Odd Things NASA Knows About the Moon

NASA knows a great deal more about the Moon than you may realize. Further, there have been stories passed down regarding a time when the moon arrived in our system; Velikovsky captured this in his writings about the Proselenes (pro=before; selene=Moon).

Following is an excerpt from WHO ARE WE REALLY 101—Return of the Shaman, regarding the moon. I highly recommend combining this information with Jose Escamilla’s recent films about the moon, as well as information covered by James Horak in the 3-part series: A Refined Cosmology to Address Cosmic Anomaly.

On page 97 of The Anti-Gravity Handbook (David Hatcher Childress) we come to a section called: ELEVEN THINGS THAT NASA DISCOVERED ABOUT THE MOON THAT YOU NEVER KNEW:

The Puzzle of the Moon’s Origin: Scientists have offered three major theories to account for the moon in orbit around our planet. All of the theories are in doubt, and none satisfactory. NASA scientist Dr. Robin Brett sums it up best: “It seems much easier to explain the nonexistence of the moon than its existence.

The Puzzle of the Moon’s Age: Incredibly, over 99 percent of the moon rocks brought back turned out upon analysis to be older than 90 percent of the oldest rocks that can be found on Earth… Other rocks turned out to be even older: 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 and one even alleged to be 5.3 billion years old!.. and the area of the moon the rocks came from was thought by scientists to be one of the youngest areas of the moon! Based on such evidence, some scientists have concluded that the moon was formed among the stars long before our sun was born.

The Puzzle Of How Moon Soil Could Be Older Than Lunar Rocks: The mystery of the age of the Moon is even more perplexing when rocks taken from the Sea of Tranquility were compared to the soil in which they rested. Upon analysis, the soil proved to be at least a billion years older. This would appear impossible, since the soil was presumably the powdered remains of the rocks lying alongside it. Chemical analysis of the soil revealed that the lunar soil did not come from the rocks, but from somewhere else.

The Puzzle of Why the Moon “Rings” like a Hollow Sphere When a Large Object Hits it: During the Apollo missions, ascent stages of lunar modules as well as the spent third stages of rockets crashed on the hard surface of the moon. Each time, these caused the moon, according to NASA, to “ring like a gong or bell”. On one of the Apollo 12 flights, reverberations lasted from nearly an hour to as much as four hours.

The Puzzle of the Mystifying Maria on the Moon: The dark areas of the moon are know as maria… and are, strangely, located almost entirely on one side of the moon. Astronauts found it extremely difficult to drill into the surface of these dark plain-like areas. Soil samples were loaded with rare metals and elements like titanium, zirconium, yttrium, and beryllium. This dumbfounded scientists because these elements require tremendous heat, approximately 4, 500 degrees Fahrenheit, to melt and fuse with surrounding rock, as it had.

Let’s move ahead to number 10 on the list:

The Puzzle of the Moon’s Strange Magnetism: Early lunar tests and studies indicated that the moon had little or no magnetic field. The lunar rocks proved upon analysis to be strongly magnetized. This was shocking to scientists who had always assumed that the rocks had “some very strange magnetic properties… which were not expected.” NASA cannot explain where this magnetic field came from.

David Hatcher Childress addresses anomalies of the moon landings by quoting from a book called “MOONGATE: SUPRESED FINDINGS OF THE US SPACE PROGRAM (THE NASA-MILITARY COVER-UP), By William L. Brian II, an Nuclear Engineer from Oregon State University. Of significance in Brian’s book, is that the equation of the moon’s gravity being one-sixth that of earth’s, is nonsense, and that the true equation has not only been hidden from the general public, but the true equation means that the TRUE fuel requirements based on the moon having a higher percentage of gravity, reveals “The startling conclusion that if men really landed on the moon in high lunar gravity conditions, it was not done with rockets!”

Brian points out many obvious things that indicate a higher lunar gravity, including the fact that images of astronauts on the moon show them able to jump no higher than 18 inches off the ground, well below what was expected in low gravity.