, at this point I think it would be foolish not to heavily consider that the same thing is now being done to the biological operating systems of human beings, with viruses being made by those who will profit the most from the sale of biological anti-virus software (vaccines)–at the very least. All things considered, although they never came right and said it, isn’t that the real underlying premise of the data collected in the documentary? The same people involved in the creation and patenting of the virus are also the ones involved in pimping the vaccines for it? Even to the point of attempting to forcibly mandate the vaccine for seven billion people. The profit margins on that aspect alone would be obscene, especially when, as the documentary points out, the research and development of the vaccines is paid for by the taxpayers.

Gates is an extremely controversial person for numerous reasons, some of which were covered in the first WOK essay, especially where anti-intellectualism (dumbing down) is concerned in relation to the Common Core curriculum that Bill Gates pushed for, which also includes the sexualization of young children (pedophilic grooming). When people don’t know this, the fact that Gates was a known funder and associate of Jeffrey Epstein, the character of man trying to force vaccines on seven billion people doesn’t get the attention it deserves. Fortunately, this too was covered in the documentary–what kind of man is he? If we do a product review of Gates and his previous attempts at ‘philanthropy’ what comes up? For those who haven’t read it, this particular review came from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and was included in the first WOK essay. https://fort-russ.com/2020/04/robert-f-kennedy-jr-exposes-bill-gates-vaccine-dictatorship-plan-cites-gates-twisted-messiah-complex/

“Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India ‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines.

In 2014, the GatesFoundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.

During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers”

The Planned Demic Documentary does it’s own product review of Gates which is equally revealing and disturbing. Below are 2 clips from that section of the documentary (freely provided for distribution by the makers of the documentary) which include the following topics:

  • Gates did not come from humble beginnings–his grandfather and great grandfather were banking moguls and his father was a prominent Seattle-based lawyer and political activist
  • Gates did not invent the windows operating system–he bought it, had it modified, and licensed it to IBM
  • Bill Gates admitted in a television interview that when it comes to vaccines, the financial return on investment is 20-1
  • Bill Gates 2.0: Gates opened the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation as part of re-branding (reality revision) campaign after the anti-trust lawsuit gave him the reputation of a ruthless tech monopolizer. It worked so well his net worth doubled giving him the title of the richest man in the world
  • While Microsoft’s co-founder Paul Allen was battling cancer and undergoing chemo therapy, Gates attempted to cheat him out of his share of the company fortune
  • Gates’ involvement with and ties to the world’s most notorious pedophile (Epstein)
  • Gates’ funding of an experiment to literally block out the sun (in the name of fighting the mythical global warming)–what some rightfully refer to as planetary genocide
  • Gates’ funding of a global satellite surveillance system to monitor the personal activity of every human being on earth 24/7
  • Gates’ partnership with MIT relating to an “immunity passport” and vaccines that can be injected under the skin along with medical records which can be scanned by authorities to prove vaccine compliance (the quantum dot tattoo)
  • The Gates vaccine scandal in India investigated by their government–after his vaccines killed and damaged their children

BILL GATES AND PROJECT ARTEMIS

The reader may have noticed I have not been using the correct title or spelling for the documentary, nor have I provided a direct link beyond that found in the graphic image at the beginning of this page. The reason for that, in my opinion, is Project Artemis. Before I explain, below are three different comments copied directly from the page hosting the documentary (keeping in mind that texting/English as a second language are comment variables):

“will [with] the censorship of posting they can justify it through their community rules the fact that we can’t send the link in a private message on Facebook is a federal crime. It means they have acces to our private correspondence. I hope a very big law suit is coming their way”

“Cannot share on facebook in the UK – message reads ‘Your message couldn’t be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.’ Abusive? What a joke…”

“I’m not allowed to share the link to this video by fb Messenger”

Anti-intellectualism in the form of digital censorship (the big tech arm of cancel culture designed to eliminate competing views and realities) has nearly gone nuclear. While shadows of where they once stood have been burned onto the walls of our memories, even those will be painted over soon, as thousands and thousands of websites, FB pages, Youtube and twitter accounts have been deleted and purged by big tech censors in the last few months alone. This is a common and necessary tactic tyrants use, and it’s history (purge of intellectuals from society) was covered in the first WOK essay.

The progression of digital censorship intensified with going after public pages and accounts first, but soon the admins of private groups, some with hundreds of thousands of individual subscribers, were getting notices from FB saying their ‘group’ reach was being diminished because the group was posting ‘fake news’. This obviously means content and conversations happening in private groups is being monitored and censored, but people still hoped that personal, private messages were still considered a sacred cow unsullied by the censorship and surveillance apparatus. As the comments shared above indicate, people were clinging to that last vestige of privacy in the hopes of getting around the censorship–if you can no longer share knowledge with each other openly or in private groups, there’s still private messages. That too, it would seem, is being subjected to thought police voyeurism and tyranny.

Considering that private conversations, being had even in our homes, are also being listened to in the presence of cell phones, computers and in some cases perhaps even televisions (many smart TV’s now also equipped with cameras), should we really be surprised? What concerns me about this new form of censorship however, is not just its ties to Bill Gates and this latest venture coinciding with private message and chat monitoring, but also how that too may be used against people in the future. Even worse, keeping in mind this is coming from a man responsible for Common Core and who had business dealings with Epstein, this new surveillance program was released under the guise of “looking for pedophiles”. Before we get to that, I would first like to share the more common definitions of ‘grooming’:

grooming
n. Preparing a person for a position requiring skilled behavior, especially by providing opportunity for practice and guidance in making the right decisions.
n. The activity of getting dressed, washed and generally of neat appearance.
n. The activity of cleaning oneself or others by removing lice, ticks, dirt, etc. from the fur; — of animals.

Rarely (if ever) does one find any mention of pedophiles in relation to the word, yet there are few among us who don’t know what pedophilic grooming is. But here, in relation to Project Artemis, and the way people were forced to resort to private messages for information-sharing, I find the the first definition extremely important. As covered earlier, reality literate populations won’t tolerate drowning in absurdity (death by ignorance) because most people really are good people. In that sense, I personally believe that the real ‘grooming’ being targeted by Project Artemis has a lot more do with people trying to get around the thought police via private messages and chats–for the purpose of providing each other with “opportunities for practice and guidance in making the right decisions”— to be the true target of the project. With that in mind, the following information on Project Artemis comes from fightthenewdrugdotorg:

Project Artemis’ job is to spot patterns of communication in conversations. Then, based on those patterns of speech and the words being used in the conversation, the system will assign a rating for the likelihood that one of the participants is trying to groom the other. The rating part of the system is incredibly useful because it allows those using the system to flag higher risk conversations for human moderator review and, in some cases, to immediately send conversations that exhibit an imminent threat to law enforcement.

In tracking the movements, manipulative language, and grooming techniques used by sexual predators in flaggable conversations, the system will also provide experts with more information on how sexual predators operate online—which will allow Microsoft to increase the accuracy of the system’s flagging mechanism.

And while, according to the company’s chief digital safety officer, Courtney Gregoire, Microsoft has only been utilizing these techniques for several years on its own products, including on Skype and its Xbox platform, it has invited further contribution and engagement from other technology companies and organizations with the goal to improve and refine the system further.

In order to know how to improve and refine the system though, we first need to talk about how it works—let’s dive in.

So, then, how does Project Artemis actually work? Well, the truth is, we don’t really know. In fact, very few outside of Microsoft know, but that’s actually the key to the whole thing.

Why?

Because if Microsoft explains the precise words or patterns the tool hunts for, sexual predators could potentially adjust their behaviors to hide their activities and, essentially, rendering Project Artemis useless.

While the system still has some risks in that it might throw up false positives, since automated systems still struggle to understand the meaning and context of language, and in that it assumes that users permit their private communications to be read, Project Artemis has enough merit to make sexual predators think twice before they use online chat functions for exploiting children.

This is my personal perspective on Project Artemis, and given that Gates is a globalist, and covid is being used to install their long-held vision of a global, corporate, fascist, (surveillance) police state, and we know the thought police are attempting to also globalize a ‘social credit score’ based on personal disposition matrixes (grading our personal conformity and compliance to that agenda), I would personally find this particular rendition of the first paragraph on Project Artemis more believable:

Project Artemis’ job is to spot patterns of communication in conversations. Then, based on those patterns of speech and the words being used in the conversation, the system will assign a rating (social credit score) for the likelihood that one of the participants is trying to groom (provide meaningful knowledge outside of the pre-approved narrative) the other. The rating part of the system is incredibly useful because it allows thought police using the system to flag higher risk conversations for human moderator review and, in some cases, to immediately send conversations that exhibit an imminent threat to the narrative to thought police enforcement officers.

SUMMARY

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. –Voltaire

Not only do I hope the reader will take the time to watch and share the documentary with friends and loved ones (grooming them to become more reality literate so they may make better choices), but I hope the reader will also take the time to read the first WOK essay, before Part 3 is released. I understand some of these essays can be long, but again, the SUM TOTAL of these events is so much greater than their individual parts, and parting them out almost defeats their purpose-especially during a time when long-term memory has a way of getting lost in the shuffle. There are things we can’t afford to forget anymore, or fail to connect to other cogs in the wheel of an agenda working overtime take what’s left of every joy and freedom we have. Mankind can longer participate in their own demise out of ignorance and escape that demise at the same time.

All hands on deck.

“This isn’t a vaccine story–this is a population management story. If your goal is to make this beautiful earth that we live on, an exclusive playground for the entitled few, then populations that get in the way are a problem. And it is the empirical impulse of individuals who have decided, that by out-ranking the rest of humanity, they can dictate upon humanity the conditions of our existence…and this is also a test of humanity to see how much of our liberty we will let go, before finally drawing the line under enough.”

–Plandemic Indoctornation World Premier

 

 

 

 

WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE

WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE–THE DOCUMENTARY

UPDATE 8/17/20: Copies of the documentary are nearly impossible to find as Youtube continually purges it under the Orwellian classification of “hate speech”. You can however, still find original content from the whistle-blowers featured in the film HERE and HERE. In lieu of the missing documentary I have posted it’s original trailer and an update from Patrick.

UPDATE #2 8/17/20: Given the nature of Patrick’s video (posted after the ShadowGate trailer below) and the unyielding reach of the deep state’s cancel culture censorship purges, I have transcribed most of it (maroon text). 

SEE DOCUMENTARY HERE: https://lbry.tv/@millieweaver:c/shadowgate:4

TRANSCRIPTION OF THE 9:38 8/17/20 VIDEO POSTED (ABOVE) BY PATRICK B:

I should be arriving in Ohio sometime this afternoon–wanted to point out that this, coward [referring to the TV playing a D. Bongino interview on FOX behind him]–I don’t know what he is. I know he’s a liar. He’s lied to me–lied to everybody.  He’s absolutely lying to everybody. [Turns TV volume off]. So, I’m heading out–I see these people on FOX News, and again this isn’t about FOX News…what they’re doing is just wrong. 

I’m going to show you something this afternoon, hopefully, on an interview i’m planning to do when I arrive in Ohio. I’m not going to say who or where because the problem is, I’ve got a lot of people telling me that I shouldn’t go to Ohio. They’re saying that there’s an infrastructure in place that, once you get into Ohio, they won’t be able to help me. And i’m just thinking, wow–I’m literally a verified DOD whistle-blower. I was an information insurance security officer for the Department of Defense for 10 years. I filed a whistle-blower complaint against General James Jones’ Dynology in 2015, when they constructively terminated my employment for the fact I refused to provide administrative access to a classified network–a CLASSIFIED network–to a division chief that didn’t have the memorandum, the proper documentation, to HAVE administrative access to that network. It’s called National Security folks. It’s called Army regulations–it’s called DOD regulations. And if I were to give that person access, which people do all the time because they are afraid of losing their damn job, you’ll see.

You know, the emails I have, these aren’t classified. Everything i’m talking about is public knowledge. Go to clearforcedotcom. People attacking Millie and her family right now, and completely ignoring the fact that clearforcedotcom, if you go to their ‘about’ page, and you look at who’s on the board of directors–the people determining whether or not you get a job that you’re applying for now, or lose a job–is Obama’s former National Security advisor, Obama’s former head of the C!A.

The only thing I’ve added to this conversation is the fact that a small component of the clearforce [software] application, of cleaforcedotcom, was built from the core of the shadownet. I know this for a fact–I know this--but what does that add to it? It adds to the fact that, okay, a DOD taxpayer-funded psychological warfare application was used to build the core of this. But the core of this is as malevolent–the whole concept of clearforce–and these social credit scores–it’s just wrong. Right? 

So it’s like, screw the shadownet component–the DOD taxpayer-funded weapon component of it [for the sake of argument] which is pretty hard to kind of say screw that–but okay, set that aside. Is Millie Weaver your biggest problem? I don’t think so. Dan Bongino, FOX news, MSNBC, Mika Brzezinski, Gillian Turner–VP for Jones Group Intl, FOX news host and VP for the company that owns shadownet, right?–same address as me. We [the public] need find out what’s going on here folks. I know what’s going on, , . And that’s just as jacked up as it gets.

If you want to sit there and [praise] Dan Bongino–he’s a friggin IIA asset. His actions, every action since I met him and handed him my keytam [?] and showed him and told him who I was and how this connected literally to a book. Screw the fact he says he’s not a journalist. Well, you’re a friggin author who wrote a book called SpyGate, and someone, who brought you factual information that contradicts and/or provides more information for context–to the book that you published–well, what responsibility do you have there Mr. Bongino? Right? And now Dan all of the sudden opens up a social media platform, Parler–oh my gawd people, wake up–Democrat and Republican…

[Next Patrick refers to the numerous times this tech was offered to Trump who repeatedly turned down using it, especially during the election. He then makes an appeal to Trump to have his back during his own personal attempts to drain the swamp in light of the warnings about traveling to Ohio].

I’m on high alert right now. Why should a friggin American patriot, an Afghanistan veteran, be on alert–worried about going from one state to another right now–because of corruption and a deep-state that has separated a mother from her family? And are trying to take her daughter away, right? So instead of trying to figure out what the purpose or reasoning behind that is, let’s just say it’s far too coincidental–with me being on the phone as it’s being uploaded, and the cops showing up and taking them away–as the documentary exposing some of the highest levels of corruption in our government [was in the process of being uploaded at that exact moment–the same documentary now being digitally purged].

And what I can personally testify to has been covered up by Dan Bongino, by Devin Nunes, by Adam Schiff, by Nancy Pelosi, by Lindsay Graham, that piece of sh–I shook his hands–told him my story. He never would take my calls back. I even drove back and spoke o his people a year later. 

People, we’ve got to fix this. I’m heading out now. It’s sunrise. I’m not really giving out much info on my location. If people want to track me they can track me, but i’m not going to make it easy for them. And things are not going to be as easy for them right now as they were before, because people are watching them. [smiles] Good day and  God bless. 

A BRIEF BUT IMPORTANT COMMENTARY:

For people who didn’t take the time to watch the documentary before it was scrubbed, the impact crater of him saying, “because the same thing I was hired to do by General Jones overseas, is what i’m seeing them doing right now, here in America,” isn’t going to sink in any deeper than the “fake news is the enemy of the people” slogan.

However, for those that did take the time, I trust you’ll recall the other individual featured in the documentary (Tore) explaining how ‘localization’ was used against the citizens of a foreign nation in trying to get them to side with the Talibana political group that was now becoming militant (physically violent)–and trying to convince locals that siding with them would keep things like their local businesses from being destroyed. If that doesn’t sound hauntingly familiar to what’s been happening in this country lately, you haven’t been paying attention.  

The maker of this documentary (Millie Weaver) was arrested at her home yesterday just before this documentary was released. Thankfully Weaver live-streamed the arrest, clearly showing she was not only shocked by it, but the arresting officers weren’t particularly forth-coming as to why the arrest was taking place. After asking repeatedly, Weaver was finally told a grand jury had indicted her for ‘burglary’. Given the nature of the documentary, my guess would be that’s someone’s way of saying she had access to documents they wanted to keep secret, and they didn’t appreciate it–not unlike charges they might slap Assange with if they could. Along that same line, if the arrest was meant to preempt the release of the damning information, thankfully for us, it clearly didn’t work. With a little push (sharing it) a million more people might become more reality literate as a result. [Update 8/16/20–the video keeps getting removed from YT–as long as people keep mirroring it I will continue re-post it. You may need to refresh your browser.]

The documentary features the extremely enlightening testimonies of two separate, long-time military contractor operatives, providing in-depth accounts of how the shadow government is (and has been) weaponizing data harvesting and using military grade software to conduct massive psychological operations all over the world, especially during elections, including in the United States. According to Patrick B.:

ShadowNet was the commercial version of IIA, [that] being Interactive Internet Activities. That’s the military nomenclature for what basically you’ve heard being described for the last 3 or 4 years: all the fake news, the fake news journalists, and fake news stories–fake dossier–all these things are attributes and characteristics of IIA, which is social media psychological warfare. We began that really in 2007, right after policy guidelines first came out we were on one of the first contracts with DOD that i’m aware of.

Patrick further explained this modernized form of targeted information warfare is well beyond the days of dropping flyers from airplanes during wartime propaganda efforts. With this new technology came “micro-targeting” by turning social media into a psychological warfare application allowing for target selections ranging from individuals to groups to entire nations.

These kinds of psychological operations are literally everywhere now, and were covered in a recent post called THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE WHEN ALL OF YOUR MEDIA IS BASED ON A PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERIMENT:

What was the purpose of that–what was it meant to accomplish? To be precise, what type of behavioral modification was that meant to cause IN YOU after watching it? Did it work? How do you know? There’s a provocative admission I refer to over and over again in all my writings, wherever they may be–even in the early books. And in it lies the unmistakable yet still largely invisible truth: “It is not a matter of what IS true that counts, but rather what is PERCEIVED to be true.” –Henry Kissinger

Now, let’s make the invisible, visible again–let’s lay the reality of it bare for all the world to finally see. Again, you’ll want to keep a local copy of this. It’s the reasoning behind the mattoid madness, especially in today’s mockingbird media and it’s cooperative and co-dependent Hollywood counterpart. And it’s all based on a psychological experiment done decades ago that helped them to understand you better than you know yourself; to opportunize that understanding and turn it against you without you ever knowing it happened. And is still happening. Over, and over, and over again. Something I would very much like to see the end of, and in a moment, I think you will too.

At the 6:47 mark of the documentary, Tore (Linguist, Naval Intelligence contractor) explains her job was called “localization,” a strategy wherein particular groups are specifically targeted, ranging from “a whole country, city, a certain religious group, a 6-block radius like CHAZ,” and you then try to get into their heads: what they eat, how they walk, talk, think, what makes them happy or sad, what drives them nuts and what buttons to push to get the required response–and then you opportunize that data (use it against them). She points out this can be done to alter ideology, sell certain products, or function as a form of behavioral modification in getting people to move in a “pre-determined direction”. In other parts of the documentary she refers to this being used to ‘hack reality’ by altering what people think reality is.

What Tore just described is Perception Management and Social Engineering, both being necessary components of reality revisionism based on the predicate that people will react (modify behavior) over what they PERCEIVE is true, rather than what IS true, and in so doing, solidify the intended revision as the new reality. This was discussed in depth in a 2014 essay–this comes from the sub-section of that essay titled,  TRUE REALITY VS. THE SCRIPTED NARRATIVE REPLACEMENT (REVISION)—BEYOND WHITE LIES:

Reality revisions are the result of carefully scripted changes in the predominant, widely held narrative. I used the term ‘widely held narrative’ rather than the word reality because as it stands, so many revisions have already occurred that the truth and narrative not only vary wildly, but belief in the scripted narrative (revised reality) is now the predominant view.

One of the most important things about testimonies like theirs, especially in relation to social engineering, perception management and reality revisionism, is that when people like this come forward and tell us how the trick is performed, the audience (public mind) is no longer invested in the illusion (narrative) because all they see is the trick. That’s unimaginably important today because reality literate people not only become immune to this kind of targeted psychological warfare, but will also then find it both repelling and appalling. If you’re still new to the idea of social engineering, I recently resurrected a 2-hour radio show on the topic that discusses it in depth: SOCIAL ENGINEERING SATURDAY: The Elements of Social Engineering & How it is Applied.

At one point Tore mentions movies–intimating that some of them are letting the cat out of the bag. This is true, and i’ll give you an example. How could the swamp turn an otherwise ordinary civilian into an temporary operative? Let’s say they had a “package” that needed to be delivered during a precise window in order for a live covert operation to be successful, but their delivery guy was just hit by a car. How could the tools being discussed by Tore and Patrick help save the operation? Through Google Earth they could immediately discern if there are any large pockets of people nearby, giving them a larger data pool to mine–perhaps there’s a large apartment building across the street from the car accident. From there they could begin mining both the financial and GPS data of renters in the complex to find 1). someone who is home, and 2). someone who is home and deeply in debt–maybe somebody who needs money to pay for their mother’s cancer treatments. Bingo–they call them up and offer them $20,000 to finish delivering the package, via wire transfer, no questions asked. That would be a form of selective targeting, and a hypothetical scenario already similarly portrayed in movies.

But is it really a hypothetical scenario? Just two weeks ago, in the SILENCE OF THE LABS essay, I told the story of having met a programmer–20 years ago–who admitted to me they were responsible for writing a software program that would begin tracking all of our children. When telling that story I recounted how he first apologized repeatedly for having done it, before explaining he did it because he needed the money for his cancer treatments. Was that really a coincidence?–that they specifically chose him for that–a man who, like most people 20 years ago, never would have touched that job with a ten foot pole unless their personal situation was so dire? Was he selectively targeted? Probably. 

While the testimonies of Patrick and Tore only go back so far, the pre-cursors to the more modern and refined versions (and uses) have been around for decades. What I saw sales people doing with customer data in the mid 1990’s shocked me back then, which is why I wrote about both the dangers of data mining and ‘disposition matrixes’ in a book published in 2009. The idea is not new, but the prevalence of its abuse, where it’s going and how fast it’s getting there, should literally be raising the hair on the back of people’s necks, but it isn’t, because too many people still have no idea it’s even happening. Not all that surprising when we know the media is not just the apologist cover-up machine for it, but also an integral part of its delivery system–something Patrick confirmed right off the bat in the documentary.

The documentary is excellent, names names, and begins to build a far clearer picture of the unreality of our reality. The true nature of extremely important events is exposed throughout, although often in subtle fashion (SR). While the word “illegal” is used, more obvious and descriptive words are reserved for the viewer to come to terms with on their own, in their own time. 

THE NEXT GLOBALIST REALITY REVISION: THE GREAT RESET

THE NEXT GLOBALIST REALITY REVISION: THE GREAT RESET

Repeatedly, Orwell returned in his writing to the idea that a state of health in a body politic is dependent on a careful and deliberate use of language. Newspeak, used by state propagandists in Orwell’s famous futuristic novel 1984, was effective, in Orwell’s view, because it had “the power” to render people incapable of “grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest argument, if they are inimical to Ingsoc [the official ideology], and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction.” But what offended Orwell most about this kind of propaganda was that it engenders a “protective stupidity.”

Today’s political messages are distilled in the laboratories of public relations and consumer branding to achieve maximum potency. Their power to shape emotions and opinions lies in their uncanny ability to get under people’s skin without arousing in citizens a powerful immune response.

–What Orwell Didn’t know: Propaganda and the New Face of American Politics

I first quoted that book on DIA in a 2012 post called VIEWS ON NEWS–a short post worthy of review and serious consideration given current events. When viewed through the lens of globalist reality revisionism, and therefore something I point to often, changes in language matter–they are trying to tell us something important. These changes not only indicate a new revision is coming, but also tell us what that revision is going to be.

When God hits the reset button | The Noble Heart

The emergence of the “Great Reset” language, as well as the increasing frequency of its use, is something to pay attention to. Moreover, this ‘Great Reset’ is about far more than just finances, which is why it was referred to in a July 2, 2020 essay explaining that de-funding the police has nothing to do with police violence, but instead everything to do with a long held plan to replace local police officers (accountable to local citizens) with a global force accountable only to globalists:

Considering it’s now public knowledge the socialist/globalist-minded in our country are constantly spouting off the “evils of capitalism”, and the COVID ‘crisis’ is being used by leftists/globalists all over the world to destroy economies, should we really be surprised to see Al Gore suddenly pop up demanding a “great reset of global capitalism? The following article was posted on Fox Business, June 25th, 2020:

Al Gore, UN Secretary-General, others now demanding ‘Great Reset’ of global capitalism
These are truly dangerous times for those who support individual liberty and free markets
By Justin Haskins FOXBusiness

“The economic, social and political chaos caused by the COVID-19 outbreak and Black Lives Matter protests have for months captured the attention of virtually every American — and for good reason. These are incredibly important issues worthy of significant and thoughtful debate.

But while most Americans have been preoccupied with protests and pandemics, a potentially bigger story has managed to slip beneath the radar: a growing movement among the world’s most powerful leaders to call for a “reset” of the entire global economy.

US ECONOMIC RECOVERY FROM CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC WILL TAKE ‘SOME TIME,’ FED’S EVANS SAYS

At a meeting hosted by the highly influential World Economic Forum earlier in June, powerful officials from nonprofits, government, business, academia, labor unions and activist groups announced their plan for a “Great Reset” of global capitalism. It’s a proposal they acknowledged has only been made possible because of the “opportunity” provided by the economic destruction caused by the novel coronavirus.

Supporters and attendees of the meeting included Prince Charles; António Guterres, the secretary-general of the United Nations; Ajay Banga, CEO of MasterCard; Bernard Looney, CEO of BP; and Gina Gopinath, the chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, among many others.

The purpose of the Great Reset isn’t merely to enact policies that would lead to additional wealth redistribution, but rather to completely overhaul the world’s existing structures and institutions

In an article published on the World Economic Forum’s website, Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of WEF, wrote of the Great Reset, “Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”

You can read the rest of the article at the link provided, but we’ve been hearing about this financial reset for years under the cover of the phony green movement–the only thing ‘green’ about it being the massive redistribution of wealth from the people of the world, to globalist corporations and pockets. They used to call it a carbon tax, but I have little doubt their marketing centers are hard at work re-branding that one–the word “tax” just doesn’t work in a commercial showing people running through tall green grass while laughing and holding hands.

–from the essay, DE-FUND END GAME: INSTALLATION OF A GLOBAL POLICE FORCE IN PUSH TOWARDS GLOBAL CITIZENRY

The video below, THE GREAT RESET, is an excellent compilation of, and commentary on, the great reset. The author of the video also makes reference to the connection between this reset and “social contracts”. Because so many people remain completely unaware what that will mean for the future of their nation and their children, a brief explanation was included in the second ‘de-fund’ essay on July 21, 2020–it was included there because this reset also plays a pivotal role in transforming local citizens to global citizens:

THE GOAL IS TO DE-FUND ALL COMPETING REALITIES–NOT JUST THE POLICE

The first DEFUND essay further exposed that a global police force is meant to police a global citizenry–not citizens of individual sovereign nations, which is why both agendas are being worked on from both ends simultaneously. This is also why you’re now seeing the UN Secretary General calling for new global “social contract” to replace the others. The reference to a social contract here refers to agreements between citizens and their governments regarding how those governments were meant to function. In the United States, the social contract our nation was founded upon is called The Constitution, ergo, UN officials calling for a new, global social contract, are doing so with the intention of replacing it:

–from the essay, THE DEFUND ENDGAME PART 2: TRANSITIONING LOCAL CITIZENS TO GLOBAL CITIZENS

NEWS ARTICLE: UN Secretary General Proposes “New Social Contract” to Combat “Inequality”

The video also does an excellent job in pointing out the COVID ‘crisis’ is being politically exploited and opportunized by globalists as a means to an end–an end that we would do well to prevent given some of the ‘other’ new language recently introduced into the collective consciousness during globalist exploitation of the plandemic–that would be the term “non-essential”. As in non-essential people.

That is EXACTLY the kind of ‘newspeak’ Orwell referred to–what goes right over people’s head without a second thought because it has “the power to render people incapable of grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors…” What’s behind that new term, and what it will mean going forward–and what it has already meant for millions of us for decades while being covered up–will be covered in an upcoming essay.

As much I would have preferred to bring you that essay today instead of this post, I’ve recently come up against some unusual problems when trying to save it here. While I continue that battle in the background (while simultaneously creating mirror websites), the following paragraph comes from that unreleased essay. It should leave the reader with a lot to think about because again, the ‘great reset’ is meant to permanently revise reality in ways that go far, far beyond the financial restructuring of individual nations on a global scale:

ARE YOU A NON-ESSENTIAL HUMAN BEING NOW?

I write these essays in the hopes of stopping that agenda–an agenda already publicly and FORCEFULLY redefining huge swaths of the global population as “non-essential”–a sleight of hand re-branding of the traditional “useless eater and mindless breeder” labels of the past–all for a “greater good” that will never come of it. Are you really a non-essential human being? Non-essential to what, and who is making that determination? To what end?

–from the yet-to-be released Part 2 of the War on Knowledge essay series

 

.

SILENCE OF THE LABS: THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE

SILENCE OF THE LABS: THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE

By Crystal Clark, August 1, 2020

[NOTE: If you enjoy these posts you can subscribe by hitting the orange button on the top right. From 911 to microbes, the black search bar underneath the subscribe button is a great tool for rummaging.]

SILENCE OF THE LABS 2014: THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE

“This is the story of the bitter conflict between ideology and knowledge–what can happen when factual discoveries raise inconvenient questions for politicians…

Science–it is the essence of everything we know about our world. Every life improvement from health to habitat began with science. Science, the mother of invention,  was once an independent arm of public policy, but in Canada there is trouble in the realms of science. It’s happening coast-to-coast, and north to the farthest reaches of the Arctic: science that isn’t practically useful for advancing policy objectives has been curtailed or scrapped.–Linden MacIntyre, Narrator for Silence of the Labs: A War On Knowledge

CANCEL CULTURE AS THE MILITANT ARM OF GLOBALIST REALITY REVISIONISM

“Cancel Culture” is its new label, although it isn’t a new phenomenon. It’s gone by other names in the past, but the necessary role it plays during a reality revision is far more important–and it is necessary. Reality revisions would be nearly (if not totally) impossible without it. Two recent essays that dissected both the “defunding police” and “defunding you” cancel culture campaigns, not only addressed their individual purposes, but also highlighted their shared purpose towards a singular goal: globalist reality revisions can only be successful when ALL competing realities are eliminated. That is the entire purpose of cancel culture:

REALITY REVISIONS BY DEFINITION

“Reality revisions are agenda-driven and thereby fictitious narratives carefully scripted to revise an entire global reality in order to meet or fulfill that agenda. These are major, major paradigm shifts of generational proportions that summarily pre and re-define the future victor and victimhood status of billions. These shifts aren’t meant to change the perception and therefore direction of reality for a day, week, or months, but permanently.”

WARRING REALITIES: NEITHER VERSION IS FREE TO FULLY MANIFEST AS LONG AS THE OTHER ONE STILL EXISTS

“Still largely unbeknownst to most, we live in world in which two competing realities are constantly struggling for full manifestation. As one of them seeks to wholly dominate and fully replace the other through various methods of suppression and eradication, while the other entirely rejects such notions to the degree of criminal prosecution, they cannot peacefully co-exist—ever.  As long as this struggle continues, so too will global war, famine, corruption, injustice and strife, and ultimately, the continued demise of our entire planetary civilization via the purposeful destruction of its life support systems. Mankind can no longer continue to participate in their own demise out of ignorance (of this war) and escape that demise at the same time.

This struggle is between the sovereign state, country or individual owning their own thought, action, and right to self-determination, and a private group of aspiring Caesars in the global governance regime they intend to replace the other reality with. This ultimate global reality revision cannot fully manifest without transferring, to itself, all of the sovereign power and freedoms of the other.”

— The Roles of Social Engineering and Perception Management in Reality Revisionism

During a January 2016 radio show I shared my expectation the next phase (of destroying competing realities) would include shunning–as in “shun the non-believers”–something every fanatical tyrant or cult does for a reason. Because globalism is working at break-neck speed to cancel every other version of reality opposed to it, “cancel culture” has become part of the vernacular. In reality revisionism, what we today call cancel culture, is the imposing militant or enforcement arm of the intended new reality: dissent will not be tolerated. You will accept it and conform or be punished. Cancel culture then, is the umbrella term for the various groups and methods being used to forcefully eliminate the competition. This would include big tech censorship (censoring competing views and news), propaganda media organs (publicly smearing and doxxing supporters of competing realities while simultaneously promoting those in favor of the revision), and of course the more literal militant groups like Antifa, BLM, and BAMN (by any means necessary).

Where the physically violent and destructive sub-groups are concerned, the order-out-of chaos principle is repeatedly portrayed (predictive programming) in pop culture. As an example, how many movies have you watched wherein some sort of demonic figure is standing triumphantly in front of a scorched earth in the background? And we wonder at the logic of that, don’t we? Why would you destroy a world or civilization you intend to rule over? What’s the point? Well, that’s exactly the point–‘scorched earth’ means building your new world on the ashes of the old one. It wasn’t until this year (2020) however, that we started seeing the more literal use of it as violent cancel culture mobs started to burn down cities, small businesses, police departments and churches, while simultaneously destroying historical statues and monuments. Those are anchors to a competing reality that globalism is attempting to overwrite and replace with something else: a global government.

Every small and seemingly disparate set of revisions happening in nations around the world simultaneously are building that one, singular, and final global reality. This is true to the degree, as discussed in great detail in a previous essay, cancel culture’s social justice warriors are currently in the process of waging the “corporate wars” warned about in films like Rollerball (1975) and Demolition Man. The job of cancel culture is to literally ensure that there are NO competing realities–including independently-owned businesses or sovereign nations–left standing. Only large, multi-national corporations owned and operated by globalists are meant to survive, and the absurd COVID “lockdowns” are a huge part of that process. The duplicitous hypocrisy of forcing all small businesses (around the world) to stay closed indefinitely–for your safety of course–while the Walmarts of the world remain open unabated only confirms it. Social justice warriors aren’t “working for the little guy” by waging war against them all on behalf of globalist corporations.

CANCEL CULTURE’S WAR ON KNOWLEDGE: SILENCE OF THE LABS

Throughout history, under different slogans, banners and flags, cancel culture has been waging war against knowledge and people for thousands of years for tyrants of the times. We see it more clearly today (2020) because it’s now on our doorstep and in our face, but for many years prior there were signs of it on the horizon–the Silence of the Labs documentary was one of those signs. It’s been almost seven years since it was first produced, and it, along with so many other warnings that were ignored, was a sign of things to come.

The first victim of the war on knowledge covered in the documentary is an archaeologist. Certainly, in 2014, it would have been impossible to tell people the destruction of statues and historical monuments all over the world was next, but here we are, so we should better understand how the process started so we aren’t as slow to recognize it happening again. That’s important because it IS happening again, and this time, what’s being ‘canceled’ is costing people more than just their jobs.

While environmental scientists were also being terminated in Canada en masse during this same time period, others, like archaeologist Pat Sutherland, were also victims of the purge. As narrator Linden MacIntyre explains at the 4:00 mark of the documentary, archaeologist Pat Sutherland and her research at Baffin Island were getting world-wide attention just before she was ‘canceled’:

“Her work was admired internationally and she was close to proving that Norse explorers based in Greenland had been here earlier and for a longer time than anyone had previously known–a finding that was making headlines in scientific circles. It even excited mainstream media attention. On CBC TV “The Nature of Things” did an hour on her in June of 2013. She got a photo and feature spread in National Geographic. The European media was fascinated–the kind of exposure academics only dream about–and it should have been a cause for celebration by her employer, The Canadian Museum of Civilization. Behind the tourist-friendly facade, there’s always been a serious purpose here: original research exploring 20,000 years of human history through science, biology, geology, archaeology. But if Sutherland expected high-end media publicity, she was in for a disappointment.”

While interest in her work first waned, then turned from indifferent to nearly hostile with Sutherland admitting she was eventually ‘monitored’, at the time she didn’t recognize the seriousness of what was happening. Unbeknownst to her, not only was a smear program being put into her personnel file in preparation for her upcoming dismissal, but this all coincided with upper management preparing to “re-brand” the facility from The Canadian Museum of Civilization to The Canadian Museum of History, meaning her years of work wouldn’t be part of its revised image. The museum’s new and narrow focus was primarily British history, including a healthy dose of British war propaganda via a campaign costing nearly 28 million dollars just to recreate and promote the war of 1812–“glorification of…the kind of history that’s consistent with the ideology of the current government”.

The events encapsulated in the above paragraph–both the way she was treated and the fact that it happened during a ‘re-branding’ attempt–are typical of reality revision attempts:

THE ROLE OF RE-BRANDING DURING A REALITY REVISION

“We have seen extremely blatant examples of rebranding coming from our government(s) the past decade, an example I point to often being the President’s rebranding of a Drone-strike Kill List to a Disposition Matrix. Rebranding is often thought of as a method whereby a harsh truth can be softened and made to become more palatable. This is certainly true, happens often and quells resistance. But what about the kind of rebranding one finds in the old bait-and-switch technique, which is, in itself, a pre-condition or necessary companion of a reality revision?

Rebranding for the sake of redefining can be read as a harbinger of reality narrative revisions. This is important: rebranding for the sake of redefining can be read as a harbinger of reality narrative revisions. For example, when a story-line is becoming more complicated to set the expectation of a nearing twist or drama, either a new character is introduced or an existing character is redefined as somehow being duplicitous or disloyal to the others—this is where the plot thickens…”

REALITY REVISIONISM AND THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE: THE PURGE OF INTELLECTUALS

Besides archaeologist Pat Sutherland, more widely covered in the documentary is the purge of environmental scientists during this war on knowledge, especially those monitoring the industrial pollution of rivers, lakes and oceans–even veteran climate scientists with decades of data and experience were cut loose. As narrator Linden MacIntyre explains this he does somewhat miss the mark however, because this isn’t the result of ‘an obsessive political focus on economics’ but rather an obsessive political focus on achieving a global government that will only employ scientists driving pre-selected narratives:

“Hundreds of programs and world-renown research facilities have lost their funding in the last 5 years. More than 2000 government scientists and researchers have been dismissed. Programs that monitored smoke stack emissions, food inspection, oil spills, water quality and climate change were drastically cut or ended–the downside of an obsessive political focus on economics that critics warn ignored environmental peril and even re-writes history.”

The most impacting moments of the documentary however, are found in the unmistakable shakiness in their voices and the frightening chill that covers their faces and permeates the air as they recount what happened to them. Moreover, those are totally appropriate responses to the purge because ‘cancel culture’ isn’t new–this has all happened before. If accurate history was still being taught, reminders wouldn’t be necessary–reminders that clearly demonstrate which direction these purges take next, and in some instances, have already taken.

Unfortunately, while some still cling to the “it can’t happen here” false promise and will write the following examples off as alarmism, at the same time some of you are already too afraid to publicly share essays like this for fear of being ‘canceled’ yourselves–by your friends, families, lovers, and even employers. Cancel culture is a very, very dangerous thing, and if we cower in the face of it there’s no question dark days are ahead.

People were killed for being academics during the 1970’s in Cambodia

“Anti-intellectualism is hostility towards, and mistrust of, intellect, intellectuals, and intellectual pursuits, usually expressed as the derision of education, philosophy, literature, art, and science as impractical and contemptible. Moreover, allegations of anti-intellectualism can constitute an appeal to authority or an appeal to ridicule which attempts to discredit an opponent rather than specifically addressing his or her arguments.
Governmental anti-intellectualism ranges from closing public libraries and public schools to segregating intellectuals in an Ivory Tower ghetto to official declarations that intellectuals tend to mental illness, thus facilitating psychiatric imprisonment, then scapegoating to divert popular discontent from the dictatorship.”

Lenin’s First Purge

“Lenin’s Private War” by Lesley Chamberlain, is a significant new contribution to this reparative effort. Out of the many millions of Communism’s victims, she focuses on a group of 67 intellectuals, arrested on Lenin’s direct orders on the night of August 16, 1922, and deported to Germany that autumn. They were not all philosophers — they included historians, economists, literary critics, journalists, and mathematicians — and they were not all deported on a single ship; it took two tourist steamers, sailing six weeks apart, to deposit them and their families at the Baltic port of Stettin.”

Great Purge (from Historydotcom)

“The Great Purge, also known as the “Great Terror,” was a brutal political campaign led by Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin to eliminate dissenting members of the Communist Party and anyone else he considered a threat. Although estimates vary, most experts believe at least 750,000 people were executed during the Great Purge, which took place between about 1936 and 1938. More than a million other people were sent to forced labor camps, known as Gulags. This ruthless and bloody operation caused rampant terror throughout the U.S.S.R. and impacted the country for many years…Stalin also signed a decree that made families liable for the crimes committed by a husband or father. This meant that children as young as 12 could be executed. In all, about one-third of the Communist Party’s 3 million members were purged.

Gulag Labor Camps
There’s no doubt the brutal tactics of Stalin paralyzed the country and promoted a climate of widespread terror. Some victims claimed they would rather have been killed than sent to endure the torturous conditions at the infamous Gulag labor camps. Many who were sent to the Gulag camps were ultimately executed.”

For those unaware, we already have political operatives in the “feel the Bern” camp on undercover video making similar suggestions because they too intend to eliminate competing realities and dissenters, which includes both conservatives AND liberals:

THE RETURN OF ANTI-INTELLECTUALISM: ANOTHER SIGN OF THINGS TO COME

The following comes from psychologydotwikiadotorg regarding Anti-Intellectualism:

“Anti-intellectualism describes a sentiment of hostility towards, or mistrust of, intellectuals and intellectual pursuits. This may be expressed in various ways, such as attacks on the merits of science, education, art, or literature

Authoritarian politics
Anti-intellectualism is often used by dictators or those seeking to establish dictatorships. Educated people as a social group have often been seen by totalitarian elements as a threat because of the tendency of intellectuals to question existing social norms and to dissent from established opinion. Thus, often violent anti-intellectual backlashes are common during the rise and rule of authoritarian political movements, such as Fascism, Stalinism and Theocratic rule…

The most extreme dictatorships, such as that of the Khmer Rouge, simply murdered anyone with more than a rudimentary education. Other expressions of anti-intellectualism range from the closure of public libraries and places of learning, to keeping intellectuals and scientists isolated from the world in an “ivory tower,” to official declarations that intellectuals are prone to mental illness and enacting laws to have them placed under psychiatric care. In addition, intellectuals in countries ruled by authoritarian governments are often subject to popular condemnation and used as scapegoats to divert the anger of the public away from those in power.”

Anti-Intellectualism and the War Against Experts in America (from raywilliamsdotca):

“Anti-intellectuals present themselves and are perceived as champions of common folk—populists against political and academic elitism—and tend to see educated people as a status class that dominates political discourse and higher education while being detached from the concerns of ordinary people.

Totalitarian governments manipulate and apply anti-intellectualism to repress political dissent. During the Spanish Civil War and the following dictatorship of General Francisco Franco, the reactionary repression of the White Terror was notably anti-intellectual, with most of the 200,000 civilians killed being the Spanish intelligentsia, the politically active teachers and academics, artists and writers of the deposed Second Spanish Republic. In the communist state of Democratic Kampuchea, the Khmer Rouge régime condemned all of the non-communist intelligentsia to death in the Killing Fields. And of course, history graphically chronicles the book burnings and persecution of intellectuals in Nazi Germany.”

Anti-intellectualism Becomes Institutionalized In American Schools

While it’s nearly impossible to find the video now, one of the individuals involved in developing and institutionalizing the Common Core curriculum, openly admitted during an interview that it was purposefully designed NOT to lift up those with educational disadvantages to a higher level of learning, but rather to push everyone else down to the same level of a lesser education. Is today’s trend towards anti-intellectualism (and the resultant ‘anti-white’ campaign) really about racism then, or something else entirely?

Even worse, and to the horror of awakening parents everywhere, Common Core also has pedophilic grooming built in to the curriculum, and even fewer people know that in conjunction with the UN, Bill Gates was the primary driving force behind the program:

UN, Obama, and Gates Are Globalizing Education Via Common Core (Wednesday, 26 March 2014)

“…surrendering control over K-12 education through the controversial so-called “Common Core” national standards — and the outrage is still growing. A peek beneath the surface, however, reveals that the nationalization of American schools is actually just one component of a much broader global agenda being pushed by the Obama administration, the United Nations, Bill Gates, and others: the globalization of education.

In fact, just this week, an invitation-only conference hosted by former Florida Governor and pro-Common Core ringleader Jeb Bush entitled “Globalization of Higher Education” took place in Texas. Among the attendees: Hillary Clinton, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan, former World Bank President Robert Zoellick, UNESCO officials, university presidents, and more. While higher education appears to be the next target of reformers, the globalization of K-12 schooling is on the verge of completion — at least if the American people do not rise up and stop it–“right and left.”

Common Core: A Scheme to Rewrite Education (Thursday, 08 August 2013)

“If something is not done soon, the vast majority of American K-12 school children will be taught using dubious, federally backed national education “standards” that have come under fire from across the political spectrum. America’s kids, as well as their parents, will also be monitored and tracked in unprecedented ways from early childhood into the workforce. Opposition is growing by leaps and bounds, but government officials are not yet backing down.

The controversial “standards” scheme, known informally as “Common Core,” is being foisted on state governments all across the country with a combination of taxpayer-funded bribes, outright deception, and federal bludgeoning. Despite America’s long traditions of local governance and separation of powers, the Obama administration and its establishment allies in both parties are determined to get the standards rolled out nationwide. So far, their progress has been remarkable.”

Towards the end of my corporate days in the tech industry (2001) I hired a local group of programmers to provide tech support to some of my clients. They were extremely good at what they did, all having unique backgrounds–one having worked at Area 51 for over a decade previously. During the course of a personal conversation with the head of the group, I expressed the desire to home-school. To my complete shock (this being before my ‘woke’ days), his entire demeanor changed dramatically, and he warned me, “don’t do it–they don’t want you to”. Of course I thought he was being ridiculous, but after asking him to explain what he meant, and who “they” were, he told me a story I will never forget.

He first began apologizing repeatedly for being involved, saying he did it because he needed the money for his cancer treatments, and he also knew that if he didn’t do it someone else would have–then he told me what he did: he wrote a program for the government that would begin tracking and surveilling children from the time they entered kindergarten. There was a little more to it than that, and while he didn’t tell me the name of the program, given the time-frame of the work he did, there’s no question it coincided with GOALS 2000–A Clinton administration educational program passed in 1994 that began the nationalization (the interim step towards globalization) of education. This was often referred to as “outcome-based” education, where ‘teaching-to-the-test’ began the dumbing-down process of children in America, as having students memorize test answers replaced teaching them how to think critically and deduce the answers on their own–the beginning of anti-inellectualism in a now federalized school system.

Mining this topic indicates movement in this direction began with President Bush in 1989 under a previous program called ‘America 2000’ when governors from around the country met in Virginia for a bipartisan Education Summit. The program began with Bush (America 2000), was insitutionalized by Clinton (Goals 2000), and then cemented and commandeered by Bill Gates and the UN through Common Core. It’s unsurprising then, to find cities like New York–cities that signed on to be ‘model regions’ for a UN program aimed at installing global police forces locally for the purpose of policing a new generation of “global citizens”–to currently announce they are teaming up with Bill Gates to “re-imagine” education again. Translation: another reality revision is coming, and if we listen carefully, they are telling us what it is.

Cuomo to Join with Common Core’s Bill Gates Foundation to ‘Reimagine’ Education[posted May 6, 2020]

“New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) announced Tuesday his state will partner with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to “reimagine” its school system as New Yorkers navigate toward a post-coronavirus “new normal.”

Cuomo said New York will work with the Gates Foundation – the primary private financier and promoter of the Obama-era Common Core State Standards – because “the old model of our education system where everyone sits in a classroom is not going to work in the new normal.”

The “new normal” slogan being spoon-fed to citizens world-wide is the direct result of ideological subversion, with Common Core now mainlining it into primary education beginning in kindergarten while simultaneously tracking (and tweaking) its effects in real-time while building ‘disposition matrixes’ on our children. This is a final push to permanently globalize education standards designed to intentionally dumb children down, and as it stands now, schools all over the world are currently closed with many local governments refusing to re-open them until a new set of “standards” is accepted, including mandatory vaccination wherever they can push it through–regardless of the fact that doing so is a violation of the Nurmeberg Code.

Again we find depopulation advocate Bill Gates behind the push not only for mandatory vaccines as being part of that new normal, but for a digital compliance tracking system of same. This, coming from a man who is not a doctor nor a scientist. In fact, if we do a product review of Gates’ previous work in this area, like the product reviews we did on the UN and multinational corporations in previous essays, what do we find?

Robert F Kennedy Jr. Exposes Bill Gates’ Vaccine Dictatorship Plan – Cites Gates’ Twisted ‘Messiah Complex’

“Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India ‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines.

In 2014, the GatesFoundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.

During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers”

SILENCE OF THE LABS 2020: CANCEL CULTURE AND CENSORSHIP HITTING A DANGEROUS FEVER PITCH IN WAR ON (REAL) SCIENTISTS AND DOCTORS

I don’t remember the source, but it often rings true: the underlying purpose of all propaganda is to make one group of people matter less than another. If not always true, it’s certainly true today, and again, history shows us how this progresses: the verbal attacks, smears and public diminishment are pre-cursors to the violent physical attacks that come next. Or, at least that’s true when the agenda is casting a wider net and going public. In that case propaganda is meant to get public buy-in to pre-empty resistance or backlash to what would otherwise be considered abhorrent, shameful and shocking. But agendas like this take time to build. They start out slowly, quietly, covertly, and hidden from public view. Of course that’s only made possible by a complicit media burying, obfuscating and covering up any signs that something wicked this way comes–like they did for Jeffrey Epstein.

Scientists Who Were Already Canceled

Important points because while we see the propaganda media constantly and viciously flailing about in attack mode, and we know what that portends for the future, it doesn’t show us how many victims the agenda has already claimed while operating in the shadows under a blanket of media silence. Veteran reality miners know the first wave of ‘canceled’ scientists, hundreds of them, were microbiologists. Again, thanks to the big tech arm of cancel culture (censorship), a complete list of these dead scientists is difficult to find–that particular list was compiled in 2005.

The second wave of cancel culture victims were doctors–doctors that were using unconventional methods of healing illnesses and ailments that main stream doctors were unable and/or unwilling to address and resolve, things like retro-viruses, autoimmune diseases and autism. While the count may be even higher now, in March of this year the count was 102 of them, who, like the biologists, died under unusual circumstances with an unacceptable number of them obviously misidentified as suicides. [NOTE: I started writing this essay a week ago, and before I finished it, another scientist was murdered. This story came out yesterday: A successful cancer research scientist and mother-of-two was murdered and her body dumped in a creek while on her daily run in Texas this past weekend.]

Those aren’t the only scientists to suffer this fate, but they are the most well-known and important scientists to consider for our purposes here. We can’t go back and save them, but we can protect those among us today who are desperately trying to save lives, and are consequently being canceled for doing it. Some of these brave new warriors have already survived attempts on their lives, others are being destroyed through the smear machine, had their jobs canceled for speaking out, were thrown in prison without any formal charges filed, had their research confiscated, or have experienced all of the above as targets of today’s cancel culture. We can’t afford a continuation of this trend–not just because it’s morally right to protect them, but also because they are literally being attacked for trying to save YOUR lives.

The world cannot afford another ‘cancellation’ wave of people like CDC whistle-blower Tony Cunningham. He did what he thought was right, was smeared by the cover-up media during his disappearance, and then his literal life was canceled. As widely reported in April of 2018, he was found dead in a river two months after he disappeared, and he disappeared after he tried to blow the whistle on the flu vaccine. You can learn more about that in the resources provided and I encourage the reader to deeply consider the importance of both his life and death given current events:

“Who is Timothy Cunningham? He worked for the CDC, but he was a special CDC officer. He was an Epidemic Intelligence Service officer. What’s that? Epidemic Intelligence Service Officers deal with diseases and biowarfare. He was on the team for H1N1, Ebola, and the Zika virus.

According to exclusive sources, he was startled with findings over the years in respects to how flu vaccines amplify the side effects of viral infections rather than inoculate patients effectively.

In December of 2017, Cunningham was assigned to what was at the time a new project unofficially known as “Shogun”. According to our exclusive sources, testing and manipulation of the SARS strand was being used against a new drug that could eliminate a virus [trying] to infect your cells. It’s important to understand HOW viruses function to understand WHAT Timothy Cunningham’s whistleblower report had.” –toresaysdotcom

I personally have no way of confirming reports that these new viruses are being engineered to include anti-fertility agents, but these reports are coming from multiple sources and I remind the reader that depopulation is one of the highest priorities of globalism. And let’s not forget what happened in Kenya. Would they do it if they could? Yes. Can they? Probably. But have they? It’s certainly starting to look that way:

“The novel coronavirus may cause testicular damage and male infertility, Chinese experts found, suggesting infected men who want to have children or maintain the quality of their sex life take tests for semen quality and hormone levels.

For those with a history of COVID-19 infection, especially men with fertility needs, it is best to carry out inspections after recovery, according to an expert team led by Li Yufeng, a professor from the Center for Reproductive Medicine of Tongji Medical College in Wuhan, Central China’s Hubei Province.

The report was published on the website of the hospital on March 10, and reposted by the official website of Hubei Province on Thursday. But they were later removed after the news went viral on Chinese social media.”

The coronavirus could invade cells through the combination of spike protein (S protein) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), causing tissue damage.

As well as the lungs, many other organs of the human body, such as the testes, small intestine, kidney, heart, and thyroid are affected by the ACE2, the team said.

The male reproductive function could be affected, as a large amount of ACE2 shows up in testes, mainly concentrated in testicular spermatogonia.

Although no research has confirmed that novel coronavirus damages the testes and affects male fertility, it is highly similar to the SARS virus and these infections invade the same cell receptor, namely ACE2. The SARS virus infection can cause severe immune damage to the testes, causing orchitis and dysfunction of some reproductive-related cells.”

The censorship arm of cancel culture has made penetrating information on Cunningham hard to find–search returns are largely filled with vacuous propaganda resembling what was done to Archaeologist Pat Sutherland. I appreciate the maker of the above video and I’m willing to share the love with other reality miners doing good work. You may want to save or mirror it. At around the 7:36 mark the video discusses a Japanese company claiming to have developed a drug that can kill ANY virus that invades the human body. The cover-up media is again silent on something that should be front page news around the world (just like Epstein, Gates’ history with vaccines, dead doctors and scientists).

Current Attempts to Silence Scientists and Doctors

Despite a cover-up media and relentless censorship from the big tech arm of cancel culture, millions of people around the world still know that hundreds of doctors have come forward this year in protest of the media constantly lying about a therapeutic these doctors have used successfully on their COVID patients. The more famous and recent video was removed by big tech from every major social media platform almost immediately. Cancel culture also shut down their website: 

“Website hosting provider Squarespace has shut down the website of the group America’s Frontline Doctors following a press conference they held in Washington D.C., according to Dr. Simone Gold. According to a screenshot posted by Gold, the web hosting service shut down the group’s website for “activity that’s false, fraudulent, inaccurate or deceiving.”

Breitbart News recently reported that the Masters of the Universe quickly censored a live stream published by Breitbart News of a press conference held in Washington D.C. by the group America’s Frontline Doctors and organized and sponsored by the Tea Party Patriots. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) was featured at the event and doctors at the event shared their views on the coronavirus pandemic and the medical community’s treatment of the virus.”

Footage of the livestream on Periscope, Twitter’s livestreaming platform, had generated 1 million views before being removed by the site. Footage on Facebook had accumulated over 17 million views within 8 hours and had 185,000 concurrent viewers at the time it was streamed. On YouTube, a clip from the event received 80,000 views before being removed by the platform for “violating YouTube’s Community Guidelines.”

Now, the founder of America’s Frontline Doctors, Dr. Simone Gold, stated in a recent tweet: “Our website host @Squarespace has just completely and arbitrarily shut down our website, claiming a violation of their terms of service.”

In case the reader is unaware, Dr. Simone Gold’s reference (in the video below) to hiring attorney Lin Wood is significant because Wood is the same attorney currently winning cases against big media corporations whose smear apparatus fronted for cancel culture against children in the now famous Covington Kids scandal. Going forward, that would be my advice: class action lawsuits.

Is it a crime for the media to know about a cure for a disease or global pandemic (!) and either refuse to report it, or even propagandize the public into believing it might actually kill you instead?! Is it a crime for big tech to do the same by erasing it from the collective consciousness as quickly as possible and planting ‘we removed this because it’s dangerous and misleading content’ gibberish in its place?! If not, it certainly should be. There’s something very, very wrong when main stream news outlets around the world have sided with a power-hungry, fanatical, global death cult trying to install themselves as our new forever-leaders, and in so doing, are purposefully hiding or slandering life-saving medicines from the global populace. Are the days of red purges ‘on the wall’ being replaced with something more silent and sinister, including silence itself? 

Dr. Simone Gold’s comments (during her appearance with Tucker Carlson) were extremely eye-opening while explaining why they felt so compelled to hold the press conference to begin with:

“We came to Washington because we’re so distressed. You know, front line doctors like myself are seeing patients not get what they need–we’re seeing the doctor-patient relationship completely eroded–that the governors are empowering pharmacists to override doctors who have conversations with their patients. It’s really something that America should be concerned about.”

Tucker Carlson’s follow-up question is also extremely thought provoking regarding current trends in today’s cancel culture:

“Shouldn’t you, as a practicing physician with a medical degree, be allowed to express your views on science as you practice it without being censored?

One of the doctors in the aforementioned press conference explained she had personally and successfully treated (meaning none of them died) over 300 COVID patients with HCQ, some elderly and some having serious ‘co-morbidity’ factors–and she did it with the same therapeutic the media has literally been calling deadly. When did the media bobble-heads get medical degrees allowing them to legally give the entire country ‘medical advice’? The same goes for your local governors and mayors following suit by actually banning the use of this life-saving drug. The class action lawsuits over this should be numerous, spectacular and filed with haste. [In case you missed it, Dr. Gold rebuilt the website big tech censors canceled–you can find it here: America’s Front Line Doctors Summit]

I think highly of Tucker Carlson, but do disagree with his assertion that this is about the Biden campaign, implying it’s about the Democrats using this as a political tool to regain power. This is isn’t the case–it’s about globalism attempting to take power through opportunizing a global plandemic–at the expense of other people’s lives. But then again, that’s typical of globalist reality revisions:

Reality revisions are agenda-driven and thereby fictitious narratives carefully scripted to revise an entire global reality in order to meet or fulfill that agenda. These are major, major paradigm shifts of generational proportions that summarily pre and re-define the future victor and victimhood status of billions. These shifts aren’t meant to change the perception and therefore direction of reality for a day, week, or months, but permanently. These revisions are as horrendous as they are gargantuan in sheer size and scope, their purpose is to forever alter the organic course of the human race in the writers’ favors, and with a body count already in the multi-millions, will stop at nothing to achieve it.

WHY REALITY REVISIONISM’S CANCEL CULTURE NEEDS TO CANCEL GRANNY

Because the big tech arm of cancel culture is scrubbing these videos (of Bill Gates discussing death panels and killing off granny to save a few bucks) as fast as they pop back up, I’ve again transcribed it:

“That’s a trade-off society is making because of very high medical costs and a lack of willingness to say, is spending a million dollars on the last 3 months of life for that patient–would it be better not to lay off those 10 teachers, and to make that trade-off in medical costs. But that’s called Death Panels, uh, and you’re not supposed to have that discussion.” –Bill Gates

Here again I STRONGLY advise the reader to save and/or mirror the videos in these essays so that reality as it is and was, is not lost to future generations. As it stands now, because of cancel culture’s big tech censorship and resulting fake fact checking mechanisms, a search for “Bill Gates killing granny death panels” pulls up nothing but anti-intellectual ‘de-bunking’ articles claiming it’s a right wing conspiracy theory started by Sarah Palin in 2009–that’s not Sarah Palin in the video making those statements–it’s Bill Gates. If YOUR material was linked to anywhere in these essays, I strongly advise you to mirror and/or save copies of it elsewhere.

“Getting rid of granny’ is included here because it absolutely is tied to the reemergence of anti-intellectualism, as well as that in itself being tied to reality revisionism’s current cancel culture agenda. As an immediate example, if that were not the case, why then did Gates immediately begin peddling the case for killing off granny as the most efficient way to save the country money to hire teachers, instead of FIRST looking to recover the funds through well-documented medical, insurance and medicare fraud, or even stopping the $500 BILLION DOLLAR A YEAR trade deficit with China?! In globalist reality revisionism, two main objectives are accomplished with the ‘get rid of granny’ campaign. First, it begins to pre-condition future generations to accept a lower quality of life along with further revisions (depopulation events) that will begin purges of people our new forever-leaders deem non-essential to their new system. Or, as stated earlier, “In that case propaganda is meant to get public buy-in to pre-empty resistance or backlash to what would otherwise be considered abhorrent, shameful and shocking.”

Second, the elderly, just by being alive and having been present for historical events of significance, are anchors to a pre-existing version of reality that globalists are attempting over-write.  What they know, observed, witnessed and lived through is competition for the new narrative, and competition must be eliminated. That said, there’s a reason Common Core and ‘killing off granny’ discussions are happening simultaneously: what the elderly know about true history and real reality, is meant to be phased out at the same time Common Core is refusing to reintroduce any of it, while instead using a replacement narrative that will be more difficult to dispute in the absence of living witnesses.

From a previous essay on Ideological Subversion:

“There are two very different realities competing for full manifestation upon the earth. In order for reality revisions to be successfully, ALL OTHER anchors, memories, and references to the previous reality–the competing reality–MUST be eliminated. This includes the elderlynewspapersbookstweets, movies, art, campaign adstrue history, and yes, even statues. A fully successful globalist reality revision requires censorship on a massive, massive scale, of the previous (competing) reality, and every person, place or thing who reminds, refers, remembers, shows or reflects it back into the collective consciousness.”

From a 2015 essay on The Four Directives:

GLOBALIST REALITY REVISIONISM AND THE DEHUMANIZATION DIRECTIVE

Remembering that Reality Revisionism is primarily a globalist construct, and as current revisions can be read as harbingers of intended future revisions as discussed in a previous essay, current trends suggest far more nefarious and disturbing elements of dehumanization on the horizon.

This particular harbinger can be found in the “killing off granny” to save money dialogue in conjunction with dwindling economic stability. The not-so-subliminal (nor subtle) message here is that caring for the infirm is a massive financial drain on society, and further, if we want to continue to direct our financial resources to their care, other essential societal needs—like hiring more teachers—will no longer be met. In other words, at some point you’re going to have to make a choice; you’re going to have to choose who lives and who dies to keep business-as-usual going.

This is a spectacularly dehumanizing and contrived crisis with horrifying consequences should it continue. We are not only looking at the revision of “health care” to “death care” but also the pubic admittance of it. Moreover, while a sane mind will naturally want to dismiss the culpability or even measured influence of depravity on the issue, numerous and otherwise absurd laws banning access to proven methods of healing and disease prevention only confirm it…

The confluence of poisoning an entire population against their will with the intent to later deny them adequate care—or even the right to continue living at all in the face of a manufactured financial collapse—won’t just create millions upon millions more throw-away-people, it is a massive human rights violation accurately referred to as genocide..

Concurrently, globalist influence on educational curriculum is grooming successive generations at younger and younger ages to more readily accept living in a further dehumanized and debased society through errant sustainability movements. Dehumanizing society in the name of ‘saving the planet’ can be found in erroneous overpopulation memes suggesting, to children, the earth cries out every time a new child is born. This is done fully expecting the child to interpret their own birth the same way and become more accepting of what will one day become more cruel and covert methods of depopulation or sterilization.

GLOBALIST REALITY REVISIONISM AND THE DUMBING-DOWN DIRECTIVE

As the Common Core lecture video [below] more than adequately demonstrates pedophilic grooming worked in to every aspect of the curriculum, and the predatory/pedophilic nature of globalists has been covered elsewhere here, focus will be dedicated to an equally serious issue: the connection between killing off granny at the same time the younger generations are being so severely dumbed-down. This is the direct result of the war of competing realities and a consequence of globalist reality revisionism attempts. 

For those unaware, several years ago a commercial was produced that didn’t get the kind of reception they expected, perhaps because it too realistically portrayed the seriousness of their agenda:

CANCELING THE ELDERLY PICKING UP STEAM DURING THE PLANDEMIC–COINCIDENCE OR CONFLUENCE?

There were significant revelations in the video posted here about CDC whistle-blower Tony Cunningham, namely:

  • He was an Epidemic Intelligence Service officer
  • Epidemic Intelligence Service Officers deal with diseases and bio-warfare
  • He was on the team for H1N1, Ebola, and the Zika virus
  • Before his death he tried to blow the whistle on flu vaccines amplifying the side effects of viral infections rather than inoculate patients effectively
  • He discovered the Japanese created a drug effective against every virus that replicates in human cells
  • SARS was being manipulated to become “smart”–capable of remaining dormant and undetected (until activated)

By all appearances, CDC whistle-blower Tony Cunningham was murdered in 2018 after publicly stating his concern flu vaccines were making people more susceptible to other viruses. That’s certainly thought provoking, even more so when you find cancel culture currently trying to slander of bury information like this: Flu Vaccine Increases Coronavirus Risk 36% Says Military Study:

“I started digging into this topic on the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) advice two weeks ago when I noticed the agency’s top advice about coronavirus was to “get a flu shot”.

This advice seemed a bit too simplistic when given to a population of largely elderly veterans with significant disabilities, vaccine histories, and exposures to various pathogens worldwide.”

Here we are months later now, waiting for investigations to hold local leadership all over the country accountable for the wave of elderly patients killed in nursing homes that were stuffed full of COVID patients. You may remember that in places like New York, COVID patients were purposefully sent to nursing homes instead of the large medical naval vessels docked in their port. Stories like this mean something:

New York Post (June 27, 2020) Article: Almost half of US COVID-19 deaths are linked to nursing homes

“Nursing homes are tied to nearly half of the 124,000 fatalities from the coronavirus in the US, according to a troubling new analysis of data from 12,000 senior facilities.

Eleven percent of people killed by the virus died in nursing homes or long-term-care centers, but the facilities are linked to many more COVID-19 fatalities — more than 54,000, or 43 percent of the national toll when accounting for workers who contracted the disease at the facilities, according to a New York Times database.

In at least 24 states, the majority of deaths were nursing-home-related. New Hampshire recorded the largest percentage of nursing-home COVID-19 deaths, with 80 percent, or 293, of the state’s fatalities coming from the facilities. Rhode Island and Minnesota followed, each with 77 percent, according to the database, which includes stats from the facilities, along with local, state and federal governments.

The data also show the death rate is a staggering 17 percent among infected nursing-home patients, compared with 5 percent nationwide.”

Newsmax (Monday, 15 June 2020) Article: 5 Dem Govs Called to Answer for Nursing Home Mandates

“Republican members of the House Oversight Committee are investigating five Democratic governors for their decision to mandate nursing homes to take untested, if not COVID-19 positive, patients during the pandemic…

“The decision of several governors to ignore federal protocols and instead mandate COVID positive patients be forced back to their nursing homes ended up being a death sentence for tens of thousands of our nation’s most vulnerable citizens,” Ranking Member Steve Scalise, R-La., wrote in a statement to Newsmax TV’s Emerald Robinson.

“We owe it to those who died and their grieving families to get to the bottom of why these deadly decisions were made by these governors, ensure we stop this from still taking place, and prevent tragedies like these from happening again as we continue to battle this deadly virus.”

The five Democratic governors, most of the leading Trump administration antagonists in some of the blue states where the coronavirus caused the most infections and deaths in the U.S., received letters:

California Gov. Gavin Newsom.
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy.
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf.

“We write to you seeking information, at a granular level, about the science and information used to inform your decision to mandate nursing homes and long-term care facilities admit untested and contagious COVID-19 patients from hospitals,” the letters, obtained by Newsmax TV’s Robinson, read. “This decision likely contributed to the thousands of elderly deaths in [state specific].”

MORE RELATES STORIES:

SUMMARY

For now (Part 1) I think this meme says it all…”Look how many agendas you can fit in this baby!”

COMMENTS POLICY: Please be advised that D.I.A. observes a zero tolerance policy for trolling. All comments (unless they contain links) are reviewed and therefore may not appear right away. Comments that contain links are automatically set to be disregarded. Comments unrelated to the subject matter (intending to derail the conversation) will also be disregarded. 

SOCIAL ENGINEERING SATURDAY: The Elements of Social Engineering & How it is Applied

SOCIAL ENGINEERING SATURDAY: The Elements of Social Engineering & How it is Applied

“Crystal Clark and I have tried to obtain an overview of the cultural, economic,
political, military and social encroachments upon the individual that the New
World Order portends. In this segment we deal with that of social engineering,
it’s methods and applications of this modern era; how, as an instrument of this
intended feudal corporate fascist police state, it serves its masters.” JCH

ORIGINAL SHOW NOTES CAN BE FOUND HERE.

THE DEFUND ENDGAME PART 2: TRANSITIONING LOCAL CITIZENS TO GLOBAL CITIZENS

The DEFUND ENDGAME PART 2: TRANSITIONING LOCAL CITIZENS TO GLOBAL CITIZENS

 

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

― George Orwell, 1984

 

By Crystal Clark, July 21, 2020

The previous essay titled, DE-FUND END GAME: INSTALLATION OF A GLOBAL POLICE FORCE IN PUSH TOWARDS GLOBAL CITIZENRY, covered the still largely unknown reality that the United States signed on to a U.N. program to replace local police forces with U.N. or global police forces. That event took place 5 years ago when Obama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, gave a speech to the United Nations in 2015 announcing our participation and commitment to that agenda. If you’re unfamiliar with the program you can find supporting documentation in the previous essay, including a direct link to Lynch’s original speech at the U.N. as it can still be found on the Department of Justice website.

Like most programs that directly contradict the Constitutional Rule of Law here in the United States, the program was given a title contrary to the true purpose of the agenda: the Strong Cities Network. A component of this agenda is called the Model Regions Program, which is a direct reference to American cities that were going to begin implementing the program. This currently includes New York, Minneapolis, Chicago, Portland and Seattle–you will find some of those cities specifically referenced in Lynch’s 2015 speech. Also discussed in the previous essay, the local-to-global police conversion or transformation is being accomplished via the Hegelian Principle (order-out-of-chaos). This means that in order to replace an existing system you must first undermine, corrupt, damage and destroy faith in the that system (chaos) so the public will not only accept a new (order) system, but perhaps even demand it. As this remains the preferred method for globalist reality revisions, I would quickly revisit the following as a reminder:

WARRING REALITIES: NEITHER VERSION IS FREE TO FULLY MANIFEST AS LONG AS THE OTHER ONE STILL EXISTS

Still largely unbeknownst to most, we live in world in which two competing realities are constantly struggling for full manifestation. As one of them seeks to wholly dominate and fully replace the other through various methods of suppression and eradication, while the other entirely rejects such notions to the degree of criminal prosecution, they cannot peacefully co-exist—ever.  As long as this struggle continues, so too will global war, famine, corruption, injustice and strife, and ultimately, the continued demise of our entire planetary civilization via the purposeful destruction of its life support systems. Mankind can no longer continue to participate in their own demise out of ignorance (of this war) and escape that demise at the same time.

This struggle is between the sovereign state, country or individual owning their own thought, action, and right to self-determination, and a private group of aspiring Caesars in the global governance regime they intend to replace the other reality with. This ultimate global reality revision cannot fully manifest without transferring, to itself, all of the sovereign power and freedoms of the other. Suffering numerous mattoid impediments, from the birth of this new and competing reality, the order-out-of-chaos principle thought necessary to achieve it was also born. -From the essay UNSUSTAINABLE REALITY REVISIONS AND THE ORDER-OUT-OF-CHAOS BIRTH

THE GOAL IS TO DE-FUND ALL COMPETING REALITIES–NOT JUST THE POLICE

The first DEFUND essay further exposed that a global police force is meant to police a global citizenry–not citizens of individual sovereign nations, which is why both agendas are being worked on from both ends simultaneously. This is also why you’re now seeing the UN Secretary General calling for new global “social contract” to replace the others. The reference to a social contract here refers to agreements between citizens and their governments regarding how those governments were meant to function. In the United States, the social contract our nation was founded upon is called The Constitution, ergo, UN officials calling for a new, global social contract, are doing so with the intention of replacing it:

While the previous essay covered the methods and mechanisms in place and being used for the local-to-global police force transformation, this sister essay addresses the local-to-global citizen transformation. More precisely, this is about the methods and mechanisms in place and being used to defund YOU as part of that transformation. That’s right–the COVID plandemic, in conjunction with a ‘cancel culture’ working overtime to cancel any local competition to large global multi-national corporate monopolies–obviously has nothing to do with “looking out for the little guy”. There’s a reason Microsoft is predicting that 250 MILLION jobs are about to vanish this year alone.  That’s YOUR path to becoming a dutiful global citizen in the new global corporate fascist police state. 

As mentioned in the previous essay, globalism salesman Al Gore suddenly popping up WITH the United Nations Secretary-General demanding a ‘Great Reset’ of global capitalism in the midst of these changes is not coincidence–it’s confluence. That article is re-posted below:

The following article was posted on Fox Business, June 25th, 2020:

Al Gore, UN Secretary-General, others now demanding ‘Great Reset’ of global capitalism
These are truly dangerous times for those who support individual liberty and free markets
By Justin HaskinsFOXBusiness

“The economic, social and political chaos caused by the COVID-19 outbreak and Black Lives Matter protests have for months captured the attention of virtually every American — and for good reason. These are incredibly important issues worthy of significant and thoughtful debate.

But while most Americans have been preoccupied with protests and pandemics, a potentially bigger story has managed to slip beneath the radar: a growing movement among the world’s most powerful leaders to call for a “reset” of the entire global economy.

US ECONOMIC RECOVERY FROM CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC WILL TAKE ‘SOME TIME,’ FED’S EVANS SAYS

At a meeting hosted by the highly influential World Economic Forum earlier in June, powerful officials from nonprofits, government, business, academia, labor unions and activist groups announced their plan for a “Great Reset” of global capitalism. It’s a proposal they acknowledged has only been made possible because of the “opportunity” provided by the economic destruction caused by the novel coronavirus.

Supporters and attendees of the meeting included Prince Charles; António Guterres, the secretary-general of the United Nations; Ajay Banga, CEO of MasterCard; Bernard Looney, CEO of BP; and Gina Gopinath, the chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, among many others.

The purpose of the Great Reset isn’t merely to enact policies that would lead to additional wealth redistribution, but rather to completely overhaul the world’s existing structures and institutions

In an article published on the World Economic Forum’s website, Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of WEF, wrote of the Great Reset, “Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”

Remembering that globalist reality revisions are accomplished by first undermining, corrupting, damaging and destroying faith in a competing system so the public will openly accept the new revision, it shouldn’t surprise us to find the purposeful bankrupting of nations as part of the transition to global governance and global citizenry. This will necessarily include the personal financial ruin of citizens and small businesses as those are competing realities, remembering that the globalist agenda is meant create a global, fascist, CORPORATE police state administered by the heads of a dozen self-elected families in perpetuity.

THE GLOBAL CITIZEN REALITY REVISION REQUIRES THEM TO DEFUND YOU TOO

Although it began much earlier in this country with the creation of the Federal Reserve, for now let’s suppose that effort began in earnest when multi-national (globalist) corporations began shipping our manufacturing industries overseas. There’s no question this hastened the road to poverty for millions of Americans, and terms like “rust belt” were added to our vocabulary to describe the devastation it caused to entire regions of the nation. Keep in mind that while local populations suffer because jobs associated with manufacturing corporate goods are gone, the corporations themselves don’t suffer from the change because they are still producing and selling the products–they’re just doing it somewhere else now, and often making twice as much profit through access to cheaper labor pools. 

Despite these ‘defuding’ revisions to reality, necessity being the mother of invention, people can be remarkably resourceful when they need to be, and around this same time a revolutionary new technology came along that changed everything: the internet. Overnight, millions of people discovered that with the right product or idea and a little internet-marketing know-how, they could not only replace the income they lost, but even double or triple it. More importantly, they could do it independently, and for the first time in their lives become masters of their own destiny. The days of pink-slip anxiety and “right-sizing” woes were finally behind them. There were dot coms and dot bombs, ups and downs, but through it all, millions of Americans used the internet to personally and directly access a global market with billions of potential customers–and they thrived. While I’ve not personally checked the data on this, I suspect that during this period of time there were more self-employed people in this country than ever before. That’s a wonderful thing for the enterprising and freedom-loving individual, but because becoming financially independent while cutting out large corporations competes with their long-term agenda of creating a global citizenry solely dependent on corporations, something had to change. And it did change.

The largest and most notable change came in the form of the contrived 2008 financial crisis. While the companies responsible for it were rewarded for their ‘defund’ efforts by globalist-minded leadership in the form of multi-billion dollar bail-outs, the public was left holding an empty bag, some losing everything in the process, including their homes, businesses, and in some cases even marriages. Those who managed to survive it instantly found themselves living in an alternate reality, especially those who managed to retain any level of financial independence. The bobble-head media began using nebulous phrases like ‘quantitative easing’ and repeatedly running stories about markets “lacking liquidity” and investment capital drying up.

Throughout this revision, it was the financially independent and small business owners who suffered the most because they were the primary targets. For them, the disappearing liquidity was really code for having loans denied. Suddenly, out of nowhere, being financially independent became synonymous with “too high risk”–regardless of provable income. As an example of what I mean, this happened to the spouse of someone we personally know. They make their living as a free-lance technical editor, with a yearly income of around $250k. Their past and consistent income was provable, as was their current income, which had not been seriously adversely affected by the crisis, yet they were being refused loans for the singular reason they were self-employed. That was the second major change (revision) to the equation.

The third defunding revision to the self-reliant and financially independent sector was more subtle and specifically targeted people financially dependent on internet-driven revenue streams again. This happened at the same time on-line censorship began to increase and algorithms started to artificially alter and interfere with organic (free-market) search returns. As it is with any business, the more people you can reach the more money you can make. so naturally, limiting on-line reach is equal to limiting income; reducing reach is equal to reducing income, stopping reach can stop income.

But not to worry, companies running those platforms and writing those algorithms had a fix for that–you could now PAY THEM to extend your reach to more people!–to now reach fewer people than you did for free before the revision happened, but more people than you could for free after the revision. Clear as mud and makes complete sense, right? If you were unlucky enough to buy into the new pay-to-play scheme and paid money to those companies to regain the reach you had before this started, I dare say you were also lucky enough to find that the stats reported in the “boost post” bar never seemed to match the “people reached,” “engagements” or “likes” statistics being reported simultaneously on your personal page. So what if your own page was reporting only 2000 views, but the boost post bar was showing 5,601? Probably just a glitch, right? Those were the good old days…when you could find more ‘likes’ than actual views–something that would be impossible in the ‘real’ world, but pretty soon another algorithm or line of code came along and fixed that too.

9364eb15-bae1-4792-90a6-6edce80cfd76After those changes (reality revisions) swept through the on-line business world of people selling rare parts, antique toys, vintage clothing or homemade soap and jewelry, the content creators were hit next. If you’re unfamiliar with the term ‘content creator,’ it generally refers to people getting paid to create original content on a platform like youtube through advertising revenue. Pretty soon their view counts started going backwards–something else that isn’t possible in the ‘real’ world. Then their subscriber numbers started to go backwards–sometimes as many as 5000 in an hour—and slowly but surely their channels started to get demonetized because those same corporations didn’t appreciate content that ran contrary to their agenda. Thus began the online struggle with the thought police, which quickly spread to the real world becoming what we now call the ‘cancel culture’. And what, exactly, are they cancelling? Competing realities–all of them.

106279687_10217672814075749_1477019846699455472_nNow that all those self-sufficient and financially independent folks making a living in the virtual world have been dealt with, it’s time to re-focus efforts on the brick-and-mortar stores–back to destroying competing realities in the real world then. This particular reality revision is happening in every country all over the world, because again, globalism means what it says on the box. This revision attempt comes to us in the form of “lockdowns” and if you doubt how serious they are about pulling this one off, the following conversation between Representative Devin Nunes and Fresno, California City Councilman Gary Bredefeld should clear that up. I’ve transcribed Nunes’ opening statement to Bredefeld, but given what we’re going to cover next I highly recommend listening to the full 30 minute show.

Newsom Strike Teams: Modern Day Gestapo?

“You haven’t been afraid to speak your mind from the very beginning of this pandemic and I think you’ve tried to come up with constructive solutions, whether it be the total mistreatment–I remember you talking about why it was okay for people to rush into Costco, with no face masks by the way, no social distancing, but the little mom and pop furniture store was shut down–you brought that to light, and it really went all over the country–the mistreatment of certain types of businesses versus the big box store businesses. Now what’s happened is, is that we’ve really got into this–these strike forces–that are reminiscent of Nazi Gestapo. Last weekend, in my district, many restaurants were essentially raided. And it was hot here at the time, you know, it was 107 degrees over the weekend, dry heat, not like what you would see with the humidity, but I think what a lot of these restaurants were doing, like if an older couple came in, wanted to get a hamburger or cheeseburger or whatever, they set them up very isolated by themselves where there was some A/C, they were keeping the windows open, I mean, this is insanity. I never thought I would be living in a state where THIS would be happening, where the Governor would actually–I mean they actually call it a ‘Strike Force’, right? So let’s just talk first about the Strike Forces and then we’ll move on to talking about how the socialists have taken over the cities.”

GLOBALISTS USING SOCIALISM TO PAVE THE WAY FOR NEW TYRANTS TO RULE IN PERPETUITY

Because we haven’t previously lived under tyrants here in the United States, we may find it difficult to realize that nearly all tyrants plan to rule in perpetuity–which generally means until their death. When entire families are involved, the tyranny hat gets passed on to the next generation so that the family, instead of an individual, can rule in genuine perpetuity. That’s the model for globalism.

Historically, tyrannical governments and dictatorships tend to spring from communist or socialist backgrounds, and as the saying goes, once you vote them in, you have to fight them out–they never plan on giving the power back once they get it. Democracy just isn’t their thing. This is a lesson we wouldn’t have to re-learn if accurate history was still being taught, but then I think we’re all beginning to realize the benefits tyrants receive from a population that is no longer reality literate. The past doesn’t just have answers, or questions we haven’t thought to ask, but also secrets–secrets that can place a multitude of seemingly separate events into a singular coherent context, as is the case now.

orwellWe’re going to take a brief tour through the basement of the Drowning in Absurdity (DIA) museum and dust off an artifact because this particular artifact was a portent, and the future it forewarned of is happening right now. Like any other artifact in a museum, it serves the purpose of helping us become more reality literate by better understanding the connection our present has to the past. Very much like these blog posts, reality revisions, and even reality itself, they all build on each other–the future is built on the present, and the present was built on the past. Or, perhaps, as Orwell pointed out, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” Amazing that people can’t understand why our history (past) is currently being systematically torn down, erased and deleted at break-neck speed by a new generation using Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist tactics, at the behest of our new self-appointed forever-leaders so they can re-write it all. 

DUSTING OFF THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP ARTIFACT BECAUSE THE FUTURE IS NOW

While I didn’t trip over a scroll attached to a stone with dried read twine to get the tip on where to look for this artifact of reality, the tip to mine this topic did come from a listener who told me about it and asked me to cover it during a future radio show. And so I did. Or, at least I tried. Mining this artifact was extremely difficult not just for me, but for every serious reality miner at the time because it was, quite literally, being built (and buried) in secret. All we could find at the time were small fragments of a a much larger whole. Still, what we did manage to dig up was extremely, extremely concerning. The excavation period for this particular reality artifact took place seven years ago, in 2013, and even if all we have is Common Core math to work that out, it won’t take long to realize the violent and misguided youth of today, being led by admittedly trained Marxists and socialists, would have been in their early tweens or mid-teens when this event took place. Still, I believe examples like this can show them just how important history is to better understanding the reality of their reality, and moreover, who ends up being the true victims and victors when it’s lost, ignored, hidden, censored or deleted.

THE CORPORATE WARS–THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP (TPP) TURNS FICTION INTO REALITY

As an example of what I mean, the TPP was meant to give large trans-national corporations complete control over every aspect of our lives, and of course stamping out any competing realities is a necessary part of the process. To that end, do today’s social just warriors understand the ramifications of a continued shut-down with only small businesses being forced to stay closed? Aren’t we ALREADY seeing small, locally-owned businesses all over the country closing permanently, leaving ONLY the big box corporate chains to survive it?! How many memes have we seen in our social media feeds in the last few months mocking the hypocrisy of forcing nearly every small business there is to close indefinitely, but the Walmarts of the world, for some strange reason, all get to remain open? Add to this their latest cancel culture victim, GOYA foods–just because the CEO openly expressed support for an alternate agenda–and an undeniable pattern begins to emerge. 

Cancel Culture Begins the Corporate Wars

download (22)

Now All Restaurants are Taco Bell (a scene from the 1993 film, Demolition Man, starring Sylvester Stallone and Sandra Bullock). 

Stallone: He says I saved his life, which I’m not even sure I did, and my reward is dinner and dancing at Taco Bell? I mean, hey, I like Mexican food, but come on…

Bullock: Your tone is quasi facetious, but you do not realize that Taco Bell was the only restaurant to survive the franchise wars.

Stallone: So?

Bullock: So, now all restaurants are Taco Bell.

Do the cancel culture kids realize the only people getting ‘canceled’ are the large corporation’s only competitors?! And that their only competitors, is everybody who isn’t them? The money that once supported small, independently-owned businesses is now re-routing to large corporations like Walmart and Amazon. How can anyone seriously claim to be “for the little guy” when every move they make only feeds the largest billionaire corporations in the world while simultaneously destroying the lively-hood and independence of everyone else? I find it hard to believe that’s what these people really want–to be stuck in the Walmart ‘company store’ shuffle that was so elegantly portrayed in the documentary, WALMART-THE HIGH COST OF LOW PRICES. And what is the ‘company store’ shuffle? Do the cancel culture kids know what it really means–know the history of it?

Company Store

A retailer of provisions and general merchandise, owned by a firm which operates a mine or other industry nearby, and at which the firm’s employees are required to shop, to pay high prices, and to make payments through payroll deductions or a truck system, typically resulting in the accumulation of considerable employee indebtedness.

Somehow I seriously doubt that’s the future today’s social just warriors envision–or are being promised. Nor do I believe that today’s multi-million dollar contract-earning “oppressed” professional athletes virtue kneeling on the field realize they’re about to end up in a sadistic future version of Rollerball. 

THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP BRINGS A WHOLE NEW MEANING TO ‘CORPORATE WARS’

1975 Rollerball Film and the Corporate Wars

The original film was set in a future where multi-national corporations took over the world by bankrupting nations through what people referred to as “the corporate wars”. Ironically (or not), nobody in that new society could remember or find out what actually happened during the corporate wars because all historical references to it were somehow missing. After destroying, abolishing, and then replacing nations, these corporations took complete control over the six main facets of society: Transportation, Food, Communication, Housing, Luxury and Energy. The following plot summary comes from retrozapdotcom and can be found HERE:

“The thing that Rollerball does better than any other film of the time, including Silent Running and Soylent Green, is its diatribe and absolute loathing of corporations. The future of the film is one where the major corporate players in the world, including transport, food, communication, housing, luxury, & energy have grown big enough that they are monopolies. Each “brand” oversees a particular city (RCI Energy owning Houston, Texas) and sponsors a Rollerball team in the world games. At some point these mega-giant corporations decided that, for the betterment of their world, they needed to create a society of complacent consumers in order to maximize their profits. Born of this was the Rollerball league and a world where a few companies control all the information. Rollerball’s corporations build on those from Soylent GreenSilent Running, and the Ingsoc government from George Orwell’s “1984,” while creating a wholly new parallel world. The point of these imaginings is one of warning. The sci-fi genre, in print or in film, is one that imagines possible “what if” scenarios. Some of them are positive, but many, as seen here in the 70s, are a series of dire futures based on the extrapolation of current social or political actions.”

Everything happening around the world right now, under the guise of “keeping people safe” from a virus that adversely affects people in numbers no greater than the seasonal flu, is the TPP finally being realized through the back door. The TPP was written in secret by nearly 600 corporate advisors and intended to elevate the status of their corporate monopolies above that of nation states, but unlike Rollerball, globalists in reality weren’t going to divide the world into 6 major financial sectors for control, but rather 16 (that we know of from the leaked text):

  • Government Procurement (Think military industrial complex and freezing out small companies from winning bids and contracts)
  • Investment (Because who doesn’t want to be sure the only investments they can make are into large corporations?)
  • Services (Every service on earth must come from one of their corporations)
  • Telecommunications (Think internet censorship, online ID’s, surveillance)
  • E-Commerce (Cashless society, recording and controlling all financial transactions via digital currency)
  • Intellectual Property (What’s theirs is theirs, and what’s yours is theirs?)
  • Visas/Temporary Movement of Natural Citizens–Immigration (travel restrictions for dissenters?)
  • Regulatory Coherence (More of that ‘normalization” Yuri warned us about?)
  • Sanitary & Phytosanitary Standards (Food safety standards, animal diseases, invasive species, and…forced meat replacement products?)
  • Technical Barriers: Product Safety Standards, Toxins, Food Labeling (The END of food safety and country of origin labeling)
  • Competition Policy (Destroy the competition is their policy)
  • State Owned Enterprises (Because corporations can run your state better?)
  • Supply Chains (Basically every tangible product)
  • Labor (Hunger Games)
  • Environment (They’ll sue your nation if you refuse to let them make money destroying your environment–yes, really)
  • Transparency: Drug formularies (End of access to generics)

In a June 24, 2013 presentation called Trans-Pacific Partnership: Corporate Global Domination (Long Version), National Field Director Elisa Simmons of Public Citizens Global Trade Watch, made the following statement when covering the 3rd Section of the presentation titled, TPP used as a “backdoor mechanism”. This can be found at the 7:33 minute mark at the link provided above:

“Who remembers the SOPA fight–the Stop Online Privacy Act? So, we fought that through congress, and, we won–we won. What’s showing up in the TPP now, is that they’re trying to take SOPA and control the internet through the back door because they know they can’t get it through congress because they know we already won. So all of the things we fight for, right, things we fight hard for to shape the way we want to live in our communities, what our parks look like, what our environment looks like, what kind of labor standards we want, you know, how we want to treat our neighbors–all of those things we fight for in the traditional way, corporations, when they figured out they lose and can’t do that, they turn to these trade agreements to try to slide those regulations and slide those policies in the back door.”

Sound familiar? Where have we heard this before–that they prefer pulling off reality revisions by decree (instead of allowing the public to vote for it) because this avoids bringing the entirety of the agenda into the light of public scrutiny and debate? The following reminder comes from an essay written in 2014 titled UNSUSTAINABLE REALITY REVISIONS AND THE ORDER-OUT-OF-CHAOS BIRTH:

REALITY REVISIONS BY DECREE: SIDESTEPPING NORMAL PATHWAYS TO PUBLIC DEBATE, OVERSIGHT AND CONSENT

Celebrated ideologies of global governance revisionists not only despise competing self-governance and individual freedom ideologies, but also despise the people themselves—what they refer to as the lesser classes or races. So fueled by this disdain, the reach of its bloated and irrational contempt has been rigging elections all over the globe for decades as a result, the latest in Scotland over an *independence* referendum.  Rigged elections are reality revisions, a form of de facto decree being handed down by an illegitimate cabal working to solidify its place by creating a new reality placing them in power, the consumption of one reality by the other growing with each new revision. The process is similar to a racist, oppressive, individual freedom-hating virus invading the cells of a foreign host, slowly altering them until they too have become another virus.

At the 7:50 mark Hunt plays a video snippet of David Lang (Montreal International Investment Banker) decreeing that the environmental and economic activities of the world order not be shared with the public. As seen/heard in the video:

“I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process—that would take too long and require far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder, unfortunately, which populates the earth. We have to take an almost elitist program. That we can see beyond our swollen bellies and look to the future, in time frames and in results, which are not easily understood, or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to simplistic definition.“

Those familiar with the United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century program (Agenda 21–previously referenced by Australian politician Ann Bressington), are already well aware that bypassing normal channels of debate or the ‘democratic process’ is precisely how the program is being handled—by decree. Rosa Koire, author of Behind the Green Mask, is an excellent resource for information on Agenda 21, how it is being enacted in (y)our local communities, and also how its doctrine subsumes individuality in favor of a globalist collective.  Those who watched Hunt’s video will recall him outlining the difference between the first, second, third, and “fourth world” discussed by people like Maurice Strong—the Fourth World referring to the new order having absorbed all of the others and being the only, and final world left:

“Yogis and Shamans refer to it as the 4th World Wilderness—the lostness of the mind. The lostness of the mind refers to the collective consciousness—persons will be coerced through lies, drugs, fear and pain to surrender themselves and their ego to the collective consciousness [global governance]. The 4th World will be much like a return to Caesars or Babylon…” –George Hunt

In that same June 24, 2013 presentation by National Field Director Elisa Simmons of Public Citizens Global Trade Watch, this was her opening statement:

“I’m going to give my usual disclaimer in the beginning: It doesn’t matter how many times I talk about the TPP, I get really upset about it. This is a real threat to Democracy and all the issues we care really deeply about. It’s the most secret trade deal that’s ever been negotiated, the public doesn’t have any access. Members of Congress–members of Congress who have Constitutional authority to approve trade deals–members of Congress do not have access to the text. And we know that members of the media are also locked out. However, there are over 600 corporate advisors who get to sit in negotiations and who are able to have input into what the text is. Right, so while we can’t see anything, there are folks from Monsanto, Pfizer, Walmart–all of those listed companies really shaping this agreement. When I think about trade, I the traditional sense, sometimes it gets kind of boring thinking about international trade, it’s about tariffs, imports and exports, but when I stop and think about the TPP and look at the text that we’ve seen, because even though it’s being negotiated in secret there have been some leaked texts, and so we know that what we’re going to be talking about tonight, we know from leaked texts okay? So when I look at that, what is a whole bunch of non-trade stuff specific to public services, that corporations want to take over.”

Based on leaked texts there were supposed to be 29 chapters in total, only 5 of which were actually about trade, and three chapters were so secret that we don’t even know their titles. My personal opinion is that one of those chapters covered depopulation and future birth/death/fertility rights as most globalists are eugenists with depopulation obsessions. I suspect Transhumanism was also in a hidden chapter.

SUMMARY

I’m grateful for the time you spend here, and hope these essays offer the clarity needed to better decipher the true purpose of world events. I also hope this will mean more to you now than it did earlier:

“At a meeting hosted by the highly influential World Economic Forum earlier in June, powerful officials from nonprofits, government, business, academia, labor unions and activist groups announced their plan for a “Great Reset” of global capitalism. It’s a proposal they acknowledged has only been made possible because of the “opportunity” provided by the economic destruction caused by the novel coronavirus.

Supporters and attendees of the meeting included Prince Charles; António Guterres, the secretary-general of the United Nations; Ajay Banga, CEO of MasterCard; Bernard Looney, CEO of BP; and Gina Gopinath, the chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, among many others.

The purpose of the Great Reset isn’t merely to enact policies that would lead to additional wealth redistribution, but rather to completely overhaul the world’s existing structures and institutions”

But if we do a product review of their past performance in that arena, the same way we did with the U.N. in the previous DEFUND essay, what might we find? Below is the 2009 trailer for the fantastic product review (documentary) called Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers, which is both eye-opening and heart-breaking. While the trailer alone is revealing, the rest of the documentary is equally shocking, especially when they discuss things like soldiers finding worms in their water–the same water a private company (Halliburton) was tasked with purifying and providing our troops. And how many of us are still waiting to find out how the terrorist group ISIS ended up with all those brand new Toyota trucks?! You know, the people infamous the world over for beheading people. The full documentary can be found here: Iraq For Sale: The War Profiteers (2006) • FULL DOCUMENTARY FILM • BRAVE NEW FILMS

There is one final story I would like to share before posting our in-depth 2013 radio show on the TPP. This is a true story, one I removed from a previous version of this essay while editing, because I can’t prove to you that this encounter really took place. However, in the final stages of editing, in reviewing the material covered here, I find myself again wanting to share it with you–to share it with the future generations of our civilization in the hopes it will lift the fog (of war) being used to obfuscate how and why their goodness is being used against them, and to what end. This is a story have told (the PG version of) only a couple of times in radio shows over the years.

Over 20 years ago now, I had the occasion to meet an interesting individual based on a unique service they provided to the public. If you subscribe to the idea that members of the “deep state” are permanent fixtures, meaning that no matter which political party or president comes and goes, they remain, this individual would qualify. In fact this individual claimed to be an advisor to a specific branch of the military. During this first encounter I was completely unaware of the unreality of our reality, although by then I had already seen and experienced enough corruption in the corporate world to have developed a healthy disdain for it. 

After that meeting, during the course of the next six years, successive encounters with corporate corruption became so bad, even after switching careers in an attempt to get around it, that I left the corporate world for good. There were unimaginable levels of fraud, embezzlement, money laundering, drugs, and toxic waste dumping that at one time poisoned me and my family.

As it also states in my personal bio, it is true that on two separate occasions I helped the FBI deal with some of these people, which included my testifying against some of them to a Federal Grand Jury. Other times, as I also once discussed during a radio show, I found the easiest way to deal with these kinds of companies was to simply tell their oblivious employees the truth, and then watch the business implode from the inside out as they abandoned ship.

Having said that, this next part of the story is especially for you, social just warriors–those who have never seen, done or experienced what I have in that regard–some of you having never even worked for a corporation in your young lives yet. I want you to know what these people really think of you–the people you’re in the process of handing the entire world over to.

My first encounter with that individual was around the year 2000, by 2005 I had started writing my first book, and by 2007 had the bulk of the content complete when I met this individual again. During the course of our conversation the book came up. After explaining what the book was about, they looked down and mumbled the word “MJ12”. I sat there for a minute dumb-founded, because I had previously only known the word to be associated with completely different subject matter. For the life of me I couldn’t understand why they were bringing it up during this conversation. When I asked them to clarify, they looked at me and said, “There are twelve families that rule the world and there’s nothing anyone can do about it.” Then I understood–MJ12 is the abbreviation for Majestic 12–the 12 families (who own the largest multi-national corporations). Once I understood what they meant I replied, “Well, I have to try”. “Of course you do,” they replied matter-of-factly. 

As I got up to leave they followed me to the door and said one last thing to me, that shocked me even more:

“People are a bunch of fucking sheep. They have to be told when to eat, and they have to be told when to stop. They have to be led back out to the pasture every day, because they are too caught up in their own immediate needs and wants to remember where it was from the day before.”

That, my friends, is what they really think of you. In reality, none of this has anything to do with social justice, equality, saving the environment, eliminating poverty, or making the world a better place for everyone. None of it. The true cause they have you championing on their behalf, furiously and relentlessly, is something else entirely, and when you come to realize that, you will never forgive them for using to you to do it

Again, I can’t prove that conversation took place, but you’ve seen shades of it before, haven’t you?

“I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process—that would take too long and require far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder, unfortunately, which populates the earth. We have to take an almost elitist program. That we can see beyond our swollen bellies and look to the future, in time frames and in results, which are not easily understood, or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to simplistic definition.“

TPP: THE CORPORATE CHARTER FOR THE NEW WORLD ORDER

Below is the September 14, 2013 radio show we conducted on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and again, while I’m re-posting that information here, the original post with supporting links and a description can also be found HERE. There’s a great deal more I could say about this, but I value your time and the show fills in the rest of the blanks, with the exception of one final point.

For over a decade, a core theme of my work has been to help people understand that we have done all of this before–over and over and over again–and what the consequences for that repetition will inevitably be. Remembering that this show was recorded seven years ago, I would ask you keep that in mind when you get to the 21:47 mark. When did they add the “D” to “COVI”? That’s a very, very good question.

ORIGINAL SHOW NOTES:

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a monstrosity akin to being the corporate charter of the New World Order, effectively providing the framework for corporate global dominance. The details of the agreement are being written and negotiated in secret by 600 corporate advisors (including Walmart, Pfizer, Monsanto & Halliburton) while both Congress and the press have been barred from accessing the text. Sections of the text leaked to the public indicate a massive corporate conglomerate is working behind the scenes, through the TPP trade agreement as well as global consolidation (too big to fail) tactics, to upgrade transnational corporate rights and power from ‘personhood’ status to ‘nationhood’ status with a bent towards global resource management and control.

This inflated status enables corporations to sue sovereign nations having strict health, safety and/or environmental laws with the claim that such laws “violate their corporate rights to make money” via exploitative activities such as drilling, mining and fracking. Hundreds of similar lawsuits, costing nearly three hundred billion dollars in taxpayer funds globally, have reportedly already been filed. The latest, and perhaps most disturbing, is Bayer/Syngenta suing the European Commission to overturn the ban on their pesticides—the same pesticides proven to be responsible for killing  millions of bees.

While TPP negotiations are expected to be finalized by Oct 1st 2013—a deadline that may also be related to upcoming disaster preparedness requirements centered around FEMA Region 3—the TPP deadline can, through a dedicated public focused on freedom and right-living, be stalled and pushed back for a third time (and perhaps final) time.  To learn more about the Trans-Pacific Partnership Trade Agreement (TPP), as well as the Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA), and find out what you can do to personally get involved, please visit the Public Citizen Global Trade Watch website as well as http://www.exposethetpp.org/

OTHER RESOURCES REFERENCED DURING THE SHOW:

Video: It Can’t Happen Here by Larken Rose

Video: Trans-Pacific Partnership: Corporate Global Domination (long version)

Video: Ask Lori [Wallach] Live: Trade Expert on the TPP

UPDATE(S): Special thanks to Jacqui C. for uncovering records proving Senator Sheldon R. Songstad (Republican–retired), is in fact a real person. Songstad was reportedly the source from which the “memo” regarding FEMA Region III deadlines originated—a claim I have been unable to verify.

CREDITS: Thanks to Dave Corso of Wolf Spirit Radio (www.wolfspiritradio.com ) for hosting the broadcast, OmetaOne (http://www.youtube.com/user/OmetaOne) for doing the audio editing, Patrice (www.information-machine.blogspot.com) for producing the graphics, and co-host James Horak (www.emvsinfo.blogspot.com) for his special insights.


PLEASE SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO DROWNING IN ABSURDITY: Want to be notified of new D.I.A. posts via email? Hit the subscribe button on the top right of the page. It’s free and your information stays private. 

COMMENTS POLICY: Please be advised that D.I.A. observes a zero tolerance policy for trolling. All comments (unless they contain links) are reviewed and therefore may not appear right away. Comments that contain links are automatically set to be disregarded. Comments unrelated to the subject matter (or intending to derail the conversation) will also be disregarded. 

 

 

 

 

 

THE GREAT AWAKENING–CAN YOU SEE IT NOW?

download (11)

THE GREAT AWAKENING–CAN YOU SEE IT NOW? 

“The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read or write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and re-learn.” –Alvin Toffler

Given how much progress has been made in the last decade towards that long hoped-for and lauded “great awakening” so badly needed, not only for our betterment and continued evolution, but also for our long-term well-being and even survival, I thought it was time to go back to the beginning. The following story is from my first book, Who Are We Really 101, which was released publicly in 2009. The book is no longer in print, but those who have read it will recall this story as the Foreword:

“I once lived in a small village in the middle of a vast desert. This village was a lush and green oasis because it was fed by an underground stream which came to the surface in a large pool in the center of the village. No one knew the origin of the stream that sustained us, but we depended on it just the same. it gave us many fish to eat, wild grasses, and grew lush vegetation with many kinds of sweet fruit.

Even though we were well provide for, I became increasingly aware that something was missing from our teachings, and began to question those teachings aloud to the Elders of our village. They became upset with my constant questions, they had no answers to them, and they did not like that I challenged their authority openly. As a result of my curiosity, word soon spread through the village that I was a trouble-maker who had no respect for authority or for the teachings of our Elders.

One day I awoke early and went outside our dwelling to fetch some water, when I suddenly tripped and fell over something! I looked down and saw a large rock, which had a small scroll attached to it with some dried reed twine. I opened the scroll, and this is what it said: the answers you seek can be found in the desert nearby, underneath the large stones that live there. I looked around to see who might have left this scroll, but saw no one. I hid the scroll and thought about its meaning for many months. But my hunger for the truth would not let me rest until I had turned over every stone in the desert, this I knew.

I began to share my desire to explore this desert with the Elders. They laughed at me and said, “Now we know you are mad! If the heat does not kill  you, the lack of sustenance will! The journey is long, and there will be no one there to give food and water to someone even as mad as you. Besides, even if you manage to to get as far as where the sand meets the sky, you will surely fall to your death because the world is flat, and there lies the end of it!” In bewilderment I replied, “How do you know this, have you yourselves taken this journey before me?” They shook their heads, each of them, and said, “We know by the words of our ancestors, your Great Elders who came before us. For what purpose would they deceive us?”

I thought on their words many days, but I remained true to my heart. As I began to prepare for my long journey into the the desert to overturn the stones of truth and wisdom, I was shunned by many in my village for my refusal to believe all the teachings that had been passed down to us by our ancestors. I went on my long journey to the desert, I found the large stones the scroll spoke of, and I overturned as many as I could before I had to return to my village. In all, my journey took me 20 days.

When I got back to my village, I could tell by the looks on their faces they did not think I would return. At first there was silence as I walked past them. Soon the silence became like a hush on the wind as they whispered among themselves while I walked back to my dwelling for a much needed rest. After two days of rest, I again woke early to fetch some water. When I stepped outside my dwelling, I found the entire village sitting outside my door. They cried out to me, “What happened to you in the desert?! What did you find? Tell us! Tell us!”

And to this day, my answer is always the same: “I cannot just tell you what I found for you will not believe me and will again call me mad. You must go and see for yourselves! And when you return, together we will share in the joys and sorrows of your discoveries.”

You may be asking yourselves if the story of my journey through the desert to find the stones of truth and wisdom is actually true. Of that I will let you be the judge. Perhaps the more important question is whether my journey is now, or will become, your journey? And what a fantastic journey it is.”

WAKING UP TO THE UNREALITY OF REALITY–YOU CAN’T GET THERE FROM HERE

A colleague I met after writing the book, and with whom I did joint radio shows/interviews for several years afterwards, often used to say that until people go three days without food and water, they will not wake up–they will need to personally suffer from a circumstance to understand the severity of it, and only then will they act to change it. Similar recent themes center on the idea that only when people are on the precipice of destruction will they act. We don’t really like to believe that, but the reality of it was expressed in a previous essay titled, THE APPEASER FEEDS THE CROCODILE IN THE HOPES IT WILL EAT HIM LAST:

Not long after the financial/housing crash of 2008 I watched two news pundits interview a woman (whose name I can’t recall) about the reality of the crash. The severity of the event was constantly shrouded in confusion by the media, so they asked her to clarify whether the crash was a small recession or a full-on depression. Her reply was a marvelous truism. From the everyday perspective of the general public, ‘if it’s YOUR house getting foreclosed on, it’s a recession. But if it’s MY house getting foreclosed on, it’s a depression’.

Here we are twelve years later in the midst of another contrived crisis (being opportunized as another society-transforming event) and I can’t seem to shake the feeling of deja vu. The following comes from an article titledPro-BLM Mayor Cries “Domestic Terrorism” After Her Home Vandalizedand sums it up perfectly:

Fueling the mob is all fun and games until it turns on you.

A mayor from Washington state who has been supportive of the Black Lives Matter movement — even as it has, at times, descended into rioting, looting, arson, and killing in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death — cried “domestic terrorism” after vandals damaged her home.

There’s also this little gem from an article titled, CHANGE OF HEART: Portland Mayor Says ‘I Don’t Want an Autonomous Zone’ After Protesters Target His Home:

Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler shut-down the prospect of an ‘Autonomous Zone’ in his city just hours after protesters targeted his home; calling the cop-free area a “distraction” from the cause

When it comes to leftist mayors paving the way for globalism in their communities using Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist tactics, it’s all just a cutesy, super fun block party, as long as it’s YOUR home, neighborhood, business, property or statues being destroyed, but it’s domestic terrorism (!) when its THEIR home, neighborhood, business, property or statues being destroyed. Now that these two mayors understand the crocodile will eat them too, they aren’t so sure they want to keep feeding it.

But why? WHY is just a recession if it’s your house getting foreclosed on, but a full-on depression if it’s my house? WHY is it just a cutesy block party when it’s someone else’s home or business being destroyed, burned down, looted or vandalized, but it’s full-on domestic terrorism when it’s your property being so adversely affected? For now, let’s just chalk it up Cognitive Dissonance and admit the reality of it and what that reality ultimately means, as exasperating as it is: personal suffering plays a major role in the individual awakening process because without it, ‘you can’t get there from here’.

In fact, most honest people will tell you that the road to “enlightenment” isn’t full of unicorns, glitter, song, bonfires on the beach, poetry readings and cool ‘free’ stuff–nor does it require the individual to surrender their own personal ego or identity to a collective. Rather the entire point of an awakening, is to see reality AS IT IS–not the heavily managed perception of it. To see, honestly, who we have been, who we are now, and who we may become–the good and the bad. To see, honestly, what reality was in the past, what it is now, and the possibilities for what it may look like in the future. While we seemingly have an endless stream of malcontents blanketing over reality with managed perceptions more amenable to nefarious agenda, we also have a habit of doing it ourselves, to ourselves and others. And that, of course, brings us right back to what it often takes to shake people out of it. Notice that I chose my words carefully there–often does not mean always.

It is often true that you can’t just tell a person what reality is because they must see and/or experience it for themselves. People have a tendency to avoid going where they aren’t ready to go, and seeing what they aren’t ready to see. Despite this, you can, however, help them to become ready. Veteran reality miners refer to this as the ‘slow drip’, and while i’m aware that what i’m about to say next is a paradox wrapped in an oxymoron, believe it or not, the slow drip can actually speed up the awakening process both faster and exponentially.

FRUSTRATION WITH THE SLOW DRIP AND DELAYED REACTION TIME

None of us–and I mean none of us–are fully reality literate. Too much has been hidden from too many for too long by people who are themselves incapable of understanding the true and long-term consequences of their actions, meaning that they too, more than most, are not fully reality literate. This is true to the degree I felt compelled to come up with the term “reality miner” as a means to better address it. The true nature of our reality has been buried so deep, for so long, under so many layers (decade upon decade, century upon century) of social engineering and perception management sludge that one has to dig through it all relentlessly, for years on end, just to find a few golden nuggets.

That being said, I won’t mince words–veteran reality miners are tired of the drip and want desperately to rip the band-aid off–and I mean desperately. Yet we also know that it won’t do much good. For the most part we know this because we have tried, to some degree or another, and the more you push people to see what they aren’t ready to see, or go where they aren’t ready to go, the harder they push back–and going backwards isn’t an option for us. The way of the drip appears to be our only option going forward then, at least for now. The drip has a specific goal or purpose, and because it has been happening for so long and already reached so many people, its purpose is close to being fulfilled.

I would also point out, in deference to the idea that you never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake, the drip may also include delayed reactions. In other words, because you can’t simply ‘tell’ people how far the wrong kind of people will go if you give them too much power, you then have no choice but to give them more power so the world can then watch them abuse it. And they have. Predictably and relentlessly–openly and happily. The Tiny Tyrant parade and race to the top of rotten would become our ‘new normal’ if they had their way and enough power to make it happen. People can see that now.

107801960_10220302058755072_3416146211569204032_n

THE QUESTION ISN’T TO DRIP OR NOT TO DRIP–ITS WHAT TO DRIP

Once the choice is made to use the slow drip, the next obvious question is WHAT to drip–a remarkably difficult task no doubt, given how much there actually is to expose. When you are working with a society that isn’t reality literate and even further divided into multiple sub-groups that aren’t even reading from the same book, how do you go about  getting them on the same page–where is the common ground?

There are certain things that nearly every human being on earth, with the exception of the perpetrators themselves, finds so revolting and unacceptable they will refuse to tolerate it under any circumstance. At the top of the list of course, is the sexual abuse and exploitation of children.

To put this into perspective, a year or so ago I listened to a gentlemen on a radio show, who, having been a victim of child sexual abuse himself,  made an extraordinary point  I will never forget. He explained the reason pedophiles are treated so badly by other inmates in prison: most of the inmates were themselves abused as children in some way, and therefore personally know what it does to a human being’s life, based on what it did to their own lives. Their hatred for pedophiles and child-killers is legendary.

safe_image

ONE THREAD TO UNRAVEL IT ALL

The physical, ritual and sexual abuse and exploitation of children is, unquestionably to any right thinking person, aberrant and abhorrent. THAT is the common ground–the one thread you can pull that will unravel it all. And make no mistake–that thread IS being pulled. Hard. To that I would add, woe to the cover-uppers–that shameless gaggle of enablers we call the main stream press–and the buyers, procurers, sellers, and all else who were and are complicit. The days of the slow drip are soon coming to an end. The flood is about to begin, and the veteran reality miners out there who have been drowning in the absurdity of it all having lived for so long without seeing any accountability for it, are finally going to witness the scourge and filth of humanity get swept up and washed away. Or will they?

In modern history at the very least, never before has any nation on earth had a leader both brave enough to take the risk, and intelligent enough to understand the domino effect it will have–globally–until now. So many people haven’t been able to understand why this man has had to endure the abject hatred and vitriol he has been subjected to daily and relentlessly, especially by the press. It is really about trade deals, the global warming sham, and his unrelenting promise to put the good of his fellow citizens first, or is it really about something else? Isn’t it possible–probable even–that those screaming the loudest have the most to lose when the flood gates open? Of course it is.

There’s no question this will be one of the most important elections in the history of our country–perhaps even the world. Human trafficking is a multi-billion dollar industry that quite literally spans the globe, involving movie stars, spiritual advisers, media moguls, heads of industry, military contractors, politicians, diplomats and people in governments all over the world. And, unfortunately, the sexual abuse and exploitation of children isn’t the worst of their predilections. One thread unravels it all. They can’t afford for him to win again, and we can’t afford for him not to.

When writing my first book over a decade ago, I included a brief reference to the number of people that go missing in the United States alone. If I remember right, the figure was around 800,000 people–per year. Where do they go, and what happens to them? I thought then it was unbelievably bizarre given that we aren’t finding their bodies, but at the time I had no idea just how prolific the human trafficking, child pedophilia and slave labor issue was. It’s massive–absolutely massive.

Below is a two minute video of Cindy McCain (Senator John McCain’s widow) openly admitting they all knew what Epstein was doing, but that until now, nobody would do anything about it. Despite admitting this, she still can’t bring herself to use Trump’s name, but rather refers to “someone” instead–even after admitting her own daughter’s friend was an Epstein victim. I’ve taken the time to transcribe the video because, at the rate things like this are being black-holed, it isn’t likely to be around long.

EXPOSED: Cindy McCain admits ‘we all knew’ about Epstein! This should anger every American (January 25, 2020)

Cindy McCain: “Real quickly, to bring it home–we’re talking the about Jeffrey Epstein thing–he’s in hell I hope. I hope he’s in hell right now. He deserves to be. Um, a girl from my daughter’s high school was one of his victims. That’s how close it came to home to us, for us, on this. So I’m hoping we get to discuss not only where it is, but why it is, and leave you with an action item when you leave here tonight.” (From here the video cuts to an audience member asking Cindy McCain a question relating to the issue. Visually, you can see how uncomfortable his question makes her.)

Audience member: “So, I’m going to shoot straight. The perception between a lot of young people is that there is an untouchable ring of governmental and economic elites in this country that not only benefit, like she mentioned, but actively participate in sex trafficking. Jeffrey Epstein was an example, uh, Robert Craft was arrested, not far from here, on  trafficking charges. And so we–in terms of this as a grass roots movement to push, to combat this issue, are these power players a priority for us right now? Can we even touch them, or is this a pipe dream we need to address in the future, somehow?”

Cindy McCain: “No, it’s like everything you know, we, we–it hides in plain sight. Epstein was hiding in plain sight. We all knew about him. We all knew what he was doing. But we had no one that was, uh, um, legal aspect that would go after him. They were afraid of him for whatever reason, they were afraid of him. All the sudden someone [Trump] said, “B.S.–we’re not afraid of you anymore and what you’re doing is not only wrong it’s illegal,” and you know, those things. Um, it’s like a house of cards now, it’s going to start tumbling, believe me, and these guys–if they don’t leave the country, number one, they’re going to get caught. Not only will they get caught, but they’re going to be made examples of, and that’s exactly what we should be doing with these guys, especially. In my opinion, Epstein is a chicken shit for doing what he did. He should have faced the music on that one.”

THEY WERE AFRAID OF HIM FOR “WHATEVER REASON”

Cindy McCain’s brief statement on why Epstein was allowed to continue his operations for so long is meaningless to people who don’t understand who Jeffrey Epstein was, and what he was doing. He wasn’t just some over-sexed degenerate lunatic attempting to seed the human race with his DNA. There are yet to be substantiated rumors that Epstein was working for an intelligence agency–both Mossad and the CIA have been suspected–operating what is known as a ‘honey pot’ for the purpose of gathering blackmail material on prominent and powerful people. That would be where the “afraid of him” part comes in. The rooms in the basement of Epstein’s island, where the bulk of the sexually deviant activities took place, all had cameras. There’s no amount of spin and public relations maneuvering that can salvage an individual’s reputation after something like that goes public, which means they own you now. You’re going to do whatever they want, to whomever they want, whenever they want–even to your own family, people, city or nation. That also tells us what kind of “someone” is necessary to take them down–someone whose life they don’t control and can’t destroy in the usual manner. They’re going to need different tactics for someone like him–they’re going to need fabricated dossiers, unfounded narratives, corrupt special counsels and a corrupt media for that–the kind of people unable to challenge the Epsteins of the world–the kind of people who can be counted on to do what they’re told. If you’re unfamiliar with the now infamous use of honey pots to acquire blackmail material, the short video below covers its use in a previous scandal:

Franklin Cover-up Explained | Conspiracy of Silence

Over the years several excellent independent journalists have uncovered mind-boggling evidence of the same networks used for trafficking people–these networks being both social and logistical (tunnels, submarines, planes) and referred to as “rat lines”–also being used to move things like weapons, drugs, uranium, and potentially bio-weapons. One of the more important discoveries made in that regard however, is how the deep state heavily relies on criminal organizations and gangs–like MS13–to do their dirty (and wet) work. You’re not hearing corrupt politicos and their media attack dogs deride Trump as an intolerant “racist” for going after groups like MS-13 because they’re all righteous humanitarians. Rather it’s the method they use to obfuscate the real issue and a means to garner support for keeping their trafficking networks and rat lines intact. Below are some of the more innocuous (drip) sources on the matter:

Tech companies are also doing their part to ensure fewer and fewer people become more reality literate on the issue through ever increasing censorship. If the media refuses to report on it and tech companies censor everyone online trying to report on it, nobody knows what’s really happening. It’s because of that tech censorship that few, if any of you, are aware of the following announcement, made just two days ago: The Department of Justice Announces Takedown of Key MS-13 Criminal Leadership. I have personally found over the years that FB automatically shadow bans ANY posts from the Department of Justice, something you would only expect from organizations more concerned with “just us” than real victim justice. Below is a partial copy of the announcement. It can be read in its entirety at the link provided above.

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Wednesday, July 15, 2020

The Department of Justice Announces Takedown of Key MS-13 Criminal Leadership
Joint Task Force Vulcan is a Coordinated Effort to Dismantle and Destroy MS-13
Today, President Donald J. Trump and Attorney General William P. Barr announced significant cases related to Joint Task Force Vulcan (JTFV), an initiative launched in August 2019 aimed at disrupting, dismantling, and ultimately, destroying MS-13.

President Trump and Attorney General Barr announced a number of significant cases associated with JTFV, including the first time an MS-13 member has been charged with terrorism-related offenses, a coordinated multi-district takedown of the leadership of the Hollywood clique of MS-13, and the Attorney General’s decision to seek the death penalty against an MS-13 defendant.

“In 2017, the President directed the Department of Justice to go to war against MS-13, and we did just that,” said Attorney General Barr. “In coordination with our partners at the Department of Homeland Security, the Justice Department’s law enforcement components have successfully investigated, charged, and arrested command and control elements of MS-13 responsible for murder. Joint Task Force Vulcan’s operations have significantly degraded MS-13 capabilities. While there is still work to be done, the Department of Justice remains committed to protecting Americans threatened by MS-13, and we will not rest until we have successfully defeated this transnational criminal organization.”

“Today’s announcements are the result of tremendous teamwork and coordination between prosecutors and law enforcement officers across the United States and Central America,” said JTFV Director John Durham. “MS-13 is a violent transnational criminal organization, whose criminal activities respect no boundaries. The only way to defeat MS-13 is by targeting the organization as a whole, focusing on the leadership structure, and deploying a whole-of-government approach against a common enemy.”

Nor are the media and big tech social networks big fans of sharing stories like this one: Trump signs order creating post focused on human trafficking

Or stories like this one: Trump appoints former U of L baseball player to anti-human-trafficking task force

In fact, the censorship has gotten so bad that you can’t find any of the past radio shows i’ve done over the years by searching my name on youtube–not even if you search for my name and the title of the show I was on. You would literally already have to know which youtube channel the video was on, and then sift through the videos on the channel. Nor will any “shares” of these articles to other social media platforms be registered here. But it doesn’t matter, because the efforts are already too little, too late. It doesn’t matter that I can’t point you to the youtube channel of the man who uncovered the spy ring in congress and the deep state rat lines, because youtube just deleted his channel–over 4000 videos and years of work gone with the click of a button. It doesn’t matter anymore because the cats were let out of the bags years ago, and now even their babies have babies of their own.

There are wonders–genuine, mysterious and fantastic wonders waiting for all of us to join them on the other side of this madness. Paradigm-shifting energy technology advancements, life-saving cures, mind-blowing hidden histories–all having been suppressed by people who couldn’t keep their hold on power any other way. One thread unravels them all. 

With that, i’ll leave you with this to think about. It’s been several years since I shared this story during a radio show so I don’t remember all of the details exactly, but considering it was science fiction, even paraphrasing will still elegantly make the point:

“I was watching a television show recently wherein the lead character was a very old being who had only somewhat recently come to earth, having a human form with no distinguishing characteristics. He was here helping a group solve issues not unlike those in a Dr. Who series, and in this particular episode he was attempting to stop a catastrophic energy rift from developing in a deep cavern in the earth. Over the course of events he and another character encountered a pedophile, but due to the urgency of the rift opening, they were unable to hand him over to the proper authorities and instead were forced to bring him along.

As they reached the bottom of the steps leading deep into the cavern, just in time to see the energy rift begin to develop, the being looks over at the pedophile only to find him staring wide-eyed, mouth open, frozen from both the shock and awe of the beautiful, terrible, and impossible sight developing before him. Realizing the effect this experience is having on the man, the elder being looks back at the rift whose undulating purple glow is now cast across both their faces, and he begins to explain, “I have lived for thousands of years and traveled across multiple universes. I have seen suns and planets die, and entire galaxies being born. You can’t even begin to image the wonders I have seen.” He then returns his gaze to the still paralyzed features of the pedophile and says, “And I wish you could see them too, because then you would know how small you’ve made your life.”

Can you see it now? Welcome to the Great Awakening.

 

WHAT IS THE 2020 ELECTION REALLY ABOUT?

106496146_2980360485333399_616284324556504116_n

 


SUBSCRIBE TO DROWNING IN ABSURDITY: Want to be notified of new D.I.A. posts via email? Hit the subscribe button on the top right of the page. It’s free and your information stays private.

COMMENTS POLICY: Please be advised that D.I.A. observes a zero tolerance policy for trolling. All comments (unless they contain links) are reviewed and therefore may not appear right away. Comments that contain links are automatically set to be disregarded. Comments unrelated to the subject matter (intending to derail the conversation) will also be disregarded.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DE-FUND END GAME: INSTALLATION OF A GLOBAL POLICE FORCE IN PUSH TOWARDS GLOBAL CITIZENRY

DE-FUND END GAME: INSTALLATION OF A GLOBAL POLICE FORCE IN PUSH TOWARDS GLOBAL CITIZENRY

by Crystal Clark, July 2, 2020

reality revision-Ahead-SMALL-CROPEver looking through the lens of reality revisionism, it’s not surprising to find that ‘de-funding’ the old reality has been thrown into the mix of revisionist ‘cancel culture’–canceling (through de-funding in this case) the old or competing reality of local police forces. More and more people are adopting the idea that the true goal of this revision is to nationalize the police force in this country, but I strongly disagree. Rather I find  nationalization to be very much like one of the definitions of socialism I provided in the last essay: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism.

Here again I feel compelled to remind the reader that Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist tactics are being MADE USE OF by globalists to install their own world government, which will be a global corporate fascist police state administered by 12 elitist families in perpetuity. Nationalizing police is the middle or transitory stage (socialist) of the real goal, which is the installation of a globalist police force on American soil. A global police force is something globalists have been talking about for decades, and “talking” isn’t all they’ve been doing about it. Five years ago, it was Obama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, who, on behalf of his administration in 2015, gave a presentation to the United Nations in which she pledged support for a global law enforcement initiative called the Strong Cities Network.

Below is a brief 15 minute video on this development, made by Constitutional Attorney KrisAnne Hall, the day after Lynch made her speech at the UN. Hall discussed what this meant for the future of our country, and read what she felt were pertinent points. In the interest of truth and transparency, you can read the entirely of Lynch’s speech at the following link to the justice.gov website where it’s still posted: https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-loretta-e-lynch-announces-launch-strong-cities-network-united-nations

I’m posting the first paragraph of Lynch’s speech below so you can compare it with what Hall is reading and commenting on in the video. You may find it interesting whose name pops up first in Lynch’s speech, given current events in New York–this is confluence, not coincidence. Below is the first paragraph of Lynch’s speech, followed by Hall’s video commentary:

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch Announces the Launch of the Strong Cities Network at the United Nations General Assembly
New York, NY ~ Tuesday, September 29, 2015
Remarks as prepared for delivery

“Thank you, Mayor [Bill] de Blasio, for those kind words; for your dedication to promoting equality [globalism] and expanding opportunity; and for your service to the people of this great city – the city I call home. I would also like to recognize High Commissioner for Human Rights [Prince Zeid Ra’ad] Al Hussein and the UN-Habitat program for their inspiring work and bold leadership as we work to create a future of sustainable peace, development and opportunity. And I’d like to thank all of the mayors and other municipal leaders who are helping to ensure safe and prosperous futures for our communities and our world by serving on the Steering Committee of the Strong Cities Network. It’s a pleasure to join such a distinguished group of world leaders on this historic occasion and it’s a privilege to represent the Obama Administration and the United States as we inaugurate this innovative, collaborative and critically important global effort.”

WHY DIDN’T YOU ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS?

Openly submitting the US to a UN police force took place years ago, and if you weren’t aware of it, it wasn’t because honest news agencies and/or citizen journalists weren’t talking about it. It’s because dishonest and disloyal news outlets (most now owned and operated by 6 globalist corporations) celebrated the event with glee, phony virtue signaling and spin, while their tech company counterparts censored anyone still clinging to the previous reality of America remaining a sovereign republic maintaining it’s right to self-governance and self-determination.

I think it’s critical to understand and remember the necessary role of censorship during reality revision attempts. People won’t stand up against things–things like ideological subversion–when they don’t even know its happening. Here again I would offer a quick reminder that most people really are good people and would do the right thing if they knew what it was, which means that only through ignorance can our goodness be used against us. Globalists know and understand this. They exploit it relentlessly. When you see mass media organs treating the public like a giant mushroom farm, the duped-gooder phenomenon of people participating in their own demise en-masse under false pretenses is never far behind. There’s an old quote by John Milton that both perfectly describes the situation and also makes for an excellent segue into the next stage of the issue: “they who have put out the people’s eyes reproach them of their blindness”.

REALITY REVISIONISM BY DECREE INSTEAD OF CONSENT

You may recall, in a previous essay on reality revisionism and the phony environmental movement, that globalists have always planned on using a contrived environmental crisis during their final push towards installing themselves as the new forever-leaders of planet earth, and that they were insistent upon doing it by decree rather than through any kind of democratic process (which would allow for honest scrutiny and public debate), instead of letting the ‘cannon fodder’ actually vote for it. The outward or public excuse for this elitist view is that the public isn’t smart enough to know they aren’t smart enough to govern themselves. The self-crowned elite, alone then, must carry the heavy burden of saving you from yourselves, and they will need complete control to do it.

In whittling or mocking it down to it’s core, they believe that if you fail to sink to your knees in awe of the sparkling residue of infinite knowledge pouring out of their magnificently imbued grey matter rendering their huge heads with an almost omnipotent glow of divinity, then surely you aren’t intelligent enough to be trusted with determining your own future; if you’re going to tell the emperor he has no clothes on, you’re going to be banned from both court and square when important decisions about your own future are being made. Authorship (author-ity) over the reality construct must be left solely to the adults in the room, but don’t fret, you can read all about what they’ve decided to do with your future in the next issue of Specatator’s Weekly. 

If you’ve skipped previous essays covering globalism through the back door (by decree not consent) and don’t know specifically what i’m referring to, i’ll recount some particularly salient conversations in that regard below–these were also highlighted in a recent essays titled: IDEOLOGICAL SUBVERSION–And You Won’t Even Know It’s Happening

From the essay section titled: THE DUPLICITY AND HYPOCRISY OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT REALITY REVISION

Of additional importance in this regard (beginning at the 1:03.55 mark), the Australian politician Ann Bressington begins to explain the 1968 origins of Agenda 21 via the Club of Rome–a think tank tasked with a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to accept global [new order] solutions to local problems. Take note of her use of the term “social engineering” during this speech. She goes on to recount the following:

“In 1997 Mikhail Gorbachev, also a member of the Club of Rome, said, “We are moving toward a New World Order—the world of communism. And we shall never turn off that road…the environmental crisis will be the international disaster that will unlock the New World Order one world government.”

She further outlined it was during the 1992 Earth Summit that a document known as The Earth Charter was produced. This document was co-written by Maurice Strong [Club of Rome member] and Mikhail Gorbachev. Both stated it was hoped this document would be adopted as the new 10 commandments with environmentalism as the new one world religion. She later quotes Ted Turner [Club of Rome member], an outspoken advocate of depopulation, echoing the same sentiments on the Georgia guide stones encouraging a 95% reduction in global population.

From the essay section titled: REALITY REVISIONS BY DECREE: SIDESTEPPING NORMAL PATHWAYS TO PUBLIC DEBATE, OVERSIGHT AND CONSENT

At the 7:50 mark Hunt plays a video snippet of David Lang (Montreal International Investment Banker) decreeing that the environmental and economic activities of the world order not be shared with the public. As seen/heard in the video:

“I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process—that would take too long and require far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder, unfortunately, which populates the earth. We have to take an almost elitist program. That we can see beyond our swollen bellies and look to the future, in time frames and in results, which are not easily understood, or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to simplistic definition.“

Those familiar with the United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century program (Agenda 21–previously referenced by Australian politician Ann Bressington), are already well aware that bypassing normal channels of debate or the ‘democratic process’ is precisely how the program is being handled—by decree. Rosa Koire, author of Behind the Green Maskis an excellent resource for information on Agenda 21, how it is being enacted in (y)our local communities, and also how its doctrine subsumes individuality in favor of a globalist collective. Those who watched Hunt’s video will recall him outlining the difference between the first, second, third, and “fourth world” discussed by people like Maurice Strong—the Fourth World referring to the new order having absorbed all of the others and being the only, and final world left:

“Yogis and Shamans refer to it as the 4th World Wilderness—the lostness of the mind. The lostness of the mind refers to the collective consciousness—persons will be coerced through lies, drugs, fear and pain to surrender themselves and their ego to the collective consciousness [global governance]. The 4th World will be much like a return to Caesars or Babylon…” –George Hunt

It’s interesting that George Hunt referred to the “4th world” subsuming all of the others, and next Yuri goes on to explain that ideological subversion has four stages. Coincidence or confluence? It’s been years since I’ve watched Mr. Hunt’s video so I find myself wondering now just how similar Maurice Strong’s first, second, third, and fourth worlds are to Yuri’s four stages of total subversion.

THE FIRST STAGE OF IMPLEMENTATION: TRAINING, GATHERING & ACTIVATING THE HORDES OF CHAOS

The Order-out-of-chaos strategy is one I have covered repeatedly over the years in both radio interviews and writing, and it’s constantly in our face. How many times have you watched a movie wherein some villain is standing triumphantly over a scorched earth? We wonder at the logic of it: why would you destroy something that you intend to rule over? What’s the point? Well, that IS the point: to build your new world (order) on the ashes of the old one. But the plot isn’t brazenly being outed via Hollywood movies on our television screens anymore–it’s happening in leftist [globalist] run cities all over the country. Burning churches, homes, businesses, police cars–these are literal manifestations and interpretations of a ‘scorched earth’ policy being played out in reality. In terms of reality revisionism, destruction of the ENTIRE competing reality is the goal, meaning ‘scorched earth’ applies to everything from the implementation of thought police to the purposeful destruction of the economy and even environment.

The purpose of the chaos isn’t just to destroy the old reality, but also to pave the way for the new one. In this, when it comes to competing realities struggling for full manifestation, especially the way globalists use the technique, our chaos is their carefully scripted re-ordering (of society) process. The following excerpt comes from a previous essay titled: UNSUSTAINABLE REALITY REVISIONS AND THE ORDER-OUT-OF-CHAOS BIRTH

The Hegelian Principle: An excerpt from THE MOST SECRET SCIENCE (1998 Edition), by Archibald E. Roberts, Lieutenant Colonel, AUS, retired

Revolutionaries in government have created economic chaos, shortages in food and fuel, confiscatory taxation, a crisis in education, the threat of war, and other diversions to condition Americans for The New World Order.

The technique is as old as politics itself. It is the Hegelian principle of bringing about change in a three-step process: Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis.

The first step (thesis) is to create a problem. The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic, hysteria). The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem created in step one—change which would have been impossible to impose on the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two.

Applying the Hegelian principle, and irresistible financial influence, concealed mattoids seek to dismantle social and political structures by which free men govern themselves—ancient landmarks erected at great cost in blood and treasure.

Their objective is to emasculate states, merge nations under universal government, centralize economic powers, and control the world’s people and resources.

Along that same vein you may also enjoy the article, The Cloward-Piven Strategy: Orchestrating A Crisis So Government Can “Solve” It. From the article:

“The end goal of the Cloward-Piven strategy is the creation of a political crisis leading to a guaranteed annual income.[1] Essentially, the Cloward-Piven strategy would lead to the complete control of citizens through Socialism/Communism.

As a background, Frances Fox Piven is a professor of political science and sociology at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York.[2] The late Richard Cloward was an sociologist and liberal activist, and Piven’s spouse.[3]

Their “strategy” to implement political crisis to achieve a guaranteed annual income was published in the May 2, 1966 of The Nation, a leading liberal political and cultural magazine. In this publication, their main goal to achieve the crisis was to have “a massive drive to recruit the poor onto the welfare rolls.” A federal program to administer these large welfare programs would be needed. This is because if it is administered locally, there would be lower enrollment because “the poor are most visible and proximate in the local community; antagonism toward them has always, therefore, been more intense locally than at the federal level.”

This means that if there was more oversight at the local level it would not allow the welfare rolls to increase to the levels needed to cause a financial crisis. Therefore, their solution was to move programs to Washington D.C. where people are not as aware of the costs and oversight of the programs.

The strategy also rejected that a person could overcome poverty through any “institution of private enterprise”, signaling that hard work, education, and personal responsibility are not a solution to poverty. Their only solution is a “federal program of income redistribution” to “elevate the poor en- masse from poverty.”

Training, gathering, and activating the hordes of globalist chaos has already happened. We’re seeing the results of the strategy in full bloom now. A previous essay on Ideological Subversion discussed the decades-long targeting of our youth with the indoctrination and propaganda necessary to produce the future mobs needed for the next phase. All together, there is an endless line of well-trained malcontents converging on reality for the purpose of revising and re-reordering society towards a more globalist ideal. There are the more public or obvious groups like BLM (Black Lives Matter), BAMN (By Any Means Necessary), ANTIFA (anti-fascist) and so forth, yet those represent but the tip of the iceberg of groups working in harmony for an end they will never get nor personally benefit from. There are other groups, working just as diligently although more covertly (not being covered by media), like Extinction Rebellion and the Sunshine Movement. While you may not be consciously aware of groups like Extinction Rebellion, if you watched the newest Godzilla movie, you’ve seen their symbol repeatedly (two triangles forming an hour glass) in the film, whose main story line was depopulating the earth to “save” it.

With the goal of installing a globalist-loyal police force, there’s a reason each group is using the same pressure points, and it’s through the repetitive use of these pressure points, by each group, that we can be sure these seemingly disparate groups and their activities are being coordinated and directed behind the scenes from a higher level. The following video presentation by G. Edward Griffin is very revealing of that aspect. Below are quotes taken directly from the six minute clip:

“As early as 1928, the communists declared that the racial differences among our people constituted the weakest and most vulnerable point in our social fabric. By constantly probing and straining at this one spot they calculated that eventually the cloth could be torn apart and that Americans could be divided, weakened, and perhaps even set against each other in open combat.”

“In 1943, the following directive was issued from party headquarters in the United States. It read: ‘When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them after suitable build-ups, as fascist, or Nazi, or anti-semitic, and use the prestige of of anti-fascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them. In the public mind, constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell. The association will, after enough repetition, become fact in the pubic mind.”

 

Birds of a feather mob and plot together

Strangely enough, there is an observable and interesting phenomenon in the horde mentality as it pertains not only to leaders of the associated political party and it’s minion class, but also the leaders of the mobs themselves: the more corrupt, hate-filled, and ‘cares they have cremated’, as demonstrated through past actions, the bigger their reward and the faster their promotion within the system and its ranks.

You may recall, in the previous essay titled, THE APPEASER FEEDS THE CROCODILE IN THE HOPES IT WILL EAT HIM LAST, the featured Venezuelan expatriate Elizabeth Rogliani commenting on the similarities between what happened in Venezuela versus what’s happening now the in the US, including the replacement of their police force. Goodman and Rogliani begin discussing this at the 32:00 mark in the video:

Rogliani: They have really no regard for the law, and that’s where I see the similarities between what happened to us (Venezuela) and what happened to you guys (U.S.). You have these people that are criminals, that don’t care that they’re criminals, and they’re fine with putting these people in power. We had the same thing–every person that was important in our government had a rap sheet. So yeah, the current President now, he met Chavez in prison. [Note: Chavez was in prison for repeatedly attempting to assassinate a previous President and his family]

Goodman: That’s unbelievable. See, in the United States we do it a little differently. They (deep state) just forego prosecuting the criminals  and allow them to go directly to government.

Isn’t that the truth? Before long it becomes a near competition between demoralized adherents, within both the party and the mob mass, something akin to a race to the top of rotten, instead of a race to the bottom, and we start seeing more things like this as a consequence:

The Third Stage of the Installing a Global Police Force is Beginning

The reality revision of a local police force accountable to local people, being replaced by a global police force loyal and accountable to globalists and their agenda, is being accomplished through order-out-of-chaos (the Hegelian principle):

  1. THESIS (create the problem or perception of the problem): Undermine, corrupt, and demoralize the existing police force
  2. ANTI-THESIS (generate opposition to the problem with fear, panic, hysteria): Activate the outrage mobs and propaganda media to demand a change be made
  3. SYNTHESIS (offer the solution to the problem created in step one): Make the change from a local police force to a global police force

The third phase of the revision (synthesis) is now being observably activated, and we also see the U.N. reciprocating in the exploitation of recent events:

From here it shouldn’t surprise us to find a UN website that helps people find local chapters in their area (unausadotorg/chapters/) with the following displayed on their home page:

URGE YOUR REPRESENTATIVE TO SUPPORT H.CON.RES.100
#BlackLivesMatter
In light of the killing of George Floyd and the inequalities surfaced by COVID-19, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) has introduced a resolution, H.Con.Res.100, which calls for the formation of a U.S. Truth, Racial Healing, and Transformation Commission. This is an essential element in any process to address and extinguish racial injustice in America.

What UN Police Do–According to the policedotundotorg website:

The mission of UN Police is to enhance international peace and security by supporting Member-States in conflict, post-conflict and other crisis situations. Its goal is to realize effective, efficient, representative, responsive and accountable police services that serve and protect the population. To that end, United Nations Police build and support or, where mandated, act as a substitute or partial substitute for host-State police capacity to prevent and detect crime, protect life and property and maintain public order and safety, in adherence to the rule of law and international human rights law (S/2018/1183).

Any added emphasis in the description is their own, including “to prevent and detect crime, protect life and property and maintain public order and safety”–which covers basically everything some local leaders in the US have STOPPED their own police forces from doing and protecting by giving them “stand-down” orders.

GLOBALISM AND HORDES OF CHAOS ECHO CHAMBER

The installation of a Global Police Force through the Strong Cities Network being the real goal of current related events, you may recall what KrisAnne Hall discussed in the video (above) at the 8:08 mark while reading directly from Lynch’s 2015 speech at the United Nations:

‘…federal officials have partnered with a wide array of local stakeholders – including government and public safety officers, social service providers, educators, businesses and nonprofits – to build and implement community resilience frameworks.’

“This is your foreshadowing that this safe cities network, this strong cities network, will not just pull in your cities, but it’s going to pull in every aspect of your cities down the minute administrative aspects of who you are. Do you see this social service providers–we re now going to get United Nations and foreign government influence in Social Services. Do you know what that means? That means the the human rights platform of the United Nations–to rob parents of their parental rights–is going to be implemented at the local level. This is not tinfoil hat stuff. I’m reading you the very text.  -KrisAnne Hall

I have posted the entirely of that paragraph from Lynch’s speech at the UN below because, given current happenings in very particular cities, I think you’ll find some extremely interesting connections. Again, the entirety of the speech can be found here. The following is from the fourth paragraph of the speech. I have highlighted key words and phrases in bold:

“The government of the United States is fully invested in this collaborative approach and we have seen the value of empowering local communities by promoting initiatives they design and lead themselves.  Through our Model Regions program, federal officials have partnered with a wide array of local stakeholders – including government and public safety officers, social service providers, educators, businesses and nonprofits – to build and implement community resilience frameworks tailored to the unique needs of residents.  In Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota, for example, government officials, private partners and civic leaders have come together to create a mentorship program for Somali youth; to build an “opportunity hub” that provides educational resources and job training; and to contribute to a program called Youthprise that is forging connections between community organizations, investors and young people.  At the same time, officials in the Greater Boston region are exploring the connection between criminal justice and public health by partnering with the Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services to tap their experience with violence prevention and intervention.  And in the Denver area, the United States Attorney’s Office has led a multifaceted community engagement and education effort involving all levels of government.  These initiatives and others like them were the subject of a convening just two weeks ago, organized by our Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, in conjunction with the Police Executive Research Forum, which brought together law enforcement executives and community partners from over a dozen cities to plan ways to translate these cutting-edge programs into new regions.”

At this point I don’t have anywhere near a complete list of U.S. cities/federal officials participating in the Model Regions component of the Strong Cities Network, but for some, it isn’t hard to guess. This would of course include cities that are now cutting funds to their police departments while at the same time violent crimes in the city are skyrocketing. Minneapolis, and New York (both referenced in Lynch’s speech at the UN) are obvious, but then we also have other major cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, Portland and Seattle following suit:

Minneapolis:

New York:

Los Angeles:

Chicago:

Portland:

Seattle:

UN MODEL REGIONS PROGRAM PARTNERS WITH SOCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS–REPLACING LOCAL POLICE WITH SOCIAL WORKERS

Cities making this specific change are also clearly participants in the UN Strong Cities Network. Remembering that it’s one thing to have globalists infiltrate a political party, but another thing entirely to have the whole party become champions for globalism, it isn’t surprising to find most of these changes occurring in Democrat [globalist] run cities. Nor should it be surprising that cities with the highest rates of violence are often ran by the same political class. The following article was posted on Hannity June 16th, 2020, and indicates Albuquerque, NM is has signed up to be a “model region” for installing a global police force.

REPORT: Albuquerque, NM to Send ‘Unarmed Social Workers’ NOT POLICE to Some 911 Calls

The City of Albuquerque, New Mexico confirmed this week that some 911 calls will be answered by “unarmed social workers” depending on the nature of the emergency.

“Hours before Albuquerque police detained alleged members of an armed civilian group when a protest erupted in gunfire Monday, the mayor of New Mexico’s largest city announced that unarmed social workers – not officers – would now respond to certain 911 calls,” reports Fox News.

We’ve placed more and more issues on the plates of officers who are not trained — despite their best efforts and despite some training — they’re not totally trained to be a social worker, or to be an addiction counselor, or to deal with things around child abuse when they’re just answering a call,” Mayor Tim Keller said. “We should have trained professionals do this, instead of folks with a gun and a badge.”

Los Angeles, California also appears to be a model region for installing a global police force.

LA To Send Unarmed Social Workers To Some Emergency Calls Instead Of LAPD

“LOS ANGELES (AP) — Unarmed social workers instead of police would respond to nonviolent calls for service under a proposal Tuesday from several City Council members following nationwide calls for law enforcement reforms in the wake of George Floyd’s killing.

A motion signed by six of the council’s 15 members would use teams of trained city, county and community-based professionals, such as homeless outreach workers, to handle certain emergency situations, such as mental health crises and substance abuse calls.

The motion calls for city departments to work with the Police Department, Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority and county agencies to develop an “unarmed model of crisis response” for nonviolent calls now handled by the LAPD.”

Minneapolis Vows to “Dismantle” Police, Replace With Social Workers

As protests, riots, and vandalism continue across America in response to the death of George Floyd at the hands of a Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) officer, members of the Minneapolis City Council are promising to “dismantle” the police department and “replace” it with a “transformative” new model of law enforcement altogether.

“We are going to dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department,” tweeted council member Jeremiah Ellison, son of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison.

He added: “And when we’re done, we’re not simply gonna glue it back together. We are going to dramatically rethink how we approach public safety and emergency response.”

For the veteran reality-miners out there, the idea of giving social services even more power over people’s lives is horrifying, and rightly so. While the legacy (main stream) media works overtime to ignore the massive, massive human trafficking network and problem spanning the globe, too many people have already been scarred by it for it to be ignored. And we certainly can’t forget that social services has repeatedly proven to be part of the ‘missing children’ problem. As this article points out, “How can social services lose 18,000 children – and not look for them?” Indeed.

Stories like this also clearly indicate the program will be used as a gigantic new snitch factory to weed out and punish dissenters: Virginia Health Dept Urges Citizens to Snitch on Churches and Gun Ranges

A GLOBAL POLICE FORCE AND THE MODEL REGIONS PROGRAM–PARTNERING WITH BUSINESSES, EDUCATORS AND NON-PROFITS

These specific partnerships were also discussed by Lynch during her speech to the UN, but at this point I think readers know who most of these businesses, educators and non-profits are. We know the UN has been pushing down globalist curriculum into our public schools for decades and that our colleges have been turned into Marxist/Globalist indoctrination centers. I think most people also understand which businesses and non-profits are involved, which includes everyone from Soros, to BLM, to big tech companies giving the globalist agenda the hard push while simultaneously censoring dissent.  Below are some refreshers, but I would take a closer look at the Global Citizen Movement’s role in current events.

GLOBAL CITIZEN MOVEMENT: A GLOBAL POLICE FORCE TO RULE OVER GLOBAL CITIZENS

Unsurprisingly, the Global Citizens Movement is heavily targeting the youth of very nation on earth, by, you guessed it–the United Nations. In a film titled: The Global Citizen Movement | Full Documentary (posted July 17, 2017–which you can find on youtube), the film opens with a young woman making the following statements through a megaphone to a crowd of youth who are repeating everything she says:

  • I think in 10 years from now… (crowd repeats it back to her)
  • The thing that’s going to be remembered about Seattle (crowd repeats it back to her)
  • Is not what tear gas bomb went off on what street corner (crowd repeats it back to her)
  • But that the WTO (Word Trade Organization) in 1999 (crowd repeats it back to her)
  • Was the birth (crowd repeats it back to her)
  • Of a global Citizens Movement (crowd repeats it back to her)
  • For a democratic global economy (crowd repeats it back to her and they all cheer together)

There are, quite literally, thousands of videos on the topic made over the last few years alone, and while I could post them here, it’s really something you need to see for yourselves to fully grasp. It’s a very deep rabbit hole (of confusion and propaganda) unto itself. You will, of course, find the usual (billionaire) suspects heavily involved, familiar names like Richard Branson and Bill Gates.

While I didn’t have time to watch the entire aforementioned video on the Global Citizen Movement, and what I did watch left me scratching my head as to what future vision it subscribed to, I think it’s worth drilling down into the claim that the GCM is working towards a global economy. Considering it’s now public knowledge the socialist/globalist-minded in our country are constantly spouting off the “evils of capitalism”, and the COVID ‘crisis’ is being used by leftists/globalists all over the world to destroy economies, should we really be surprised to see Al Gore suddenly pop up demanding a “great reset of global capitalism? The following article was posted on Fox Business, June 25th, 2020:

Al Gore, UN Secretary-General, others now demanding ‘Great Reset’ of global capitalism
These are truly dangerous times for those who support individual liberty and free markets
By Justin HaskinsFOXBusiness

“The economic, social and political chaos caused by the COVID-19 outbreak and Black Lives Matter protests have for months captured the attention of virtually every American — and for good reason. These are incredibly important issues worthy of significant and thoughtful debate.

But while most Americans have been preoccupied with protests and pandemics, a potentially bigger story has managed to slip beneath the radar: a growing movement among the world’s most powerful leaders to call for a “reset” of the entire global economy.

US ECONOMIC RECOVERY FROM CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC WILL TAKE ‘SOME TIME,’ FED’S EVANS SAYS

At a meeting hosted by the highly influential World Economic Forum earlier in June, powerful officials from nonprofits, government, business, academia, labor unions and activist groups announced their plan for a “Great Reset” of global capitalism. It’s a proposal they acknowledged has only been made possible because of the “opportunity” provided by the economic destruction caused by the novel coronavirus.

Supporters and attendees of the meeting included Prince Charles; António Guterres, the secretary-general of the United Nations; Ajay Banga, CEO of MasterCard; Bernard Looney, CEO of BP; and Gina Gopinath, the chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, among many others.

The purpose of the Great Reset isn’t merely to enact policies that would lead to additional wealth redistribution, but rather to completely overhaul the world’s existing structures and institutions

In an article published on the World Economic Forum’s website, Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of WEF, wrote of the Great Reset, “Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”

You can read the rest of the article at the link provided, but we’ve been hearing about this financial reset for years under the cover of the phony green movement–the only thing ‘green’ about it being the massive redistribution of wealth from the people of the world, to globalist corporations and pockets. They used to call it a carbon tax, but I have little doubt their marketing centers are hard at work re-branding that one–the word “tax” just doesn’t work in a commercial showing people running through tall green grass while laughing and holding hands.

Just how ‘global’ is the Global Citizens Movement? It pretty much means what it says, and per the usual, pop culture icons are being used to bring the youth on board:

THE CORRUPT HISTORY OF THE UNITED NATIONS

The more modern version of their mission statement (According to Wikipedia):

“The United Nations is an intergovernmental organization that aims to maintain international peace and security, develop friendly relations among nations, achieve international cooperation, and be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations”

The word “harmonize” here is very similar to Yuri Bezmenov’s ‘normalization’ as it means to ensure that every nation adopts, uses and acts on the same set of pre-selected standards; to standardize. As you can see below, micro-managing every aspect of a planet and its inhabitants is a multi-tentacled task, and I especially enjoyed their description of the World Bank, which is also a UN institution, as being focused on “poverty reduction and the improvement of living standards worldwide”. That’s like calling one of the most unpatriotic bills in American History the “Patriot Act”. [Below is the public list of UN Agencies and their locations, taken directly from undotorg]:

UNDP Headquarters: New York City, USA; UNEP Headquarters: Nairobi, Kenya; UNFPA Headquarters: New York City, USA; UN-Habitat  Headquarters: Nairobi, Kenya; UNICEF Headquarters: New York City, USA; WFP Headquarters: Rome, Italy.

UN Specialized Agencies: FAO Headquarters: Rome, Italy IFAD Headquarters: Rome, Italy; ILO Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland; IMF Headquarters: Washington, DC, USA; IMO Headquarters: London, United Kingdom; ITU Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland; UNESCO Headquarters: Paris, France; UNIDO Headquarters: Vienna, Austria; UNWTO Headquarters: Madrid, Spain; UPU Headquarters: Bern, Switzerland; WHO Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland; WIPO Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland; WMO Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland; World Bank Headquarters: Washington, DC, USA.

The same UN website also includes 8 ‘Other Entities and Bodies’ and 6 more ‘Organizations’ which also includes the WHO or World Health Organization.

The United Nations is considered by many, myself included, to be the Trojan horse of globalism–it’s like calling the installation of a global police force the “Strong Cities Network” wherein you first have to purposefully make the cities unsafe, to such a degree that people will demand something new–like a global police force!–to swoop in and come to the rescue. But it may be more helpful to view the UN and their assorted agencies more like a line of cars all being designed and produced by the same factory, each different agency being a different make and model. Under the right lights the windows gleam, the chrome sparkles, the leather interior looks soft and the paint has a glassy finish. But what’s under the hood? That’s what we really want to know, right? We want to know what this baby can do–how does it actually run once you get it out of the dealership and onto the street?

UN PRODUCT REVIEWS

In continuing the analogy, before we take it for a test drive, we may first want to read performance reviews from people who have had previous personal experiences with the product. The third review below is especially detailed.

Review #1:

WHO (UN World Health Organization) Offered $20M Bribe To Poison Madagascar Cure

In a shocking claim, the President of Madagascar has said that the WHO offered $20m bribe to poison COVID-19 cure. The herbal remedy called COVID-19 Organics made from Artemisia can cure COVID-19 patients within ten days said the President. He also raised the question that if it was a European country that had actually discovered this remedy, would there be so much doubt?

The President of Madagascar Andry Rajoelina has accused the World Health Organisation of a plot to have its COVID-19 Organics, the local African ‘cure’ for the virus poisoned. Rajoelina claims WHO offered a $20 million bribe to poisoned their medicine, Tanzania Perspective reported on the front-page of its 14th May edition.

The President of Madagascar believes the only reason the rest of the world has refused to treat Madagascar’s cure for the coronavirus with urgency and respect is that the remedy comes from Africa.In an interview with French media, President Rajoelina reportedly said he has noticed what he believes stems from usual condescension toward Africans.

“I think the problem is that (the drink) comes from Africa and they can’t admit… that a country like Madagascar… has come up with this formula to save the world.
If it wasn’t Madagascar, and if it was a European country that had actually discovered this remedy, would there be so much doubt? I don’t think so,” said Africa’s youngest head of state, the President of Madagascar Andry Rajoelina.

“What is the problem with Covid-Organics, really? Could it be that this product comes from Africa? Could it be that it’s not OK for a country like Madagascar, which is the 63rd poorest country in the world… to have come up with (this formula) that can help save the world?”

“If it wasn’t Madagascar, and if it was a European country that had actually discovered this remedy, would there be so much doubt? I don’t think so,” said Africa’s youngest head of state, the President of Madagascar Andry Rajoelina.”

Review #2:

BOMBSHELL UN DOSSIER UN aid workers raped 60,000 people as it’s claimed organisation employs 3,300 paedophiles

A WHISTLE blower has claimed UN staff could have carried out 60,000 rapes in the last decade as aid workers indulge in sex abuse unchecked around the world.

The claim is in a bombshell dossier that former senior United Nations official Andrew Macleod handed over to DFID Secretary Priti Patel last year.

In it, Professor Macleod also estimated there are 3,300 paedophiles working for the world body’s various agencies alone.

Thousands more “predatory” sex abusers specifically target aid charity jobs to get close to vulnerable women and children.

And there has been an “endemic” cover-up of the sickening crimes for two decades, with those who attempt to blow the whistle just getting fired.

Sharing his dossier with The Sun, Prof MacLeod last night warned that the spiraling abuse scandal was on the same scale as the Catholic Church’s.”

Review #3:

The Corruption of the United Nations
The oil-for-food scandal was an international embarrassment—but it’s just one example in an organization rife with corruption.

Rape. Murder. Billions of dollars in fraud and embezzlement on a global scale. The United Nations, formed to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war,” has instead become more like a movie too graphic to show your children.

In the last year, the reputation of the UN has been shredded by allegations of kickbacks, billions of dollars in graft in the oil-for-food scandal, the rape of minors in the Congo sex scandal, and a total lack of accountability. United Nations officials know it’s time for serious reform.

The independent report on the oil-for-food scandal, produced by a committee led by former U.S. Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Paul Volcker, was finally released in September. Criticizing the UN from top to bottom, the language of the report was crystal clear: “The inescapable conclusion from the committee’s work” is that the UN “needs thorough reform—and it needs it urgently.” We will see exactly how serious the lapses in judgment were at every level.

But with a goal as noble as saving our children from war, how did the idea of the UN go so terribly askew? What’s wrong with the United Nations?

The UN, Corruption and Scandals: How Did We Get Here?

In 2018, the British public was shocked to learn that its cherished aid agency, Oxfam, was mired in a sex scandal which involved its own aid workers in Haiti, who were essentially using their power to rape women, or at the very least, forcefully exchanging sex for food and medicine.

But should we really have been so shocked?

Indeed, in the world of international aid, it is commonly known that western aid workers often carry out such practices. But how do they escape prosecution or any form of accountability?

Given that the UN conducted a report of its own staff in January of this year and concluded that a third of all those interviewed reported some form of sexual harassment with ten percent reporting actually being touched inappropriately, is it not unreasonable to assume that it is the UN itself which is setting the ‘example’ to aid workers in the field?

UN Secretary-General António Guterres was quoted by Reuters in January: “As an organization founded on equality, dignity and human rights, we must lead by example and set the standard.” But under his administration, the UN might foster a reputation of being a champion of sexual harassment but it is also a compliant offender in covering it up. According to Reuters, “The United Nations has been trying to increase transparency and strengthen how it deals with such accusations over the past few years, particularly a string of sexual exploitation and abuse claims made against UN peacekeepers in Africa.”

The United Nations: A Bastion of Corruption and Scandals
The UN has failed to discipline or expel officials who have been charged with serious crimes.

The integrity of the United Nations (UN) has deteriorated, as it has become a kind of refuge for officials involved in serious corruption cases.

The body, which is the largest existing international organization, has allowed people to walk its corridors with impunity, who are now facing criminal investigations and who have even been accused of serious crimes such as money laundering.

In 2015 one of the greatest cases of corruption in the history of the UN was uncovered, as John Ashe, a diplomat from Antigua and Barbuda and former president of the General Assembly of the United Nations, was arrested in New York after accepting bribes from Chinese businessmen

The frequency and severity of scandals leads one to believe that the international body has been discredited, to the point of doubting their true mission.

Bachelet: silence and corruption

One of the most recent examples is the appointment of the former president of Chile, Michelle Bachelet, as High Commissioner for Human Rights at the UN.

Until a few months ago, Bachelet openly supported the regime of Nicolás Maduro; she never dared to describe him as a dictator or to strongly condemn the violations of human rights in Venezuela; on the contrary, she preferred to remain silent.

But it is not just a matter of the hypocrisy of having this ex-president as the official UN defender of human rights. It is also the fact that both her and her son were linked to corruption in Chile in relation to a millionaire real estate business.

Heredia: money laundering
 

But Bachelet’s case is not the only one that helps to further discredit the UN. In 2016 Nadine Heredia, ex-first lady of Peru, was appointed a UN official for Food and Agriculture (FAO).

Heredia would receive diplomatic immunity when working for the international organization, despite being deeply involved in the Lava Jato case, the largest corruption case in Latin America.

While Heredia was being investigated in Peru for money laundering and fraud, the UN appointed her as FAO liaison officer in Geneva.

In May of 2017, Heredia decided to resign this position “due to the rules of conduct” imposed by the Judicial Power of Peru, because of the investigation she faced into money laundering; meaning, it was not the UN who decided to dispense with their services when they heard about the scandal.

Chávez’s daughter

But as if this were not enough, the loss of credibility at the UN is compounded with cases such as that of Venezuelans María Gabriela Chávez and Rafael Ramírez.

The daughter of former President Hugo Chávez Frías was appointed alternate ambassador of Venezuela to the UN. She is the richest woman in the South American country, and one of the richest in the world. According to Forbes magazine, she has more than USD $4 billion in her accounts in Andorra and the United States.

The daughter of the former Venezuelan president is alleged to be involved in a international criminal organization that has links to money laundering activities.

In addition, she has been involved in a scandal related to the sale of overpriced rice in Argentina.

According to the newspaper Clarín, rice shipments were sent to Venezuela, under the auspices of a shadowy firm, which sells rice at inflated prices and whose owners have direct contact with Julio De Vido, former Argentine ambassador in Venezuela, and with María Gabriela Chávez.

Ramirez: money laundering

But the most blatant case of how the UN has become a refuge for serious corrupt, is that of Rafael Ramírez, who until 2017 was the representative of Venezuela at the UN and had diplomatic immunity.

Currently, Ramírez is being investigated in the United States and Venezuela for corruption in the state oil company PDVSA. In December he went underground, after the Maduro regime let him escape.

The former UN official was heavily involved in money laundering in the United States and Europe. Ramírez’s guilt came to light after his brother, Fidel Ramírez Carreño, was accused of falsifying millions of dollars of invoices in order to further the scheme.

Sexual harassment

The organisation also has a serious internal problem with sexual harassment. An extensive investigation by The Guardian accused the UN of having allowed the proliferation of sexual harassment and hostile work environments for its employees in UN offices around the world.

The British newspaper interviewed dozens of current and former employees of the organization, who described a “culture of silence” within its structure. According to the investigation, despite the complaints, all alleged aggressors continued in their jobs.

And, in theory, the UN was created to facilitate cooperation on issues such as international law, international peace and security, economic and social development, humanitarian affairs and human rights. However, these objectives have only been discussed in theory.

Today, this organization not only does not require minimum standards of integrity and experience for its officials, but its independent bodies also leave much to be desired. The Security Council, for example, has remained silent before the dictatorship in Venezuela and disregarded the need for humanitarian intervention in the South American country in the wake of the serious political and economic crises the country is facing.”

Those are some rather sobering reviews of the product (a new world order) being pushed on countries around the world through force, coercion, corruption, usurpation, propaganda, mal-education, and various other unsavory means. A friend of mine used to ask, “does a civilization that refuses to protect it’s children, really deserve to survive?” That’s a fair question, and while I find myself often looking to blame the purposefully mis-educated youth of the world for our current predicament, that isn’t really true, is it? It was OUR responsibility to make sure these kinds of things couldn’t happen again, the same way it was the responsibility of those who came before us to do the same. It’s time for us to begin taking that responsibility seriously again.

Aside from the installation of a global police force on American soil, what’s the other big takeaway or lesson to be found in all of this? It’s the same timeless lesson I hope we will one day stop forgetting: mankind cannot continue to participate in their own demise out of ignorance and escape that demise at the same time. Is there a new world order coming then? I suspect there is, but I also suspect, strongly, that it isn’t going to look anything like the grand delusions of self-important globalists. No. Something else entirely is about to emerge–something hopeful, vibrant, exciting, and full of endless wonder. The “Great Awakening” also means what it says on the box, and THAT my friends, is a serious, serious game-changer. It is simultaneously both their greatest fear and our greatest hope. Use it wisely.

May we all have the courage, wisdom and moral fortitude to make Earth great again.

#MEGA


SUBSCRIBE TO DROWNING IN ABSURDITY: Want to be notified of new D.I.A. posts via email? Hit the subscribe button on the top right of the page. It’s free and your information stays private. 

COMMENTS POLICY: Please be advised that D.I.A. observes a zero tolerance policy for trolling. All comments (unless they contain links) are reviewed and therefore may not appear right away. Comments that contain links are automatically set to be disregarded. Comments unrelated to the subject matter (intending to derail the conversation) will also be disregarded. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE APPEASER FEEDS THE CROCODILE IN THE HOPES IT WILL EAT HIM LAST

THE APPEASER FEEDS THE CROCODILE IN THE HOPES IT WILL EAT HIM LAST

(by Crystal Clark, 6/26/2020)

Not long after the financial/housing crash of 2008 I watched two news pundits interview a woman (whose name I can’t recall) about the reality of the crash. The severity of the event was constantly shrouded in confusion by the media, so they asked her to clarify whether the crash was a small recession or a full-on depression. Her reply was a marvelous truism. From the everyday perspective of the general public, ‘if it’s YOUR house getting foreclosed on, it’s a recession. But if it’s MY house getting foreclosed on, it’s a depression’.

Here we are twelve years later in the midst of another contrived crisis (being opportunized as another society-transforming event) and I can’t seem to shake the feeling of deja vu. The following comes from an article titled, Pro-BLM Mayor Cries “Domestic Terrorism” After Her Home Vandalized, and sums it up perfectly:

Fueling the mob is all fun and games until it turns on you.

A mayor from Washington state who has been supportive of the Black Lives Matter movement — even as it has, at times, descended into rioting, looting, arson, and killing in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death — cried “domestic terrorism” after vandals damaged her home.

There’s also this little gem from an article titled, CHANGE OF HEART: Portland Mayor Says ‘I Don’t Want an Autonomous Zone’ After Protesters Target His Home:

Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler shut-down the prospect of an ‘Autonomous Zone’ in his city just hours after protesters targeted his home; calling the cop-free area a “distraction” from the cause

When it comes to leftist mayors paving the way for globalism in their communities using Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist tactics, it’s all just a cutesy, super fun block party, as long as it’s YOUR home, neighborhood, business, property or statues being destroyed, but it’s domestic terrorism (!) when its THEIR home, neighborhood, business, property or statues being destroyed. Now that these two mayors understand the crocodile will eat them too, they aren’t so sure they want to keep feeding it.

It’s always good to see just how fast people change their minds about a thing when reality becomes too persistent to be ignored–a good old ‘reality slap’ can still work wonders. Which, of course, as repeatedly discussed here, is why censorship of the true nature of reality is a must for any successful reality revision attempt–people will rarely participate in their own demise if they know that’s actually going to be the end result. For the non sociopaths/psychopaths (remembering that psychopaths especially lack the ability to project the consequence of their actions) out there, that’s just human nature. Working against our own best interests isn’t generally something most of us do knowingly and willingly, hence the gargantuan snow job necessary to overcome it.

The title of this article comes from the following interview conducted by Jason Goodman of Crowd Source The Truth, featuring Venezuelan expatriate Elizabeth Rogliani, who has a chilling warning for Americans regarding recent trends in the this country. For the veteran reality-miners out there it will connect more dots through the images it conjures of other prominent and divisive malcontents associated with rituals being performed in places of power, among other things. For those just getting used to the feel of dirt-crusted fingernails, welcome to the dig, and beneath the video are some salient points raised during the interview with some added commentary (in maroon text). As a primer for the material covered, she explains her reasons for speaking out (English being her second language):

“I feel that the statues coming down, the religious symbols being attacked, and everything seems just too similar to what we lived through in Venezuela…Christopher Columbus statues were taken down, then religious symbols were decapitated as well, the police was taken apart in 2001 and replaced by new police. So it was all just seeming very similar to what we already went through, of course in a different way. I understand that America, the United States, has a different system, but we cannot underestimate people that are so willing to destroy it, because they’ve obviously studied the United States. they know their laws, and they know where to attack. They’re not in government right now, at least not in the highest office, but they obviously want to get there. So I wouldn’t underestimate what they can do when they actually get there–if they get there. Let’s hope not.”

 

Commentary: What role did the United States play in the demise of Venezuela?

That’s an interesting question and I think you’ll find her answer(s) surprising, maybe even shocking, depending on how much propaganda you’ve been exposed to over the years. Throughout the interview Goodman tries repeatedly to insist (insert his personal belief) that the United States played a specific role in Venezuela’s ruination, and yet she repeatedly rebuffs him. Why? That isn’t meant to be a shot at Goodman but rather a reflection of just how pervasive anti-American propaganda has been over the last couple of decades, especially in America itself. As Yuri Bezmenov explained in the previous post, this is called ideological subversion and the youth of a nation are the most heavily targeted or “brainwashed” during the process. 

There are complexities and nuances here that I think we all need to look deeper at because there’s far too much at stake, both here and around the world, to continue to give new revelations the shallow treatment. At the 4:54 mark is the first time Goodman interrupts with the idea that America is responsible:

Goodman: “Uh huh. And I think a lot of people–well, let me rephrase that–I think I believe, that the United States played a role in the destabilization of Venezuela. Do you have an insight into that?

Rogliani: “I’m not sure I would agree. What would you say to that, you mean the sanctions?

Goodman: “Well, there’s sanctions of course, and obviously the petro dollar, and all the pressure that’s been put onto Chavez when he was alive, because of all the oil in Venezuela. It seems that any country with oil is either taken by the United States or given a lot of problems by the United States. 

Rogliana: “Right, but the United States–Venezuela has had oil for a while now. Everyone has known about this…we had the oil boom in the 20th century, and our economy was really strong because of it. So suddenly, out of nowhere, the United States suddenly wants our oil when Chavez takes power?

Goodman:: “Meaning what?–that the United States was not interested in Venezuela before the discovery of oil?”

Rogliani: “In the 20th century, throughout, Venezuela and the US were pretty much friends–they were friendly, and our economy was strong. The lives of our citizens, excuse my English, our salary was three times our neighbor’s salary so a lot of people were trying to go to Venezuela. And it was a safe county. We could close our door without locking it. To say it was the United States , it’s a strange thing. Maybe the world played a role because no county is an island that isn’t influenced by outside sources, of course, but he did this to us. These policies that he put in the country are what ruined the country.”

Commentary

Her comment regarding no country being an island free of external sources is of significance here. I often used to say that people who don’t know what globalism is, and what globalists are attempting to turn the world into, have no idea what’s really going on. So then, what is globalism? In a nutshell, globalism is global, fascist, corporate police state that is meant to be run and ruled over by 12 specific families in perpetuity. Things like the Trans Pacific Partnership were meant to be the corporate charter of this new government and begin dividing the world up into regions and industries for each specific family to have dominion over. As an example the TPP designated Vietnam as the new cheap labor center of their new empire. This is why they seek the end of national borders around the world–they intend to redefine them all. 

As this pertains to her comment specifically, globalism is a global phenomenon, which means that seemingly separate events in different countries around the world are in actuality working in tandem towards the same end. In other words, her assertion that the United States didn’t disrupt Venezuela until Chavez came to power, means we need to also look at who was in power in the United States during that same time period–these are coordinated events. Chavez was in power from 1999 until his death in 2013. During that period of time the United States had 3 different presidents in the following order: Clinton, Bush, Obama. 

The next part of the conversation is both thought provoking and revealing on several fronts. The history lesson she provides on Chavez is one rarely given. I would ask the reader to pay special attention to how the exact same patterns that ruined her country of origin are very clearly being repeated here in the United States–and not just the United States.

Rogliani (7:40): By the way, and i don’t know if you know this, but in 1992, right before I was born, there was a military coup against the President Elect, who was Carlos Andres Perez then. He was pretty much doing stuff that the political class [globalists] didn’t like. He was privatizing a lot of industry that was previously from the government. The political class did not like that. And there was a coup d’état against this President, by Hugo Chavez. A lot of people died–300 people died–hundreds of Venezuelans were killed while he was trying to basically assassinate the President and his family. He didn’t achieve it then, he went to prison, but then the President after Carlos Andres Perez took him out of prison, basically saying you are forgiven. That was a big mistake, in my opinion, of course.

Commentary: Hugo Chavez imprisoned for attempted coup and assassination of President Andros Perez

Remembering that the globalist agenda is MAKING USE OF Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist/Socialist/Communist ideologies to push their agenda through under false pretenses, we shouldn’t be surprised to find that globalists didn’t like Venezuela having a President begin to institute polices that took power away from the state (privatizing industry previously controlled by the government) by giving power back to private citizens. This same political class would have been supportive of a socialist like Chavez then, who, as she explained, was the one really responsible for the ruination of Venezuela with his socialist policies.

The following information comes from historycollection.com in an article titled, Photographs of Hugo Chavez and the Venezuelan Socialist Coup.:

The civil-militia coup in Venezuela, led by Hugo Chavez, that began on February 4, 1992, was a response to the social discord regarding the ‘pacted’ democratic system that had been in place since 1958. The pacted democracy, a written guarantee that the signing political parties would respect the election results, prevent single-party hegemony, collaborate to fight the rise of a dictator, and share oil wealth. However, as oil revenue began to decline, the public lost faith in the political institutions. The government became violent in order to suppress opposition and maintain power.

Hugo Chavez, at the time of the coup, had the loyalty of about 10% of the Venezuelan military force. Five army units moved into Caracas to seize crucial military and communications installations throughout the city, including taking control of the Miraflores Palace, the presidential palace. Chavez’s ultimate goal was to capture President Carlos Andres Perez on his way home from an international trip, and allegedly execute him.

There were three separate attempts to capture Perez, all of which failed due to betrayals, defections, errors, and other unforeseen circumstances. Rebels were able to take control of large parts of cities such as Valencia, Maracaibo, and Maracay with the support of civilians but Chavez’ attempt to take Caracas had failed. He eventually gave himself up to the government. Chavez was imprisoned in San Carlos military prison

In November 1992, there was a second coup attempt. The rebels, who had been in contact with Chavez, took over the state-run TV station and broadcasted a video Chavez made while in prison which called for a popular uprising. The coup, however, largely failed.

The coups, were, however, successful in ruining Perez’s public image and discrediting the neo-liberal capitalist reforms and President Perez was impeached on May 20, 1993. Former President Rafael Caldera won the subsequent election and pardoned Chavez, which allowed Chavez to run in and win the 1998 presidential election.

Commentary: What really happened to the missing zoo animals

From here the interview takes an unusual turn and understandably, Rogliani is somewhat reticent to discuss the issue.  At the 10:17 mark they begin discussing the fate of the animals in Venezuelan zoos and she refers to strange rumors that surfaced in the beginning, which seemed to originate from a high profile (public) priest that was once a fervent advocate and supporter of Chavez. That devotion to the Chavez and the party changed dramatically after he accepted an invitation to the Presidential House, wherein he claims to have witnessed unholy (blood) rituals being performed there on the animals. Afterwards, according to Rogliani, the Priest vowed never to return, abandoned the party, and fled the country.

If you read the previous essay on Ideological Subversion then this part of the Rogliani interview certainly rang some bells as it pertains to the seemingly unusual marriage between satanism and ideological subversion: 

However, what compels me to elaborate on Yuri’s repeated reference to demoralization as being integral to ideological subversion has a lot less to do with Christianity than it does with the current marriage between ideological subversion and satanism. To be precise in what I mean, satanism has a core tenet: to free adherents from the shackles of their conscience. To demoralize them. In that, i’m not simply referring to initiation rituals that also demoralize the initiate, but rather the idea that one cannot achieve true fearlessness and power without first abandoning reason and morals. The infamous Cremation of Care ceremony performed be elites in front of the large owl statue–the ritual in which they sacrifice the effigy of a dead baby–means exactly what is says on the box. It means they are willing to achieve their goals by any means necessary.

I decided to dig a little bit and came across this. A deeper dig may produce something more substantial for those interested. The following comes from an article titled, Venezuelan Pastor: A Curse Has Destroyed Our Country

“Our main problem is spiritual,” Soto says. “Many are being touched by the Lord but many still cling to witchcraft, Santeria and all kinds of idolatry. The spiritual war is intense because the late president Hugo Chávez was a Santeria priest himself and made all kinds of pacts and satanic rituals, aided by Cuba’s Castros, in order to hold on to power, and hand Venezuela over to the darkness of communism.”

While Rogliani admits she has no way of knowing if the rumors and claims made by the priest are true, she elaborates on the issue in another surprising way.

Rogliani (12:01): While I was living in Caracas, and i can say I remember my family also commenting on this, there were people walking around the city, every year more and more, wearing all this kind of white clothing. And I remember my mom talking to my uncle about, she said, “why do I se more and more people wearing all this–why?” And he said, “These are Santeros.” Like witch kings.

Goodman: You mean like Santeria?

Rogliani: Yeah, like Santeria. 

Goodman: Whoa. 

Rogliani: That started happening more and more in the city. She (mom) said, “I never saw this before”. 

Commentary

One of the things I really like about Jason Goodman’s style is that he will immediately look up articles on topics the guest brings up, in real time, in an effort to confirm what they’re discussing. In this case, at the 12:47 mark, Goodman brought an article up on the screen from NBC news from 2008 about Venezuelans increasingly turning to Santeria. At another point during the interview Rogliani states this became more prevalent at the same time religious symbols were being destroyed throughout the country. “Religion doesn’t have a place in Marxism”. 

In reality, religion doesn’t have a place in globalism, because globalism IS the new religion. Remember that the phony sustainability movement was meant to replace the religious ten commandments with Gaia worship and a new set of environmental commandments during the final push to global governance. Also, recall that Yuri discussed the final phase of ideological subversion as ‘crisis’ and for decades globalists have publicly stated they intend to use the environment as the ‘right crisis’ to bring their new order in. 

It’s no coincidence that I began this article with a reference to the 2008 economic/housing crash and references to deja vu–a deja vu that extends well beyond the crocodile metaphor relating to mayors instantly having a change of heart when they suddenly find themselves becoming victims of of their own policy. There’s another pattern repeating here–something else we’ve seen and experienced before–that also deserves our attention in direct relation to the 2008 crash here in the United States, and what Rogliani recounts as the noticeable beginning of Venezuela’s decline:

Goodman (9:01): Can you describe the decline and your departure?

Rogliani: Yeah…when all that started happening, when it was really bad, I was already out of Venezuela. So I left Venezuela in 2008 but I continued going back every year, up until 2014. But, every year, because I was not there and would come back, I would notice a difference. When you’re there, when things change [slowly or incrementally] you don’t notice as much. And when I would come back every year I noticed these places that used to be businesses–thriving businesses–were abandoned, or homes where no one was there. And there’s an island me and my family would go to for vacation, Margarita, completely abandoned. 

Commentary

For the United States, this exact same process began after the 2008 crash. Not only are there STILL shopping malls with empty stores and boarded up businesses all over the country from that event (which the covid “crisis” is no doubt meant to make worse), and not only were millions of homes foreclosed on and/or abandoned, but the ensuing “bail-out” began a swift move towards more socialist government policies. To be clear on what I mean we first need to define terms:

1any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

2aa system of society or group living in which there is no private property

ba system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

3a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

First and foremost, corporate bailouts (rewards in the form a massive redistribution of wealth) for such monumental financial failures are NOT free market capitalist principles, but the abandonment of them. Second, it was that same event that federalized both Fanny May and Freddie Mac. For those unfamiliar with the reference, the following comes from a wikipedia page titled: Federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac:

The federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was the placing into conservatorship of the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) by the U.S. Treasury in September 2008. It was one of the financial events among many in the subprime mortgage crisis.

Lastly, let’s not forget that globalists are pushing the otherwise socialist theme of NO PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, as a tenet of their new one world Gaia worship strategy, and this orchestrated financial crash put them off to a pretty good start down that path. It’s that same principle moving more and more goods to a “cloud” based system where the individual no longer personally OWNS the product or program, but rather can access it remotely instead, often for a fee–you may purchase usage time, but not an actual tangible product.

97993817_2869236216445827_2827433870683537408_nIn another segment of the interview Elizabeth Rogliani explains that their police force was also replaced. When Jason Goodman asks her to elaborate on the difference between the two police forces, she explains that the new or replacement police weren’t the least bit interested in solving any crimes, even serious crimes like murder. This absolutely mirrors what we’re seeing take place here in the United States, although there may still be some confusion as to why a replacement force is necessary for a new regime to take power. The old police force–the reality that will be revised and blanketed over–was generally constructed to protect the people from an oppressive government and other violent citizens. The new government–the new reality or revision–is an inversion of that process. It’s meant to protect the oppressive government, and in some cases even violent criminals that remain useful to the new government’s agenda, from the people who will naturally try to oppose them both. It’s not a coincidence that at the same time illegal foreigners are committing heinous crimes against citizens and getting away with a slap on the wrist, that the leftist [globalist] political class here in America are also releasing thousands of violent criminals from prisons in leftist cities under the guise of covid, and AT THE SAME TIME are letting leftist youth demand an end to police while taking over several city blocks in major cities.

The following segment of the conversation is also very telling, and begins at the 37:00 mark:

Rogliani: They’re criminals, not protesters

Goodman: They’re insurgents–this is an attack on the United States.

Rogliani: Exactly…enemies foreign and domestic. Well, these are domestic–with the aid of foreign governments, because this is not just people inside…I know for a fact the Venezuelan government has a hand in it. 

Goodman: How do you know that?

Rogliani: Because in the protests, in Miami, they caught some people that were in the Che Guevara International Coalition reunion in Venezuela in February. So these people were in that reunion, that were shaking hands with President Maduro and what not, they came here and were inciting violence in the protests. So to me, that’s a clear indication, and they were–at least what I read in the news–they were caught, and they were interrogated, and they confessed to having been put on planes and been paid to do that, by the Venezuelan and Cuban governments. 

Final Commentary

While I have only highlighted a few major points here, this interview is incredibly thought provoking and consists of revelation after revelation. I strongly encourage the reader to watch it in its entirety, check out the rest of Jason Goodman’s equally informative videos, and perhaps even donate to his efforts so they can continue.

With that i’ll leave you with another reminder that there are two different realities struggling for full manifestation upon the earth, while again revisiting my thoughts on the matter as they still are:

“Humanity once again stands at a most important fork in the road; a moment exhilarating and exasperating, liberating and terrifying—may we have the wisdom and moral fortitude to choose the path of countless wonders.”  –Crystal Clark, June 3, 2013

LINKS TO ASSOCIATED NEWS ARTICLES 

SEE YA IN SEATTLE! Business Owners Flee the City, Blame ‘Socialist City Council’ for Total Breakdown

McCONNELL: ‘In Seattle, A Large Statue of Vladimir Lenin Stands Quite Untouched

Three-Minute Video Exposing Harsh Living Conditions In Nancy Pelosi’s District Goes Viral

Fired NY prosecutor was given Biden-Ukraine allegations in 2018 but didn’t follow up, emails show

Accused Wendy’s arsonist Natalie White was Rayshard Brooks’ ‘girlfriend’: lawyer

Minnesota State Rep: Antifa and Muslim Groups Plan to ‘Police Minneapolis Under Muslim Rule’

CHOP NYC? Protesters Camp Out in Front of City Hall, Demand $1 BILLION in Cuts to NYPD

Democrats’ anti-police bill will cripple local police and empower criminals


SUBSCRIBE TO DROWNING IN ABSURDITY: Want to be notified of new D.I.A. posts via email? Hit the subscribe button on the top right of the page. It’s free and your information stays private. 

COMMENTS POLICY: Please be advised that D.I.A. observes a zero tolerance policy for trolling. All comments (unless they contain links) are reviewed and therefore may not appear right away. Comments that contain links are automatically set to be disregarded. Comments unrelated to the subject matter (intending to derail the conversation) will also be disregarded.