FEAR MONGERING: Truth, Denial, or the new Politically Incorrect?

Fear Mongering: Truth, Denial, or the new Politically Incorrect?


Crystal Clark
August 14, 2012

As I discussed in my first book in great depth, patterns are an exceptionally important thing to pay attention to; they tell us a great deal, not just about the world around us, but about ourselves as well. Very much like a shadow, patterns have no life of their own—they are merely reflections of something else.

Using a social media outlet like Facebook is something I put off for some time, but not only has it turned out to be a wonderful tool for connecting with others of like mind, it’s also an excellent tool for discovering emerging patterns in the mindset of people whose “thought feed” I see. It’s true that this and other types of social media are used by tptb to see the same thing, and they do have some interesting algorithms that alter an individual’s feed, as a means to alter their perception. Search engines do the same thing, and this was proven and subsequently discussed in a TED Talks presentation, wherein the presenter clearly showed that if five different people search for the same thing on the internet, they will get five different types of results—this isn’t by accident.

Once we know this takes place, we can get around it by taking the time to personally visit the FB page of people we know have something important to share—we have to “go find it” because it’s no longer in our feed, but it’s there nonetheless. In taking this step, we notice other significant patterns. Patterns that go beyond what our psychologically tailored feed was hoping to convey or impress upon us, if you know what I mean.

All the same, like anything else, a sharp tool can be used one of two ways: for good or bad—heal or kill. A scalpel in the right hands saves lives. A scalpel in the wrong hands takes them. The same is very much true for behavioral pattern recognition and the data-mining social networks that provide a platform for the information being mined to congregate in the first place.

In other words, while the alphabet agencies might find your “thought feed” a good tool for understanding how better to manipulate you (or how well previous manipulations have taken hold) I also personally find it a very valuable tool for similar reasons: to see what they are doing, how it’s being done, and how people are responding to it. Because I’m a big fan of ending the needless suffering in the world—psychological manipulation being part of that—I’m entirely interested to see how well it’s working, and whether or not people are “buying it”.

I bring all of this to your attention because there is a pattern I have seen rearing its head over and over again in this form of social media. Whenever too many people are posting things that really deserve (y)our attention, even and especially if they do it independently of each other so that it comes from all sides in the “feed”, the same perplexing response to that information can be found in the feed shortly thereafter: “I’m tired of the fear mongering”.

Why is it “perplexing” though? Why does it happen, and what is the shadow of this pattern reflecting back to us? As the title of this article indicated, in order to answer that question properly, we need to honestly assess what fear mongering really is—to define it in ways that matter. That’s an important step, isn’t it? If we can’t define something, we can’t understand it. If we can’t understand it, we convolute it. If we convolute it, we can’t grow from or beyond it.

The question begs to be asked then: Is fear mongering a truth we can’t accept for ourselves so we deny it by calling out “fear monger” when we hear it, is it a pre-programmed response to the truth unconsciously driven by relentless perception management designed to make sure we won’t accept it, or is it really just fear mongering? How can we know the difference, and why is it important to do so?

Unlike the social engineers of perception management who have been far too successful at “telling” you what you should think, I’m simply going to ask you a few questions with the expectation that you will answer them honestly—to and for yourself. The questions are mine, yes, and while they have indeed been strategically selected (based on see a need, fill a need), the answers are yours. These particular questions have also been selected to help you see/remember what you ALREADY KNOW—to also help you see how much time, effort and money is being externally applied to confuse you into believing you don’t really know—but you do. Below are the questions then, and they all have similar endings for a purpose:

  1. If I show you that vaccines are harmful because I don’t want to see your children become the next victims of BigPharma, is that fear mongering, or is it a truth I shared in the hopes you and your babies could have a better life for knowing this and acting on it?
  2. If I show you that GMO’s are altering the codes for life in ways that have been shown to make animals sterile, is that fear mongering, or is it a truth I shared in the hopes you and your children could carry on your lineage and have a better life for knowing this and acting on it?
  3. If I show you that technologies like HAARP exist and have been written about in military dossiers that discuss having “Full Spectrum Dominance” over your lives through the wrongful use of this technology, is that fear mongering, or is it a truth I shared in the hopes that you and your loved ones could have a better life for knowing and acting on it?
  4. If I show you that fluoride is a toxic byproduct of industry, and that it actually causes brittle teeth, bones, and brain damage, am I fear mongering, or is it a truth I shared in the hopes that you and your loved ones could have a better life for knowing and acting on it?
  5. If I show you that the people in power on this planet are instituting things like Agenda 21 and Codex to deny you your God-given right to a healthy life on purpose because they are genocidal maniacs, is that fear mongering, or is it a truth I shared in the hopes that you and your loved ones could have a better life for knowing and acting on it?
  6. If I share with you that chemtrails are polluting our air, food and water with toxic chemicals that will make you sick, am I fear mongering, or am I trying to help you see that a better future lies in ensuring they stop doing it?
  7. If I share with you that there are no evil ET’s or “space hazards” coming here to kill us all, and that these are perception management tools used to keep you from seeing the true evil on this planet perpetuated entirely by human beings, am I fear mongering, or is it a truth I shared in the hopes you and your loved ones could have a better life for knowing and acting on it?
  8. If I share with you that a young girl died after taking the 3-phase HPV vaccine, and that HPV rDNA was discovered in her system, and even give you the definition of rDNA and what it does, am I fear mongering, or is it a truth I shared in the hopes that you and your loved ones could have a better life for knowing and acting on it?
  9. If I share with you that during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill debacle, they not only released tons of a toxic substance (Corexit) to hide what they did, but also released a synthetic organism (SYNTHIA) that is self-replicating, am I fear mongering, or am I one simple person—who is also a mother—who hopes that if enough people know what is really going on and act on it, all of our children will have a future?

I pose the question again then: Is fear mongering truth, denial, or the new politically incorrect? Why would it be the new “politically incorrect” you might rightfully wonder? The first problem with anything politically correct, is that it is, by its own definition, political; you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours kind of thing. This is not just about bribes and career elevation, either, mind you. It’s about being popular and “well-liked” to get more votes, subscribers to websites, buyers of books, and all around contributors to our campaigns, whatever they may be.

Along that same vein, what we don’t ask ourselves nearly often enough, is WHY being politically correct works, and WHO it works for! Have we really so thoughtlessly arrived at a place where being popular is more important than a future? We don’t want to “offend” people with the truth after all—how rude—they may un-friend us on FB, stop buying our albums and books, and might even begin to look down their noses at us for having the gall to offend people with fear mongering, er, I mean the truth.

There is not a singular group of wishful do-gooders on this planet that hasn’t been affected by the *implanted need* to be politically correct—not one. Politicians are busy selling the Christians on more brown-skinned wars, and the Christians are busy buying it not only to feed their own egos, but feeding the death and money/usury machines (which go against their own scriptures in the process), which is no doubt enriching to so-called Christian religions that are themselves promulgating white supremacy because they are just *sure* that anyone who isn’t Caucasian, bears the mark of Cain.

“Go get those mongrel rag heads” they yell with torch and pitchfork in hand, never taking the time realize that those supposedly heathen non-Christian people and the countries they live in, actually have some of the same commandments where usury is concerned, and unlike their Christian counterparts, they actually kept those commandments. We aren’t bombing those people off the face of the earth because they are brown, non-Christians, or terrorists that don’t have some of the same values, no. We’re trying to remove them, because they had more sense than we did, and *refused* central banking as a result. That wasn’t particularly politically correct of me say now, was it? You’re damn right it’s not…but it’s the truth and it needs to be heard.

There is an enormous pile of these politically incorrect truths, practically begging us to see them for what they are, clean house, and live a bright, free and abundant future for having done so. But politicians blame the opposite party for all our ills, religions blame people of other faiths, and new-agers call it fear mongering—sshhh—that’s too confrontational…we can’t talk about that. If the truth hurts other people’s feelings, you can’t say it—but you can say Namaste—never mind what the world actually means.

Of course the divinity in me recognizes the divinity in you, but do you? Is it “divine” to bury your heads in the sand with gentle smiles on your faces, pretty pictures in your head, but no meaningful actions necessary to alleviate the suffering of billions that will eventually include you and your children?

Divine (sentient) beings that they are, what does it generally mean to them when they say, ‘let go and let God?” What does it mean when rightfully angry victims of injustice, suffering and wrongful death ask, “Why would God allow this to happen?” What good does it do to use the word Namaste, if you don’t really mean it? Life is all rainbows and butterflies, and if you say anything different, even if your parent is dying of a cancer that never should have happened because the local mine bought off the EPA, your beautiful child became autistic or died after a particular round of vaccines, or all the animals on your ranch died after being fed GMO seed, well, you’re just not using the power of intention properly to make it go away—you’re a FEAR MONGER.

If facing reality and fully expecting the other people on this planet to pony up and do the right thing as a result makes me a fear monger, then I am guilty as charged. Notice I didn’t say “guilty as charged and proud of it”. The way we  people on this planet behave, relentlessly feeding self-serving and polluted beliefs to the point of self-destruction, is nothing to be proud of. On top of that, the very idea that we’ll become “Debbie downer fear mongers” for even discussing what the real problems are in the hopes humanity will actually deal with them, is nothing to be proud of either. I’m at a complete loss as to when “Hear no evil, See no evil, Speak no evil”, became transformed into the politically correct version of “Hear no Truth, See no Truth, Speak no Truth”. We are better than this, and until we recognize it and act on it, our future will continue to be a shadow we didn’t have the courage to face.

Before I wrap this up, I would quickly add that yes, I’m fully aware of the power of the mind and meditation—I’ve written a great deal on similar subjects myself. What I also wrote about, is that these same spiritual methods were also practiced in the previous [six] destruction episodes, but it was not enough. How many Essenes, true Gnostics, or even those from Lemuria, Atlantis, or the writers of Sanskrit, do you see around now? Spiritual well-wishing and meditation alone wasn’t enough to save them then, nor will it be enough to save you now. Like any other history lesson gone awry, what we don’t understand, we will repeat.

I want better than that for you, and better than that from you as a result. By the same token, what reason do I have to hope for something better, if every time the cruel side of our reality is presented, you run and call it fear mongering? Have I missed something? Is there any particular reason you and the other billions of people on this planet are not capable of making things right again? If you really believe you are a powerful, sovereign, co-creative being capable of handling whatever comes your way, where is the fear in that? Do you believe it and therefore mean it, or don’t you? Will you use the full capacity of that power, or won’t you?

You can despise, resent, and ignore the “fear mongers” if you like, with a proper understanding of it, or, you can also utterly fail to see the reason behind those who cry “fear monger” every time you tell them a truth that the fear-monger-reply indicates they are not ready to deal with. What hope is to be found in that? When will people be ready to deal with it then? I’m sure there were plenty of fear mongers living in the past destruction episodes as well, and because they are no longer here, perhaps being politically correct was equally responsible for their downfalls. As it is today, I’m sure plenty of people back then thought they would have more time to get their act together, but tomorrow always comes.

You ARE brilliant. You ARE intelligent. You ARE capable. You CAN do it, and every living thing on this planet is betting its future on you *knowing* that this is true, and taking correct action because of it.

Perhaps I can’t do without the analogy because I live in Las Vegas (!), but I suppose life is like a casino in some ways, in that you can’t win if you don’t play—not to be confused with “thinking” about, or “intending” to play. I’ve seen that result before: someone hesitated about which machine they wanted to play, and in the meantime, someone else walked up, played it, and won!…happens more than you might think.

Like the rest of creation, because the only two horses in the race are the 1%  or the 99%, I’ve placed my bets on you and your courage as well, even though your social “mind/thought feed” is telling me you believe you’re the underdog. That’s a curious thing, given how many researchers have explained the power of belief. Simple ideologies like this get blown out of proportion more often than not, but in this case especially, it has its proper place. Still, while belief may only be the first step, it often proves to be the most important. Without the belief that getting to the top is possible, all the steps in between never hear the sound of footsteps.

Blessings, Crystal Clark

THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN

The Man Behind the Curtain

By Crystal Clark
February 18, 2012

Most people are familiar with the film, The Wizard of Oz, and certainly the themes it presented to us are equally valid today. The three main characters believed they were lost and/or incomplete somehow, and set out to find the wizard—an external savior with awesome powers—to cure all of their ills.

The journey was bizarre and treacherous, and upon completion of it, to their utter shock and dismay, the wizard refused to see them. Why would such a great and powerful being deny them his service? Believing they had nowhere else to turn, they refused to leave and demanded an audience. As the flustered wizard uses every mechanism at his disposal to scare them away, he’s unaware of the small dog pulling back the curtain concealing his true identity.

The three main characters are shocked to discover the great and powerful wizard is nothing but a man—an old, frail, and simple man. Without the mirage of super-human power being projected by his advanced technology, the truth of his identity and real power are revealed in an instant. Even more bizarre, knowing his true identity has been revealed, he irrationally responds by simply pulling the curtain back and continuing the charade! “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!” he spouts. To the credit of the three main characters however, they aren’t about to let it go—and they aren’t keeping it to themselves.

This is very much the position that humanity is in now, with one exception: the man behind the curtain in the film, didn’t go as far as to say that aliens made him do it. He wasn’t quick enough on his feet to pretend that there was another curtain, with another wizard behind it, to keep the illusion going.

In the real world, the truth has been cloaked by more than one curtain. Our world leaders are the curtain, and they shield us from the faces of those behind them. Should our gaze sneak past the well groomed automatons in front, again we find more ordinary men using advanced technologies to project the image of master wizards who, alone, can save us. Save us from whom? There are even more powerful wizards they say…they come from the stars and are insidious, world-destroying, soul-eating creatures. If we don’t give all of our power away to our own wizards to protect us, all will be lost. Our human wizards behind the curtain, and the ever increasing destructive technologies they develop, are our only hope, they say.

What they say is another curtain, and if we pull it back and take a good long look, we see something quite different than what we are told. It’s not aliens that put fluoride in our water, it’s people. It’s not aliens poisoning our air with chemtrails, it’s people. It’s not aliens injecting toxic vaccines into our children’s bodies, it’s people. Aliens aren’t suppressing clean, advanced energy technologies to get rich from oil, and aliens aren’t modifying our weather to destroy world food crops while capturing record profits from the continued manufactured lack—it’s people. It’s not aliens poisoning our planet’s oceans with toxic oil, corexit and radiation—it’s people. It wasn’t aliens that enslaved people, and it’s not aliens rigging our elections. It’s not aliens feeding you teleprompter propaganda night after night through the television. It’s people—human beings—that rewrite our history books, dumb our children down, murder and destroy anyone who dares create a world of abundance and equality, and more importantly, it’s human beings that tolerate it.

This is not merely implied, supposed, or theorized—it’s a fact. Quite often we hear people say that some sort of veil is lifting, and consequently, we are seeing things as they really are. I would suggest that the veil and the curtain are one and the same, and we hide behind it every bit as much as the mysterious wizard. We do this because, to see the man behind the curtain for what he really is, is to see ourselves for what we really are: willing participants in our own demise. We must acknowledge our participation however, because it is the first step to change. Furthermore, if we don’t refuse what is happening to our planet and our race, we are accepting it by default.

If we strip away all the curtains and all the false wizards, the only thing we see staring back at us, are the seven billion beautiful faces of humanity and the choices they make or allow to be made on their behalf. If we no longer accept that all powerful wizards are the only ones that can save us, what kinds of things happen? It wasn’t wizards and aliens that built suspension bridges, created magnificent symphonies and the musical instruments that manifest them to our ears, nor was it wizards or aliens that created beautiful poetry and masterpieces. It wasn’t aliens or wizards that created healing centers or wrote the Constitution and Bill of Rights—it was people—people just like you and me. John Lennon, Malcolm X, Ghandi, Tesla, and Martin Luther King, were simply human beings. They saw the men behind the curtain for what they were, and they wanted something better for their human family.

The credit for our successes and our failures should be given where it’s due—to humanity. And while I’ve listed only five extraordinary people that shared their visions of a better future with us, today there are literally too many to be named. When you hear of groups showing up to their City Council meetings to demand that fluoride be removed from their water supply, or that chemtrails be investigated and stopped immediately, or countries burning their GMO fields and banning these crops entirely, remember that these are people. There are people defecting from the wizard’s palace left and right, and they are telling you what they saw behind the curtain: corruption, insanity, world-wide manufactured lack, and widespread death for profit.

What I personally find so remarkable about these people however, is their innate understanding that aliens are not our problem—human beings are. The truth of the matter is that we don’t need the help of off-world wizards to kill us off…we’re doing a fine job of it all by ourselves. The same goes for the equally invented and over-sold terrestrial terrorists that can’t wait to destroy our country. If one takes a good look around, it’s not long before the same conclusion is drawn: it’s already being done from within—they can simply sit back and watch it happen—at least until they are too busy watching it happen to their own country.

While I applaud all of the often nameless, and remarkable people for doing what they know to be right to protect the future of our human lineage, there is a catch. We have looked the other way far too long, giving the men behind the curtain more than enough time to create the most inconceivable, horrific, mass killing technologies, that they may well be close to perfecting. If these technologies are unleashed fully, be it energy or bio technology, the magnificent race of human beings will come to an end for the seventh, and perhaps final time.

The question then becomes, how do we prevent it? Perhaps the best way to answer that, is to honestly consider how we got to this point. How does a race practically drowning in rules, laws and checks-and-balances, designed to prevent such things, bypass them all to the point self-destruction? The answer is always the same: corruption and the inability to see the final outcome of it; the refusal to follow it through to its natural conclusion—extinction.

Certainly the term “dereliction of duty” comes to mind, yet this is a duty we all have to our fellow man, in whatever circles we travel. We have always had the responsibility to ensure the safety and evolution of our race, whether as a cook, mother, politician, cleric, doctor, scientist, educator or military personnel. We have however, in my view, reached a point where some of these circles and those who travel in them, have a great deal more responsibility in how this turns out.

I appeal to those of you in these positions—as a fellow human being. I appeal to whatever sense of honor still remains in clarity of purpose to your race, to fully recognize what it is you have done, and are being asked to do.

Given the eons that span mankind’s attempt at becoming a fully manifested race, I ask that you take more than a moment to consider that only six times have so few people had so much power over life and nature, and never once have we survived it.

There are more and more individuals on the outside working hard to educate people regarding the breadth of corruption in every aspect of our lives, which means that more and more people are coming forward to share what they know is taking place behind the curtain—perhaps you’re one of them.

Should this be the case, there is another element involved. It’s not enough that I express what we need from you in your current capacity. If we are to work together, you must tell us what you need from us as well. We are listening…

Blessings on your continued journey,

Crystal Clark
www.thesolsociety.com

CAN OUR INSANITY BE CURED PART II

CAN OUR INSANITY BE CURED?
Part Two
By Crystal Clark
January 13, 2012
As discussed in the Part One of this article, this particular question was beautifully raised by the Shaman in the Avatar film. When an outsider wanted to spend time with her tribe, she allowed it, and succinctly explained why she agreed to do so: we’ll see if your insanity can be cured. This was one of Hollywood’s finer moments, which is a rare thing these days, and this deserves our attention.
All forms of media, not just films, are tools to communicate information, ideas and messages, to a wide and even global audience. In this sense, media is the communicative channel (such as broadcast media) for singular mediums such as art, music, literature, news and information.
In other words, through some type of singular medium such as painting, music or writing, an idea (immaterial) has expressed (material manifestation) from the individual via the singular type of medium used to convey it, and then some type of communication media like radio, television, newspapers or the internet, is then used to broadcast the original content to a wider audience.
This sounds practical, even necessary, and innocent enough, until we look deeper at how media can and is being abused to alter our perceptions of reality—globally. This includes both forms: communicative or broadcast media channels, and the original content being broadcast: what is created, and how it is shared with an audience beyond the creator. There is a third factor involved in this as well however—the way in which content/creations are presented to you.
This is where marketing enters the picture, and marketing has become a rather complex form of psychological science—this is important to recognize—there is a very fine line between science and manipulation in this regard. Successful marketing strategies include two primary things after the target market has been identified: repetition and emotional manipulation. Repetition speaks for itself, although in many ways it is a secondary form of emotional manipulation.
Emotional manipulation plays on two primary emotions: fear and love. More specifically, self-preservation (fear) and compassion (love). It might sound odd to include love, but this emotion is preyed upon every bit as much as fear, and in fact they are often connected. Genetically Modified Foods, as an example, were physically created, and then knowledge of their existence was channeled to the public via mass media. However, the marketing ploy used to increase the sales of these creations, was to play on our compassion for others. We were told that we would not be able to feed the growing global population without these creations, even though animal testing showed these creations cause far more problems than they solve.
This is a very serious problem because through intentional omission of facts and research, not only were our emotions manipulated, but our ability to use free will became polluted, limited and in fact self-sabotaging. These are important patterns to identify because this type of manipulation has become a global epidemic. This not only severely limits our ability to create and uphold abundance, but life as well. This is an exceptionally disturbing trend in terms of getting our collective and individual “buy in” to literally participate in our own demise. Below is a short list of how this trend has played out:
  • Vaccines — Save the children from disease
  • Fluoride — Save our teeth and bones
  • GMOs — Save people from starvation
  • Chemtrails — Save us from the sun
  • Chipping — Save your pets, elderly and children from being lost or stolen
  • Patriot Act — Save us from local terrorists
  • War — Save us from global terrorists
  • Population Control — Save the earth
  • Bailouts — Save the banks to save your money
  • Space Weapons — Save us from the aliens
What’s so interesting about all of these examples (aside from the fact that they generally do the exact opposite of what we were “told”), is that in every case the same two emotions were played/manipulated. We don’t want to see people suffer or starve needlessly because we love them, and part of loving people is to ensure their preservation. We want them to have everything they need to preserve themselves and continue on, don’t we? That’s an interesting question these days, and to answer it properly, we may have to honestly define who the “we” really is.
I personally believe that the majority of the people on this planet want to do what’s right, but through this small list alone we can see that a great deal of time, money and effort have been expended to ensure that people would no longer know what right is. Hollywood movies, television shows, commercials, music, newspapers, and news agencies, keep reinforcing the same ideas to us over and over again. In this sense, we are not only emotionally manipulated to think, feel, act, and behave certain ways once, but repeatedly.
By “repeatedly” I’m not just referring to hour after hour, day after day, month after month, year after year or even generation after generation—but also lifetime after lifetime. We have done all of this before, and it has never ended any other way. Is it really so difficult to recognize that nobody wins if we’re all extinct?
We’ve come full circle now: insanity is to do the same thing over and over, expecting a different outcome each time. How many times will we hit the same finger with a hammer, still believing it won’t be painful the next time even though the pain is still fresh? How many times will we simply hear and repeat, dutifully ignoring the inconsistencies we actually see, feel and experience around us? Those “splinters in our mind” as Morpheus so accurately called them…we know they are there, but we ignore them. It’s simply not popular (or even well-paying) to address them.
We don’t want to stand up because we’re afraid to stand out—a reflection of successful social engineering via peer pressure—more emotional manipulation. We’re afraid to say or do what we know is right, because we might not be as popular. We don’t want to make a choice because it might not be politically correct. Clearly, too many of us are concerned with all the wrong things, but to what end?
An even bigger part of this type of manipulation, goes back to the beginning of the article in terms knowing the difference between a communicative medium that channels/broadcasts a creation, and the creation itself. They appear to be different, but when a race is dealing with this kind of global mental and emotional manipulation, they no longer are—that’s the problem. Mind is the builder—the idea always comes first. When your mind (idea) is not your own, neither are your consequent creations and contributions. Perception is everything, is it not? People react to what they believe or are led to perceive is true or real, not what IS true or real.
Can our insanity be cured then? Of course it can—once we recognize that it exists. The only thing left after that, is choice. But how can we possibly use our free will productively to choose a better future that everyone benefits from, when so many things have been distorted or hidden from us?
I would say Morpheus got it right…the splinters in our minds are a good place to start—they are trying to tell us something important.
Blessings on your continued journey, Crystal Clark

CAN OUR INSANITY BE CURED?

CAN OUR INSANITY BE CURED?

Part One
By Crystal Clark
December 16, 2011

This was hands down my favorite scene from the well known Avatar movie, by James Cameron. A truly fascinating and necessary view in many ways, as were other themes presented by this film, that surely also deserve deeper consideration.

As you’ll likely recall, this idea was posed to the main character of the film by the Shaman of the tribe he was initially conned into infiltrating for nefarious reasons. Upon agreeing to let him spend time with their tribe, she states: We’ll see if your insanity can be cured. But what exactly did this Shaman mean? There are many different layers to this, and before we move on to the deeper ones, I would like to express a broader yet more practical view, via an old story.

A wealthy businessman went to visit an old friend who lived a simple life in a village on the coast. After a long day of catching up, they retired to hammocks swaying in the breeze under coconut trees, as they watched the sun set over the ocean.

The businessman asked his friend, “How do you survive out here?” The village man replied, “We gather fruit from the trees, and there is an abundance of fish in the ocean here.” The businessman inquired a little more about the abundant fishing in the area, and upon realizing the commodity of abundance, began to tell his village friend how much money he could make if he opened a commercial fishing business.

The village man sat quietly as his old friend explained that he could start out with one small commercial fishing vessel, and then slowly build an empire. And though it may take years of hard work to build this empire, at some point his village friend could retire a wealthy man. The businessman began to explain, “You could eventually earn enough money to live on an island, fish for yourself, and… sit in a hammock each night… watching the sun set over the ocean,” he slowly trailed off.

Recognizing that his friend had just been confronted with the absurdity of his own life, he simply smiled at the businessman, before nodding understandingly back to the beauty of the darkening golden jewel in the sky, slowly sinking into an abyss of blue glass.

This is but one form of insanity we have come to accept, but again, there were other themes in this exceptional film that also deserve our attention. It became somewhat well known, after the film came out, that viewers began to suffer from what was coined “Avatar Depression”. On the surface, most would ascribe this to how pointedly the story line had us confronting what we’ve done to our own planet. An important lesson, to be sure, but there was a greater message: What we will do to other planets, if we are allowed to expand out into the stars before we grow out of the insanity.

Given the relentless, generational mental programming of entirely nonsensical views of reality, the importance of this understanding cannot be overstated. I grew up on many of the same Science Fiction movies as most others, and how could we ever forget the famous line, “Luke, I am your Father”.

Yoda’s character was exceptional and before its time in many ways, but the rest is nothing more than a projection—into outer spaceof our own insanity. Until we outgrow this insanity, mankind will struggle once more to become a fully manifested civilization. There are always rules and guidelines in place for creation to exist, and this applies to ourselves traveling out into the stars as well.

If we cannot outgrow the need, or even acceptance, of commoditizing and subsequently destroying the very things that give us life for profit, the cosmic or Universal Community is off limits to us. As strange or even cruel as that statement may appear, honestly ask yourself this question by putting the shoe on the other foot: If you were a member of the Universal Community, would YOU allow humans into your neighborhood, knowing they have the technological ability combined with unchecked insanity, to destroy your own planet? Or even the planets of others?

This was a strong message that the Avatar film conveyed, even if only on a subconscious level, and I strongly suspect this was a co-contributor to Avatar Depression. At the same time, it was an absolutely beautiful film, because it so accurately reflected our selves back to us in ways that really count—in ways we can tremendously benefit from if we’re willing to see our reality as it is, and therefore grow beyond it.

I’m well aware of what that tiny voice is whispering to many of you, in the back of your mind… What about the moon? It isn’t a real planet—it’s just like the Death Star that Darth Vader was building. Or, what about Zechariah Sitchin’s work, and how he explained planetary space wars and the destruction of entire worlds? Isn’t that just like what Hollywood has shown us over the years? Of course it is! That’s the problem. We’ll get to that in Part Two.

I honestly don’t know how long it will take people to see that the Laws of Man, and the Laws of Creation are so far out of synch, that our very survival is in question. Does Hollywood teach you the Laws and Principles of Creation? How about your Pastors and Universities? More importantly, are they all funded by the same people?

Avatar was an exceptional film, because it dared us to see things (including ourselves) as they truly are. Are we up to the challenge these truths present us with? Based on the Global Revolutions taking place, I would say yes. We have a lot of work to do, but that’s the beauty of the lesson: It is OUR work, and everyday I see more and more people leaving the illusion long enough to take up that challenge. As this movement and awareness of what really matters grows, better days and a fully manifested race of extraordinary human beings into the Extended Community of forever, becomes more and more a surety. This is no small thing…

Blessings on your continued journey, Crystal Clark

PAINTING WITH TOO BROAD A BRUSH: WHAT WOULD BUDDHA SAY NOW?

I see many, many people quoting Buddha in terms of judgment—how we will be more spiritually advanced if we one day learn to live without it. Of course we should know better than to judge people on things that don’t matter, but we have every right—and in fact a responsibility—to use the kind of judgment ONLY sentient beings have, to alleviate suffering.

The idea that judgment as a *whole* is beneath the only beings on the planet that actually have the capacity to use it any meaningful way, is accepting full-on anarchy, and dare I say, a complete perversion of what Buddha meant. Are you so sure you don’t need judges, or even laws, for that matter? Is it really beyond your spiritual evolution to judge pedophiles, murderers, greedy banksters, corrupt politicians and genocidal maniacs?

This reminds me of a recently circulating image, showing two old ladies holding a sign saying, “Fuck the cops.” Would it be as funny if the image were reversed? If the image was of two cops holding a sign that said, “Fuck old ladies”? (You’ll pardon my so-called French here).

Each and every one of you have been gifted with an intellect and therefore moral capacity that is the ONLY thing separating all of us from the animals. Neither of those signs are funny, and misunderstanding what Buddha meant, doesn’t change that. Good Judgment should reflect this truth back to us, and when what he said is *genuinely* thought upon, it will reflect more than that…

Blessings, Crystal Clark

Odd Things NASA Knows About the Moon

Odd Things NASA Knows About the Moon

NASA knows a great deal more about the Moon than you may realize. Further, there have been stories passed down regarding a time when the moon arrived in our system; Velikovsky captured this in his writings about the Proselenes (pro=before; selene=Moon).

Following is an excerpt from WHO ARE WE REALLY 101—Return of the Shaman, regarding the moon. I highly recommend combining this information with Jose Escamilla’s recent films about the moon, as well as information covered by James Horak in the 3-part series: A Refined Cosmology to Address Cosmic Anomaly.

On page 97 of The Anti-Gravity Handbook (David Hatcher Childress) we come to a section called: ELEVEN THINGS THAT NASA DISCOVERED ABOUT THE MOON THAT YOU NEVER KNEW:

The Puzzle of the Moon’s Origin: Scientists have offered three major theories to account for the moon in orbit around our planet. All of the theories are in doubt, and none satisfactory. NASA scientist Dr. Robin Brett sums it up best: “It seems much easier to explain the nonexistence of the moon than its existence.

The Puzzle of the Moon’s Age: Incredibly, over 99 percent of the moon rocks brought back turned out upon analysis to be older than 90 percent of the oldest rocks that can be found on Earth… Other rocks turned out to be even older: 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 and one even alleged to be 5.3 billion years old!.. and the area of the moon the rocks came from was thought by scientists to be one of the youngest areas of the moon! Based on such evidence, some scientists have concluded that the moon was formed among the stars long before our sun was born.

The Puzzle Of How Moon Soil Could Be Older Than Lunar Rocks: The mystery of the age of the Moon is even more perplexing when rocks taken from the Sea of Tranquility were compared to the soil in which they rested. Upon analysis, the soil proved to be at least a billion years older. This would appear impossible, since the soil was presumably the powdered remains of the rocks lying alongside it. Chemical analysis of the soil revealed that the lunar soil did not come from the rocks, but from somewhere else.

The Puzzle of Why the Moon “Rings” like a Hollow Sphere When a Large Object Hits it: During the Apollo missions, ascent stages of lunar modules as well as the spent third stages of rockets crashed on the hard surface of the moon. Each time, these caused the moon, according to NASA, to “ring like a gong or bell”. On one of the Apollo 12 flights, reverberations lasted from nearly an hour to as much as four hours.

The Puzzle of the Mystifying Maria on the Moon: The dark areas of the moon are know as maria… and are, strangely, located almost entirely on one side of the moon. Astronauts found it extremely difficult to drill into the surface of these dark plain-like areas. Soil samples were loaded with rare metals and elements like titanium, zirconium, yttrium, and beryllium. This dumbfounded scientists because these elements require tremendous heat, approximately 4, 500 degrees Fahrenheit, to melt and fuse with surrounding rock, as it had.

Let’s move ahead to number 10 on the list:

The Puzzle of the Moon’s Strange Magnetism: Early lunar tests and studies indicated that the moon had little or no magnetic field. The lunar rocks proved upon analysis to be strongly magnetized. This was shocking to scientists who had always assumed that the rocks had “some very strange magnetic properties… which were not expected.” NASA cannot explain where this magnetic field came from.

David Hatcher Childress addresses anomalies of the moon landings by quoting from a book called “MOONGATE: SUPRESED FINDINGS OF THE US SPACE PROGRAM (THE NASA-MILITARY COVER-UP), By William L. Brian II, an Nuclear Engineer from Oregon State University. Of significance in Brian’s book, is that the equation of the moon’s gravity being one-sixth that of earth’s, is nonsense, and that the true equation has not only been hidden from the general public, but the true equation means that the TRUE fuel requirements based on the moon having a higher percentage of gravity, reveals “The startling conclusion that if men really landed on the moon in high lunar gravity conditions, it was not done with rockets!”

Brian points out many obvious things that indicate a higher lunar gravity, including the fact that images of astronauts on the moon show them able to jump no higher than 18 inches off the ground, well below what was expected in low gravity.

A Refined Cosmology to Address Cosmic Anomaly: Lifting the Veil (parts 1-3)

Crystal Clark Interviews James Horak: A 3-Part Series

Download the audio only file here: http://www.divshare.com/download/17315051-574

Filename: A_Refined_Cosmology_J_Horak_Pt1-3.pm3

This may well be the first time earth-bound humanity has been told the truth about our past—ever.

Should that be the case, this is a Great Day for the people on this planet—this is no small thing. It is entirely natural and expected that people will ask themselves, “How can we possibly know if this is true?”

As you move through each segment of this 3-part series, the answer will become self-evident: If we are able to turn things around on this planet fast enough, which will also ensure that we survive our own technology and those who abuse it, we will be in a position to TEST this story…I like that.

I would imagine some of you are wondering if I personally believe this story?

Yes—I do.

At the same time, as another friend (Mel Fabregas) often says in his own way, I would rather *know* than believe…but there’s only one way to do that, and we deserve that opportunity. I look forward to it…

Blessings and enjoy the view, Crystal Clark

*Special thanks to Helvetic for initiating this series, and special thanks to James Horak for his participation.