by Crystal Clark, July 2, 2020

reality revision-Ahead-SMALL-CROPEver looking through the lens of reality revisionism, it’s not surprising to find that ‘de-funding’ the old reality has been thrown into the mix of revisionist ‘cancel culture’–canceling (through de-funding in this case) the old or competing reality of local police forces. More and more people are adopting the idea that the true goal of this revision is to nationalize the police force in this country, but I strongly disagree. Rather I find  nationalization to be very much like one of the definitions of socialism I provided in the last essay: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism.

Here again I feel compelled to remind the reader that Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist tactics are being MADE USE OF by globalists to install their own world government, which will be a global corporate fascist police state administered by 12 elitist families in perpetuity. Nationalizing police is the middle or transitory stage (socialist) of the real goal, which is the installation of a globalist police force on American soil. A global police force is something globalists have been talking about for decades, and “talking” isn’t all they’ve been doing about it. Five years ago, it was Obama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, who, on behalf of his administration in 2015, gave a presentation to the United Nations in which she pledged support for a global law enforcement initiative called the Strong Cities Network.

Below is a brief 15 minute video on this development, made by Constitutional Attorney KrisAnne Hall, the day after Lynch made her speech at the UN. Hall discussed what this meant for the future of our country, and read what she felt were pertinent points. In the interest of truth and transparency, you can read the entirely of Lynch’s speech at the following link to the website where it’s still posted:

I’m posting the first paragraph of Lynch’s speech below so you can compare it with what Hall is reading and commenting on in the video. You may find it interesting whose name pops up first in Lynch’s speech, given current events in New York–this is confluence, not coincidence. Below is the first paragraph of Lynch’s speech, followed by Hall’s video commentary:

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch Announces the Launch of the Strong Cities Network at the United Nations General Assembly
New York, NY ~ Tuesday, September 29, 2015
Remarks as prepared for delivery

“Thank you, Mayor [Bill] de Blasio, for those kind words; for your dedication to promoting equality [globalism] and expanding opportunity; and for your service to the people of this great city – the city I call home. I would also like to recognize High Commissioner for Human Rights [Prince Zeid Ra’ad] Al Hussein and the UN-Habitat program for their inspiring work and bold leadership as we work to create a future of sustainable peace, development and opportunity. And I’d like to thank all of the mayors and other municipal leaders who are helping to ensure safe and prosperous futures for our communities and our world by serving on the Steering Committee of the Strong Cities Network. It’s a pleasure to join such a distinguished group of world leaders on this historic occasion and it’s a privilege to represent the Obama Administration and the United States as we inaugurate this innovative, collaborative and critically important global effort.”


Openly submitting the US to a UN police force took place years ago, and if you weren’t aware of it, it wasn’t because honest news agencies and/or citizen journalists weren’t talking about it. It’s because dishonest and disloyal news outlets (most now owned and operated by 6 globalist corporations) celebrated the event with glee, phony virtue signaling and spin, while their tech company counterparts censored anyone still clinging to the previous reality of America remaining a sovereign republic maintaining it’s right to self-governance and self-determination.

I think it’s critical to understand and remember the necessary role of censorship during reality revision attempts. People won’t stand up against things–things like ideological subversion–when they don’t even know its happening. Here again I would offer a quick reminder that most people really are good people and would do the right thing if they knew what it was, which means that only through ignorance can our goodness be used against us. Globalists know and understand this. They exploit it relentlessly. When you see mass media organs treating the public like a giant mushroom farm, the duped-gooder phenomenon of people participating in their own demise en-masse under false pretenses is never far behind. There’s an old quote by John Milton that both perfectly describes the situation and also makes for an excellent segue into the next stage of the issue: “they who have put out the people’s eyes reproach them of their blindness”.


You may recall, in a previous essay on reality revisionism and the phony environmental movement, that globalists have always planned on using a contrived environmental crisis during their final push towards installing themselves as the new forever-leaders of planet earth, and that they were insistent upon doing it by decree rather than through any kind of democratic process (which would allow for honest scrutiny and public debate), instead of letting the ‘cannon fodder’ actually vote for it. The outward or public excuse for this elitist view is that the public isn’t smart enough to know they aren’t smart enough to govern themselves. The self-crowned elite, alone then, must carry the heavy burden of saving you from yourselves, and they will need complete control to do it.

In whittling or mocking it down to it’s core, they believe that if you fail to sink to your knees in awe of the sparkling residue of infinite knowledge pouring out of their magnificently imbued grey matter rendering their huge heads with an almost omnipotent glow of divinity, then surely you aren’t intelligent enough to be trusted with determining your own future; if you’re going to tell the emperor he has no clothes on, you’re going to be banned from both court and square when important decisions about your own future are being made. Authorship (author-ity) over the reality construct must be left solely to the adults in the room, but don’t fret, you can read all about what they’ve decided to do with your future in the next issue of Specatator’s Weekly. 

If you’ve skipped previous essays covering globalism through the back door (by decree not consent) and don’t know specifically what i’m referring to, i’ll recount some particularly salient conversations in that regard below–these were also highlighted in a recent essays titled: IDEOLOGICAL SUBVERSION–And You Won’t Even Know It’s Happening


Of additional importance in this regard (beginning at the 1:03.55 mark), the Australian politician Ann Bressington begins to explain the 1968 origins of Agenda 21 via the Club of Rome–a think tank tasked with a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to accept global [new order] solutions to local problems. Take note of her use of the term “social engineering” during this speech. She goes on to recount the following:

“In 1997 Mikhail Gorbachev, also a member of the Club of Rome, said, “We are moving toward a New World Order—the world of communism. And we shall never turn off that road…the environmental crisis will be the international disaster that will unlock the New World Order one world government.”

She further outlined it was during the 1992 Earth Summit that a document known as The Earth Charter was produced. This document was co-written by Maurice Strong [Club of Rome member] and Mikhail Gorbachev. Both stated it was hoped this document would be adopted as the new 10 commandments with environmentalism as the new one world religion. She later quotes Ted Turner [Club of Rome member], an outspoken advocate of depopulation, echoing the same sentiments on the Georgia guide stones encouraging a 95% reduction in global population.


At the 7:50 mark Hunt plays a video snippet of David Lang (Montreal International Investment Banker) decreeing that the environmental and economic activities of the world order not be shared with the public. As seen/heard in the video:

“I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process—that would take too long and require far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder, unfortunately, which populates the earth. We have to take an almost elitist program. That we can see beyond our swollen bellies and look to the future, in time frames and in results, which are not easily understood, or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to simplistic definition.“

Those familiar with the United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century program (Agenda 21–previously referenced by Australian politician Ann Bressington), are already well aware that bypassing normal channels of debate or the ‘democratic process’ is precisely how the program is being handled—by decree. Rosa Koire, author of Behind the Green Maskis an excellent resource for information on Agenda 21, how it is being enacted in (y)our local communities, and also how its doctrine subsumes individuality in favor of a globalist collective. Those who watched Hunt’s video will recall him outlining the difference between the first, second, third, and “fourth world” discussed by people like Maurice Strong—the Fourth World referring to the new order having absorbed all of the others and being the only, and final world left:

“Yogis and Shamans refer to it as the 4th World Wilderness—the lostness of the mind. The lostness of the mind refers to the collective consciousness—persons will be coerced through lies, drugs, fear and pain to surrender themselves and their ego to the collective consciousness [global governance]. The 4th World will be much like a return to Caesars or Babylon…” –George Hunt

It’s interesting that George Hunt referred to the “4th world” subsuming all of the others, and next Yuri goes on to explain that ideological subversion has four stages. Coincidence or confluence? It’s been years since I’ve watched Mr. Hunt’s video so I find myself wondering now just how similar Maurice Strong’s first, second, third, and fourth worlds are to Yuri’s four stages of total subversion.


The Order-out-of-chaos strategy is one I have covered repeatedly over the years in both radio interviews and writing, and it’s constantly in our face. How many times have you watched a movie wherein some villain is standing triumphantly over a scorched earth? We wonder at the logic of it: why would you destroy something that you intend to rule over? What’s the point? Well, that IS the point: to build your new world (order) on the ashes of the old one. But the plot isn’t brazenly being outed via Hollywood movies on our television screens anymore–it’s happening in leftist [globalist] run cities all over the country. Burning churches, homes, businesses, police cars–these are literal manifestations and interpretations of a ‘scorched earth’ policy being played out in reality. In terms of reality revisionism, destruction of the ENTIRE competing reality is the goal, meaning ‘scorched earth’ applies to everything from the implementation of thought police to the purposeful destruction of the economy and even environment.

The purpose of the chaos isn’t just to destroy the old reality, but also to pave the way for the new one. In this, when it comes to competing realities struggling for full manifestation, especially the way globalists use the technique, our chaos is their carefully scripted re-ordering (of society) process. The following excerpt comes from a previous essay titled: UNSUSTAINABLE REALITY REVISIONS AND THE ORDER-OUT-OF-CHAOS BIRTH

The Hegelian Principle: An excerpt from THE MOST SECRET SCIENCE (1998 Edition), by Archibald E. Roberts, Lieutenant Colonel, AUS, retired

Revolutionaries in government have created economic chaos, shortages in food and fuel, confiscatory taxation, a crisis in education, the threat of war, and other diversions to condition Americans for The New World Order.

The technique is as old as politics itself. It is the Hegelian principle of bringing about change in a three-step process: Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis.

The first step (thesis) is to create a problem. The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic, hysteria). The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem created in step one—change which would have been impossible to impose on the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two.

Applying the Hegelian principle, and irresistible financial influence, concealed mattoids seek to dismantle social and political structures by which free men govern themselves—ancient landmarks erected at great cost in blood and treasure.

Their objective is to emasculate states, merge nations under universal government, centralize economic powers, and control the world’s people and resources.

Along that same vein you may also enjoy the article, The Cloward-Piven Strategy: Orchestrating A Crisis So Government Can “Solve” It. From the article:

“The end goal of the Cloward-Piven strategy is the creation of a political crisis leading to a guaranteed annual income.[1] Essentially, the Cloward-Piven strategy would lead to the complete control of citizens through Socialism/Communism.

As a background, Frances Fox Piven is a professor of political science and sociology at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York.[2] The late Richard Cloward was an sociologist and liberal activist, and Piven’s spouse.[3]

Their “strategy” to implement political crisis to achieve a guaranteed annual income was published in the May 2, 1966 of The Nation, a leading liberal political and cultural magazine. In this publication, their main goal to achieve the crisis was to have “a massive drive to recruit the poor onto the welfare rolls.” A federal program to administer these large welfare programs would be needed. This is because if it is administered locally, there would be lower enrollment because “the poor are most visible and proximate in the local community; antagonism toward them has always, therefore, been more intense locally than at the federal level.”

This means that if there was more oversight at the local level it would not allow the welfare rolls to increase to the levels needed to cause a financial crisis. Therefore, their solution was to move programs to Washington D.C. where people are not as aware of the costs and oversight of the programs.

The strategy also rejected that a person could overcome poverty through any “institution of private enterprise”, signaling that hard work, education, and personal responsibility are not a solution to poverty. Their only solution is a “federal program of income redistribution” to “elevate the poor en- masse from poverty.”

Training, gathering, and activating the hordes of globalist chaos has already happened. We’re seeing the results of the strategy in full bloom now. A previous essay on Ideological Subversion discussed the decades-long targeting of our youth with the indoctrination and propaganda necessary to produce the future mobs needed for the next phase. All together, there is an endless line of well-trained malcontents converging on reality for the purpose of revising and re-reordering society towards a more globalist ideal. There are the more public or obvious groups like BLM (Black Lives Matter), BAMN (By Any Means Necessary), ANTIFA (anti-fascist) and so forth, yet those represent but the tip of the iceberg of groups working in harmony for an end they will never get nor personally benefit from. There are other groups, working just as diligently although more covertly (not being covered by media), like Extinction Rebellion and the Sunshine Movement. While you may not be consciously aware of groups like Extinction Rebellion, if you watched the newest Godzilla movie, you’ve seen their symbol repeatedly (two triangles forming an hour glass) in the film, whose main story line was depopulating the earth to “save” it.

With the goal of installing a globalist-loyal police force, there’s a reason each group is using the same pressure points, and it’s through the repetitive use of these pressure points, by each group, that we can be sure these seemingly disparate groups and their activities are being coordinated and directed behind the scenes from a higher level. The following video presentation by G. Edward Griffin is very revealing of that aspect. Below are quotes taken directly from the six minute clip:

“As early as 1928, the communists declared that the racial differences among our people constituted the weakest and most vulnerable point in our social fabric. By constantly probing and straining at this one spot they calculated that eventually the cloth could be torn apart and that Americans could be divided, weakened, and perhaps even set against each other in open combat.”

“In 1943, the following directive was issued from party headquarters in the United States. It read: ‘When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them after suitable build-ups, as fascist, or Nazi, or anti-semitic, and use the prestige of of anti-fascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them. In the public mind, constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell. The association will, after enough repetition, become fact in the pubic mind.”


Birds of a feather mob and plot together

Strangely enough, there is an observable and interesting phenomenon in the horde mentality as it pertains not only to leaders of the associated political party and it’s minion class, but also the leaders of the mobs themselves: the more corrupt, hate-filled, and ‘cares they have cremated’, as demonstrated through past actions, the bigger their reward and the faster their promotion within the system and its ranks.

You may recall, in the previous essay titled, THE APPEASER FEEDS THE CROCODILE IN THE HOPES IT WILL EAT HIM LAST, the featured Venezuelan expatriate Elizabeth Rogliani commenting on the similarities between what happened in Venezuela versus what’s happening now the in the US, including the replacement of their police force. Goodman and Rogliani begin discussing this at the 32:00 mark in the video:

Rogliani: They have really no regard for the law, and that’s where I see the similarities between what happened to us (Venezuela) and what happened to you guys (U.S.). You have these people that are criminals, that don’t care that they’re criminals, and they’re fine with putting these people in power. We had the same thing–every person that was important in our government had a rap sheet. So yeah, the current President now, he met Chavez in prison. [Note: Chavez was in prison for repeatedly attempting to assassinate a previous President and his family]

Goodman: That’s unbelievable. See, in the United States we do it a little differently. They (deep state) just forego prosecuting the criminals  and allow them to go directly to government.

Isn’t that the truth? Before long it becomes a near competition between demoralized adherents, within both the party and the mob mass, something akin to a race to the top of rotten, instead of a race to the bottom, and we start seeing more things like this as a consequence:

The Third Stage of the Installing a Global Police Force is Beginning

The reality revision of a local police force accountable to local people, being replaced by a global police force loyal and accountable to globalists and their agenda, is being accomplished through order-out-of-chaos (the Hegelian principle):

  1. THESIS (create the problem or perception of the problem): Undermine, corrupt, and demoralize the existing police force
  2. ANTI-THESIS (generate opposition to the problem with fear, panic, hysteria): Activate the outrage mobs and propaganda media to demand a change be made
  3. SYNTHESIS (offer the solution to the problem created in step one): Make the change from a local police force to a global police force

The third phase of the revision (synthesis) is now being observably activated, and we also see the U.N. reciprocating in the exploitation of recent events:

From here it shouldn’t surprise us to find a UN website that helps people find local chapters in their area (unausadotorg/chapters/) with the following displayed on their home page:

In light of the killing of George Floyd and the inequalities surfaced by COVID-19, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) has introduced a resolution, H.Con.Res.100, which calls for the formation of a U.S. Truth, Racial Healing, and Transformation Commission. This is an essential element in any process to address and extinguish racial injustice in America.

What UN Police Do–According to the policedotundotorg website:

The mission of UN Police is to enhance international peace and security by supporting Member-States in conflict, post-conflict and other crisis situations. Its goal is to realize effective, efficient, representative, responsive and accountable police services that serve and protect the population. To that end, United Nations Police build and support or, where mandated, act as a substitute or partial substitute for host-State police capacity to prevent and detect crime, protect life and property and maintain public order and safety, in adherence to the rule of law and international human rights law (S/2018/1183).

Any added emphasis in the description is their own, including “to prevent and detect crime, protect life and property and maintain public order and safety”–which covers basically everything some local leaders in the US have STOPPED their own police forces from doing and protecting by giving them “stand-down” orders.


The installation of a Global Police Force through the Strong Cities Network being the real goal of current related events, you may recall what KrisAnne Hall discussed in the video (above) at the 8:08 mark while reading directly from Lynch’s 2015 speech at the United Nations:

‘…federal officials have partnered with a wide array of local stakeholders – including government and public safety officers, social service providers, educators, businesses and nonprofits – to build and implement community resilience frameworks.’

“This is your foreshadowing that this safe cities network, this strong cities network, will not just pull in your cities, but it’s going to pull in every aspect of your cities down the minute administrative aspects of who you are. Do you see this social service providers–we re now going to get United Nations and foreign government influence in Social Services. Do you know what that means? That means the the human rights platform of the United Nations–to rob parents of their parental rights–is going to be implemented at the local level. This is not tinfoil hat stuff. I’m reading you the very text.  -KrisAnne Hall

I have posted the entirely of that paragraph from Lynch’s speech at the UN below because, given current happenings in very particular cities, I think you’ll find some extremely interesting connections. Again, the entirety of the speech can be found here. The following is from the fourth paragraph of the speech. I have highlighted key words and phrases in bold:

“The government of the United States is fully invested in this collaborative approach and we have seen the value of empowering local communities by promoting initiatives they design and lead themselves.  Through our Model Regions program, federal officials have partnered with a wide array of local stakeholders – including government and public safety officers, social service providers, educators, businesses and nonprofits – to build and implement community resilience frameworks tailored to the unique needs of residents.  In Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota, for example, government officials, private partners and civic leaders have come together to create a mentorship program for Somali youth; to build an “opportunity hub” that provides educational resources and job training; and to contribute to a program called Youthprise that is forging connections between community organizations, investors and young people.  At the same time, officials in the Greater Boston region are exploring the connection between criminal justice and public health by partnering with the Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services to tap their experience with violence prevention and intervention.  And in the Denver area, the United States Attorney’s Office has led a multifaceted community engagement and education effort involving all levels of government.  These initiatives and others like them were the subject of a convening just two weeks ago, organized by our Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, in conjunction with the Police Executive Research Forum, which brought together law enforcement executives and community partners from over a dozen cities to plan ways to translate these cutting-edge programs into new regions.”

At this point I don’t have anywhere near a complete list of U.S. cities/federal officials participating in the Model Regions component of the Strong Cities Network, but for some, it isn’t hard to guess. This would of course include cities that are now cutting funds to their police departments while at the same time violent crimes in the city are skyrocketing. Minneapolis, and New York (both referenced in Lynch’s speech at the UN) are obvious, but then we also have other major cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, Portland and Seattle following suit:


New York:

Los Angeles:





Cities making this specific change are also clearly participants in the UN Strong Cities Network. Remembering that it’s one thing to have globalists infiltrate a political party, but another thing entirely to have the whole party become champions for globalism, it isn’t surprising to find most of these changes occurring in Democrat [globalist] run cities. Nor should it be surprising that cities with the highest rates of violence are often ran by the same political class. The following article was posted on Hannity June 16th, 2020, and indicates Albuquerque, NM is has signed up to be a “model region” for installing a global police force.

REPORT: Albuquerque, NM to Send ‘Unarmed Social Workers’ NOT POLICE to Some 911 Calls

The City of Albuquerque, New Mexico confirmed this week that some 911 calls will be answered by “unarmed social workers” depending on the nature of the emergency.

“Hours before Albuquerque police detained alleged members of an armed civilian group when a protest erupted in gunfire Monday, the mayor of New Mexico’s largest city announced that unarmed social workers – not officers – would now respond to certain 911 calls,” reports Fox News.

We’ve placed more and more issues on the plates of officers who are not trained — despite their best efforts and despite some training — they’re not totally trained to be a social worker, or to be an addiction counselor, or to deal with things around child abuse when they’re just answering a call,” Mayor Tim Keller said. “We should have trained professionals do this, instead of folks with a gun and a badge.”

Los Angeles, California also appears to be a model region for installing a global police force.

LA To Send Unarmed Social Workers To Some Emergency Calls Instead Of LAPD

“LOS ANGELES (AP) — Unarmed social workers instead of police would respond to nonviolent calls for service under a proposal Tuesday from several City Council members following nationwide calls for law enforcement reforms in the wake of George Floyd’s killing.

A motion signed by six of the council’s 15 members would use teams of trained city, county and community-based professionals, such as homeless outreach workers, to handle certain emergency situations, such as mental health crises and substance abuse calls.

The motion calls for city departments to work with the Police Department, Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority and county agencies to develop an “unarmed model of crisis response” for nonviolent calls now handled by the LAPD.”

Minneapolis Vows to “Dismantle” Police, Replace With Social Workers

As protests, riots, and vandalism continue across America in response to the death of George Floyd at the hands of a Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) officer, members of the Minneapolis City Council are promising to “dismantle” the police department and “replace” it with a “transformative” new model of law enforcement altogether.

“We are going to dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department,” tweeted council member Jeremiah Ellison, son of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison.

He added: “And when we’re done, we’re not simply gonna glue it back together. We are going to dramatically rethink how we approach public safety and emergency response.”

For the veteran reality-miners out there, the idea of giving social services even more power over people’s lives is horrifying, and rightly so. While the legacy (main stream) media works overtime to ignore the massive, massive human trafficking network and problem spanning the globe, too many people have already been scarred by it for it to be ignored. And we certainly can’t forget that social services has repeatedly proven to be part of the ‘missing children’ problem. As this article points out, “How can social services lose 18,000 children – and not look for them?” Indeed.

Stories like this also clearly indicate the program will be used as a gigantic new snitch factory to weed out and punish dissenters: Virginia Health Dept Urges Citizens to Snitch on Churches and Gun Ranges


These specific partnerships were also discussed by Lynch during her speech to the UN, but at this point I think readers know who most of these businesses, educators and non-profits are. We know the UN has been pushing down globalist curriculum into our public schools for decades and that our colleges have been turned into Marxist/Globalist indoctrination centers. I think most people also understand which businesses and non-profits are involved, which includes everyone from Soros, to BLM, to big tech companies giving the globalist agenda the hard push while simultaneously censoring dissent.  Below are some refreshers, but I would take a closer look at the Global Citizen Movement’s role in current events.


Unsurprisingly, the Global Citizens Movement is heavily targeting the youth of very nation on earth, by, you guessed it–the United Nations. In a film titled: The Global Citizen Movement | Full Documentary (posted July 17, 2017–which you can find on youtube), the film opens with a young woman making the following statements through a megaphone to a crowd of youth who are repeating everything she says:

  • I think in 10 years from now… (crowd repeats it back to her)
  • The thing that’s going to be remembered about Seattle (crowd repeats it back to her)
  • Is not what tear gas bomb went off on what street corner (crowd repeats it back to her)
  • But that the WTO (Word Trade Organization) in 1999 (crowd repeats it back to her)
  • Was the birth (crowd repeats it back to her)
  • Of a global Citizens Movement (crowd repeats it back to her)
  • For a democratic global economy (crowd repeats it back to her and they all cheer together)

There are, quite literally, thousands of videos on the topic made over the last few years alone, and while I could post them here, it’s really something you need to see for yourselves to fully grasp. It’s a very deep rabbit hole (of confusion and propaganda) unto itself. You will, of course, find the usual (billionaire) suspects heavily involved, familiar names like Richard Branson and Bill Gates.

While I didn’t have time to watch the entire aforementioned video on the Global Citizen Movement, and what I did watch left me scratching my head as to what future vision it subscribed to, I think it’s worth drilling down into the claim that the GCM is working towards a global economy. Considering it’s now public knowledge the socialist/globalist-minded in our country are constantly spouting off the “evils of capitalism”, and the COVID ‘crisis’ is being used by leftists/globalists all over the world to destroy economies, should we really be surprised to see Al Gore suddenly pop up demanding a “great reset of global capitalism? The following article was posted on Fox Business, June 25th, 2020:

Al Gore, UN Secretary-General, others now demanding ‘Great Reset’ of global capitalism
These are truly dangerous times for those who support individual liberty and free markets
By Justin HaskinsFOXBusiness

“The economic, social and political chaos caused by the COVID-19 outbreak and Black Lives Matter protests have for months captured the attention of virtually every American — and for good reason. These are incredibly important issues worthy of significant and thoughtful debate.

But while most Americans have been preoccupied with protests and pandemics, a potentially bigger story has managed to slip beneath the radar: a growing movement among the world’s most powerful leaders to call for a “reset” of the entire global economy.


At a meeting hosted by the highly influential World Economic Forum earlier in June, powerful officials from nonprofits, government, business, academia, labor unions and activist groups announced their plan for a “Great Reset” of global capitalism. It’s a proposal they acknowledged has only been made possible because of the “opportunity” provided by the economic destruction caused by the novel coronavirus.

Supporters and attendees of the meeting included Prince Charles; António Guterres, the secretary-general of the United Nations; Ajay Banga, CEO of MasterCard; Bernard Looney, CEO of BP; and Gina Gopinath, the chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, among many others.

The purpose of the Great Reset isn’t merely to enact policies that would lead to additional wealth redistribution, but rather to completely overhaul the world’s existing structures and institutions

In an article published on the World Economic Forum’s website, Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of WEF, wrote of the Great Reset, “Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”

You can read the rest of the article at the link provided, but we’ve been hearing about this financial reset for years under the cover of the phony green movement–the only thing ‘green’ about it being the massive redistribution of wealth from the people of the world, to globalist corporations and pockets. They used to call it a carbon tax, but I have little doubt their marketing centers are hard at work re-branding that one–the word “tax” just doesn’t work in a commercial showing people running through tall green grass while laughing and holding hands.

Just how ‘global’ is the Global Citizens Movement? It pretty much means what it says, and per the usual, pop culture icons are being used to bring the youth on board:


The more modern version of their mission statement (According to Wikipedia):

“The United Nations is an intergovernmental organization that aims to maintain international peace and security, develop friendly relations among nations, achieve international cooperation, and be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations”

The word “harmonize” here is very similar to Yuri Bezmenov’s ‘normalization’ as it means to ensure that every nation adopts, uses and acts on the same set of pre-selected standards; to standardize. As you can see below, micro-managing every aspect of a planet and its inhabitants is a multi-tentacled task, and I especially enjoyed their description of the World Bank, which is also a UN institution, as being focused on “poverty reduction and the improvement of living standards worldwide”. That’s like calling one of the most unpatriotic bills in American History the “Patriot Act”. [Below is the public list of UN Agencies and their locations, taken directly from undotorg]:

UNDP Headquarters: New York City, USA; UNEP Headquarters: Nairobi, Kenya; UNFPA Headquarters: New York City, USA; UN-Habitat  Headquarters: Nairobi, Kenya; UNICEF Headquarters: New York City, USA; WFP Headquarters: Rome, Italy.

UN Specialized Agencies: FAO Headquarters: Rome, Italy IFAD Headquarters: Rome, Italy; ILO Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland; IMF Headquarters: Washington, DC, USA; IMO Headquarters: London, United Kingdom; ITU Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland; UNESCO Headquarters: Paris, France; UNIDO Headquarters: Vienna, Austria; UNWTO Headquarters: Madrid, Spain; UPU Headquarters: Bern, Switzerland; WHO Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland; WIPO Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland; WMO Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland; World Bank Headquarters: Washington, DC, USA.

The same UN website also includes 8 ‘Other Entities and Bodies’ and 6 more ‘Organizations’ which also includes the WHO or World Health Organization.

The United Nations is considered by many, myself included, to be the Trojan horse of globalism–it’s like calling the installation of a global police force the “Strong Cities Network” wherein you first have to purposefully make the cities unsafe, to such a degree that people will demand something new–like a global police force!–to swoop in and come to the rescue. But it may be more helpful to view the UN and their assorted agencies more like a line of cars all being designed and produced by the same factory, each different agency being a different make and model. Under the right lights the windows gleam, the chrome sparkles, the leather interior looks soft and the paint has a glassy finish. But what’s under the hood? That’s what we really want to know, right? We want to know what this baby can do–how does it actually run once you get it out of the dealership and onto the street?


In continuing the analogy, before we take it for a test drive, we may first want to read performance reviews from people who have had previous personal experiences with the product. The third review below is especially detailed.

Review #1:

WHO (UN World Health Organization) Offered $20M Bribe To Poison Madagascar Cure

In a shocking claim, the President of Madagascar has said that the WHO offered $20m bribe to poison COVID-19 cure. The herbal remedy called COVID-19 Organics made from Artemisia can cure COVID-19 patients within ten days said the President. He also raised the question that if it was a European country that had actually discovered this remedy, would there be so much doubt?

The President of Madagascar Andry Rajoelina has accused the World Health Organisation of a plot to have its COVID-19 Organics, the local African ‘cure’ for the virus poisoned. Rajoelina claims WHO offered a $20 million bribe to poisoned their medicine, Tanzania Perspective reported on the front-page of its 14th May edition.

The President of Madagascar believes the only reason the rest of the world has refused to treat Madagascar’s cure for the coronavirus with urgency and respect is that the remedy comes from Africa.In an interview with French media, President Rajoelina reportedly said he has noticed what he believes stems from usual condescension toward Africans.

“I think the problem is that (the drink) comes from Africa and they can’t admit… that a country like Madagascar… has come up with this formula to save the world.
If it wasn’t Madagascar, and if it was a European country that had actually discovered this remedy, would there be so much doubt? I don’t think so,” said Africa’s youngest head of state, the President of Madagascar Andry Rajoelina.

“What is the problem with Covid-Organics, really? Could it be that this product comes from Africa? Could it be that it’s not OK for a country like Madagascar, which is the 63rd poorest country in the world… to have come up with (this formula) that can help save the world?”

“If it wasn’t Madagascar, and if it was a European country that had actually discovered this remedy, would there be so much doubt? I don’t think so,” said Africa’s youngest head of state, the President of Madagascar Andry Rajoelina.”

Review #2:

BOMBSHELL UN DOSSIER UN aid workers raped 60,000 people as it’s claimed organisation employs 3,300 paedophiles

A WHISTLE blower has claimed UN staff could have carried out 60,000 rapes in the last decade as aid workers indulge in sex abuse unchecked around the world.

The claim is in a bombshell dossier that former senior United Nations official Andrew Macleod handed over to DFID Secretary Priti Patel last year.

In it, Professor Macleod also estimated there are 3,300 paedophiles working for the world body’s various agencies alone.

Thousands more “predatory” sex abusers specifically target aid charity jobs to get close to vulnerable women and children.

And there has been an “endemic” cover-up of the sickening crimes for two decades, with those who attempt to blow the whistle just getting fired.

Sharing his dossier with The Sun, Prof MacLeod last night warned that the spiraling abuse scandal was on the same scale as the Catholic Church’s.”

Review #3:

The Corruption of the United Nations
The oil-for-food scandal was an international embarrassment—but it’s just one example in an organization rife with corruption.

Rape. Murder. Billions of dollars in fraud and embezzlement on a global scale. The United Nations, formed to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war,” has instead become more like a movie too graphic to show your children.

In the last year, the reputation of the UN has been shredded by allegations of kickbacks, billions of dollars in graft in the oil-for-food scandal, the rape of minors in the Congo sex scandal, and a total lack of accountability. United Nations officials know it’s time for serious reform.

The independent report on the oil-for-food scandal, produced by a committee led by former U.S. Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Paul Volcker, was finally released in September. Criticizing the UN from top to bottom, the language of the report was crystal clear: “The inescapable conclusion from the committee’s work” is that the UN “needs thorough reform—and it needs it urgently.” We will see exactly how serious the lapses in judgment were at every level.

But with a goal as noble as saving our children from war, how did the idea of the UN go so terribly askew? What’s wrong with the United Nations?

The UN, Corruption and Scandals: How Did We Get Here?

In 2018, the British public was shocked to learn that its cherished aid agency, Oxfam, was mired in a sex scandal which involved its own aid workers in Haiti, who were essentially using their power to rape women, or at the very least, forcefully exchanging sex for food and medicine.

But should we really have been so shocked?

Indeed, in the world of international aid, it is commonly known that western aid workers often carry out such practices. But how do they escape prosecution or any form of accountability?

Given that the UN conducted a report of its own staff in January of this year and concluded that a third of all those interviewed reported some form of sexual harassment with ten percent reporting actually being touched inappropriately, is it not unreasonable to assume that it is the UN itself which is setting the ‘example’ to aid workers in the field?

UN Secretary-General António Guterres was quoted by Reuters in January: “As an organization founded on equality, dignity and human rights, we must lead by example and set the standard.” But under his administration, the UN might foster a reputation of being a champion of sexual harassment but it is also a compliant offender in covering it up. According to Reuters, “The United Nations has been trying to increase transparency and strengthen how it deals with such accusations over the past few years, particularly a string of sexual exploitation and abuse claims made against UN peacekeepers in Africa.”

The United Nations: A Bastion of Corruption and Scandals
The UN has failed to discipline or expel officials who have been charged with serious crimes.

The integrity of the United Nations (UN) has deteriorated, as it has become a kind of refuge for officials involved in serious corruption cases.

The body, which is the largest existing international organization, has allowed people to walk its corridors with impunity, who are now facing criminal investigations and who have even been accused of serious crimes such as money laundering.

In 2015 one of the greatest cases of corruption in the history of the UN was uncovered, as John Ashe, a diplomat from Antigua and Barbuda and former president of the General Assembly of the United Nations, was arrested in New York after accepting bribes from Chinese businessmen

The frequency and severity of scandals leads one to believe that the international body has been discredited, to the point of doubting their true mission.

Bachelet: silence and corruption

One of the most recent examples is the appointment of the former president of Chile, Michelle Bachelet, as High Commissioner for Human Rights at the UN.

Until a few months ago, Bachelet openly supported the regime of Nicolás Maduro; she never dared to describe him as a dictator or to strongly condemn the violations of human rights in Venezuela; on the contrary, she preferred to remain silent.

But it is not just a matter of the hypocrisy of having this ex-president as the official UN defender of human rights. It is also the fact that both her and her son were linked to corruption in Chile in relation to a millionaire real estate business.

Heredia: money laundering

But Bachelet’s case is not the only one that helps to further discredit the UN. In 2016 Nadine Heredia, ex-first lady of Peru, was appointed a UN official for Food and Agriculture (FAO).

Heredia would receive diplomatic immunity when working for the international organization, despite being deeply involved in the Lava Jato case, the largest corruption case in Latin America.

While Heredia was being investigated in Peru for money laundering and fraud, the UN appointed her as FAO liaison officer in Geneva.

In May of 2017, Heredia decided to resign this position “due to the rules of conduct” imposed by the Judicial Power of Peru, because of the investigation she faced into money laundering; meaning, it was not the UN who decided to dispense with their services when they heard about the scandal.

Chávez’s daughter

But as if this were not enough, the loss of credibility at the UN is compounded with cases such as that of Venezuelans María Gabriela Chávez and Rafael Ramírez.

The daughter of former President Hugo Chávez Frías was appointed alternate ambassador of Venezuela to the UN. She is the richest woman in the South American country, and one of the richest in the world. According to Forbes magazine, she has more than USD $4 billion in her accounts in Andorra and the United States.

The daughter of the former Venezuelan president is alleged to be involved in a international criminal organization that has links to money laundering activities.

In addition, she has been involved in a scandal related to the sale of overpriced rice in Argentina.

According to the newspaper Clarín, rice shipments were sent to Venezuela, under the auspices of a shadowy firm, which sells rice at inflated prices and whose owners have direct contact with Julio De Vido, former Argentine ambassador in Venezuela, and with María Gabriela Chávez.

Ramirez: money laundering

But the most blatant case of how the UN has become a refuge for serious corrupt, is that of Rafael Ramírez, who until 2017 was the representative of Venezuela at the UN and had diplomatic immunity.

Currently, Ramírez is being investigated in the United States and Venezuela for corruption in the state oil company PDVSA. In December he went underground, after the Maduro regime let him escape.

The former UN official was heavily involved in money laundering in the United States and Europe. Ramírez’s guilt came to light after his brother, Fidel Ramírez Carreño, was accused of falsifying millions of dollars of invoices in order to further the scheme.

Sexual harassment

The organisation also has a serious internal problem with sexual harassment. An extensive investigation by The Guardian accused the UN of having allowed the proliferation of sexual harassment and hostile work environments for its employees in UN offices around the world.

The British newspaper interviewed dozens of current and former employees of the organization, who described a “culture of silence” within its structure. According to the investigation, despite the complaints, all alleged aggressors continued in their jobs.

And, in theory, the UN was created to facilitate cooperation on issues such as international law, international peace and security, economic and social development, humanitarian affairs and human rights. However, these objectives have only been discussed in theory.

Today, this organization not only does not require minimum standards of integrity and experience for its officials, but its independent bodies also leave much to be desired. The Security Council, for example, has remained silent before the dictatorship in Venezuela and disregarded the need for humanitarian intervention in the South American country in the wake of the serious political and economic crises the country is facing.”

Those are some rather sobering reviews of the product (a new world order) being pushed on countries around the world through force, coercion, corruption, usurpation, propaganda, mal-education, and various other unsavory means. A friend of mine used to ask, “does a civilization that refuses to protect it’s children, really deserve to survive?” That’s a fair question, and while I find myself often looking to blame the purposefully mis-educated youth of the world for our current predicament, that isn’t really true, is it? It was OUR responsibility to make sure these kinds of things couldn’t happen again, the same way it was the responsibility of those who came before us to do the same. It’s time for us to begin taking that responsibility seriously again.

Aside from the installation of a global police force on American soil, what’s the other big takeaway or lesson to be found in all of this? It’s the same timeless lesson I hope we will one day stop forgetting: mankind cannot continue to participate in their own demise out of ignorance and escape that demise at the same time. Is there a new world order coming then? I suspect there is, but I also suspect, strongly, that it isn’t going to look anything like the grand delusions of self-important globalists. No. Something else entirely is about to emerge–something hopeful, vibrant, exciting, and full of endless wonder. The “Great Awakening” also means what it says on the box, and THAT my friends, is a serious, serious game-changer. It is simultaneously both their greatest fear and our greatest hope. Use it wisely.

May we all have the courage, wisdom and moral fortitude to make Earth great again.


SUBSCRIBE TO DROWNING IN ABSURDITY: Want to be notified of new D.I.A. posts via email? Hit the subscribe button on the top right of the page. It’s free and your information stays private. 

COMMENTS POLICY: Please be advised that D.I.A. observes a zero tolerance policy for trolling. All comments (unless they contain links) are reviewed and therefore may not appear right away. Comments that contain links are automatically set to be disregarded. Comments unrelated to the subject matter (intending to derail the conversation) will also be disregarded. 





  2. Pingback: Comply or Die: How America Will Enforce TOTAL Wokeness | Glenn TV | Ep 98 | Drowning in absurdity

  3. Once again you have bought focus to the the drama being played out before our eyes. I am a slow reader and have spent most of today reading this and still havent finished. I am at the reviews of UN..glowing as they It is hard not to get emotional. I looked for the documentary on Gloabal Citizen and became overwhelmed. I could not find the one you referenced but saved one Titled “UN agenda 30 and what it means to be a Gloabal Citizen” It has helped me reinforce myself how dire the situation is. Articles like this is what we need to wake people up. If they would only read.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks for your thoughtful comment Jenny. There was a wonderful meme circulating a while back that said, “Things are getting worse, they’re just becoming more obvious”. That’s true, but at the same time, things are being ‘allowed’ to become more obvious, as Q recently stated; You are being the gift of vision. Enough people have to see it for themselves, it’s the only way. This is absolutely true. And in that same spirit, I think you’ll find the last paragraph of the essay more uplifting.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s