TRIFECTA: Mullins, Sutton and Iserbyt

If people could only read the work of three authors to figure out what’s really going on in the world—-who breaks it for profit and then rebuilds it in their own image with other people’s money, both historically and today—that powerhouse trifecta would be Antony C. Hutton, Charlotte Iserbyt, and Eustace Mullins, all three of which are featured in this 3-part series, focusing on the relevant work of Eustace Mullins first:

Mullins, you might recall, until his death in 2010, was the last living protégé of world renowned poet (and political prisoner) Ezra Pound. Four of Pound’s other protégés won Nobel prizes: Earnest Hemmingway, William Butler Yeats, T.S. Elliot, and James Joyce. Ezra Pound heavily influenced and directed the research efforts of Mullins, including deep research into the Federal Reserve in 1948, from which the world learned the Federal Reserve is neither federal nor a reserve. Mullins was eventually poisoned and suffered a stroke, and was often mislabeled as antisemite for his research on Zionism. A complete list of his works can be found here: https://archive.org/details/eustace-mullins-collection

The work of Antony C. Sutton is as comprehensive and exhaustive as Mullins’. Sutton was born in London (1925), moved to the US in 1957, and became a citizen in 1962. He studied at several universities before becoming an economics professor at California State University, Los Angeles. From 1968-1973 Sutton had a research fellowship at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace. He covered critical topics too numerous to list here, but is widely known for extensive research uncovering perhaps as much as 75% of the secret societies running both American and the world, further identifying their names, members and hierarchy. He is also well-known for his trilogy, WESTERN TECHNOLOGY AND SOVIET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, which painstakingly documented western corporate technology transfers to Russia, and that conflicts of the Cold War were “not fought to restrain communism” but were organized “to generate multibillion-dollar armaments contracts”, causing that technology to end up in the hands of adversaries using it against American troops in both the Korea and Vietnam wars. This is what happens when elites “fund both sides of wars”. A complete list of his works can be found here: http://antonysutton.com/suttonbibliography.html

Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt (1930-2022), worked for the U.S. Department of Education as the senior policy advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), during the first presidential term of Ronald Reagan. She later became a staff employee of the U.S. Department of State (South Africa, Belgium, South Korea). Iserbyt is well known for her work, The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America, and “Exposing the Global Road to Ruin Through Education”. Iserbyt’s Father and Grandfather were also Yale University graduates, and members of the Skull and Bones, whose previously unreleased documents and yearbooks she supplied to Anthony C Hutton in furtherance of his secret society research. Charlotte’s website and work can be found here: https://deliberatedumbingdown.com/ddd/

EUSTACE MULLINS

EUSTACE MULLINS EXPLAINS WHY BANKERS PREFER COMMUNIST GOVERNMENTS

The entire Mullins interview, US POLITICAL STRUCTURE, WAR, CENTRAL BANKS, GLOBAL CRIMES, is embedded below and most people today will find it both shocking and eye-opening given how far this agenda has unfolded, just in the last decade alone. In particular, for our purposes here, are two significant commentaries: WHY bankers want nations to have communist governments, and WHAT a capitalist actually is. Just these two simple ideas alone explain a lot, including the difference between vulture capitalists and free market capitalism, and consequently why the former only thrives during the death of the latter. In other words, vultures feed on carrion (dead things). Never before has this been more evident, than how the recent planned-demic COVID restrictions on free enterprise—restrictions specifically written by vulture (not venture) capitalists—forced extended small business closures while leaving only their own large corporations open to the public, resulting in the mass die off of their free market competition and record profits for themselves.

(23:43) Mullins: “At the very time of the Cold War with communism, the US taxpayer was totally financing the Soviet Union, which had been insolvent since 1917, and which has been maintained by the the United States taxpayer ever since. And Woodrow Wilson, who was born about 3 blocks from where we’re sitting, initiated this system of financing the Soviet Union in 1917, when Congress voted him a special emergency war fund of 100 million dollars—which is about the same as about a trillion dollars [today]—to prosecute the war against Germany. And he took 10 millions dollars of that, 1/10th of it, and sent it to Russia to help the Bolsheviks in Russia. And there were no Bolsheviks in Congress, so why did the US Congress authorize him to send them 10 million dollars?

Well, they’ve been doing it ever since…because the bankers, consider communism and dictatorships a good investment. A bank considers a dictatorship as a perfect form of government, because everybody is totally controlled, and if anybody objects to paying taxes, or paying debts, you can put them in a concentration camp or execute them. Which, Stalin did in Russia, it’s the perfect system. No banker will tell you this—well, David Rockefeller did in the 1940’s: he said the reason he was so pro-communist at the time was because communists collected their debts. At the point of a gun, which he didn’t say, but that’s why they do it. That’s why dictatorship remains the ideal of all bankers.”

ALL WARS ARE BANKER’S WARS: MULLINS EXPLAINS WHY BANKERS COULDN’T HAVE THIER FIRST WORLD WAR WITHOUT A CENTRAL BANK IN THE UNITED STATES

In the Mullins interview below, he explained that the people who fled Europe to come to the United States, were actually running from a corrupt banking system that had become so tyrannical it was confiscating people’s property, and because of this, the people themselves (not their corrupt leadership) would never accept a central bank in this country. But it was put upon them anyway, because banking families wanted a war, but having already bankrupted every nation in Europe, couldn’t fund one any other way:

(26:57) Mullins: He (Ezra Pound) was living in Paris during WW1, and he had many young artists and writer friends who were drafted into the armies—some were for Germany, and some were for France—and they were killed, and he couldn’t understand how these great talents, very brilliant young men, died for nothing. When he spent years studying the situation, in eight languages, all over Europe, he found out that bankers make war to create debt. And that’s the only reason.

(27:59) Mullins: “The bankers, the central banks of Europe, they couldn’t have WW1—they’d been wanting WW1 since 1885—but the central banks of Europe had already bankrupted every country in Europe. It was impossible to have (fund) a war. There wasn’t a country left in Europe—England, Germany, France, Russia—there wasn’t a country in Europe which could finance one day’s war anywhere. So, that’s why they were conspiring in the United States to get the Federal Reserve system passed. Because the Federal Reserve system, was conjured up, simply to make war possible. Without the Federal Reserve, there never would have been a WW1, no American ever would have died in WW1. So you can say they were murdered by the bankers because that’s the only reason they were there.”

MULLINS EXPLAINS HOW CENTRAL BANKS CONTROL & DESTROY NATIONS WITH RUNAWAY INFLATION

9:00 Interviewer: “What are the consequences of the Federal Reserve System controlling the monetary system of the United States?”

Mullins: “The consequences are important, and they’re never discussed by any economist in the United States. The Federal reserve is a central bank, and a central bank is a bank of issue. Which is the right to print all the money it wants. That’s what a bank of issue means: you can print all the money you want, there’s no control over it whatsoever. And right now the Central Bank is printing trillions of dollars, which are almost worthless, and they’re looking for/at hyper-inflation, naturally….and in hyper-inflation the money becomes worthless to the point where you have to have a wheelbarrow full of currency to buy a loaf of bread which is normally worth 18 cents…but the Federal Reserve has printed so much of this paper fiat currency—debt money—that it’s overloaded the world…federal reserve currency is not federal, any more than the Federal Express company, and it has no reserves because it doesn’t need any currency reserves, because it prints its own money. If you can print your own money, what do you need a reserve (for)—you just go warm up the printing press and turn out another ten billion dollars.”

PRIVATE FAMILY DYNASTIES RUN THE FEDERAL RESERVE

While Mullins names some of the family dynasties running the Federal Reserve bank, like the Rockefellers, Warburgs and Schiffs, and even explains how Federal Reserve Shares cannot be traded publicly (keeping the wealth within these families in perpetuity), the other points highlighted lend themselves extremely well to the Antony C. Hutton material being covered in Part 2.

VULTURE (NOT VENTURE) CAPITALISTS: MULLINS PERFECTLY DESCRIBES WHY BANKERS CREATE WARS TO MAXIMIZE PROFITS

If you’ve ever watched a missing person drama showing scenes of people systematically scouring a forest during the search, you know the one thing searchers don’t want to see in that scenario, are vultures circling in the sky over a particular area—vultures feed on dead things. The Central Banking System does the same thing—it’s sometimes called ‘war profiteering’. Eustace explains it brilliantly below:

(12:23) Mullins: “See, a Central Bank is set up for speculation. The Federal Reserve is set up solely for speculation, and its author, Paul Warburg, who was a partner at Kuhn Loeb & Co. New York—which by the way funded the Communist Revolution, the Hitler Revolution, and financed the Japanese entry into WW2—so I defined, in my work, that a Central Bank’s principle role is for war finance. Because war fiance, is the most profitable enterprise you can get into. And so, if you’re a banker, you’re looking for the best investment you can make, which is a war.”

Below is information on Kuhn Loeb & Co:

EUSTACE MULLINS INTERVIEW: US POLITICAL STRUCTURE, WAR, CENTRAL BANKS, GLOBAL CRIMES

THE “GREAT RESET” IS BANKING FAMILIES & MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS ATTEMPTING TO TAKE COMPLETE CONTROL OF THE WORLD

WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF BANKS AND CORPORATIONS ATTEMPTED THIS IN YOUR COUNTRY:

1. Had hundreds of their corporate lawyers write a treaty, in secret, that would overwrite all of your laws and any previously existing social contract (like the US Constitution) you had with your government that clearly defined the acceptable terms of governance?
2. This treaty was intentionally mislabeled a “trade” treaty, but in reality was meant to prevent your government from ensuring the safety of your food, enforcing environmental standards, regulating financial markets, forming its own energy and climate policies, and instead established sweeping new powers for corporations OVER your governments?
3. What if those sweeping new powers allowed corporations to offshore your current industries and production to whatever cheaper labor market they deemed would give them the most profits?
4. What if those new powers let corporations drain your economy by sending your tax dollars off shore so they can source their materials cheap with your money?
5. What if those sweeping new powers included criminal punishment for sharing/downloading information from the internet, forcing your internet service providers to spy on you, report you, and ban you from the internet?
6. What if this secret treaty gave corporations the right to sue your governments for making ANY laws that interfered with a corporation’s “right” to make money, even if those laws were there to protect you and your environment?
7. What if those lawsuits were going to be heard in corporate tribunals—outside of your nation’s own judicial systems—and the three deciding judges on those tribunals were all corporate lawyers?
8. What if these corporate tribunals refused to set ANY financial loss caps for claimed damages, and could therefore bankrupt nations with astronomical judgments your taxes had to pay for?
9. What if that secret treaty gave corporations the right to enter your nation and take whatever resources they wanted without first getting permission?
10. What if that secret treaty was going to drive medical costs through the roof and give pharma companies record profits by extending their drug patents beyond 20 years thereby preventing generic drugs from hitting the market?
11. What if NONE of your elected representatives were allowed to see the text of this treaty without making extraordinary demands, and afterwards, could still only view certain sections after all of their staff left the room, and they weren’t allowed to take a pen or phone into the room when viewing it—nor could they every publicly discuss what they saw?

THAT ALREADY HAPPENED—10 YEARS AGO—IN 2013

This author covered that event in a 2013 radio show, and if you’re wondering how we know what was in this “secret” treaty, it’s because Wikileaks leaked part of it:

***

Once it was leaked, and the public AND our government representatives subsequently found out what was in it, it was impossible to get passed. However, at the time, readers should know that the United States was pushing for it the most—other countries didn’t like how many freedoms it destroyed. Below is a 2013 video of trade expert Lori Wallach explaining the details to Amy Goodman of Democracy Now—a video that treaty would have made it a criminal act for me to download and share with you. That’s important—extremely important—if you understand how that plays into extreme censorship. After all, the reason so many of us download and save this material (and you should too) is because the original videos, and their channels of origin, are all being systematically deleted. If that treaty would have been ratified, none of us would be able to share anything but links to content that isn’t there anymore.

Perhaps now readers who were previously unfamiliar with the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership “trade” treaty) can understand why COVID has in many ways given them more power than the TPP would have. Readers should also be advised that the TPP isn’t dead—it’s still on the table and likely growing more draconian by the day. I don’t know where it stands now, but here’s a video from 7 years ago, of Trump refusing to go along with it when outlining his 7-point trade plan. In fact, his very first point of the plan was this: “I am going to withdraw the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which has not yet been ratified.”

THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS TREATIES

Another treaty, NAFTA, was also referenced in the above video, and most people today, especially millennials, don’t know any more about that little devil than they do about the TPP. Either re-negotiating that treaty, or pulling out altogether, was the 5th point of Trump’s 7-point plan: “I’m going to tell our NAFTA partners that I intend to immediately re-negotiate the terms of that agreement, to get a better deal for our workers. If they don’t agree to negotiation—which they might not because they’re used to getting their way—then I will submit, under article 2205 of the NAFTA agreement, that America intends to withdraw from the deal.”

ROSS PEROT & THE DEVIL CALLED NAFTA

A decade ago, just before I had the pleasure of being on the Kevin Smith Show, we spoke on the phone for a couple of hours for a pre-interview. The subject of politics came up, so I explained that over the course of time, I believe that certain events or people come along, that have the ability to dramatically change the course of events—in terms of course correction—and that I believed a man named Ross Perot was one that we missed, during my lifetime. Never knowing how people are going to respond, I was surprised to find Kevin impressed by that, telling me he even had a set of collector dishes with Perot’s face on them.

When Perot ran for President in 1992, it was the first election I was old enough to vote in. What I saw happen to that man—what I saw the media and establishment do to that man—disgusted me so much that I completely tuned out of politics for decades, until about 10 years ago. He was the first Billionaire, running as an Independent, that entirely paid for his own campaign with his own money and had no allegiances to special interests, PACs or corporate sponsors, and they did everything in their power to belittle him, slander him, and when that didn’t work, they simply excluded him from the debates and refused to give him air time—not all that dissimilar to what Robert Kennedy Jr. is currently experiencing. Determined to educate Americans about the danger of these treaties—especially NAFTA—he personally paid for 30 minute infomercials in which he showed the public numerous charts and graphs so they could see what was really happening behind the constant spin. I learned more about politics and government from those infomercials than I ever did in school. It was amazing.

Ross Perot was more than just a self-made billionaire and patriot, he was also what some referred to as the “Patron Saint of POWs”, and also personally paid for and organized the rescue mission of 2 EDS employees being held hostage in Iran. He did this as a private citizen, long before running for President:

Below are two short videos of Perot explaining what would (and later did) happen to this country, if that treaty passed, what Perot called “that giant sucking sound” you’ll hear as your jobs and wealth disappear. Of significance, is a picture he held up during a squirrely quasi-debate against the condescending, globalist darling Al Gore, on an episode of the Larry King show—it’s a photo of the Mexican ghettos surrounding American companies/factories that had already moved to Mexico.

SAME THING, DIFFERENT DAY

A previous article, THE GREAT RESET: WHY MOST PEOPLE STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND IT’S CREATING A GLOBAL, CORPORATE, FASCIST/FEUDAL POLICE STATE, included a comparison between ye old feudalism, and what modern corporate feudalism is going to look like in reality, and isn’t what the brochures are selling. A photo comparison is below, the third photo being the one Ross Perot took of a shanty town developing around an American factory in Mexico. Instead of the new feudal fiefdom revolving around the lord of a castle or manor, it’s going to revolve around the production manager of a corporate location/production facility, and the CEO will be the new king—not unlike District 12 having to mine coal, in The Hunger Games. Note that if you watch the Eustace Mullins interview in its entirety, you’ll find him explaining that banks have already divided the United States into districts.

OLD FEUDALISM (The role of the Church was to keep the peasants from uprising)

WHAT THE BROCHURES SAY MODERN BANKER/CORPORATE FEUDALISM IS GOING TO BE LIKE (while you own nothing, eat bugs, and are super happy about it)

WHAT MODERN BANKER/CORPORATE FEDUALISM LOOKS LIKE IN REALITY (before it’s mandatory)

FOR OVER A HUNDRED YEARS IT’S BEEN INCREASINGLY DIFFICULT TO TELL WHERE THE BANKS END & THE CORPORATIONS BEGIN

The reason for this becomes exceedingly obvious via the Antony Sutton material, as well as the price numerous generations of people, all over the world, have paid for it. Mullins gave an example of this, when referring to oil companies (Rockefeller’s Standard Oil in WW1, and Halliburton during the Iraq war) making record profits during wars, sometimes from no-bid contracts. During his lifelong research, Mullins repeatedly found many of these same people sitting on the boards of numerous multi-national corporations. Today, one can’t help but wonder, how many banking family members sit on the board of the same pharmaceutical companies that foisted billions of dollars in vaccines on tax payers all over the world—at the tax payer’s expense— in their increasingly overt war on you.

BANKERS & CORPORATIONS HAVE OPENLY PLANNED TO TAKE CONTROL FOR OVER 100 YEARS

“REPUTATIONAL RISK”—UNELECTED BANKERS GIVING THEMSELVES THE POWER TO PUNISH CITIZENS FOR BANKER-UNAPPROVED THINKING AND LIVING

PART 2 PRIMER: THE PAST, PRESENT & FUTURE OF CORPORATE CITIES

How many of you use Gillette razors or products? How many of you would continue to use those products—what kind of “reputational risk” score would you assign them—if you were aware of the the company’s true history and philosophy on ‘corporate socialism’ from as early as 1895:

“You have various books, one by Gillette—the razor blade Gillette—called The City, I think it was, which laid out this corporate socialism for the world to see as early as what, 1905-1910. So, around the turn of the century you begin to see actually, written statements by these internationalist businessman, as to a kind of socialist empire they want to bring about.” Antony C. Sutton

I wasn’t able to find that particular book. I suspect Sutton misremembered the title, and was instead referring to this one, written by “King” Camp Gillette.

In the section on Echota in the screen shot above, you’ll notice the term “model workers’ town”. Before movies like the Hunger Games showed us what that would like in reality (District 12), this madness used to be called the “company store”. Remember that King Gillette’s book came out in 1894—that’s how long these people have been planning your 15-minute slave cities. Before we get to the company store issue, let’s look at “model worker’s town”.

COMPANY TOWNS: TOWNS CREATED AND RAN BY A SINGLE COMPANY

WALMART PAVED THE WAY FOR THE NEW “COMPANY STORE” MODEL

I know many of you have heard about this, but never watched it yourself. You, your children, and your grand children, need you to be fully present for this—in the now—because it’s already happening. These corporate busybodies are not the morally motived philanthropic saviors they claim to be, focused on creating a more ‘equitable’ society for the people. Instead, they are greedy corporate dynasties attempting to gain complete control while simultaneously creating record profits, for themselves. Speed it up to 1.25 or 1.5 if you’re pressed for time. You need to know what the next phase of this ideology is really going to look like, not based on history, propaganda or alarmism, but based on TODAY.

MODERN CORPORATIONS ALREADY GETTING PERMISSION TO BUILD THEIR OWN CITIES

SUMMARY

This author isn’t a big fan of bumper sticker logic, but, DEAR FEMINISTS: THE PATRIARCHY IS THE CENTRAL BANKS AND MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS—NOT YOUR DAD, BROTHER OR BOYFRIEND, might be actually be a good one. It might make a nice T-shirt too. I considered this one, DOWN WITH THE PATRIARCHY OLIGARCHY, instead, but sadly, not enough people know what an Oligarchy is or means.

If you have a young (or even older) feminist—or anyone else for that matter—in your household who considers themselves to be ethical, open minded, and genuinely on the right side of these issues, you may want to share this with them, and then ask how they feel about things afterwards.

Humanity can no longer participate in their own demise out of ignorance and escape it at the same time, and there aren’t 10 more years on the table to figure it out. DO NOT COMPLY WITH YOUR OWN DEMISE.

PART 2—SKULLS, BONES, CHARLOTTE’S WEB, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFERS & SOCIALIST CORPORATIONS: THE CAPITALIST COMMUNIST CONSPIRACY

Humanity once again stands at a most important fork in the road; a moment exhilarating and exasperating, liberating and terrifying—may we have the wisdom and moral fortitude to choose the path of countless wonders.”

–Crystal Clark