October 19, 2014 by Crystal Clark

This second essay addresses the order-out-of-chaos principle in global revisionism, its ties to the duplicitous establishment of the green or sustainable development movement, associated economic revisions, the duplicity of pandemic narratives, and the hypocrisy of spreading democracy via illegal wars on what remains of sovereign nations and peoples. This essay also begins to identify and address the revisionists responsible.


The definition of a reality revision is being re-posted below from the previous essay with a reminder that the purpose of reality revisionism is to quite literally eliminate the competition or competing reality—the reality standing in the way of the intended replacement.


“Reality revisions are agenda-driven and thereby fictitious narratives carefully scripted to revise an entire global reality in order to meet or fulfill that agenda. These are major, major paradigm shifts of generational proportions that summarily pre and re-define the future victor and victimhood status of billions. These shifts aren’t meant to change the perception and therefore direction of reality for a day, week, or months, but permanently.” — The Roles of Social Engineering and Perception Management in Reality Revisionism


Still largely unbeknownst to most, we live in world in which two competing realities are constantly struggling for full manifestation. As one of them seeks to wholly dominate and fully replace the other through various methods of suppression and eradication, while the other entirely rejects such notions to the degree of criminal prosecution, they cannot peacefully co-exist—ever.  As long as this struggle continues, so too will global war, famine, corruption, injustice and strife, and ultimately, the continued demise of our entire planetary civilization via the purposeful destruction of its life support systems. Mankind can no longer continue to participate in their own demise out of ignorance (of this war) and escape that demise at the same time.

This struggle is between the sovereign state, country or individual owning their own thought, action, and right to self-determination, and a private group of aspiring Caesars in the global governance regime they intend to replace the other reality with. This ultimate global reality revision cannot fully manifest without transferring, to itself, all of the sovereign power and freedoms of the other. Suffering numerous mattoid impediments, from the birth of this new and competing reality, the order-out-of-chaos principle thought necessary to achieve it was also born. From the previous essay:

“The events of 911 were a tipping point in a missive, GLOBAL reality revision meant to change the perception and therefore direction of reality permanently, and it isn’t the first. Repeatedly we were told these heinous acts of terrorism were committed by those who hate freedom and free people, which is the one thing they actually told the truth about. It’s important to remember that reality revisionists use these revisions to eliminate the competition or competing reality. It is an impossibility for an oppressive, elitist global government (for and by the elite) to establish itself among free peoples with governance established for and by the people. Their power ends where our freedoms begin—it’s like turning a dial—when you turn our freedoms down you turn their power up, and when you turn our freedoms up you dial their power down. These reality revisions are designed not to simply turn the freedom dial down, but to ultimately turn it off.”


In the same way our ignorance is their strength, and our individual freedoms inhibit their collective power, SO TOO IS OUR CHAOS THEIR ORDER—they cannot have the one without the other. In other words, what we view as unfolding global chaos is actually a carefully scripted and manufactured order—the current reality is being re-sculpted, redesigned and re-ordered.

I suspect this is most easily recognized in the ordered chaos of sovereign nations (competing realities) just before the reality revision of regime change (war) introduces them to the democracy narrative, allowing for the installation of a pro new order leader (hopeful legate) as in the recent attempt in Ukraine. That being after, of course, previous successful regime changes (reality revisions) made in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, ect, ect.

Perhaps surprisingly, the order-out-of-chaos principle has been playing out over and over again in the margins of society through Hollywood movies consistently representing this theme and characterized by a particular image:  a demonic or satanic figure standing triumphantly with a scorched and destroyed earth in the background. After watching these movies we often find ourselves wondering at the “logic” behind completely destroying a planet you then intend to rule over—what was the point? And yet, that is precisely the point of the order-out-of-chaos principle—the birth of a new civilization built on the ashes of the old one. Contemplation of the doctrine may conjure up images of the two-faced, Roman God Janus, for whom the month of January was named: God of beginnings, transitions and endings.

This principle includes the Hegelian dialectic, which is why we find pro new order officials (legionaries) espousing the benefits of “never letting a good crisis go to waste”. We also find world leaders (legates) publicly espousing the same for a coming new world order with a grin while their citizens are left to marvel at what is otherwise considered to be a profound and near complete lack of competence where any other matter of importance is concerned. Notice the recent proliferation of the ‘incompetence’ meme, especially where the ebola pandemic narrative is concerned, and yet, what is chaos (incompetence) to the fly is order for the spider (Caesar).

The Incompetence Meme: A Prolific Lateral Narrative Binder

The incompetence meme is a superior lateral narrative binder as it shifts thought patterns away from identifying nefarious intent, or the mindset behind planned chaos. The use of this narrative binder is aimed at preventing dissent from the official narrative by blocking or redirecting thought patterns that would otherwise lead to exposure. This isn’t to suggest that certain world leaders (legates) aren’t actually incompetent, but again, one man’s incompetence (chaos), is another man’s competent incompetence (order). The use of this particular later narrative binder is astonishingly prolific, being found in everything from complaints that Obama rarely attends national security briefings and is constantly on vacation, to the recent Washington Post article about the NBC News chief medical editor breaking a 21-day ebola quarantine to get ‘take-out food’. Currently, an internet search for the phrase “incompetence at Fukushima” doesn’t disappoint, and along those same lines one might wonder at a link between increasing police brutality and laws that prohibit the hiring those with a high IQ in the same profession. Regarding the latter, that too may be a lateral narrative binder being used to hide something else entirely.

The Hegelian Principle: An excerpt from THE MOST SECRET SCIENCE (1998 Edition), by Archibald E. Roberts, Lieutenant Colonel, AUS, retired

Revolutionaries in government have created economic chaos, shortages in food and fuel, confiscatory taxation, a crisis in education, the threat of war, and other diversions to condition Americans for The New World Order.

The technique is as old as politics itself. It is the Hegelian principle of bringing about change in a three-step process: Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis.

The first step (thesis) is to create a problem. The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic, hysteria). The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem created in step one—change which would have been impossible to impose on the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two.

Applying the Hegelian principle, and irresistible financial influence, concealed mattoids seek to dismantle social and political structures by which free men govern themselves—ancient landmarks erected at great cost in blood and treasure.

Their objective is to emasculate states, merge nations under universal government, centralize economic powers, and control the world’s people and resources.


“Will they blame the environmental holocaust on you and get away with it?” –Mr. George Hunt (1992)

Order-out-of-chaos methodology has several tentacles which necessarily include world banking and finance, and while purposefully creating chaos to destabilize the governments of other sovereign nations to achieve their new world (order) is today easily recognized, its driving force behind the “sustainable development” movement and the purposeful destruction (chaos) of the environment is not. The magnitude of duplicity and hypocrisy, within the movement and the ideologies of those behind its invention, is so monumental as to in fact be entirely antithetical to the entire concept of “sustainable”. If you can obtain a used copy of the previously referenced book, The Most Secret Science, the logo of the Tri-Lateral Commission (showing three arrows of purpose—similar to those in the recycling logo—looping back to a central core in the form of a triangle) is on the front, the book also including a complete list of known CFR and Tri-lateral Commission members at the time of its writing. The order-out-of-chaos and Hegelian stratagems also seem heavily influenced by the Janus archetype (or perhaps vice-versa), and can be found even in the rebranding (transition) of the global warming myth:

  1. Thesis/Beginning: Greenhouse gasses/global warming [Manufactured crisis via geo-engineering]
  2. Antithesis/Transition: Climate change [Rebranded after the IPCC email release or Climategate scandal]
  3. Synthesis/Ending: Geo-engineering/solar dimming/solar remediation [The cause of the problem now being sold as the solution; parallels can be found with the Ebola vaccine in the current pandemic narrative]

Despite intermittent sound quality issues, readers may not only find the following video exceptionally helpful before moving on, but an excellent companion to the discussion in the next section. Successful reality revisionism navigation requires, at the very least, a basic understanding of the new world order philosophy behind these revisions. Is it a conspiracy? Yes. Is it a theory? No, and one would think that would be obvious when the conspirators themselves have repeatedly and publicly discussed it by name. I refer to it as ‘the new world order’ in deference to those constructing it—that’s what they call it.

This video, just under 10 minutes, begins with David Rockefeller (purportedly addressing the Tri-lateral Commission in June of 1991), thanking various MSM outlets—specifically the Washing Post, New York Times, and Time Magazine—for their 40-yrear silence which was so instrumental in avoiding the public scrutiny that would have inhibited their plans for the world—not your plans —a march towards global government. Several world leaders and politicians are in the video openly discussing the designs and progress of this new order, with former President Bush Sr. admitting this new world order is “fulfilling the promise and vision of the UN’s founders,” and former Prime Minister Gordon Brown espousing the new world order and its associated great resetting of economies. David Rockefeller and his contributing foundations are referenced throughout, including a scene of Rockefeller questioning Dick Cheney over free trade agreements, with a giddy Cheney explaining that while having been a longtime CFR member, even a director at one point, he never mentioned it while campaigning for re-election in Wyoming.


I recently came across the presentation of a Mr. George Hunt, originally produced in 1992, and found it highly significant when viewed through over 20 years of hindsight, and in a video just over 30 minutes no less. Before I share it here I would like to repost the recent comments of an Australian politician coming to understand the gravity and consequence to sovereign nations, including her own, of what he and others were trying to warn the world about so long ago. The following can be found in a previous article which includes the video of Ann Bressington’s presentation:

Of additional importance in this regard (beginning at the 1:03.55 mark), the Australian politician Ann Bressington begins to explain the 1968 origins of Agenda 21 via the Club of Rome–a think tank tasked with a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to accept global [NWO] solutions to local problems. Take note of her use of the term “social engineering” during this speech. She goes on to recount the following:

In 1997 Mikhail Gorbachev, also a member of the Club of Rome, said, “We are moving toward a New World Order—the world of communism. And we shall never turn off that road…the environmental crisis will be the international disaster that will unlock the New World Order one world government.” She further outlined it was during the 1992 Earth Summit that a document known as The Earth Charter was produced. This document was co-written by Maurice Strong [Club of Rome] and Mikhail Gorbachev. Both stated it was hoped this document would be adopted as the new 10 commandments with environmentalism as the new one world religion. She later quotes Ted Turner [Club of Rome], an outspoken advocate of depopulation, echoing the same sentiments on the Georgia guide stones encouraging a 95% reduction in global population.

Beyond the biography Mr. George Hunt provided over 20 years ago in the following presentation I know nothing more about him. At the time he recorded the VHS tape in 1992 in a Colorado video studio, he claimed to be a Business Consultant, College teacher of Small Business Management in Boulder, Colorado, and an environmental business owner. He recounts his dealings with those behind the sustainable development program, his surprise at seeing very powerful interests attend a local environmental meeting he officially hosted in 1987—some having attended other similar events throughout the country—and what he came to see as the ultimate hypocrisy and danger behind the environmental movement.

While Mr. Hunt certainly had personal opinions about the situation, which he freely shared in the video, those opinions were based on facts—not suppositions. Aside from providing audio/video recording evidence of Edmond de Rothchild and Maurice Strong (reality revisionists) being behind the environmental sustainability (order-out-of-chaos) movement, he included copies of newspaper articles and program agendas that are held up to the camera so the viewer may personally read them. At the time he was selling copies of the printed material along with the video tape.

The material being of critical importance to understanding our current predicament, aside from the brief review provided as it pertains to current topics, it will also be referred to in future essays. I highly recommend the video be downloaded and mirrored elsewhere before it gets wiped in the next round of internet scrubbing, or digital reality revisionism through electronic removal of virtually seditious material.

Mr. Hunt was witness to their two-faced turnings and rightfully highlights their preference for decree over democratic processes, a theme that can be found echoing louder in the body politic of today in everything from excessive executive orders blurring the lines between the executive and legislative branches of government, to several global trade treaties that have little to do with actual trade. As expressed in the previous essay, these treaties are critical factors to finalizing their system of global governance. Those familiar with the current Trans Pacific Partnership (or its regional/global counterparts) are aware the contents of the treaties are being written in (and kept) secret, even from congress and parliament members.

“This video will show strong evidence that the persons running the UNCED Earth Summit are actually setting a net to place the power over the earth and its peoples into their hands…Brave, bold deeds are needed by the public quickly. Once governments sign their treaties, their citizens are de jure in the hands of the world order.”

–Mr. George Hunt, 1992

Review of Mr. George Hunt’s Video:

UNCED (pronounced un-said) stands for United Nations Committee for Environment and Development. The UNCED logo for the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992, as shown in the video, included a hand formed to look like a dove holding the earth in its hands. The image was accompanied by the phrase: IN OUR HANDS. At this point Mr. Hunt rightfully asks: In whose hands?  

Several connections were made between the banking industry and the sustainable development sham (reality revision being used to transfer more individual sovereign power over to the new order), with notable banking figures attending his 1987 meeting in Colorado. This was 15 years after the first environmental congress ever held in Sweden in 1972, and 5 years before the UNCED appearance at the 1992 World Summit in Brazil.

Below is a partial list of attendees and other influential characters he referenced in the video:

  • David Rockefeller-Attendee
  • Edmond de Rothchild-Attendee
  • Secretary of state Baker (then Secretary of the Treasury)-Attendee
  • Maurice Strong-Attendee
  • Waste company management chairman and EPA Administrator William Ruckelshaus-Attendee https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Ruckelshaus#EPA_Administrator_redux
  • UN Secretary General —Attendee
  • Various other Word Bank and IMF Officials-Attendees
  • *Cecil Rhodes (Historical character whose views on race and imperialism were celebrated by attendees)
  • *David Lang (Montreal International Investment Banker)—Attendee


Celebrated ideologies of global governance revisionists not only despise competing self-governance and individual freedom ideologies, but also despise the people themselves—what they refer to as the lesser classes or races. So fueled by this disdain, the reach of its bloated and irrational contempt has been rigging elections all over the globe for decades as a result, the latest in Scotland over an *independence* referendum.  Rigged elections are reality revisions, a form of de facto decree being handed down by an illegitimate cabal working to solidify its place by creating a new reality placing them in power, the consumption of one reality by the other growing with each new revision. The process is similar to a racist, oppressive, individual freedom-hating virus invading the cells of a foreign host, slowly altering them until they too have become another virus.

At the 7:50 mark Hunt plays a video snippet of David Lang (Montreal International Investment Banker) decreeing that the environmental and economic activities of the world order not be shared with the public. As seen/heard in the video:

“I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process—that would take too long and require far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder, unfortunately, which populates the earth. We have to take an almost elitist program. That we can see beyond our swollen bellies and look to the future, in time frames and in results, which are not easily understood, or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to simplistic definition.“

Those familiar with the United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century program (Agenda 21–previously referenced by Australian politician Ann Bressington), are already well aware that bypassing normal channels of debate or the ‘democratic process’ is precisely how the program is being handled—by decree. Rosa Koire, author of Behind the Green Mask, is an excellent resource for information on Agenda 21, how it is being enacted in (y)our local communities, and also how its doctrine subsumes individuality in favor of a globalist collective.  Those who watched Hunt’s video will recall him outlining the difference between the first, second, third, and “fourth world” discussed by people like Maurice Strong—the Fourth World referring to the new order having absorbed all of the others and being the only, and final world left:

“Yogis and Shamans refer to it as the 4th World Wilderness—the lostness of the mind. The lostness of the mind refers to the collective consciousness—persons will be coerced through lies, drugs, fear and pain to surrender themselves and their ego to the collective consciousness [global governance]. The 4th World will be much like a return to Caesars or Babylon…” –George Hunt

At the 5:45 mark Hunt shows copies of material handed out by the Secretariat for World Order to attendees of an environmental meeting held in Des Moines, Iowa, which stated the following:

We are living sponsors of the great Cecil Rhodes Will of 1877, in which Rhodes devoted his fortune to the expansion of British rule throughout the world, and colonization by British subjects of the entire continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of Euphrates, the islands of Cypress and Candia, the whole of South America, islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britian, the whole of the mele archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, and the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire. We stand with Lord Milner’s Credo—we too are British race patriots and our patriotism is the speech, the traditions, the principles, the aspirations of the British race. Do you fear to take this stand at this very last moment when this purpose can be realized? Do you not see that failure now is to be pulled down by the billions of lilliputians of lesser race who care little or nothing for the anglo-saxon system?

While the entire planet is meant to be absorbed into the new order or 4th World, orchestrated crises (chaos) in Africa in the last year have been increasingly used as the means through which foreign troops may be sent for the “humanitarian aid” (order) that will save them from their entirely manufactured chaos. There are accounts that the current ebola pandemic narrative is the second attempt at a reality revision in this regard, after the first Boko Haram narrative failed—the #BringBackOurGirls campaign based on the hoaxed kidnapping of Nigerian schoolgirls by terrorists.

The following was originally reported via CNN in early October:

  • The Ebola outbreak in Africa is spreading quickly.
  • The defense department is increasing the number of troops it’s sending to West Africa to help fight the deadly virus.
  • With three thousand troops already tapped to head to Ebola ravaged West Africa, CNN has learned the US military is increasing its fight against the deadly disease. Hundreds more are being added to the plans to help the infected countries contain and control Ebola.

These methods have also been tested twice in the last year here in the United States via two separate crises deliberately manufactured as the pretext for UN troops to occupy and operate freely on American soil in the name of humanitarian aid. The first was the Detroit water crisis, the second being the current ebola pandemic narrative. Moreover, this essay would be remiss not to draw attention to the plethora of narrative binders increasingly being used, even in the form of color-coded NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming), linking together the ebola, overpopulation and ‘green’ movement (sustainable development) narratives. Ebola alone is not the issue—what the ebola narrative is being used to accomplish through order-out-of-chaos methodology—even if only a perceived chaos—is the issue.

Additional duplicitous attempts to link overpopulation, financial instability and environmental/sustainable narratives can be found in everything from Bill Gates’ involvement in vaccine-related population reduction programs with some ‘kill Granny to save money for schools’ narratives on the side, to increasingly “incompetent” CDC and EPA rulings and behaviors, refusal to apply the ‘precautionary principle’ equally to all new chemicals, gmo products, bio, nano, nuclear and atmospheric sciences, or even refusal to apply the law equally to everyone. How it became legal to literally steal *trillions* of dollars under the lawless “Too-Big-To-Fail-or-Jail” umbrella is a testament to how near that long-awaited new governance already is. The framework necessary to exempt themselves from criminal prosecution is already in place.

Other hypocrisies include the insertion of carbon emission minders and taxes into a reality in which the single greatest nuclear meltdown in known history is being summarily ignored—in both press coverage and mitigation. Families attempting to become healthier and self-sufficient by growing and supplying their own food and milk to ensure it stays free of toxic pesticides, genetically modified organisms and hormones, are being jailed after their property is destroyed by SWAT team raids, while criminal banking enterprises and corporations destroying entire eco-systems for generations to come are simply fined and allowed to carry on with business as usual. Additionally, this all before we even get to the Planned Obsolescence (chaos) business model based on the cognitive dissonance between an infinite growth ideology on a planet with finite resources. Then again, is it really cognitive dissonance or the competent incompetence being rebranded as a ‘capability gap’?


There is a final point of importance to be made and observed in this area, something Mr. Hunt touched on in his extremely succinct yet short video: Is the New World Order really saving us from ourselves? Without a doubt, THAT is the most important question of our time—the uber or super question—the one that those suffering from lostness of mind must, despite the best efforts of their competitors, come to know the answer to before they too are swallowed up by it. I once met someone heavily involved in this agenda, who openly shared their mindset with me:

“People are a bunch of goddamned sheep. They have to be told when to eat, and they have to be told when to stop. They have to be lead back out to the pasture every day because they are too caught up in their own immediate needs and wants to remember where it is from the day before.”

This was also the first person to explain, “the bad guys always tell you what they are going to do before they do it,” and they were absolutely right. Yet there is an obscurity in this that people get stuck on in trying to explain it. This is true even of those whose lives are focused on realizing this new world, when using it as their own excuse or pardon for the “necessity” of the obscene crimes against humanity used to implement it. This obscurity lies in the idea that they broadcast what they are going to do before they do it to give people an opportunity to stop it, but also, they continue to do it because they believe the inherent cowardice of lesser race or pedigree prevents people from stopping them. Given my own life experiences and the current state of affairs on this planet, sans the racial attribution, I am in complete agreement that cowardice has definitely been a major factor in their largely unhindered rise to power.  Given the numbers in the equation alone, how could it not be?

However, the “save them from themselves” philosophy in quasi toto is errantly clung to by a gross pomp—a formidable delusion of self-grandeur exaggerated to the point of logical impairment, rendering them extremely prone to a factual selectiveness.  That is to say, those who refuse to endure the personal crisis of facing the truth, simply re-write it until they can. Thus the gigantic whole in their pseudo savior philosophy always conjures up for me a famous quote by John Milton: They who have put out the people’s eyes reproach them of their blindness. In other words, they have purposefully injected untold quantities of neurotoxins, endocrine disrupters, radiation, cancerous food, medicine and chemicals into the landscape of our lives and development, while simultaneously ensuring education lacks factual cosmological models, basic understanding of intelligent design, is riddled with endless historical revisions, fallacies and nonsensical corporate pseudo-science—all of which encourage lostness of mind—and  now want to throw us away and under the bus because they consider us “lost”.

Mr. Hunt understood this—clearly. They have set the people on this planet up to fail and take the blame for the myriad of global tragedies, shortcomings, failures, poverty, lack, contamination, illness, social crises, war, strife, Frankenstein science, and even the catastrophic biosphere and biodiversity collapse currently underway that THEY are actually responsible for. Really think about that…can a sane mind even begin to comprehend the insanity of such a monstrous and backwards design? Considering those people are responsible for intentionally altering the course of an entire planetary race, stifling all forms of natural evolutionary progress and nearly bringing it to full ruin for the sole purpose of self-edification in the process, these people can’t save themselves out of a paper bag let alone save anyone else.


Mr. Hunt was incredibly thorough and left few stones unturned, including the roles of New Age philosophies (currently promoting destruction of individual ego and do-nothing cowardice) and the associated GAIA worship being instituted to further the agenda of their new order. Both are heavily managed misdirects being socially engineered into our lives via endless forms of perception management.

True to the Hegelian principle, Rothchild was positioned to be the positive synthesis of both environmentalism on the one hand—the thesis—and growth and development on the other hand— the antithesis—and that specific Rothchild combination, including the Rockefellers and most world capitalists, aim to control the global environment and development movement as the synthesis, with power moving into the house of Rothchild. This would be the same house (E.L. Rothschild LLC) that acquired a majority stake in Weather Central, LP in recent years, and Hunt also discussed their decades-old plan to suck aquifers dry and turn California (a major food basket) into a desert—a plan that, through exposure Hunt helped to create at the time, was initially thwarted in the early days by the public.

“The world order wants to create a new society out of the ashes of the chaos—a collectivist Fourth World, complete with a collectivist religion, collectivist finance, and unchecked world national socialism. The new order will offer Gaia—mother earth—to the masses as the big brother image to worship in the Fourth World. Maurice Strong has already set up a 140,000 acre ranch in Crestone, Colorado, to develop this earth religion system. Projects are funded by the Rockefeller fund and other foundations. The Earth Summit (of 1992) will link environment to industry. The lords of the UNCED conference will be the masters of who gets what, and when, if we don’t do something about it quickly.”

The order-out-of-chaos environmental movement was invented by Edmond de Rothchild, funded by the Rockefellers and others, and globally marketed by Maurice Strong who was heavily rewarded for his efforts:

“Maurice Strong, a UN Official and employee of Rockefeller and Rothchild trusts and projects, convened the first environmental congress in Stockholm , Sweden, in 1972. By 1992 Maurice Strong was the Secretary General and convener of UNCED at the World Summit Meeting.”


Mr. Hunt didn’t believe it was too late then, and over twenty years later I still share those same sentiments. Even so, it is certainly much, much later than it was before.

In summary, the fact of the matter is, there are, and always have been, two completely different realities competing for full manifestation. I ask you once more to give them both, and their inevitable outcomes, some serious consideration and deliberation while the choices are easier to make and still available. The crossroad is on (y)our doorstep, so please, share this information with others so they may do the same. Do we really want to live in a world where our personal right to self-determination—and everything that right represents—has been written out of the script? —The Roles of Perception Management & Social Engineering in Reality Revisionism




Perhaps it’s time for the human race (marks) to heavily consider the possibility that we are not dealing with a system of global governance for and by the “elite”, but rather a global con for and by the grifters.

Definition(s) of Social Engineering: management of human beings in accordance with their place and function in society; psychological manipulation conning people into performing actions or divulging confidential information; associated with the confidence trick known as the con.

Grifter: a con man; con artist; operator of a side-show at a circus, fair, ect; swindler or dishonest gambler. A person who swindles you by means of deception or fraud; scammer.

Con (slang for Confidence Trick or Confidence Builder): A confidence trick (synonyms include confidence scheme, scam and stratagem) is an attempt to defraud a person or group after first gaining their confidence, used in the classical sense of trust. Confidence tricks exploit characteristics of the human psyche such as dishonesty, honesty, vanity, compassion, credulity, irresponsibility, naïveté and greed. An individual who operates such scams is known as a confidence artist, con-man or con artist, and such people can operate alone or in concert with others.

Con-artist:swindler who exploits the confidence of his victim—victims may be referred to as marks, goyim, sheeple or useless eaters in a more modern context.

Should you find these topics unchartered territory, an excellent series on Netflix, called Leverage, is both entertaining and educational in those areas—sort of a new twist on the old A-Team series. Season 3 has proven to be exceptionally open to even including perception management and NLP (neuro-linguistic programming) in the storyline for viewers.  The five main characters include the leader or con expert, a grifter, hacker, thief and ex-military muscle man. I think you’ll find it as enlightening as it is entertaining compared to (and paralleled with) the current global body politic, at the very least.


“It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of what is perceived to be true.”

–Henry Kissinger

“Whoever believes the citizens are too immature for the truth, are too immature for power.”

–BBC Documentary: The Moon Landing Hoax



October 2, 2014 by Crystal Clark


Reality revisions are agenda-driven and thereby fictitious narratives carefully scripted to revise an entire global reality in order to meet or fulfill that agenda. These are major, major paradigm shifts of generational proportions that summarily pre and re-define the future victor and victimhood status of billions. These shifts aren’t meant to change the perception and therefore direction of reality for a day, week, or months, but permanently. These revisions are as horrendous as they are gargantuan in sheer size and scope, their purpose is to forever alter the organic course of the human race in the writers’ favors, and with a body count already in the multi-millions, will stop at nothing to achieve it.

The purpose of this article is to explain why and how these revisions are made, with a healthy reminder that they can’t continue without your participation, nor will there be ANY victors left standing if they do continue.


These revisions are not only the cause of every major war this planet has ever seen (including class and weather warfare) but have also repeatedly ensured the wrong people were targeted in nearly every case—that would be the competition or “competing reality,” up to and including actions that support it and those who know what it is. Reality revisions have become so pervasive, the word “suicided” has become a permanent fixture of our lexicon in response to the presence, affectations and reverberations of these revisions, and are why we feel increasingly haunted by an Orwellian ghost reminding us that in times of universal deceit, telling the truth is revolutionary act. Furthermore, if these revisions were not really happening, neither would the global mass-surveillance system and the life it breathes into the pre-crime, thought-police-state necessary to enforce it. This includes indefinite detentions and sanctioned drone strikes (murder) without a trial first.

This is going to be a lengthy article, but should your reading experience parallel my own while writing it, I suspect you’ll have your own personal encounters with Orwellian ghosts of realities passed. As the phrase, “I write to discover what I know” floated in, I suddenly found myself reflecting back to a book I wrote several years ago about competing realities and a group of characters referred to as “simuls”—an odd group of people who could recall two different realities simultaneously. Perhaps it meant more than I thought it did at the time. Ironically (or not) the title was When Tomorrow Comes, and I can’t help but wonder if “tomorrow” has finally arrived and I’ve somehow managed to catch up with myself.  Stanger things have happened, of that I’m sure.


Pulling off a reality revision is no small feat, which is why mistakes are inevitably made. That being the case, like any other criminal endeavor, traces of evidence are always left behind. These can be found in  irreconcilable anomaly or discontinuity in the story line or replacement narrative—a fact exquisitely portrayed in the Matrix Trilogy when Neo became confused at seeing the exact same black cat walk by twice, and was then told it was a glitch (in continuity) indicating they “changed something”. My friend and colleague James Horak refers to these discontinuities as anomaly, while I may refer to them as holes or gaps in the story/narrative. Regardless of what we call them, they do in fact exist, and as the late (and great) Kevin Smith would also often point out, wherever he found one of these black holes, he knew they were hiding the truth, and therefore had to be investigated to find it. This is a true understanding of our predicament and the mark of both research and researcher without an opposing agenda.

Reality revisions are the result of carefully scripted changes in the predominant, widely held narrative. I used the term ‘widely held narrative’ rather than the word reality because as it stands, so many revisions have already occurred that the truth and narrative not only vary wildly, but belief in the scripted narrative (revised reality) is now the predominant view.

Unsurprisingly, reality revisions are handled and treated in much the same manner as a literal script. This means that the story/plot and characters must be carefully and methodically developed over time, regardless of the size of the climax, main event or ‘tipping point’ in the story. Failure to perform the pre-climax set-up properly, means the difference between a mega revenue-generating blockbuster and a B-rated movie, or in the case of a reality revision, the difference between success and failure. In other words, the story has to be sold properly—it has to be believable to the audience. With this in mind we know that changes in the narrative (or changes in language, as Orwell pointed out) are slowly building and creating a new reality revision and require the following:

  1. Originators/imaginers/benefactors of the new story
  2. Funding/wealth transfers (size of the production equal to the size of the funding or transfer)
  3. Script writers
  4. Managing agents
  5. Props & sets
  6. Lead actors/actresses
  7. Supporting actors/actresses
  8. Opposing ideologies
  9. Heroes & villains
  10. Victims & victors
  11. Theaters, venues, showcases
  12. Sales force & Marketing for repetitive reference
  13. Lateral narrative binders

Lateral Narrative Binders

As the ‘real world’ audience is in the billions, certainly operating in this particular theater is a little more complicated, and therefore requires the use of something I refer to as narrative binders. These are beyond the roles of lead or supporting actors, and operate outside of normal marketing parameters. Their function is to reinforce the narrative while operating both subliminally and in the margins, for differing reasons and in several unique ways:

  • Narrative binders are the glue and filler used to bind the narrative together tight enough that the holes or breaks in continuity become imperceptible; install and/or create psychic (psyche) blocks within the minds of the intended audience through constant redirection back to the new narrative or revision; the mortar filling/hiding the spaces (discontinuity) between the bricks.
  • In a real-world scenario, lateral narrative binders surround and infiltrate the daily personal lives (margins) of the audience, both before the audience member has shown up to watch the production, and continue long ‘after they have left the theater,’ so to speak.

Being that in reality an individual’s entire life and world are the stage, for our purposes here, television news outlets suffice as the theater and the home viewer as the audience member. (Note that television news outlets are owned and operated by #1 on the previous list, and are used to satisfy requirements #4, #7 and #11 of successful story writing). Ironically (or not, again), lateral narrative binders working in the periphery or margins of audience member personal experiences, both pre and post event, are often blockbuster movies all repeating (pre-marketing) or pre-seeding a theme central to the coming reality revision that will later be broadcast through the news as a real event.

Pre-event lateral narrative binders are, in and of themselves, a form of subliminal “pre-selling” of an event that has yet to happen—an event the audience member does not yet know is going to happen—and are consequently extremely effective mechanisms of steering thought and perceptions in a pre-determined direction to achieve maximum “buy-in” during the actual revision attempt.


An example of this would include pre-seeding a narrative binder into a newspaper, in the form of a claim that a specific country (character), which the new narrative has already begun to pre and redefine as the villain (terrorist), “has weapons of mass destruction,” prior to the intended reality revision (war against a competing reality). If a recognized authority figure (lead actor) were to later appear on a news program (enter the stage of the theater) to sell this new war or reality revision, they would then quote the previously seeded source (pre-event narrative binder) as proof the reasons for the intended revision are already well-known and documented by others.

Considering that example was based on real events it may sound familiar. Not only was the Iraq war started over a lie, but was also the beginning of a massive global reality revision responsible for the deaths of millions of innocent people competing for, and living in, a different reality than the one the revision created—their reality was stolen and replaced with someone else’s version.

Other examples of previous and current narrative binders, which indicate an intended reality revision is about to occur—can be found in everything from the Nike poster marketing footwear on a human calf with the flesh blown off, before the Boston Marathon bombing happened, cartoons and television programs showing the destruction of the twin towers prior to 911, over-hyping and over-televising minuscule opposition to referendums to prevent discussion or investigation of an opposing reality revision (in the form of rigged election results) to even the constant barrage of a (trending) “hostile alien” meme (a villain bait-and-switch in the “terror” narrative) found in several major motion pictures in the last two years. This is alongside a marked increase in major class division/warfare dramas being played out in post-apocalyptic and dystopian themes; sometimes a combination of them all in the same film or series.

Reality revisionists have, as arrogantly expressed in their own writings, given themselves—and only themselves—the power to mold and shape the reality narrative so completely they refer to the rest of us as mere onlookers and spectators. Additionally, given some serious thought, we may ultimately discover that it is this very specific distinction (between the writers, performers and spectators) underlying the entire premise behind ‘class warfare’ to begin with.

Their preference for the word “theater,” especially in military or wartime operations, is rooted in the reality revisionist mindset and their painfully blatant use of ‘crisis actors’ (supporting actors used to sell the revision) confirms it. They have made themselves the sole writers, producers, financiers/lenders, lead actors and beneficiaries of a fictional reality narrative that we, the audience, are expected to believe is real.  And I do mean expected. That’s what the thought police, data-mining fusion centers, and giddily awaited pre-crime divisions are for.

As explained many times before, in both written articles and radio shows, THIS is what the global surveillance network is really for—it’s being used to identify and weed out the dissenters and heretics from the official narrative of reality. It’s not being used to catch international or homegrown “terrorists,” which is why they never manage to find any they haven’t purposefully and personally funded and written into the script as supporting actors. That will only remain true, however, until the next revision is complete, and I can assure you it’s already underway.


We have seen extremely blatant examples of rebranding coming from our government(s) the past decade, an example I point to often being the President’s rebranding of a Dronestrike Kill List to a Disposition Matrix. Rebranding is often thought of as a method whereby a harsh truth can be softened and made to become more palatable. This is certainly true, happens often and quells resistance. But what about the kind of rebranding one finds in the old bait-and-switch technique, which is, in itself, a pre-condition or necessary companion of a reality revision?

Rebranding for the sake of redefining can be read as a harbinger of reality narrative revisions. This is important: rebranding for the sake of redefining can be read as a harbinger of reality narrative revisions. For example, when a storyline is becoming more complicated to set the expectation of a nearing twist or drama, either a new character is introduced or an existing character is redefined as somehow being duplicitous or disloyal to the others—this is where the plot thickens. With that in mind, let’s apply the previous 13 reality revision requirements to the 911 (narrative) chapter of the script.

 GLOBAL GOVERNANCE FOR & BY THE ELITE:  Chapter 911 (Written by the elite)

  1. Originators/imaginers/benefactors of the new story: Elite championing for their New World Order Nirvana (Global Governance)
  2. Funding/wealth transfers (size of the production equal to the size of the funding or transfer): Bribes and global surveillance systems are expensive, and we know that just before (pre-event) 911, Rumsfeld announced the “loss” of 3 trillion dollars. After 911 there have been massive transfers of wealth from the housing crisis, bank bailouts, declaration of perpetual war for the MIC, and several more trillions of dollars have been lost again. These transfers indicate expected continuing production costs.
  3. Script writers: Social Engineers (members of CFR & TC), think-tanks
  4. Managing Agents: Social Engineers, Corporate heads, media moguls, officials
  5. Props and sets: non-existent airplanes
  6. Lead actors/actresses: social engineers, media moguls and officials
  7. Supporting actors/actresses: News anchors (teleprompter/script readers), disinformation agents, controlled opposition
  8. Opposing Ideologies: Islam vs. Christianity
  9. Heroes and villains: Heroes: people willing to fight for white American Christians. Villains: people willing to fight for brown Islamic Arabs
  10. Victims & Victors: The original narrative proclaimed white, freedom-loving, Christian Americans as both victim and victor; true victims are the millions of middle-eastern people whose countries are destroyed and family members are dead
  11. Theaters, Venues & Showcases: Middle-Eastern war theater, Zionist Christian churches, all forms of media
  12. Sales force & Marketing for repetitive reference: see numbers 4, 6, 7, and 11
  13. Lateral narrative binders: coming from enumerable sources; usage example previously provided

The events of 911 were a tipping point in a missive, GLOBAL reality revision meant to change the perception and therefore direction of reality permanently, and it isn’t the first. Repeatedly we were told these heinous acts of terrorism were committed by those who hate freedom and free people, which is the one thing they actually told the truth about. It’s important to remember that reality revisionists use these revisions to eliminate the competition or competing reality. It is an impossibility for an oppressive, elitist global government (for and by the elite) to establish itself among free peoples with governance established for and by the people. Their power ends where our freedoms begin—it’s like turning a dial—when you turn our freedoms down you turn their power up, and when you turn our freedoms up you dial their power down. These reality revisions are designed not to simply turn the freedom dial down, but to ultimately turn it off. The last few major revisions are meant to accomplish this, one of which is currently in progress and accelerating.

THE NEXT REALITY REVISION: The Coming Digital Age, Net Neutrality & the Growing Problem of Freedom of Speech and Thought

In the same way changes in the ‘official narrative’ are used to build (up to) a reality revision, so too do reality revisions build on one another—they are progressive, each paving the way for the next. If the reality revision currently underway completes, the institution of which would have been impossible without the last one, the freedom dial will be turned so low it will become nearly imperceptible. This revision has been planned for some time and has been written about extensively by those involved in its facilitation. There have been marked increases in the narrative associated with this revision, changes in the narrative including the rebranding and redefining needed to set up the revision, and lateral narrative binders are seeping out with increased regularity.

This revision is something I have written about before and discussed several times in radio interviews in the last couple of years. It’s also why I have been so vocal about the misplaced trust in digital currencies—even bitcoin. My extremely strong opposition to the idea doesn’t stem from an inability to see the need for alternatives, but rather the ability to perceive that as these alternatives continue to develop in the wrong narrative of reality, they are consequently helping to feed and enable it. Right idea, wrong circumstances. It is imperative to recognize that reality revisions are carefully designed to eliminate a competing reality. Given the aim of the current revision underway, I can assure you that in no way are digital currencies (or digital anything for that matter) competing with the intended changes, and quite frankly, I’ve found it rather astonishing that more people don’t recognize this. If the current revision goes off without a hitch, in time we may look back on digital crypto currency as one of the most successful lateral narrative binders ever employed.

One Revision Begets Another: We are either with them, or against them

Not long after the 911 global reality revision, world leaders rolled out their own special version of Orwell’s 1984, complete with mass surveillance and invigorating patriotic chants of, “you’re either with us or against us”. They were careful and precise as to how they sold this new ‘terrorist’ threat in the beginning—freedom-hating, murderous, duplicitous, well-defined and middle-eastern characters the audience was expected to believe killed over two-thousand people by flying airplanes into the twin towers (building 7 apparently being written off as a sympathy collapse). Because evidence of a revision is always left behind in the form of anomalous holes or discontinuities in the new narrative, we now know the story surrounding the event was a fiction (hence the reality revision) yet it was a precondition to pave the way for other future revisions in the form of rebranding and redefining. Certainly you can’t rebrand the image of a terrorist in a story line that never introduced them to begin with.

Now that the terrorist or primary villain has been introduced, careful and deliberate rebranding is being used to broaden its scope and definition—the action is picking up. Wildly redefining the behavioral patterns of a terrorist now puts Christians, protesters, returning veterans, and basically EVERY victim of the revision, who are now waking up simply because they have been victimized by it, in the same category as a terrorist. This is a bait-and-switch altering the official terrorist narrative to now include ordinary people—this introduces a plot twist known as the homegrown threat.

This too was done to engender, within the audience and/or spectators, the expectation of another drama in the near future, and that drama is here. Remember, this rebranding or change in the terrorist narrative began at least a couple of years ago and is now working its way to a climax. Very specific lines are being drawn in the sand between your future place as an audience member/spectator, and their future place as writers, directors and producers of a film called The New World Order (global governance for and by the elite): you are either with them, or against them.

What I’m hoping to make abundantly clear at this point, is what this revision is ultimately for and about: putting you in your place as a spectator or member of the spectator class, and ensuring you stay there. Attempts to maintain, or create a competing reality, or interfere with their own reality revisions in any way—in thought, deed, or protest— will mean you are over-stepping your spectator class boundaries and are therefore against them. THAT is the line being drawn, and the system necessary to enforce it is almost complete. Moreover, if you continue to abide by your invisible (and currently *self-imposed*) spectator class boundaries, there will be absolutely nothing to prevent it. This is a major, major reality revision with extremely undesirable consequences, even for those that don’t see it. Below is a brief look at the progression of the narrative in this regard.

The following statements come from an article titled: Obama lays framework for purge of online opponents, and was written February 13, 2013—almost two years ago:

Under the guise of curbing the “radicalization” of U.S. citizens and identifying and purging potentially violent persons from the Internet, the White House has initiated the creation of a new interagency working group to address what it calls a growing problem.

The White House issued a fact sheet delineating the broad objectives of the plan.

If Wiktorowics were referring exclusively to terrorist groups such as al Qaeda, then no red flags would be raised whatsoever concerning the new program. But he never specified nor defined terms such as “violent supremacist groups” or “violent sovereign citizens.”

The Obama Administration has already caused the alarm bells to ring on several occasions as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released several internal memos referring to conservative Christians who believe the Bible, pro-life citizens who are against abortion, Tea Party activists, and political conservatives who believe in a strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution as “potential homegrown terrorists.”

And in the current gun rights debate, sovereign citizens have gone on the record to oppose the Obama administration’s all-out assault on the Second Amendment, vowing to disobey any law that would violate their unfettered rights to keep and bear firearms.

It would be difficult to imagine this administration, with its radical leftwing mindset and agenda, viewing such widespread displays of defiance as anything other than a direct threat to its power, and thus, a perfect motivation for declaring such citizens to be potentially “violent sovereign citizens.”

Remember that reality revisions are designed to cause global changes. These next statements were taken from the September 26,, 2014 edition of the Sidney Morning Gazette (Australia) in an article titled, Terror laws clear Senate, enabling entire Australian web to be monitored and whistleblowers to be jailed

Australian spies will soon have the power to monitor the entire Australian internet with just one warrant, and journalists and whistleblowers will face up to 10 years’ jail for disclosing classified information.

The government’s first tranche of tougher anti-terrorism bills, which will beef up the powers of the domestic spy agency ASIO, passed the Senate by 44 votes to 12 on Thursday night with bipartisan support from Labor.

Anyone – including journalists, whistleblowers and bloggers – who “recklessly” discloses “information … [that] relates to a special intelligence operation” faces up to 10 years’ jail.

Any operation can be declared “special” by an authorised ASIO officer

The new bill also allows ASIO to seek just one warrant to access a limitless number of computers on a computer network when attempting to monitor a target, which lawyers, rights groups, academics and Australian media organisations have condemned.

They said this would effectively allow the entire internet to be monitored, as it is a “network of networks” and the bill does not specifically define what a computer network is.

ASIO will also be able to copy, delete, or modify the data held on any of the computers it has a warrant to monitor.

The bill also allows ASIO to disrupt target computers, and use innocent third-party computers not targeted in order to access a target computer.

This is where narrative changes begin to progress even further towards the coming revision, as foretold in the book, The New Digital Age. These words came from Britain’s Home Secretary Theresa May leaves Downing Street in London, September 25, 2014 (Reuters/Luke MacGregor) as reported by RT in an article titled: Extremists may face broadcast ban, social media vetting – home secretary [Published September 30, 2014 11:18}

Powers banning extremists from appearing on TV and which allow police to vet “harmful” Individuals’ social media activity would be enforced if the Conservatives return to power next year, Home Secretary Theresa May is set to announce.

The party manifesto will also pledge to introduce time-limited Extremist Disruption Orders to curb individuals’ right to speak at public events and control their social media usage. The maximum sentence could be up to 10 years in prison for breaking a banning order.

Announcing the plans at the Conservative Party Conference in Birmingham on Tuesday, May will also promise greater powers for British police to access internet data.

Police and intelligence services would accrue greater access to details of when and where phone calls and emails are sent, but not their content.

Targeted individuals could be banned from taking part in public protests, certain public spaces, from associating with named people and from using broadcast media if deemed a threat to “the functioning of democracy.”

The Home Office counter-extremism strategy would encompass “the full spectrum of extremism” extending beyond radical Islamism to include far-right and fascist organizations.

Orders would target those who undertake activities “for the purpose of overthrowing democracy,” a broad definition that could encompass political activists of many different stripes.

Net Neutrality & the coming digital age

One of the best ways to prevent this revision from happening is to stop net neutrality in its tracks. This is critical as its entire purpose is to neutralize individual efforts to operate beyond their designated spectator class distinctions. If you want to end the progression of reality revisions altogether, preventing the fruition of treaties that amount to nothing less than a corporate charter for this new global governance, like the Trans Pacific Partnership (which also supports net neutrality), is critical. Additionally, as the statements in the previous articles highly suggest, synchronized moves by other governments around the globe are their own form of lateral narrative binders. Below is a segment of a recent speech given by the UK Prime Minister that echoes the same mindset. Listen carefully to how the narrative is set up and slowly changes to introduce the term “non-violent extremists”:

All of this synchronistically parallels statements made in a book published by Eric Schmidt (of Google) and Jared Cohen: THE NEW DIGITAL AGE. The book was published last year (2013) and the Copyright is shared between Google and Jared Cohen.  The introduction of the book begins making a case for the dangers of an internet lacking “top down control” and discusses how the spread of communication technology has served to “reallocate the concentration of power away from states and institutions and transfer it to individuals,” further explaining that as a result [of that power transfer] ‘authoritarian governments’ will find a technologically connected population “more difficult to control, repress and influence…”.

I can’t recommend the book enough for a spectacular glimpse of planned future reality revisions, and the authors were even kind enough to help us redefine the three *new* classes of people in this heavily neutralized internet future—the lowest class being called the “aspiring majority”.  I expect you’ll note the masterful rebranding of the spectator class in that one. This is doubly true when one realizes, as their own writings state, that people the government doesn’t like will have their access to the internet removed—that’s code for being forced into the aspiring majority class—punishment for forgetting one’s place. That may not seem like cruel and unusual punishment at the moment, but if and when the transition to a fully digital currency is made, it will be. This is an intended goal that is being furthered and encouraged by people like Bill Gates via the Better Than Cash Alliance.

Lateral narrative binders in this regard have been seeping out everywhere in the past few years, from the Behavioral Policy Agreement found in the Windows 8 release, to the pressure of having a singular and trackable online ID for access. The latter is associated with past and current narrative binders in the idea that those online or virtual personas may be kidnapped and held for ransom (according to Eric Schmit) and re-affirming lateral binders in the MSM reporting things like millions of gmail accounts being hacked, are all clearly moving the narrative in this direction.

In summary, the fact of the matter is, there are, and always have been, two completely different realities competing for full manifestation. I ask you once more to give them both, and their inevitable outcomes, some serious consideration and deliberation while the choices are easier to make and still available. The crossroad is on (y)our doorstep, so please, share this information with others so they may do the same. Do we really want to live in a world where our personal right to self-determination—and everything that right represents—has been written out of the script?



In this short video series on pre-fukushima radiation contamination, nowhere will you find that ignorance was bliss. Nowhere. Knowledge is the precondition for the only vote that ever really matters—our actions.

*For additional resources and information, type “fukushima” into the search bar at the top of the sidebar to the right.