May 26, 2021 by Crystal Clark

“It’s this idea, that there are too many of us on the planet, that are destroying it…really what’s happening is, you and I are not destroying the planet—the fastest way to prove this is with planned obsolescence—because what that means in a nutshell, is that the faster those garbage dumps fill up, the faster their [corporate] pockets fill up...they keep saying, now they have said this over and over again, that they have to destroy the middle class because we’re living too well, and we’re responsible for the destruction of the environment because we’re buying too many things. So they have to destroy the middle class—that’s where this is coming from. But in reality, if I have to replace the same product five times in six years, that doesn’t make me feel like i’m living high-on-the-hog, it makes me feel like i’m getting screwed.

They can make cars that will last a hundred years, they can make light bulbs that will last 100 years, they can make all of these products that will last and last and last, but they don’t because there’s no profit in it. They rape the environment, even printer cartridges…the printer is $45, great, but every cartridge is $35, you need four of them, and they’re half full when it says they’re out of ink and you can’t use them anymore, so you’ve got to buy more. So the strain on the environment has absolutely nothing to do with how many people are on the planet…”

—Crystal Clark on FreemanTV, January 23, 2016


The Light Bulb Conspiracy focuses on another of the most important (ignored and censored) issues of our time. As before, given the current confluence of events and agendas happening simultaneously all over the globe, I suspect this will mean far more now, than when it was first produced. Directly below is the video, description, and link to its original source. Drowning in Absurdity commentary and analysis comes just after the video description.

The Light Bulb Conspiracy uncovers how planned obsolescence has shaped our lives and economy since the 1920’s, when manufacturers deliberately started shortening the life of consumer products to increase demand. The film also profiles a new generation of consumers, designers and business people who have started challenging planned obsolescence as an unsustainable economic driver.

The documentary begins by visiting the longest running light bulb in the world, which has burned continuously for over 110 years in Livermore, California. Initially, light bulbs were built to last. But the film finds historical evidence revealing how a cartel in the 1920’s decided to produce bulbs limited to a maximum life of 1000 hours, making the humble light bulb one of the first examples of planned obsolescence and a model for increasing profits on other products.

Shot over three years in Europe, the U.S. and Ghana, The Light Bulb Conspiracy investigates the evolution and impact of planned obsolescence through interviews with historians, economists, designers and manufacturers, along with archival footage and internal company documents. The film profiles several well-known historical advocates — Bernard London, who famously proposed ending the Great Depression by mandating planned obsolescence, and Brook Stevens, whose post-war ideas became the gospel of the 1950’s and helped shape the throwaway consumer society of today.

The Light Bulb Conspiracy also looks at modern examples of planned obsolescence, including computer printers and the controversy over the inability to replace iPod batteries. Environmental consequences are seen most dramatically in the massive amounts of electronic waste that end up in uncontrolled dump sites in Third World countries such as Ghana. The film concludes with examples of consumers and businesses moving towards more sustainable practices and products, including Warner Philips, great grandson of the founder of Philips Electronics, who is producing an LED bulb designed to last 25 years.” —SOURCE:



If you’ve never come across this question, you may not realize it’s a reversal of the way globalists (and their corporate cultures) are looking at us, while simultaneously blaming us for their own madness: how much damage does the public have to do before we question their right to exist, especially in such high numbers? Because Planned Obsolescence is moving from products to people in an effort to “rid themselves of accusing faces,” as James Horak once so eloquently phrased it, and the same tactics are being used for both agendas, the ‘people’ aspect will be covered shortly. For now I want to emphasize how much damage corporations have and are doing to the earth (while blaming us for it), before moving on.

On August 6th, 2013 I was a guest on an AM Talk Radio show broadcast out of Utah called Fringe Radio. During that conversation I explained that my focus on environmental issues began when I was a teenager as the result of my family becoming sick from a local mining company poisoning the water supply—it was poisoning the entire community, they just didn’t know it. During this discussion I gave the host the previous name of the mine from the 1990’s, because I didn’t know what name the mine was currently operating under. The host later explained that mining company was working in Utah, and had been purchased by a company called Rio Tinto. When discussing corporate disregard for humanity in general, he also added that some of the roads in Utah had been paved with radioactive tailings. As an aside, I only recently discovered the mine was originally owned by JP Morgan. [Correction Notice: I haven’t listened to this show since it was first recorded and thought I should check to make sure the file isn’t corrupt. I have updated this paragraph to better reflect the dialogue that took place regarding the mine and the roads being paved with radio active tailings].



It’s been decades since I used to subscribe to Popular Science (and Popular Mechanics) magazine, but I archived some of the good ones, one of which featured a man who invented a machine that could reduce used-up products—trash, essentially—and their components, back to their original state for reuse. It was an amazing invention that people like myself were no doubt convinced would completely revolutionize the waste industry. Like so many other promising ‘disruptive technologies‘, like a car that runs on water, it was never fully realized. I apologize for not having better information on the technology or man who invented it—I thought for sure it would be easier to dig up. (When I find it I will post it with details). For now I would ask the reader to keep that technology in mind when reviewing the following statements from the Planned Obsolescence documentary:

37:55 [NARRATOR] Planned Obsolescence produces a constant strain of waste, which is shipped to third world countries, such as Ghana in Africa.

38:04 [ACTIVIST MIKE ANANE, GHANA] There’s been, between eight and nine years, when I noticed that loads and loads of containers were coming to this country with electronic waste. We’re talking about end-of-life computers, end-of-life television sets, which nobody wants in the developed world.

38:23 [NARRATOR] Shipping electronic waste to third world countries is prohibited by international law, but the merchants use a simple trick—they declare the waste as second hand goods. More than 80% of the electronic waste that arrives in Ghana is totally beyond repair, and whole container loads are abandoned at dump sites all around the country.

40:14 [ACTIVIST MIKE ANANE, GHANA] The saying behind those shipments is, “Well, we’re trying to bridge the digital divide between Europe, America and Africa”. But the reality is theses computers that are sent here simply do not work. There’s no point in receiving electronic waste when you cannot DEAL with it, more so when you did not produce it, and your country is being used as the world’s trash bin.

Well beyond that documentary, there are endless examples of the environmental carnage caused by corporate malfeasance. These would include the disastrous BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico (which included the compounding addition of toxic Corexit AND the release of a synthetic, self-replicating microbe called Synthia), the chemicals that made Erin Brockovich famous, the Flint Water Crisis, DUPONT being fined for its egregious activities in Deleware, New Jersey, West Virginia (and probably others), the EPA spilling toxic waste into the Colorado river, and on and on. With the exception of the Flint water crisis, ‘damages’ to the environment are never corrected by the corporations found guilty, instead they simply drop some coin into the appeasement hat labeled “fines”. At least in the Flint Water Crisis, where officials (and their families) were drinking bottled water because they knew (and kept from the public) the drinking water was contaminated with lead and bacteria causing Legionnaires disease, some of those officials were eventually charged with criminal conduct, including the governor.

Again, and perhaps more importantly, at no point was the general public at large responsible for any of those decisions or activities, instead, many of their lives were destroyed by it. Here I feel this essay would be remiss in failing to address the idea that some of these events have been caused on purpose. There are reasons—important reasons—that so many veteran reality miners share that belief, myself included, even in regard to the Fukushima and Gulf of Mexico disasters. For myself, the mountain of discontinuity in all of their story lines AND the attempt to heavily censor information from which that conclusion would be drawn, like systematically deleting the video shot by fisherman at night of the BP well being superheated by a blue beam of energy coming straight down before it exploded (that video now eerily reminiscent of similar beams captured during the recent California fires that strangely burnt homes but left the trees standing). Additionally, there is another reason this author believes, and has often stated, they are killing nature to kill us: Vestatio, and the need make the overpopulation myth a reality.


Years ago I was explaining to James Horak that I was having difficulty getting this point across in radio interviews (looking back I think the problem was public incredulity rather than my delivery method), so he tried to help me find a better analogy. He said, “Well, what is overpopulation? Isn’t it that there aren’t enough resources for everyone?” I agreed–this is true, especially where food and water sources are concerned, which globalists are attacking and poisoning constantly—the Gulf of Mexico being a perfect example. He then added, “So, if you go to the Amazon where the Aborigine live, and you cut it all down, NOW it’s overpopulated, isn’t it?”


While readers can search for the word on this blog to learn more, Vestatio is a Roman war tactic used to subjugate a population through the destruction of their environment. This can include everything from forced migration to poisoning food and water sources (salting the earth, poisoning the wells, ect).



When empire (in this case globalism) expands and begins to subsume all forms of media, entertainment and education, a carefully managed narrative echo-chamber is the result, soon having an unsuspecting public mistaking repetition for reality. There’s no question the world has some serious problems, and as many a dedicated reality miner can tell you, those parading themselves as our saviors to those problems, quite often, are anything but.

This tightly controlled circular madness is designed to prevent (and even punish or censor) thoughts and ideas that are heretical to empire’s agenda. This allows for empire to constantly reinforce specific lines of thought that a more critical analysis would almost immediately find to be absurd. You are not supposed to see beyond the problems THEY have presented to you, nor are you supposed to see beyond the solutions THEY are pushing as the answer to those problems.


In my pursuit of a more accurate reality model, an interesting phenomenon generally prevails: the answer is almost always behind door number three, and door number three is simultaneously the most forbidden to enter and difficult to find. The “third option” is almost always where it’s at, and is also the antithesis to the ‘Either/Or’ mental trap constantly being laid for us. A perfect example of this in my view, is the either/or mental trap surrounding 9/11: it’s EITHER directed energy weapons OR thermite. This author was fortunate enough to be pointed to door number three in that regard, provided in great detail by Dimitri Khalezov, and ironically (or not), that material is literally called The Third Truth. You can learn more about that in a previous post HERE, and I encourage reality miners to consider the level of reality revisionism surrounding that event, in the way Dimitri especially points to it, which includes changing the definition of ‘ground zero’ in EVERY dictionary after that event took place—they were even back-dated. Rarely does reality revisionism get more obvious than that.

Would they really do that? They have, and they are. Continually. This too was discussed during the 2016 FreemanTV interview linked to at the top. As a more recent example, because i’m convinced the public is being lied to about true global population numbers (almost all of which are now provided by the UN), my recent attempts to acquire used high school geography books from the 1990’s or earlier, where frustrating to say the least. The task proved impossible. They’ve all been removed from circulation, and this is done because they are anchors to a pre-revised version of reality.


While we’ve all been living in a seemingly endless (and heretofore unnoticed) episode of “social engineering gone wild,” with psychology becoming increasingly mired in and corrupted by agenda, the public was eventually and repeatedly bombarded with the bizarre notion that people can’t cope well with any more than two choices at a time—they just get too confused.

Numerous psychology papers, carefully and dutifully repackaged and marketed to the public by the media, were filled with phrases like, “having too many choices can cause contradictory behavior or results,” or “too many choices leads to an increase in regrets,” or “anxiety” or “option confusion“. This is exactly the kind of rhetoric (to put it mildly) a society should expect from a corrupt officialdom working overtime to carefully direct and manage thought processes, keeping the public trapped in things like left/right and either/or thought loops. People won’t make choices they don’t know they have, which is the entire point of the false (two) choice paradigm. This of course is also the reason the establishment and their lapdog media will mock, slander, and refuse to give air time to, third party candidates in Presidential elections. Door number three is verboten.

It never ceases to amaze me how these social psychology studies virtually always support the concurrent globalist agenda or narrative, making ludicrous claims like, “eating healthy is a mental disorder,” or “refusing to wear a mask might be a sign of a serious personality disorder. In particular, in the years leading up to the overt push towards Communism, it isn’t all that surprising to find these ‘option confusion’ articles began to stray into the supermarket space–too many choices at the store isn’t a good thing. Funny thing that, considering it was precisely that scenario that caused well-known Soviet officials to abandon Communism—when they saw how many choices there were in an American grocery store. Maybe the Handmaiden’s Tale and the Hunger Games aren’t the best foundations for a “Great Reset” after all:

Soviet Leader Abandoned Communism After Walking Into a US Grocery Store:

In 1989, then-Communist Party of the Soviet Union member Boris Yeltsin traveled to the United States to visit the Johnson Space Center in Texas, according to the Houston Chronicle.

While in Houston for the visit, he also stopped by a Randalls grocery store, where he “roamed the aisles of Randall’s nodding his head in amazement,” according to an account of the visit written by then-Chronicle reporter Stefanie Asin.

He further told his fellow comrades who followed him to America for the visit that if the lines of starving men, women and children in Russia were to see the conditions of America’s supermarkets, “there would be a revolution.”

In photos of the visit reportedly taken by the Chronicle, Yeltsin could be seen “marveling at the produce section, the fresh fish market, and the checkout counter. He looked especially excited about frozen pudding pops.”

“Even the Politburo doesn’t have this choice. Not even Mr. Gorbachev,” he himself reportedly said, referring to the then-president of the Soviet Union.

“‘What have they done to our poor people?’ he said after a long silence. On his return to Moscow, Yeltsin would confess the pain he had felt after the Houston excursion: the ‘pain for all of us, for our country so rich, so talented and so exhausted by incessant experiments.’”

Two years later, he reportedly left the Communist Party and “began making reforms to turn the economic tide in Russia,” according to the Chronicle.’


Whenever I write about these topics, the same Voltaire quote always comes floating back to me, “they who can make you believe in absurdities, can make you commit atrocities,” and I think the following example perfectly sums that up. There are few (if any) veteran reality miners out there who haven’t seen Bill Gates, on television, discussing both the use of vaccines to lower the population and the “death panels”. Regarding the latter, in typical fashion, Gates was mis-representing a problem here, for the sole purpose of mis-representing the solution, in this case, the need to kill off Granny because it was the only way to prevent firing teachers due to some kind of nebulous financial crisis he deceptively danced around at the same time. Gates also made sure to emotionally tug on our heart strings by coloring the issue with an almost dire sense of urgency, which further primed listeners to take his ‘death panel’ suggestion more seriously, rather than look for other, less genocidal solutions. For eugenists masquerading as philanthropists, the false choice paradigm being presented to the public over issues like this is EITHER to destroy the middle class, OR kill off the wisest and perhaps most reality literate segment of our population.

Those would be door number one and door number two. NO OTHER OPTIONS are supposed to become part of that conversation, which is why no other options were introduced during the discussion. In other words, to be clear, the solutions they present, is the course THEY have already chosen for the human race, and are now trying to sell it to the rest of us as the only viable answer. But what about door number three? Surely there’s a better solution.

It’s both dangerous and naive, in this author’s opinion, to believe that at no point did Gates, his backers, scientists, sycophants or think tanks know—or even consider—that a much better way to get money for more teachers would be to end the $500 BILLION DOLLAR PER YEAR TRADE DEFECIT WITH CHINA, or stopping the $60 BILLION DOLLAR Medicare Fraud Industry, or stopping the $100 BILLION DOLLAR PER YEAR Medicaid Fraud Industry. That the face of philanthropy everywhere went straight to senocide/gerocide (genocide of the elderly) to fix the problem should, at the very least, have the public wondering who, really, in our society, has a genuine problem with “option confusion”.

I feel compelled to remind readers that this author has been writing and speaking for years about globalist reality revisionism’s need to get rid of the elderly, simply because their very existence and knowledge base—acquired from decades of having seen, experienced and lived through a pre-revised version of reality—makes them anchors to, and reminders of, a previous version of reality that empire wants buried and forgotten. A successful reality revision requires the elimination of all competing realities, even if that means people.

Readers can certainly imagine my disdain then, for globalist Mayors like Andrew Cuomo (New York), whom I watched in disgust as they actually carried out senocide/gerocide in their states by shoving covid infected people into nursing homes (killing thousands of elderly), instead of sending them to the two large naval ships ‘Comfort’ and ‘Mercy’ President Trump provided. Moreover, in what seems standard globalist protocol in rewarding loyalists, Fauci went on television and praised Cuomo for his efforts claiming ‘he did it right’, which was followed up by Cuomo being further rewarded with an Emmy for his “COVID-19 pandemic ‘leadership” and a five million dollar book deal “to write on Covid-19, leadership.” And let’s not forget, Biden’s Assistant HHS Secretary Pick Moved Mother Out of Nursing Home After Ordering Them to Accept COVID Patients. Never has it been more obvious that the only interest globalists have in ‘mercy and comfort’, is in applying it to themselves and their own families.

Listeners familiar with the 2016 FreemanTV episode, in which vestatio was also discussed, may have made an interesting connection in terms of city leaders proving their loyalty to nefarious entities and causes, by destroying their own cities and citizens. We’ve seen darker and more prevalent shades of this in states and cities with leadership loyal to globalism, like California, Portland and Chicago, but this is the first time I’ve seen one of them be so richly and publicly rewarded for that loyalty.


In adhering to the theme of absurdities and atrocities, using the gun control issue as an example, there’s an interesting saying that history has proven to be as accurate as it is colorful: when your government attempts to disarm you, it’s because they’re about to do something you would shoot them for. To clarify, i’m not including that statement here to encourage violence—which is what the establishment both wants and needs to give credibility to their ‘homegrown terrorist’ narrative—rather that example is but one of many that provide clarity to issues purposefully shrouded in obfuscation and muddied by agenda, which is done to encourage people to participate in their own demise out of ignorance (PIOODOOI) under the false pretense of doing the exact opposite.

The ‘Case for Killing Granny’ as it’s often referred to, is but a stepping stone in that direction (participating in our demise) because if we aren’t “Granny” we don’t perceive it as our own demise. Rather these deceptive false-choice tactics are part of an effort to desensitize the public to otherwise atrocious policies, because there is intent to expand the application of those policies to more and more sub-groups of the population until wholesale depopulation becomes not only generally acceptable, but perhaps even celebrated, and we’re seeing a foreshadowing of that now (PIOODOOI and CV19). Socially engineering the populace, through incrementalism, to become more accepting of overt depopulation has been hitting us harder in recent years. Consider the following examples: It’s ‘wise and sensible’ to abort babies with Down’s syndrome, atheist Richard Dawkins says and Assisted suicide no longer just for the terminally ill. This indicates a shift in energy away from the planned obsolescence of consumer products, and a shift towards the consumers themselves.


Over the years (beginning in 2009), when I would explain the patterns that lead to the demise of an entire civilization, which primarily consists of hacking/weaponization of creation (intelligent design) and its biosphere and life support systems, I would often use the following examples to illustrate how those patterns are already repeating in our current lineage: GMO’s, chimeras, frequency weapons, weather modification and vaccines.

With regard to that last one, I would often use the analogy of a computer virus: Our bodies are biological machines with a specific operating system, and vaccines are like computer viruses that go in and alter some of the code causing alterations to the program, and it never functions the same way again. I would sometimes further explain, in the same way virus makers had to have access to the base code of the program their virus was meant to alter, the same applies to our genome. The reader may recall this was one of the main reasons software manufacturers were suspected of having written some of the first viruses that attacked their own software (for the purpose of then selling you the anti-viral software)—they were the only ones with access to their own source code.

Today, given the myriad anomalies in the CV19 storyline (Planned Demic), people are beginning to apply that same logic to virus/vaccine makers, and rightly so. First and foremost, we know for a fact these viruses were made in a lab because THEY HAVE PATENTS. That was covered in a previous essay called THE WAR ON KNOWLEDGE PART 2: INDOCTORNATION WORLD PREMIERE, providing a direct link to the documentary in which copies of the patents were displayed on the screen. From that essay:

“I’m the developer of Linguistic Genomics, the platform on which you could determine the intent of communication, rather than the literal artifact, but we’ve also used that technology for a number of other applications, in defense, intelligence and finance, and most notably for bringing down what was, at the time, the largest tax fraud in U.S. history. We maintained a series of inquiries into every individual, every organization, and every company that is involved in anything that either blurs the line of biological and chemical weapons, or crosses that line–in any of the 168 countries.

In 1999 there were a million patents digitized by IBM, and those million patents were the first time human innovation had been put into an electronic digital searchable format. We took that information and we did a very simple exercise using our linguistic genomics technology. I made the horrific assessment that approximately one-third of all patents filed in the United States were functional forgeries. Meaning that, while they had linguistic variations, they actually covered the same subject matter. In 1999 patents on corona viruses started showing up, and thus began the rabbit trail.

In 2003, the CDC saw the possibility for a gold strike, and that was the corona virus outbreak that happened in Asia. They saw a virus they knew could be easily manipulated and as something that was very valuable. In 2003 they sought to patent it, and they made sure they controlled the proprietary rights to the disease, to the virus, and to its detection and all measurement of it. We know, that Anthony Fauci, that Ralph Banic, that the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and a laundry list of people who wanted to take credit for inventing corona virus, were at the hub of this story. From 2003-2018 they controlled 100% of the cash flow that built the empire around the industrial complex of corona virus.

While we knew that corona virus manipulation started with Dr. Ralph Baric in 1999 (Ralph Baric, PhD, Professor or Microbiology and Immunology)–Ralph Baric does research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, who’s famous for his chimeric corona virus research. In 2000, there was a recognition that the corona virus was seen as an exploitable mechanism for both good and ill. On March 25, 2003 the US CDC filed a patent (patent numbers are provided on screen) on the corona virus transmitted to humans.

Under 35 Code US Section 101, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either, SARS corona virus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal, or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws. If it was natural, filing a patent on it was illegal. In either case, both are illegal.

In the spring (May 14) of 2007 the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their application confidential and private. They actually filed patents on not only the virus, but the they also filed patents on its detection, and a kit to measure it. Because of that CDC patent, they had the ability to control who was authorized, and who was not authorized, to make independent inquiries into corona viruses. You cannot look at the virus, you cannot measure it, and you cannot develop a test kit for it. And by ultimately receiving the patents that constrained anyone from using it, they had 1. the means, 2. the motive, 3. and most of all, they had the monetary gain, from turning corona virus from a pathogen to profit.

The premise of Planned Obsolescence is finding ways to shorten product lifespan (while maximizing profit)—to purposefully engineer it with a design flaw causing otherwise unnatural, early product failures. Given the current global confluence of events we now have to strongly consider the possibility that globalists, many of whom are rabid eugenists who consistently advocate for extreme depopulation, have found a way to engineer product failure and shorter life spans into the consumers themselves—into us. Without question, globalist eugenists have been chipping away at this, slowly, for decades in what some refer to as the ‘soft kill’. This came in the form giving out 50 million doses of Polio that were (knowingly) contaminated with a cancer-causing monkey virus known as SV40 (simian virus 40), which was so named because there were 39 before that, XMRV (human/animal chimeric viruses that alter immune system function) contaminated vaccines and blood supplies, Lyme disease (the result of a bio-weapons program using insects as vectors for disease), a more heavily contaminated environment, genetically modified foods known to cause sterility, and so on. The result has been significant increases in cancers of all types, miscarriages, auto immune diseases and steadily declining fertility rates.

[To be sure, in this author’s opinion, it’s a shame so much of the public still needs to be walked through the reality of these programs, rather than fervently debating and discussing how those responsible for it should be tried and sentenced for their crimes, not least of which is violations of the Nuremberg Code and genocide. At the same time however, if even one more life can be prevented from perishing for lack of knowledge, the attempt still needs to be made.]

When it comes to empire building, it’s never all about the money—it’s always about control—something money can be a useful tool in acquiring. By now I suspect readers know why I previously brought up the computer virus/human virus analogy: there are rumors COVID vaccine makers are using that same analogy, and even referred to their vaccine product as an actual operating system. For those not familiar with this, the following information can be found HERE at tapnewswiredotcom:

Enabling Drug Discovery & Development

We built Moderna on the guiding premise that if using mRNA as a medicine works for one disease, it should work for many diseases. And, if this is possible – given the right approach and infrastructure – it could meaningfully improve how medicines are discovered, developed and manufactured.

Our Operating System

Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the “program” or “app” is our mRNA drug – the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.

We have a dedicated team of several hundred scientists and engineers solely focused on advancing Moderna’s platform technology. They are organized around key disciplines and work in an integrated fashion to advance knowledge surrounding mRNA science and solve for challenges that are unique to mRNA drug development. Some of these disciplines include mRNA biology, chemistry, formulation & delivery, bioinformatics and protein engineering.

Our mRNA Medicines – The ‘Software of Life’

When we have a concept for a new mRNA medicine and begin research, fundamental components are already in place.

Generally, the only thing that changes from one potential mRNA medicine to another is the coding region – the actual genetic code that instructs ribosomes to make protein. Utilizing these instruction sets gives our investigational mRNA medicines a software-like quality. We also have the ability to combine different mRNA sequences encoding for different proteins in a single mRNA investigational medicine.

We are leveraging the flexibility afforded by our platform and the fundamental role mRNA plays in protein synthesis to pursue mRNA medicines for a broad spectrum of diseases.

It’s maybe been a couple of years ago now that I first came across an interesting video by Jay Dyer. While I particularly like his work, I don’t follow him in any real sense because my journey often takes me elsewhere. This particular video caught my attention however because he was reading directly from a book that covered this particular issue.


When it comes to the ‘operating system’ claims and analogies being assigned to those vaccines, this author can’t currently validate those claims. However, aside from pointing readers to people more well versed on the issue, what I can do, and have often done here, is provide readers with a ‘disposition matrix’ on these organizations; what I have previously referred to as ‘product reviews’, like this one on the United Nations. In truth, these matrixes and reviews are actually more of a corporate or organizational psychological evaluation. Psych Evals have a particular use that has historically, on occasion, been referenced thus: the best predictor of future performance can be found in previous behaviors, or, past performance is the best indicator/predictor of future behavior. Those are phrases the public doesn’t hear very often, but I suspect many of you made the obvious connection between the concept, a surveillance state, and the notion of “pre-crime”. For our purposes here, the exact same philosophy could (and should) be applied to corporations injecting an experimental vaccine into billions of people. If we start swinging that door (pre-crime disposition maxtrix) the other way, what kind of history is there?

ABC News reported the following story on September 2, 2009:

Pfizer fined $2.3 billion for illegal marketing in off-label drug case

By Rita Rubin, USA TODAYSeptember 2, 2009, 7:15 PM• 4 min read

“In the largest health care fraud settlement in history, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer must pay $2.3 billion to resolve criminal and civil allegations that the company illegally promoted uses of four of its drugs, including the painkiller Bextra, the U.S. Department of Justice announced Wednesday.

Besides Bextra, the drugs were Geodon, an antipsychotic; Zyvox, an antibiotic; and Lyrica, an anti-epileptic drug. Once the Food and Drug Administration approves drugs, doctors can prescribe them off-label for any use, but makers can’t market them for anything other than approved uses.

Pfizer subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn pleaded guilty to a felony violation for promoting off-label uses of Bextra, such as for pain relief after knee replacement surgery. At the FDA’s request, Pfizer pulled Bextra off the market in April 2005 because its risks, including a rare, sometimes fatal, skin reaction, outweighed its benefits. It had been approved only for treating rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and menstrual pain.

As part of the settlement, Pfizer PFE will pay a criminal fine of $1.195 billion, the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the USA for any matter, according to the Justice Department. Pharmacia & Upjohn must pay a $105 million criminal fine.”

ABC News reported this story on April 27, 2010:

Drug Giant AstraZeneca to Pay $520 Million to Settle Fraud Case
Government says pharmaceutical firm illegally marketed schizophrenia drug.

April 27, 2010, 9:48 AM
• 5 min read

“April 27, 2010— — Pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca will pay $520 million in fines to settle charges by the federal government that it illegally marketed the anti-psychotic drug Seroquel to children and elderly patients for uses not approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

AstraZeneca, one of the country’s biggest drug firms, allegedly pulled in hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars through Medicare and Medicaid kickbacks and scams. Seroquel is used to treat schizophrenia in patients older than 13, and bipolar disorder in patients older than 10.

The FDA approved Seroquel to treat only psychotic disorders, specifically short-term treatments of schizophrenia, bipolar mania and bipolar depression. The government claims that AstraZeneca intentionally marketed the drugs — by paying kickbacks to doctors — for a variety of illnesses for which it had never been tested, including aggression, Alzheimer’s, anger management, anxiety, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, dementia, depression, mood disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and sleeplessness. It was given to the elderly, children, veterans and inmates, who were treated as “guinea pigs,” according to the acting U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.”

Johnson and Johnson has also had some serious problems:

What kind of a “social corporate credit score” or “corporate extremist” or “bio/eco threat level” should we assign corporations likes these and others included earlier? What about organizations like the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) who were knowingly perpetuating—and got caught lying about—the bogus climate change scam when their emails were leaked, twice, during the Climate Gate Scandal? Should we expect more deception from them in the future based on their past performance? Should we label the IPCC “climate reality deniers” or “climate extremists”?


When it comes to creating corporate or industry disposition matrixes, this too (technology with undeclared capabilities) has been problematic in the past and likely continues. Those undisclosed or undeclared capabilities, more often than not, are surveillance capabilities that users weren’t supposed to become aware of. This has previously included things like GPS tracking and built-in back door access without the user’s knowledge or consent.


For those unaware, several disturbing videos were recently released that, if true, are definitely indicators there are undeclared capabilities in those products. The first wave of disturbing videos included individuals from all over the world showing that their injection sites are now magnetic. The second wave of videos were of people and organizations attempting to disprove the first wave, by filming live while performing the same test on themselves or random strangers they approached in public (who had recently been injected with those products). Those attempts to discredit the phenomenon failed as many of those individuals and participants also had magnetic injection sites.

The third wave of disturbing material actually comes from a video made by a Russian hacker, whose story was reportedly featured on the Hal Turner radio show. I wasn’t able to find an embeddable version, so the direct link is below. Just under seven minutes, the video, translated into English, shows the hacker getting into a database that is tracking Russians who have recently received the CV19 jab, in real-time, which includes their GPS coordinates and vital signs. The video shows the hacker searching for, and finding, the name of a personal friend who was recently injected with the product, in that database. If this information is true, it is a direct indication those products have undeclared capabilities:$/embed/BREAKING-NEWS-COMPUTER-CHIP-IN-VACCINE-NOW-BEING-TRACTED-IN-REAL-TIME,-BILL-GATES-ID2020-HAS-COME-TO-LIFE/98eddd2ef2942e08154db72d5295723418c93af0?r=62SZ1VTe4svW2o8WTemtRiHEMJGQVV8A&fbclid=IwAR1UZed8sUNthBtE4ZhT-QhQbCeHuZQJeiWAWXzmzeDSaAS5gNLJbIQEOpQ



Instead of writing an unnecessary summary of the material, I would rather share something personal. For a long time, veteran reality miners were unsure that a “Great Awakening” would ever happen. Year after year, the weight of pushing the boulder up the mountain against the wind, and seemingly getting nowhere, sometimes made if feel impossible. For most of us there aren’t words to express what it means to finally see and experience it, yet the final victory remains just out of reach as so many of our loved ones remain lost in the reverie of a reality that never really was.

There’s a joke people sometimes use when comparing life to a movie: “We need some theme music playing so we know what the hell is happening right now!” When it comes to that feeling of longing, this author had a theme song for it and used to play it often in the early days. The song is called Scarecrow (from the Beck album titled Guero). I’ll leave you with the lyrics to remind you that while we still have some distance to close, we really have come a long, long way. It took a lot of us to make it happen, from all over the world and all walks of life, and more are coming every day. Keep the faith, stand your ground and man your posts. The work isn’t over yet, and in many ways, it’s only just beginning.

For the unseen patriots out there reportedly and presumably working hard behind the scenes to finally end this madness, I don’t have to remind you the clock is ticking. Godspeed.


Walking to the other side
With the devil trying to take my mind
And my soul’s just a silhouette
On the ashes of a cigarette

Illusions never fake their lies
Trick cards fool the eyes
Carry zeroes over ’til they add up
Bury tears in the chapters you shut

Sometimes, the jail can’t chain the cell
And the rain’s too plain to tell
All alone by a barren well
Scarecrow’s only scaring himself

I’ve been digging the ground
‘Neath the dust and the clouds
I see miles and miles
Of those junkyard piles
I wanted hope from a grave
I wanted strength from a slave
What gives you comfort now
Might be the end of you then

Crows are pulling at my clothes
The winds got my fingers froze
Standin’ all day keepin’ watch
Over all the treasures we’ve lost

Sometimes the jail can’t chain the cell
And the rain’s to plain to tell
All alone by a barren well
The scarecrow’s only scaring himself
Oooh ooh ooh
Oooh ooh ooh

Scarecrow’s only scaring himself
Scarecrow’s only scaring himself

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s